CTLawGuy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:46 PM
Original message |
Dear Clinton supporters who won't vote for Obama in the GE.. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-22-08 09:47 PM by darboy
say goodbye to Roe v. Wade. It's hanging on by one vote--Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Roberts are all votes to overturn. Think about women everywhere when you vote this November. Don't give them a new Republican friend to play with.
It would be sad to lose the Abortion right because you are sore about losing a primary.
|
dsc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message |
1. before you start lecturing them |
|
you might wish to lecture the several Obama supporters who have told people like me not to vote for him (this is even after I have repeatedly stated I would).
|
loveangelc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. what supporters have told you NOT to vote for him? |
Bake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
15. I've been told numerous times - more than I can count |
|
(a) to get out of DU (although I've been here since it began); and (b) that my vote is not needed because Obama will get so many Puke/Indy votes.
You've been here, you've seen it too.
Bake
|
MH1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. If someone is telling you not to vote for Obama if he is the nominee, |
|
please do alert on that post.
They aren't a real Obama supporter if that is what they are doing.
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. Don't vote for Clinton! Did that work? Vote Obama in both the nomination and the GE. |
|
There, now you have at least one Obama supporter setting you on the right path!
And if you already voted in the primary, don't worry. Just vote Obama in the general.
Cool!
|
Umbram
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
36. Some people will do whatever they are told I guess. (nt) |
GoldieAZ49
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:hi:
seeya
I don't vote for deception
|
MH1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. So, you won't vote to prevent the overturning of Roe v Wade? |
|
Women's rights mean that little to you?
|
GoldieAZ49
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. I will not vote for Obama |
|
his deception means that much to me
|
AZBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. The GOP thanks you for your vote and your support. |
GoldieAZ49
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Reagan Democrats will be out numbered if O is the nominee
The similarities he drew to Reagan are coming true
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
buff2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Just because we don't support |
|
your Jesus,doesn't make us freepers.
|
CTLawGuy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
17. I think voting to put Roe v. Wade in grave danger |
|
just becuase your preferred candidate loses DOES make you a freeper.
Me, I would vote for Hillary if she won. I wouldn't like it, but I would do it.
Who has the "Jesus" complex now?
|
GoldieAZ49
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
14. just following the Let it Sink motto |
yodermon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
35. Enjoy Scalia pawing your uterus. |
dchill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Sniper fire!
Deception - don't vote for it.
|
sueragingroz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
8. OR... start working on the congressional and senate elections |
|
there's nothing wrong with wanting to hedge your bets.
And the fight should continue after 2008 and into the mid-terms in 2010...
Even if McCrazy does get the presidency, if democrats work hard enough, they can erect a firewall at least until 2012 and a new and hopefully better crop of potential democratic nominees.
|
Double T
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
9. That's EXACTLY what I am doing; THINKING ABOUT WOMEN.......... |
|
which is WHY HRC is the ONLY LOGICAL 'CHOICE'!!!!!!!
|
buff2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
Skip Intro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:03 PM
Original message |
I won't, but it really wouldn't matter anyway. If Obama's the nom, |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-22-08 10:04 PM by Skip Intro
that means we've told DEMCORATS in FL and MI to fuck off, and they'll remember that as they watch the Rev. Wright ads from the repuke machine. There will be no Democratic victory in November if Obama is the nom. He can't win without FL and MI, or PA for that matter.
But even that's beside the point. It wouldn't be out of "soreness" that I woudln't vote for him in Nov. It would be because all this time, I've seen through him. He is a questionable product sold to the gullible by a sustained marketing blitz. I've seen that his actions don't match is words. I've seen him change his words for poltical reasons, even admit it. I've seen him say one thing and do another. I've seen him attack Hillary with pure visciousness, and then play victim. I've seen behind the giant spinning O that has mesmerized some, and I cannot unsee it. It is not soreness, it is hs more to do with personal integrity. I cannot in good conscience pull the lever FOR someone who has been unmasked to me as a sham.
|
LisaL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message |
22. It is incredibly said that despite everything that happened with |
|
Bush, we might get president McCain.
|
angie_love
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message |
25. great I will remember posts like this in 2012 if Hillary runs again, I will return the favor |
|
by NEVER voting for her. Do you really want to start a war like this? Think before you do. I will copy/paste posts like this, save them for 2012 and remind "former" Obama supporters to NOT vote for Hillary to become the nominee. Trust me, we are ALOT of people.
|
Skip Intro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
28. Please cut and paste my post as far and wide as you can. Please. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-22-08 10:24 PM by Skip Intro
I'm not starting any war. I'm stating the reality as I see it. I'm sorry I won't be kneeling at the altar of Obama with you, but I won't. And I'm really not sorry.
Feel free to throw around threats, and to carry them out. Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn.
I will vote my conscience. Whether you are appreciative, angry, or vindictive at that really has little effect on me. I will say this, the Hillary-bashers here played no small role in my decision.
|
angie_love
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
Skip Intro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-22-08 10:33 PM by Skip Intro
|
FloridaJudy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
42. Nobody's asking that you kneel at the altar |
|
Just that you make a sane choice in the voting booth. I'm not enthralled with Senator Clinton, but if she wins the nomination I'll still vote in the general election, and it sure as hell won't be for McLame. A hundred years of a pointless war and the continued dismantling of the Constitution should be scary enough to convince even the most ideologically pure of us invest in a clothespin.
I'm old enough to have cast my first ballot in 1968 election, and remember very well the McCarthy and Kennedy supporters who wouldn't stoop to vote for Humphrey, and urged me not to either. I held my nose and did so anyway, because the alternative was so appalling. I suspect that not too many years down the road my friends who boycotted that election regretted having done so.
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
iamjoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
16. It Isn't Just Abortion |
|
It may already be too late with Roberts and Aliton, although I like to think there is still hope. If this trend of putting reactionary judges in our courts continues, I fear not only for Roe Vs. Wade, but Griswold Vs. Connecticut. This was a landmark 1965 case which was one of the first, if not the first to establish that a right to privacy was implied in the Constitution. This set the precedent for Roe Vs. Wade. So, if Roe goes bye-bye because these "strict constructionists" do not believe there is a right to privacy in the Constitution, what is to stop Comstock Laws from coming back and birth control being banned?
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Fuck all who don't vote for the eventual Democratic nominee. |
gristy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
20. I think you need not worry about this. The numbers just aren't there. |
|
I just think the number of people here who "say" they won't vote for "that other Dem" should he/she win the nomination is vanishingly small. What, maybe 100 folks? And, trust me, a large fraction of those 100 certainly will vote for the Dem, and probably in no small part due to the reasons you mention. But it certainly won't be because you mentioned it in a 4-sentence OP back in March.
|
LisaL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. You obviously haven't paid attention to the polls. |
gristy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
23. How does the OP's futile attempt to sway the 100 folks (my estimate) on DU |
|
who have stated that they hold this position have something to do with "the polls"?
|
ruggerson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
24. You're not using the right approach dude |
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
33. "Dude"??? Pleez, that's so last week. nm |
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message |
26. Dude your worrying about the wrong group of supporters |
|
From everything I've ever heard on this forum over the last 3 years, it sure as hell isn't the Hillary supporters you should be concerned about.
|
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
27. There are people on both sides that say they won't vote for the other. |
|
They can all bite my shiny metal ass.
|
Olney Blue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
UALRBSofL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Of course I wont vote for Obama in the General Election |
|
I'm voting for Clinton in the General Election.
|
Omega3
(412 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message |
34. please tell me how you know he'd appoint liberal judges looking at his record and 'votes' re; |
|
abortion and gay rights.
he has consistently surrounded himself with homophobes and his "voting" record on abortion is shocking, voting present many times. I really wonder how he actually feels about such issues. It's not a stretch to say we have NO idea who he'd appoint to the bench given the opportunities.
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
40. Obama has publicly said he supports "moderate" judges with rethug ("biparitsan") support |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-22-08 11:19 PM by jackson_dem
If someone is voting on the Supreme Court Obama, who was going to vote for Roberts until his aides told him it would be too politically costly, is the last Democrat they should have been supporting...
|
Omega3
(412 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
41. exactly!!!!! but O-supporters don't seem to get this. |
Bake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message |
37. I'm a middle aged man whose wife is post menopausal and whose kids are grown. |
|
Why should I worry about Roe?
Before you lecture me, I've "worried" for years about all the traditional Dem issues. But now, since I'm not an O-bot, many of you have told me my vote wasn't necessary anyway, I should just go fuck myself.
Since I make a 6 figure salary, maybe I should start voting self-interest.
Bake
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |
39. If you care so much about the SC why are you voting for Barack "moderate judges" Obama? |
Aussie leftie
(430 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
43. Why aren't you asking the same question of the Obama supporters |
|
who wont vote for Clinton in the general election
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message |