Aussie leftie
(430 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 08:35 PM
Original message |
What would be your solution to this problem? |
|
I think that both candidates are still in the race for the nomination. If Clinton was to drop out now, while she still has a chance, she would be letting down her supporters who donated millions to her campaign. The same could be said for Obama. Besides offering the vice presidency to his/her opponent, is there a face saving solution to this problem before it gets to the point where the democrats deliver the general election to the repugs on a silver platter.
Has there been such a close race in the Democratic Primaries in living memory?
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message |
1. depends on how long your living memory is! |
|
I'm in my 30s and barely remember Kennedy / Carter but know it mostly from reading.
|
Aussie leftie
(430 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. Kennedy was overrated and Carter was underrated |
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Hillary can not make up the difference in Popular Vote or Delegates. Who cares about saving face? I just want to save this election.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
3. When you donate to a campaign |
|
you have to accept the fact that you might just be throwing your money away.
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message |
4. If Clinton was to drop out now, she would be letting down her supporters |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 08:39 PM by DJ13
And if she doesnt she's letting down the entire party, including her supporters, who Im sure would rather not see another Republican in the WH after Bush.
|
Yael
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Hillary could show real leadership at this point |
|
by putting party in front of personal ambition.
Same could be said for Obama, but he is leading.
;)
|
IndependentDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message |
7. i say they have a vicious game of roe sham boe... |
|
just kidding. How about they stop with the negative campaigning and stop tearing each other down and start focusing on issues and differences in policy and start campaigning against McCain (showing why they are the stronger GE candidate)--- then let the rest of the primary process play out.
|
Aussie leftie
(430 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. That sounds like a very sensible solution |
|
But how do you control the media from blowing things out of proportion with the intention of creating controversy with either side? They have already issued statements (earlier in the campaign) saying that they respect each other and would like to focus on the defeating the republicans.
|
IndependentDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
the political process is a messy battle, not always because of the candidates but because of the tv ratings. Sex/Lies/Violence/Bad things in general make for good tv. but the politicians do have control over the type of adds they pay for and what they say while on the stump.
|
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Clinton doesn't have a chance; mathematics not on her side. |
|
Race isn't 'close', because Hillary has NO CHANCE of catching up in number of pledged delegates.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message |
9. She could be offered something: |
|
head of Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which Kennedy heads now? Senate Majority Leader (though I think I read she'd have to be voted in for that:shrug:), something that would appease her.
|
frogcycle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. the dem Senators could agree to vote her in |
frogcycle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |
10. they could agree to both quit |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 09:06 PM by frogcycle
say in unison "Joe was right!" and "I agree with Joe!" and then walk off the stage.
Joe could be a one-termer just to get the country past the rough spots, then hand the reins to Barack. HRC could just quietly decide not to run again, saving face because she'd be Sen Maj Ldr.
|
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Her only "chance" involves dragging Obama down to her disgusting level of decency. |
|
If he attacked her half as much as she attacked him she would be gone.
|
roguevalley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. someone should tell her that her dignity is at stake and go over this |
|
acknowledging that life isn't fair and you don't always get what you want. If I had raised zillions of her, I would be mucho pissed and speaking to her about it. Money needs to dry up and force her to see the truth. Short of having to make cupcakes herself, that is what its going to take. She has lost touch with inevitability, hence the changing scenarios about winning. I want the SD to commit and show her to the door themselves.
|
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message |
16. the only reason that any politician in either party ever stops running for president is that they |
|
run out of money. Hillary will stay in until her money runs out. This Bosnia tape could do that. They are spending huge amounts of money every day.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |