I thought I would repost these threads so people would have a better insight into the media's treatment of Senator Clinton. The idea some people think Obama is the only candidate getting attacked by the media is mistaken. I believe the media is much more fair and balanced toward Obama then they are to Clinton. If people are really interested in educating themselves about the media and not having a preconceived notion that it's just about Obama I would suggest they read this wonderfully written document written in three parts by McCamy Taylor.
1)The PRESS v. Hillary Clinton: Part. 1 The Media Fatwa Begins
What I found when I began to accumulate data was so shocking---through 8 hours of internet research I was able to amass 40 pages of condensed hard core Hillary bashing, most of it consisting of lies and malicious innuendo and that was without the Chris Tweety Matthews links since they have already been well documented here
http://mediamatters.org/items/200801110014 I strongly advise everyone to read this excellent document, because Matthews leads the pack in their attack on Hillary. He emboldens the others. They see him getting praise from his own network---and a token wrist slap followed by the solidarity of his co-workers who have begun to attack Hillary even more in the wake of his forced apology---and they join in like a bunch of school yard bullies.
Media Matters is an invaluable resource. While it does not contain all the propaganda--which a skillful propaganda artist can weave from bad photos, unflattering sound bites and slanted versions of the truth ---it does contain many of the lies and distortions which have been used in the major media skirmishes against Hillary.
I. The Press on the Fatwa
(Dana Milbank) went on to characterize Clinton's relationship with the press as "poisonous" and "venomous," and said that journalists "dislike" her. (1)
( Craig Crawford ) "I think there's a tendency here -- I know what's going on. It's all about an old journalistic rule, which is we afflict the comfortable. And so I think that's why many times, many of us in the media tend to gang up on the Clintons. Because they're very comfortable, they're very powerful, and I think sometimes we're actually a little unfair to them, but maybe that's just how it goes." (2)
(In an La Times interview Chris Matthews) said he wanted to refine his comment but added that the Clinton campaign used the incident to score political points.
"They created the storm; I had to deal with it," he said. "I think any observant person would say what I said was true. It might have been said better, more felicitously." (3)
“Part of it is her campaign’s fault,” Andrea Mitchell, the longtime NBC political correspondent, said backstage at the MSNBC debate in Cleveland in Tuesday. “They started with this notion of inevitability. And they were very arrogant.” (4)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x49576782)The PRESS v. Hillary Clinton: Pt 2. Let's Get Political
Hello Again! Last time I had gotten all the way up to late January 2007 in the right wing media conspiracy to make Hillary look like a lying, cheating Bitch and Obama look like a doping Black Muslim (who had been outed by Hillary, damn her already damned for all eternity soul!)
Before I get to that, there is one more flavor of bitchiness that I need to cover, the lying bitch . The corporate media, right, center and left has taken particular pains to tell the American public that Hillary is a great big fat liar. Lie, lie, lie. That is all she does from the moment she gets up until the moment she goes to sleep at night. There isn’t an authentic bone in her body.
And would the American news media lie to you about something as important as whether or not a Democratic presidential candidate is a liar?
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/McCamy%20Taylor/1583)The PRESS v. Hillary Clinton Part III Leaping Lesbians
Here is some music to set the mood:
http://www.themadmusicarchive.com/samples/s/u/Sue_Fink_... Just in case Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee after all, the right wing has been hard at work with a few smears designed to make her look scary in a general election. These are a little bit different from the previous Big Lies, since the values of general election voters differ from those of Democratic primary voters. After Denver, if Hillary is the One, we will be hearing less of Hillary’s War and Hillary is a racist bitch and more about family values----as in Hillary has no family values because she sprang to life, fully formed, on a woman’s collective somewhere in the radical left Northeast, clutching a copy of Our Bodies, Ourselves in one hand and SCUM: Manifesto in the other. (SCUM stands for Society for Cutting Up Men)
I. Hillary is a Lesbian Bitch
The Democrats would not care if she was, but for Independents and Republicans an alternative lifestyle might spell doom in the general election. So, the right wing has hauled out its all purpose Hillary is a Lesbian Big Lie.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4977117