|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 12:28 AM Original message |
'Unsexiest Woman' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. We cross posted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
2. Maxim ? hhaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
selador (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 12:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. i can;t believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 01:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. so it shouldn't matter, Sarah Jessica Parker never headed in the direction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
selador (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 01:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. it matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 01:27 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. she DOES sell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
selador (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 01:38 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 07:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. not all actors/actresses need to be "sexy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
El Pinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
3. I don't think it's her long face that's unsexy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 01:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. That fucking Coultergeist photo made me puke a little |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
6. I think she's incredibly sexy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
9. My Fiance is the sexiest woman in the history of the Universe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
11. I am sitting here in total astonishment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
selador (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 05:31 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. ime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 07:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. It's unfortunate that so many think this type of shit actually matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 07:36 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. In the larger picture, this type of distraction doesn't matter. Yet sometimes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 12:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. RIGHT . . .!!!! Everyone here is dealing with the "shit" . . . which I was hoping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 08:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. JLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 02:52 AM Response to Original message |
13. There are a couple of reasons for this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 12:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. But does a men's magazine have the right to sum up a female in this way . . . ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 03:00 AM Response to Original message |
14. well boo hoo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DangerDave921 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
17. WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
23. Why in the hell is this article in GD-PRIMARIES . . . ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC