Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Messes With Texas from DailyKos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:34 AM
Original message
Hillary Messes With Texas from DailyKos
Gonna do this one drive-by style and let the Dallas Morning News article speak for itself, by and large. This hasn't gotten out to the greater blogosphere yet, so here goes:

Hillary Clinton and her lawyers are trying to cast doubt on the precinct conventions.
Hillary Clinton and her lawyers are trying to deligitimize the concept of the convention itself.
Hillary Clinton and her lawyers are trying to drag out the delegate selection process for their benefit.
And ultimately, Hillary Clinton and her lawyers are probably trying to null and void as much of the convention/caucus aspect of Texas' delegate selection process as possible.

As final results from the Texas Democratic caucus remain unknown, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign wants signatures from the March 4 contest verified before party conventions are held around the state later this month.

In a letter sent to the state Democratic Party late Friday, the Clinton campaign requests the March 29 count and state Senate district conventions be postponed until the eligibility of an estimated 1 million caucus-goers are double checked.

<http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/16/21328/5928/217/477783>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. The senior democrats of the party..

...need to tell Hillary it's time to step down and get back to being a Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Fine. Let her. Then send the fucking BILL to her campaign. How do
they expect people in states they fuck with or denigrate to VOTE FOR THEM IN NOVEMBER IF THEY ARE THE CANDIDATE!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Clintons not only praised the Texas 2-step process in 1992 & 1996
but helped to develop it.

But now that she's losing the delegate total in the state?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. She wasn't supposed to be inside the Alamo walls (whoops)
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 11:13 AM by WolverineDG


too bad she got outnumbered by pissed off, organized, grassroots Texas Dems.


dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. This needs to be brought up over and over again..
that is was good then but now that she's lost Texas she's turned into what? A sore loser with lawyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton: Delay the Delegate Count (Because I'll Lose) - w/link
http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/03/clinton-delay-the-delegate-cou.html


Clinton: Delay the Delegate Count (Because I'll Lose)
9:54 AM Sat, Mar 15, 2008

The Hillary Clinton camp has tried every avenue to delay reporting on the delegates from the Texas primary. They tried to intimidate the Texas Democratic Party prior to the primary. That failed. On election night, they threw up a duststorm of objections about irregularities. Now, the Clinton camp us urging the state party to delay the March 29 county and senate conventions, where details of how 67 delegates picked in the county caucuses will be announced. Drawing/Wayne Slater

Why are they doing this? Because they are losing.

CNN projects that Barack Obama won the Texas caucuses with 38 convention delegates, compared to 29 for Clinton. The Texas primary is a complicated, two-step process. Clinton won more delegates than Obama in the popular-vote portion, 65 to 61. With his likely caucus-delegate haul, looks like Obama won the overall statewide delegate lead, 99 to 94 -- or once superdelegate endorsements are factored in, 109 to 106.

Hillary Clinton declared victory in Texas and moved on. As for these pesky details, like delegates, that's the last thing the Clinton campaign wants to talk about.

Here, after the jump, is the Clinton campaign letter urging Texas Democratic Party Chairman Boyd Ritchie to delay the March 29 county/state senate conventions:

...More at link

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. hilary's not only a sore loser with lawyers..she
doesn't care who knows it. hilary has no shame and should never ever be saying to anyone else much less Obama, "Shame on you".

No primaies yesterday but Obama keeps winning delegates. It must be driving hilaryland deeper into their rut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, boy Hillary. What next?????
I am so sick of that woman and her camp pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
43. A Pillary Camp pain is what we are stuck with... nt
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 09:23 AM by goclark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. The more she does this shit, the more she digs here own grave.
I think we approaching the tipping point of just how much of this nonsense the
SD's are willing to tolerate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. As others have pointed out, she has a technical right for this maneuver but
the longer-term public relations damage to her credibility is likely to suffer.

And deservedly so.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wasn't everybody here
clamoring for a recount in New Hampshire? Weren't they saying "What's wrong with making sure the vote was fair?!"

Now Clinton wants to make sure it's fair, and she's a villain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Kucinich was the one pushing for a recount
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yes, I know...
and the effort was widely supported here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. No, she wants to gum up the process
She had experience in running a Texas campaign in 1992 & 1996. She had no problems with the caucuses at that time. Since she ran her campaign on the theme of "experience," I'm not buying her argument that the 2-step Texas system caught her by surprise. But if it did, it shows that she is incompetent & incapable of strategic planning, not exactly Presidential material in my book.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. So when Kucinich does it it's laudable
but when Clinton does it, it's "gumming up the process." Gotcha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Was there a convention that was delayed because of Kuchinich?
No, there was not.

Face facts: She KNEW what the process in Texas was. She FAILED to plan accordingly and LOST. She's trying to stop our county conventions, which by the way, are set according to STATE LAW and can't be changed on the whims of a sore loser trying to rewrite the rules so she can win.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. She wants the signatures verified
That's how Obama won his first election, you know - he challenged his opponent's signatures in the primary.

Hypocrisy abounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. There's already a process for that
it's called the Credentials Committee & anyone who wants to be a whiner about signatures can file a complaint in writing 3 days before the convention with the county's party chair.

No need to go to court about it, except to get free publicity (which, btw, is backfiring badly).

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. She hasn't gone to court
she's written a letter. Her campaign has received 2000 complaints of violations.

What's wrong with checking into them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. She's threatening to, in order to stop the caucuses
I've already answered your incessant "what's wrong with checking the names" question. There is a process already in place for that.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Yep.
And you sure have a big chunk of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. What, exactly,
have I been hypocritical about?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. No, everybody wasn't clamoring for a NH recount
Most Obama supporters weren't. I certainly was not. I didn't support that and I don't support this obvious ploy either. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Is it just me or where is she getting all the money for these lawsuits? It must cost big bucks...
and at what cost for the Party. She is tearing the Party apart! And if those HRC super delegates think the Party will come together after they tear it to shreads then think again! How can she be doing this while she has not given any of her tax records and for that matter Bill's Dubai and Saudi millions to his library that he says are for their "charity"?

Clinton says 'not yet' to releasing tax returns

by James Oliphant

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/clinton_says_not_yet_to_releas.html

Despite pressure from Sen. Barack Obama, the Clinton campaign said Friday that it wouldn't not release Sen. Hillary Clinton's tax returns unless she secures the Democratic nomination.

The news was greeted by harsh rejoinder from Obama's campaign “Why should Democratic voters have to wait until after the primary campaign is over to find out important information about Senator Clinton's finances that Senator Obama has already disclosed?" said Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor.

"For someone who claims to be fully vetted, hiding a campaign loan from voters until after Super Tuesday and refusing to release your tax returns until after the primary doesn't seem like the best way to prove that there are no surprises for the Republicans to find once they start digging,” Vietor said.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Did she JUST say this?? Because I just heard surrogates on TV saying April 15. Somebody needs to
check this and if true, it might just warrant another Cheats and Liars Comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. That article is from Feb 8. She's since said she'll release on Apr 15. So we'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, this was the Clinton plan all along. What a bunch of criminals. Where's the expose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damndude Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. plus
there says nothing about the ability or interest to carry the state in the fall like filing a lawsuit against it. piss on texas seems to be her motto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. So let me get this straight.....
Rules count in Texas, but rules are supposed to be ignored in Florida and Michigan??

Interesting campaign strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. She "won" FL & MI
She lost Texas. There's the difference.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Me Me Me Me Me - Is WE in Hillary & Bill's vocabulary? I think not!!!
:rant:

If this continues I am out of the Democratic Party for every! I have had it!!!! No mas!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damndude Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. the RULES were Fla and Mi wouldn't count
mrs. clinton is trying to re-write the playbook in the 4th quarter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. "Eligibility checked??" I thought it was an open caucus to Dems & Repubs. What's to check?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
20. "We Don't Much Like Whiners in Texas!" (Some Texas Radio Guy on MSNBC
talking about Hillary)

She's floating another lead balloon !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
30. B. Clinton to TX: Obama campaign “believe they can come in that night and take the delegates away"
Blame your wife, Bill, not TX voters. And, AGAIN, where was YOUR outrage with the TX system when YOU ran and won the TX caucus??

---------------------
Prior to Super Tuesday:


http://www.observer.com/2008/bill-clinton-rallies-texs-diehards-continues-question-process

The former president also complained, as his wife started to fall behind in the polls, about the rules governing the Democratic contest in this state.

“The election process you’ve got takes the cake,” he told the crowd, citing the unusual combination of early voting, a primary and then caucuses on the evening of polling day.

Obama has consistently beaten Hillary Clinton in caucus states and the former first lady’s campaign is concerned that she could win the popular vote here but fail to gain a significant boost in delegates if Obama performs strongly at the evening gatherings.


The former president put it more provocatively than that, however. He asserted that members of the Obama campaign “believe they can come in that night and take the delegates away. Are you going to let that happen?”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. Earth to Hillary: There is no "signature" at the precinct convention.
People just write in their name (printing legibly). Their voter registration card and signature is verified when they voted at the . . . primary! And if Garry mauro is your legal workhorse, that wagon ain't going very far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
32. Obama pities the poor fool who messes with Texas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
34. thi sneeds more exposure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
39. Hillary is not Texan not really HRCs place is it really.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 05:15 PM by cooolandrew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
40. Unbelievable the depths to which the Clinton's will stoop. K & R.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. Messing with Texas, the only way she can win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC