Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

God help me, a poll from Ras. : O 47 H 42

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:28 AM
Original message
God help me, a poll from Ras. : O 47 H 42
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. nice
pullin away again..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. reading Ras' notes, I think
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 10:32 AM by Teaser
it was really just one day's sample that put HRC in the lead.

Too often we interpret outlier samples in these moving average polls as part of a trend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. One night of polling since speech, but not much different than the 4-day average.
Just one night of polling is included since Obama’s speech and that single night result is not much different from the four-day average.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:32 AM
Original message
What would last night's 1 day sample have been?
Any ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not much different from the last three days, according to Rasmussen--47%-42% ballpark numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Cool.
McCain is now solidly beating both Obama and HRC though... we need to get our shit together soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hey! Where's that 17pt drop?
I was told he was going to drop 17 points!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. What's bad is that it shows McCain leading both candidates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. That will change once public begins to know the differences between Dems/Repubs. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Looks like the Wright story was just a flash in the pan
For all the M$M's attempts to turn it into another Dean Scream, it seems that Obama's ratings were only affected for one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. But did you read in in Koine?
Just teasing you Teaser. Good find. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. It's about Obama, so it has to be
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 10:49 AM by Teaser
al-Lughat al-'Arabiya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Ooooh, that's low.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skater314159 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Don't you mean
الْعَرَبيّة
or just plain 'ol عَرَبيْ
:P

heh heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. remember Rasmussen trends Republican and old because of their model
They call people at home on LAND LINES during the day.

Do you even answer your land line? Home during the day? I'm not and I don't.

Who's home during the dayparts selected? Retirees, traditional 50's model housewives, and...their parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. We don't even have land lines. Got rid of them years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Rasmussen polled me at night in MS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Rasmussen is a Republican firm that regularly asks slanted questions..."
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 12:48 PM by Perry Logan
Rasmussen seems to be there to cheer up the Right. I ran across this:

"Rasmussen is a Republican firm that regularly asks slanted questions and produces pro-Republican results through a questionable poll weighting method.

Rasmussen regularly has the wildest outliers of all on Bush job approval (typically about 5-7% higher than the average of other polls).

From the start of 2005, Rasmussen has weighted to make Rep and Dem party ID equal at 37%. Yet his table of unweighted data since start 2004 shows that in every month, the Dem figure exceeded the Rep figure, often significantly. This weighting introduces a persistent bias which can be quantified if you know the cross-tab data."

http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/3/17/11424/8443
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Can you tell me where on the Rasmussen web site to bring up the
chart with the rolling average?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. kicked and recccccccccccccccccc'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC