ETHICS, and why Obama was slow to retaliate against Clinton.

[CitizenRob]

Unlike Senator Clinton who's "nobody but me" attitude has resulted in an injured front runner, Obama may actually be considering the fact that Clinton IS a Democratic Senator who needs to win her seat again in order for the Dems to maintain control of congress. Stabbing her in the back would only hurt him.

Clinton on the other hand stabs and stabs and stabs away. Without a care in the world about whether or not she hurts the front runner in the national election, or a fellow Senator who must win reelection for the Democrats to maintain their majority in the Senate.

Unethical and immoral.

[MonkeyFunk]

1. yeah

having his campaign insinuate she's a racist at every turn is so ethical and moral.

[TwilightGardener]

4. His campaign "insinuates" that she's racist? How--by defending Obama

against charges from a highly-visible Clinton advisor that he is only successful because of his color? Did Obama or his campaign start that little brouhaha? I believe all Obama himself said was that that comment was absurd and divisive, and Rice called for Gerry to step down, and that was it. Didn't stop Geraldine from hitting the talk-show circuit to make even more ridiculous pronouncements. You're sort of blaming the wrong campaign for re-introducing race here.

[MonkeyFunk]

6. Saying "fairy tale" is racist.

Pointing out that Jesse Jackson won S. Carolina twice is racist... etc. etc.

[CitizenRob]

7. Insinuate? I've seen with my own eyes the filth her campaign is wallowing in.

[stellanoir]

He is a total gent.

[stellanoir]

2. I'm so sick of these inadvertent duplicate postings

yikes. self delete

[williesgirl]

3. Couldn't agree with you more. She sickens me. rec'd

[The_Casual_Observer]

5. Maybe because he's, well , slow. He's admitted that he repeatedly

has lapses of judgment.