Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's still a question of Wright and wrong -- Boston Globe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:50 AM
Original message
It's still a question of Wright and wrong -- Boston Globe
an excerpt which makes a really good point:

When Don Imus uttered his infamous slur on the radio last year, Obama cut him no slack. Imus should be fired, he said. "There's nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they made a comment like that about anybody of any ethnic group."

When it came to Wright, however, he wasn't nearly so categorical. Oh, he's "like an old uncle who says things I don't always agree with," Obama indulgently explained to one interviewer. He's just "trying to be provocative," he told another." Far from severing his ties to Wright, Obama made him a member of his Religious Leadership Committee -- a tie he finally cut only four days ago."

Such a clanging double standard raises doubts about Obama's character and judgment, and about his fitness for the role of race-transcending healer. Yesterday's speech was finely crafted, but it leaves some troubling questions unanswered.

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/03/19/its_still_a_question_of_wright_and_wrong/

My question is was Pastor Wright ON his staff when he demanded Imus' firing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Please...give it up. You're fighting with a losing argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ha! I knew it would be Jacoby piece before I clicked!
The Globe's RW hack supreme... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. What Imus said and what Wright said were not equivalent. Nor were their forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Thank you.
People are reeeeeeally stretching to make a comparison there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Exactly. Fuck Imus. And also the rw Globe. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. The Globe Op-Ed page is generally OK, with the exception
of Jacoby and Cathy Young, who no longer writes for them, iirc. James Carrol is fantastic, actually. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Editorial pages are complicated, aren't they?
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 01:43 PM by sfexpat2000
The columnists sort themselves out but then there's the Editor's space, too.

The Editor at our fish wrap is liberal on national issues and conservative on local ones -- unless it impacts our local industry which is defense and tech. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Logic... it's strangely unpopular these days. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. This was posted yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Did Wright call anybody a honky? How about a cracker?
That would make these incidents comparable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Because the Rutgers female basketball team a bunch of whores has no truth to it, maybe?
Whereas, there was a lot of truth to what Wright said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. By trying to keep this as a divisive issue
you are just playing into the RWs hands. Give it up already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. I hate this stuff. I don't see Wright as anymore
anti-American than William Sloan Coffin. I don't see him as a racist. He's said some things I find offensive, but this has been blown up out of all proportion. Yes, I know that Obama repudiated some of what Wright has said. That doesn't mean I have too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Jeff Jacoby is a conservative columnist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. As well as a thoroughgoing asshat. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. And that's putting it mildly....
Sniffa is always disappointed when Jacoby takes a day off, since he misses out on his 2x a week outrage. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Conservatives are all the Clintons (and Clintonistas) have left to hang onto. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ahh, look at all the Obamaniacs desperately trying to sweep this unbder the rug
Charming bunch, ain't they?

Not sure about your specific question, though. Wright has long been a close adviser to Obama, and he did have an official position (head of the candidate's African American Religious Leadership Committee). He resigned that position only recently, but I am not sure when he first took the position.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I offered an article I found interesting
and asked a simple question. I guess, despite the fevered proclamations to the contrary, that Wright still IS a very, very sensitive issue.

As for the question, I wasn't sure when Wright had an official position with the Obama Campaign. If it was during the unfortunate Imus Episode, then Barack looks like a hypocrite. If the episode pre-dated Wright's position with the campaign, well, then he STILL looks like a hypocrite, I guess.

Or, as my niece put it the other day, "maybe he was taking a nap in the pew when that guy was talking?"

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Maybe your niece was correct. More power to him. Have you been to the church in question?
Perhaps you should take your niece and check it out. Before you get too set in your position. It's just a church. Sure it's one of the biggest black churches in Chicago. But they don't bite.

Don't be afraid. You could go see it and help teach your niece to think for herself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. nope, haven't been as I don't live in Chicago
but my niece has an African-American father and is proud of her mixed heritage, so your condescending attitude about teaching her to "think for yourself" or for me to "not be afraid" to go Obama's church says, unfortunately, more about your potential racial attitudes than mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I'm just saying, go the the facts for yourself, whatever your heritage. This church you are casting
asperations on has people attending who are probably a lot like you. And me.

I mean, I'm an agnostic, but still.

i want to go to one of Hill's prayer meetings, but i bet they wouldn't let me in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. Jeff Jacoby has always been a RW hack
He has an agenda, and it has NOTHING to do with Dems winning elections in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. That's a really good piece.
Here are some of Jeff Jacoby's other really good pieces about Democrats and progressive politics:

Hate Speech of the Left

Slaughter, Jubiliation and the 'Peace Process'

Al Sharpton - The Democrats' David Duke

My personal favorite:

The Chicken Hawk Smear :rofl:

Seriously now, you're not really quoting Jeff Jacoby as some kind of reasoned, thoughtful, honest broker, are you? This is the same Jeff Jacoby who was suspended by his paper for four months when he was caught plagiarizing from (of all things!!) a piece of Freeper-type viral email.

If you Obama slammers want to make some points, make them in your own words, because we're going to point out every time you cut-and-paste from pieces of shit like Jacoby. His words might fit your current meme, but they do not fit progressive and liberal points of view, nor have they ever, nor could they ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. When did Wright call whites an ethnic slur?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. And, because moral equations really do need to be "equal"
When did Rev. Wright slam a group of talented young, white, female student-atheletes who were being lauded for their prowess following a staggering victory?

And what white slur did he use against them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. That's not "The Globe" speaking -- that's fucking Jeff fucking Jacoby; their resident wingnut.
Nice attempt at misrepresentation.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. Jeff Jacoby is the author. This attack fits the pattern.
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 02:01 PM by NorthernSpy
The attacks come from neocons and long-time Israel lobby apologists. It's just a fact, and at this point, it's hard to deny -- being pretty much in the open.


The question is why they want him taken down so badly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
28. Wow.. apples to oranges?
Imus came out of nowhere and targeted a very specific group of girls who played on a basketball team. And, he did so for no reason at all - on a radio show that is broadcast to millions.

Wright was literally preaching to his own small congregation - not in a public forum. And, he didn't specifically target any small particular group.

Again. Apples to Oranges.. but nice try!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC