bicentennial_baby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 08:03 AM
Original message |
Can someone explain the importance of Clinton's Itineraries? |
|
I'm not seeing the big deal about her day to day schedule...I'd much rather see her tax returns, personally.
Also, what's up with the 32 redacted/missing days?
:hi:
|
flor de jasmim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message |
1. To prove she went to 80 countries? Any link for the records?? |
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message |
2. She's claiming all that experience |
|
and the itineraries show where she was, and with whom.
Hostessing foreign dignitaries is not the same as sitting in on planning sessions for policy making..
and foreign trips with Sinbad & Sheryl Crow are not on the same level as official visits to discuss ending the war:)
|
bicentennial_baby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Yeah, I was thinking that it might backfire, on that front. |
Drachasor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Seems a little lacking without DETAILS on the meetings she was in and such |
olkaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message |
5. It was a ham-fisted attempt at stealing Obama's speech momentum. |
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message |
6. simple. it gives her "cover" and allows her to lie that she has fully |
|
complied with requests, without providing any meat. Not even bones. Sinew. Skin. It was the absolutely least she could do and still do something, timing it (amazingly ! ! ! !) for Obama's ground-breaking speech.
|
bicentennial_baby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
casus belli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message |
8. We can look for a check mark next to |
|
() Broker Irish peace process
to finally tell once and for all if she is on the level.
:)
|
bicentennial_baby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message |
10. She's made the race about her "experience"... including her experience as first lady... |
|
...so that makes it relevant.
|
Igel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Data has to be brought to bear on a problem. If there's nothing for the data to illuminate, if the data can't be asked questions, it's still data, but pointless data.
I haven't seen this data. Don't know what's in it.
But how's this for a problem: HRC says she was involved in various health-care initiatives. If she were, she had meetings on the issue. If she had meetings, and this data includes her day-to-day schedule over the course of many years, we should be able to identify how often and over the course of how many months she had them, where they were. Perhaps we can find out who attended. If we know who attended, then we can ask *those* people what kinds of things were discussed.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message |