|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:02 PM Original message |
It's disgusting to watch the Obama camp piggyback on the right-wing Judicial Watch's witch hunt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. Those are official US government documents, not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. where are the Bush's records? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Everything is a smear campaign or a fishing expedition to the Clinton supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. is this a smear? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #21 |
53. You're the one making the claim it's a smear campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. I personally couldn't care less. Let's get that clear right here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. For someone who couldn't care less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #63 |
69. They used it today to conclude Clinton lied on NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. So why won't Clinton release the WH records? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. probably the same reason Obama's resisting the release of his own government paper trail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagickMuffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
82. JW is responsible for getting the secret Cheney Energy Meetings disclosed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
106. agreed. they belong to us. Judicial watch is the key to get them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bigleaf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. By the way, when she started spouting off that she had this wealth of experience, along with her pal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. so it's a political fishing expedition? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
39. last I heard.BO can't find them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bigleaf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
41. She's the one running on experience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. The Obama campaign has no involvement in the Judicial Watch suit n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. no, they just piggyback off of the results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
32. Please explain how this "piggybacking" supposedly works? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. six years of tax returns already released by the Clintons to ONE year's released from Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #37 |
56. Then why the problem with one more? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #37 |
58. You're coming across as a hypocrite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Oh wait, you're spamming this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. I had to make sure you would see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. I defend my posts. That's a virtue here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. You defend your posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. some argument you have there. divert, distract, change the subject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #37 |
89. The Clintons have released 6 years of tax returns? LINK PLEASE!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagickMuffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #37 |
93. If she has released her tax returns for the past six years, then how can we view them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #37 |
102. and which six years would that be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. Judicial Watch also pressed Cheney to release energy task force docs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. what are they looking for here? The one explanation was to verify claims of experience from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. disgusting to see supporters of a DEM candidate using so many neocon tactics in this campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
9. What's this? A Hillary supporter crying about right wing sources? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:12 PM Original message |
Is that all you have as a defense of appropriating right-wing garbage hunts? Someone else did it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
22. Looks like that "garbage hunt" is turning up some pretty good stuff from the people's records |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:22 PM Original message |
proof that she attended a meeting? no transcript? Two unnamed sources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
36. You're avoiding the question. Why are you bothered by the release of public records? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. where are Obama's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #40 |
75. Where are Obama's ... what? His records as First Lady? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #75 |
80. his records from his tenure in state government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. What more do you want? He was a state senator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. what's he hiding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #86 |
104. He's certainly not hiding bribes for pardons or stealth lobbying for NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. What IS he hiding??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
71. Waitaminute -- you think the Clinton administration put her in a meeting to OPPOSE NAFTA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #71 |
76. what did she 'support'? You have NO idea, because the records say NOTHING about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Avoiding the question: Is it credible that she was in that meeting to OPPOSE the admin's position? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
11. LOL, the Judicial Watch is the group that uncovered Cheney's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. what 'corruption' is the target of this fishing expedition? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. LOL - so it is a fishing expedition if they ask to review democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. you're the one claiming some noble motive of a pursuit of corruption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #35 |
43. You are the one calling legitimate review of the people's documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Are you opposed to the immediate release of Obama's state government records? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. Clintons didn't care about Whitewater - they knew it was cover for getting into Rose Law Firm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. I don't buy that. It's the same fantasy that Scaife likes to spread around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
42. Bushies biggest crimes were IN that BCCI report and its outstanding matters, and Stephens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. not choosing to use his time pursuing these charges against the former administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #44 |
52. Those relationships are NOT strung out they are DIRECT. You CALL it strung out to convince |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. they are not 'direct' to your conclusions, and you know it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #54 |
59. Baloney - you know it. You read the list of outstanding matters and know damn well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. and, you know well that I do not agree with the conclusions of those reports |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:39 PM Response to Reply #64 |
92. You don't believe BCCI's outstanding matters needed further scrutiny? Kerry made false conclusions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
13. Actually, I have no problem with JW working for release of the docs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Well said. I too am OK with any FOIA requests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
15. Looks like Scaife and Clinton made up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. looks like you are just the type of reader Newspeak counted on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. Sorry. I didn't realize Newsweek... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
20. What's really disgusting is to find proof of how Clinton has lied time and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. if you call these summary records 'proof' you are lying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
24. So, what you're saying is it's disgusting the way Obama supporters read the news. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
25. I would gladly trade all of Hillary's first lady records |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. let's see, we have six years so far of the Clintons and ONE year of Obama's taxes released |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:34 PM Response to Reply #33 |
45. Why not add one more year? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. what's Obama hiding in his state records? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
90. WOULD YOU PLEASE POST A LINK TO THE CLINTONS 6 YEARS OF TAX RETURNS, PLEASE!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #90 |
96. Remember, the objective is to confuse, not illimuminate. The OP is a world class |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Damn; I got all excited when I saw I had a reply. Thanks for that, but I am hopeful yet he'll... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
26. yes it is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
27. All y'all are nutty as bat shit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
28. K and R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
30. Is it more or less disgusting than to see American Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
34. They're not Democrats, they're Obamacrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
38. The Monica stuff is lame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
48. If it floats YOUR boat to condemn someone for what someone else said one time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. I suppose you oppose her call today for Obama to release his state government records? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #51 |
62. She has NO validity. Her requests are LAUGHABLE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #62 |
72. but, why won't he release his own records if he believes hers are so important? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #72 |
98. The same could be said of HER. Why doesn't she if .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #48 |
55. "Don't come crying when Obama's on their agenda." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #55 |
67. I'll do what I want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #67 |
74. I won't be rolled over. Not by demagogues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #74 |
99. This has nothing to do with you. I'm sure no one is looking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
49. Thanks for your research on this issue Bigtree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveOurDemocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
50. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
77. BTW...where ARE her tax returns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #77 |
81. why has Obama only released ONE year of taxes to her SIX which are now in public domain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. Where are her 2006 tax returns like the ones Obama has released? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:13 PM Response to Reply #84 |
87. what's Obama hiding??!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. Where are her 2006 tax returns....what is she lying about or covering up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #81 |
91. 20 years are in the public domain, but not the ones from 2000-2007 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #81 |
101. Why do you keep dodging the tax return question, Big Tree? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
85. I'd happily swap Clinton's phone logs for Cheney's missing 3 million e-mails |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrJJ (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
94. Who scrubbed the data? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
95. Politicians who don't like scrutiny should take up a different line of work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
100. Thanks Bigtree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. so which six years of tax returns has hrc released? Links? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC