Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AFP - Pressure grows on Democrats to unite behind a candidate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:12 PM
Original message
AFP - Pressure grows on Democrats to unite behind a candidate
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 05:14 PM by FrenchieCat



3/23/08

Pressure grows on Democrats to unite behind a candidate


WASHINGTON (AFP) - Democrats came under mounting pressure Sunday to close ranks behind a single candidate, as Hillary Clinton struggles to wrest the mathematical advantage from Barack Obama to win their party's nod for the White House.
<>
New York Senator Clinton is in an uphill battle to close the gap between her and Obama, the Illinois senator who holds a lead in the number of nominating delegates, the nationwide popular vote and the number of contests won in the campaign.

Clinton's chances of snatching a victory were receding by the day, analysts said, with respected US newspaper Politico stressing Obama would have to be "hit by a political meteor" for Clinton to win the Democratic death-match.

Clinton's own campaign reportedly has acknowledged that there is virtually no way she can finish ahead of Obama in pledged delegates.

"She will be close to him but certainly not equal to him in pledged delegates," a Clinton advisor told Politico.

Estimates show Obama leading the former first lady in pledged delegates 1,628 to 1,493, and ahead in the primary popular vote by nearly 750,000 people. The Democrats' proportional delegates system makes it highly unlikely that Clinton would surpass Obama

more..... http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080323/ts_alt_afp/usvote



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dempartisan23 Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. hillary must drop out now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. There would be a better chance of her cutting her own arm off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. The more I think about it the more I believe that the long drawn out sched of
the last 10 primaries spanning 3 months is going to motivate a lot of SDs to move now. Had the sched been more compact they would be more likely to wait it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I agree; and also, they are now name-calling and smearing one of the Top Dogs of the
Democratic Party. This will not bode well, or sit well (among all the other things that haven't boded or satted, LOL).

Richardson a "Judas" ? Nevermind that she threw Obama under the TRAIN for McCain. This may have been the signal for the rest of the SDs that this woman poses an inherent danger to anyone who crosses her path, Democrat or not. And that, we cannot afford.

Had she been running a dignified campaign, perhaps 10 more states we could have tolerated. But no.. it cannot go on and it won't. I think we may see quite a bit of movement before PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can you imagine how loud the Clintonistas and the media would be screaming at Obama
to drop out if the shoe were on the other foot? You'd need fucking ear muffs just to keep your head from splitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galactical Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If Obama lost 12 primaries in a row....
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 05:23 PM by galactical
he'd been viewed as the democrat version of Huckabee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Whatever else anyone thinks of her, she is a fighter.
Whether you want her to or not, I'll bet right now she will fight to the finish.

Whether you want to believe it or not, it's not over.

As much as I would love to see us coalesce behind one candidate, she's not afraid and she's not a quitter. That's one of the things I most admire about her.

You can throw all the garbage you want at me. It doesn't matter. It's not my decision to make. It's hers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. If the results were reversed, Obama would have been told to step down.
In no uncertain terms.... "For the good of the party".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Told by whom?
These are not school children who can be told to go to their rooms. This is not an election for student council. These two both want it and they both can do it. If they can't find it in themselves to unite, then I don't blame either for continuing the race.

Were he in the same situation, I would respect his decision as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Napolean was not a quitter either before his Waterloo...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Please see my thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks for linking to that.. I missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. I guess that is the Washington Democrats.
Hillary's Democrats are not ready to get behind BO. We want to wait until we see if the SD's change back over to Clinton and see how the next few Primary's go. Thanks but no thanks. Why push her out, let him win fair and square.
;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC