hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:35 PM
Original message |
Imagine you're a super delegate. What is your reaction if Hillary Clinton |
|
attempts an end run around the DNC by filing suit in state or federal court regarding the Michigan and Florida delegates?
|
splat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Superdelegates exist to safeguard the party; enfranchising voters does that |
|
None of this is as simplistic as you want to make it.
|
hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. So you don't think superdelegates would be really pissed at her ignoring the party structure? |
|
If she didn't like the procedures, why hasn't she spoken up before now?
|
wileedog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
So then you agree that Superdelegates overturning the pledged delegates and thus disenfranchising ALL the voters is not what they are there to do?
So why is Hillary still running?
|
splat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Their job is to further a Democratic win as late as the convention |
|
They aren't what you think they are. If should Obama self-destruct before the convention, you can guarantee the superdelegates won't worry about overturning Iowa caucus-goers.
|
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
2. If Obama blocks Mich redo,I'd consider first(Hill win) result as final and include it in my decision |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 12:44 PM by papau
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message |
4. It depends on what kind of SD I am. |
|
Do I put the DLC before the Dem party, or the Dem party before the DLC?
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message |
5. So you are against the court system protecting the rights of citizens? |
|
A Democrat against the right to redress in court? Sad.
|
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I'd say its not my business to judge or intervene |
|
Super delegates, unless they're representatives of those states, have no say in a state level issue such as this.
Bottom line, the Dems who voted in those states have a right to have their votes counted, period. And like it or not, voters from Michigan and Florida will be voting in the GE.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I wouldn't be keen on that level of trying to change the rules after the game was over |
|
Ambition over rules? I might be damned concerned that such attitude might also lead to ambition over rule of law, and frankly, I have had more than enough of THAT the past 7+ years.
|
hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Good point. Note that the ambition is cloaked with cries of voters' rights. |
|
My dad keeps asking about the rights of the voters in the 48 states that followed the rules.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. I doubt the passion for the voters of MI and FL would be the same |
|
if they had voted the other way.
Leave no stone unthrown is NOT a good campaign doctrine.
|
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. I think the way this country is going they will have a passion to vote... |
DrFunkenstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-19-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Her Small Super Delegate Lead Is Entirely DNC Members Who Committed Early |
|
Members of Congress are breaking towards Obama.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |