Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good Keerist. He's like a dog with a fucking bone ..... Olbermann

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:34 PM
Original message
Good Keerist. He's like a dog with a fucking bone ..... Olbermann
He's jumped El Sharko.

All Clinton All the Time

Never mind real newz, Keith. Just keep on doing the journalistic equivalent of drawing mustaches and goatees and Hillary Clinton campaign posters.

And we had such hope for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Olbermann is the left wing Hannity.
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 07:36 PM by AX10
I despise both of them.

He's gone "jihad" on HRC. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
81. why do you throw around "left wing" like its a insult?
especially on a left wing message board?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #81
124. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
85. Are you a closet freeper?
I have seen two posts almost back to back by you making comments about the "left wing". This is a Liberal/Progressive website. If you don't like the "left wing" - you might want to find a new home to shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #85
112. "closet"??
Ha! :rofl: Pretty transparent closet. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #85
135. I am a moderate. This site is for all people who support the Dem party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #85
152. Define "Liberal/Progressive" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
166. Goooooooooooooo KO...somebody needs to go Jihad on da Hillster...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. He gets mnore brilliant every day
Go Keith Go!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. I refuse to watch Olberman since he became a GE/NBC stooge for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
65. You're dreaming if you think GE wants Obama to be President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #65
134. You would think that a phrase like...
"GE/NBC stooge for Obama" would have enough cognitive dissonance even for a Hillbot.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #65
154. You're dreaming if you don't think GE wants to knock Hillary out so McCain can knock Obama out.
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 08:53 AM by Seabiscuit
They clearly think both GE and McCain will have an easier time against Obama than against Hillary.

They've been building Obama up during the primaries just to rip him to shreds in the GE.

You think it's gotten nasty by now? Be careful what you wish for. The Repukes and the Repuke media would behave like vultures, ripping up and devouring every last piece of Obama's carcass in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
83. Sorry that you are that much of an idiot. GE/TimeWarner/Fox/Disney ALL WANT CLINTON.
Don't bother responding...it's likely that you are a hopeless Clinton koolaid drinker.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #83
141. That's why they give her all that good press dontcha know!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #141
146. Give me a break. It's been 24/7 Wright Bullshit for TWO WEEKS SOLID.
Hillary gets more than her fair share of passes.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #83
148. are you fucking nuts?
THEY WANT MCCAIN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
108. Olberman talks so fast he sounds like he's snorting or smoking crack..
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 09:18 PM by Tellurian
I can't stand watching him. He gives me a headache.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Like Air America and Ed Schultz - everyone is doing PR for Obama.
Jeez - enough already.

I just can't listen anymore from Stepanie Miller in the AM to Ed Schultz, Randy Rhodes then on the weekend here in Chicago - all Obama all the time. The more they force him down my gullet the more I resist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Maybe....instead of everyone else being wrong...
maybe just maybe... it is you who is wrong about Obama... did you ever think of that???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
44. Did you ever think that maybe my complait has NOTHING to do with Obama?
I do not have a candidate that I support. I will simply support whoever wins the nomination.

Just because you're a groupie/cultist doesn't mean everyone else is too.

I dislike Clinton.

I dislike Obama.

What I'm sick of is the petty bullshit that even Olbermann is passing off as 'news'. Did you ever think of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #44
149. I have the same problem with the bots, Husb
it's like you have to goose-step to SOMEONE :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #44
150. Jesus, were you always this nasty
and I just didn't notice? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #44
151. Well put
and I'm in total agreement. I'll vote for whoever the nominee is but refuse to join either bandwagon before then. My candidates are out of it. I've stopped watching all cable news shows because they are focusing on the bullshit - both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Schultz, Miller, and Rhodes have gone...
over the deep end for Obama.
I see those as being just as bad as Sean Hannity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Yep...
I wrote the S. Miller show just today to tell them my favorite radio lady has been kidnapped and in her place is a whiny, sighing, groaning Dismal Danny... and said good-bye until the general election.

I used to love listening to her on my morning drive! So funny! Nothing funny about her now... the Kool Aid poisoning has left her pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
113. No...they're not like Hannity.
Hannity flat out lies. I don't think Ed, Stephanie and Randi do. They have strong opinions but they're not lying about Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Yeah it is just the whole world against Hillary
Ever think that maybe Hillary might be the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. IF it were the whole world against her, you'd be right...
But, no.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
46. Y'ever think maybe I'm pissed off about bullshit being peddled as news and that it has nothing .....
..... to do with candidates?

Not everything is a candidate post ...... Ever think of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #46
118. Kitchen sink
I don't like the news these days either but I'm damned well not going to blame a victim for it. It wasn't like this before that kitchen sink strat came out and it never had to be like this at all. Hillary is the one who wants to keep pushing things like the wright story under the excuse of "vetting" and she's cried vetting from the start, then she wants to whine and cry when she's caught in a baldfaced lie herself.

What, only the other candidate gets vetted? That wasn't supposed to apply to her?

And no, I don't, or didn't, much care for either candidate myself. She's a scorched earth corporate tool and friend to the repubs who will take this nation in the exact opposite direction it needs to go and on most issues he isn't too different in position, just lacks the scorched earth and repub ties. But, I also worry that he can't change the world through force of personality so will just break the kids hearts and turn them off from politics. Not much to choose from between them for me, or there wasn't.

Up until the last couple of weeks I not only didn't support either but I kinda disliked both. Still do, but I do know who to dislike more and who to blame more. The one who decided that the kitchen sink was appropriate, the one who is attacking another dem with more energy and more ferocity than I remember EVER being pointed at the opposition party by the same candidate. She likes them more than us. Once he was hit with it again and again it got dirty on both sides, yeah. But only one of them made that choice and stuck to it so left the other no choice. It was a clean campaign up until that point.

If she doesn't like the news coverage maybe she should stop with the lies, the swiftboating, and the kitchen sink strat long enough to remember how dems are supposed to treat dems. As far as I can tell she's confused about what party she's supposed to support in this election, and that's the deciding factor between them for me. The news is covering that news and I'd say it is worth the coverage. It's not every day you see the attempted homicide of a major political party by one of its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #118
125. The fact is, Clinton needs to drop out of the race
But that doesn't change the fact that the media is fanning the flames as much as anyone else .... and maybe more.

It isn't helping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #125
133. I can understand your point
but I'd disagree. We follow the news close so we're sick of it, I'm sick of it at least. But according to a post I saw earlier today the polls show real confusion over who is responsible for what and as many dems in a telephone survey saying Obama should drop out as Clinton.

I would like to see the news shift from the fire and smoke to the reasons behind it but the last thing I'd want to see is her coming out of this with any great number of dems thinking she was screwed out of the nomination by the media rather than by her own tactics. Clear that up so we're all on the same page and we'll get good turnout this November, leave people thinking she's robbed rather than blew it and many stay home in protest. It's an issue we aren't done with yet. The coverage could improve no doubt but it shouldn't under any circumstance end until we've got the facts.

Make sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samdogmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
48. Thanks! My sentiments exactly.
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 08:25 PM by samdogmom
Every time I see a post dissing Keith or another good open-minded reporter, I want to scream: "If the vast majority of Democratic opinion leaders are on a different page...is it the vast majority or is it you?"

Give me a break...Keith has always been a bright spot in the dismal TV correspondent pool. Don't write him off just because he hasn't joined the Hillary bandwagon. Instead, take a step back and ask yourself why you aren't seeing what Keith is seeing. You may learn something!

Edited for spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
91. Except she has half the voters.
Deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #91
97. Half the voters?
Give or take, what, 600,000 voters or so?

I call Fuzzy Math!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #97
103. When we are talking about millions, your figure is pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #103
107. Every vote counts, and you know that.
She's behind in pledged delegates and the popular vote. She has little to zero chance of surpassing Obama in either.

Parse numbers all you'd like, move the goalposts to fit your narrative arc. Or, join the reality-based community. It really is that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #107
115. If you all are so confident about Obama's chances, why the frantic
calls for Hillary to step down, since New Hampshire?

Don't give me that good for the party crap. Obama has alienated enough of the Dem base to assure a defeat if he makes it to the GE. He will also get hit with more Rezko and more Wright type scandals.

He hasn't been vetted by a long shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #115
123. I don't think she should leave until it becomes impossible by the numbers.
She hasn't been vetted by a long shot, either. As evidenced by, you know, this week.

There isn't a damned thing wrong with her continuing until at least the IN/NC primary. By then, it will become clear to all that it's a convention floor brawl, or a concession speech.

"Don't Give Me That 'Good For The Party' Crap." Duly noted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Gunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
88. Unfortunately it is true.
I work on the road all day long and get to listen to Stephanie, Ed Schultz, and some Rhandi all day and it is true. I am not a Hillary supporter, and will have a very hard time voting for her if she wins, but the 3 hour bash sessions by the few left wing talk show hosts out there is terrible for the cause. Let the right wing media have their say about Hillary. 3 hours of radio shows, and almost nothing about McCain misleading Americans about AlQuida, and needing people whispering in his ear telling him what to say. Almost nothing about Cheney's heartless comments about the 4,000 dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
168. It's because it's not possible for her to win.
If Obama were in her situation and visa versa, we'd see the same frustration toward him. I'd be among the frustrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let me guess, if he was pointing out lies and mistakes made by Obama
You would be rooting him on, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. No, only Obama supporters are that shallow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Really?!
Then explain to me why KO was a god around here when he was going after Bush, and not going after any Dem nominee? But soon as he started exposing Hillary's lies and bullshit, all the sudden all the Hillary supporters got pissed.

You can say believe what you want, but the rest of us prefer to dwell in the reality base world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. Not everybody who got pissed is a Hillary supporter
I actually dislike Hillary.

My bitch is the stupidity of it and the overall harm it is doing to Democrats in general.

Not everyone is an asswipe candidate cultist, yanno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
165. Oh sure... the Kool Aid poisoning world?
I think both Obama and Clinton are vile and dangerous. This just gives me more resolve... it proves the poisoning theory... it's the Donald Sutherland "point and scream" effect... I'm not a Hillary supporter any more than I'm an Obama supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
67. Shallow?
oddly, a new Gallup poll shows 28 percent of Clinton's supporters would back McCain should the New York senator lose her quest for the Democratic nomination.
That compares to the 19 percent of Obama supporters who say they will favor McCain should Clinton be the party’s nominee.

hmmm...who's the kool aid-drinkin' sore losers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #67
164. You mistake me for a Hillary supporter...
I voted for Edwards before he threw in the towel because I think both Obama and Hillary are dangerous and vile.

Funny how the Kool Aid swillers will bring out polls to "prove" their point, yet adamantly deny the veracity of any poll that goes against their poisoned beliefs.

I believe no polls... especially those that are merely quoted and not linked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #164
169. Sorry, my mistake....
it was an easy one to make, you seem so bitter and nasty.

ummm.....I'm NOT a kool aid drinker. I would've voter for Edwards had he NOT dropped out before Ohio.
and since I stated "gallup poll" I thought it would be a relatively easy find, but I generally am guilty of giving people the benefit of the doubt.

Link: http://www.gallup.com/
(it's on the home page)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
47. You would be wrong, Assumption Maker
I could care less who he's dissing. My complaint is the petty nature of it and the relentlessness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
52. Of course they would! lol
Keith quite accurately pounds on ALL the candidates. Everyone on DU at some time or another has been certain
he was "against" THEIR nominee. Keith isn't supporting Obama, he's holding to the flame the feet of the
candidate trying to get away with the most bullshit. Since Clinton's the one going down, she's the one fighting
hardest. I suspect her supporters see the "sniper fire" the same way Hillary did -- because they want it to be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
94. He could try it occasionally. There are plenty of Obama lies and mistakes
to fill a few evenings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can't watch him anymore. Its really sad
I used to love his show, and I'm sure will watch again in the future. But he is way over the top.

He should be targeting McCain now, not one of our candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Beaver I feel the same way as well.
And you have to wonder why Fox leads in viewers in that time slot. He is opposite of Bill O'Reilly in the same time slot. I hope in the near future Rachael Maddow takes over his time slot. She would be a great commentator for MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. There are two sides to Maddow.
On her radio show, she is fairly objective and more inclined to give HRC credit where it is due.
On GENBC, she is all for Obama, granted she is much more polite than those mediawhores Matthews, Olbermann, and Mitchell, still she shows bias for Obama while on MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. So perhaps MSNBC is part of the problem.
I think they still haven't forgiven her for the Shuster thing. Never mind that a so-called journalist subbed on an OPINION show and made a comment that showed his command of the language is relatively minimal!

I also realized that Keith is probably a sexist. He comes from the sports world. As a big time sports fan myself, believe me, I know. I love football, but get a little tired of seeing a bunch of slutty women wiggling their asses all the time during the game. And that's just the thin end of the wedge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. IRONY ALERT: You call KO "sexist" & then complain about "slutty women" in sports - LOL. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. No, I report it as I see it! LOLOL.
I'm not being ironic. Those woman detract from the sporting even and they also don't lead cheers, despite being called cheerleaders. Why are they even there? Just to strut their stuff.

So, maybe I shouldn't have said slutty, but yuck, just yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
64. AX10 actually these past 2 weeks she seems pretty equal to both
She seems to have gotten better about that or maybe is it just me???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #64
76. I believe that she will fully support the nominee.
As another poster said, the problem may lay with MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
51. I'd rather she took over the slot Gregory got from the Carlson boy.
Olbermann is, in my view, more tolerable on his worst day than Gregory is on any day.\

Or Matthews. But I think he has nude shots of the GE chairman getting laid with a tag team of goats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. "He should be targeting McCain now, not one of our candidates."
exactly...
Why is Hillary still in the race again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
66. "He should be targeting McCain now, not one of our candidates"
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 08:46 PM by joeprogressive
Now insert she in that statement and you have, "She should be targeting McCain now, not one of our candidates". Pretty ironic huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
69. If you'd watched tonight...
you'd have seen that he DID target McCain. And Walmart. And FoxNews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #69
132. A couple of days ago he named McCain "Today's worst person in the world!"
I would say that is targeting McCain. Course, Olberman didn't throw the kitchen sink at McCain so maybe Hillbots are so desensitized to anything less than total and all out war that they didn't understand what he did was targeting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
70. He destroys McCain almost every night.
You're missing it because you don't watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irishonly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
116. i haven't watched in a while
I don't think he has gone to any side. I don't think he is promoting Obama. I just want to hear more news. The bashing is all over the internet and all over the cable news. I used to enjoy his show when he was spot on with the war coverage, Bush's crimes and tricks republicans pulled. I will be thrilled when the nominee is decided and we won't have everyone talking about who did what to whom all day long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
119. And people here should be doing the same
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good thing it wasn't all Clinton
He's talking about McCain right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. He ain't my fav but he can Hill bash all he wants too.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Don't worry, Dan Abrams is on right after him & he's totally in the tank for Clinton. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Yes but Stepanie Miller is going to be on his show...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. I love listening to Olberman...he's got it right; Hillary keeps shooting herself in the foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yep, that's why he's talking about McCain right now......
All Clinton All the Time

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. I *heart* Keith
When he calls Bush on his bullshit, everyone on DU is behind KO. But when he calls bullshit on anyone of the candidates, some of those candidates supporters become unhinged.

I watched Dan Abrams last night for the first time... he ripped Obama repeatedly, and I didn't cry once.

KO called out Ferraro and Clinton and some people can't see past the fact that he did. Not my problem. And if Obama starts the bullshit, I hope KO calls him out on it too.

I'll always :loveya: Keith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. I think the commentators on MSNBC should concentrate there efforts
on challenging the credibility of McCain and other republicans in local and state races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
43. I agree 100%, however as long as our party continues this fight, McCain wins.
The MSM has no need to cover McCain; he's already won and there is no drama there. They are more interested in Clinton vs Obama the train wreck. The days of real news are over, and it's all about entertainment, wheeee!! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
101. Newsflash! They are Repukes. They are paid by GE. How deluded are you
anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. As I just said in another thread...
This dumbass sports reporter is quickly losing all the credibility he gained over the past couple of years.

Your mustache analogy is perfect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. I can't wait when he starts hating on Obama
His supporters here are goanna get pissed at him big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
105. Our consolation prize, but a sweet one if events go that way.
The constant MSM trashing didn't work against Gore, didn't work against Kerry, and won't work against Hillary.

Imagine where she would be with an even playing field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #105
139. Really? Why isn't Kerry now running to succeed President Gore? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriplePlay Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hillary Supporters - Take off the blinders
She is still LYING about the incident. She says TODAY that she met the one girl and ran inside. There is video of her with a whole class. She is a habitual liar and unelectable. If she is the nominee the democrats might as well sign off the next eight years. This is the worst campaign Ive seen in my life.

She will get torn apart in the GE - Imagine the continuous loop of her ceremony with the children on the tarmac.

It's time to get a Democrat elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. keith just blasted the immorality of wal-mart.
and that's good enough for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. KO is dead to Clinton supporters because he refuses to ignore her immoral slime and lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
106. Doesn't Mrs. Obama still work there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #106
136. She never worked at Wal-Mart
She worked for a company that sold pickles to Wal-Mart and she no longer works for that company.

Hillary actually worked for Wal-Mart in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksoze Donating Member (635 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. He disappoints
with his obama cheerleading squad of regulars who remind me of the SNL skit with Phil Hartman playing Sinatra and his Steve Lawrence and Edie Gormey hanger ons during The Sinatra Group sketch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. He's just not supporting the dumbshit from your candidate that you claim
is not your candidate.

It's OK.....you can admit it, if you haven't. It's very clear at this point.

But KO is balancing out the rest of the MSM who just did Obama an injustice with that over the top "what his pastor said" bullshit that we had to watch for 2 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #28
53. You're dead assed wrong, Frenchie.
I don't like either one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #53
72. You don't like either one of them...
So you're staying here just to antagonize us, or what? :shrug:

What real news did you want him to cover today? I just scanned the headlines on MSNBC and it looked like a pretty slow news day to me. Maybe you'd be better off with PBS' News Hour or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #72
75. Yeah, Stinky...
How dare you even BE here without a pom-pom in one hand and a machete in the other! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. Well this is the primaries forum
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 08:54 PM by high density
So I think it's a valid question. Most people here at least only shit on one candidate. I don't think we need people that shit on both of them out of spite, beg for Olbermann to shit on Obama, beg for him to ignore Clinton gaffes, or whatever. I just don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #77
82. You don't get it?
Then put me on ignore. I'm probably too smart for you to understand.

The ignore will save you the frustration of trying to glean my meanings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #82
90. Yes you are simply way too brilliant for me to even begin to comprehend
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 09:04 PM by high density
your rants.

I guess it's easier to insult my intelligence than respond to my argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #72
80. How about MIMS' confab with the brass at the five sided war palace?
I bet you missed that, too, being all candidate goofy and shit like you are.

They're gunna bring troop levels down to the 'pre-surge' 140,000.

He also got told that if we don't draw down in Iraq, we can't respond to another (real) emergency elsewhere.

That kinda newz ..... yanno?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #80
89. Well the people on DU don't control Olbermann's editorial decisions
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 09:05 PM by high density
And if you already have the news you want, what in the heck are you bitching about?

They were talking about 140k troops back in late February. Maybe Olbermann didn't feel like retreading month old news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #89
92. Okay, now you're getting silly
Stop before you get stupid, too.

Thanks for the Google tip, Jimmy Olson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #92
102. I'm honestly sad to see you so rude
I don't know what I did to spurn these stupidity comments. I seem to recall we were both on the same side back in the Clark days but now you have nothing to say to me but "you're stupid."

Oh well. I didn't think my post in this thread was going to generate this sort of response, and I'm sorry I made it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #102
121. Hahahaha
Edit your replies then go all passive aggressive .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #121
147. I edited one reply before I knew you responded to it
The edit did nothing but remove a reference to searching Google news for 140000, which you insulted me for anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
31. So, was he a hack when it was Bush he was hacking?
I suspect he was not. You merely disagree with him at this time.

He'll be Murrow reincarnated again as soon as he gets a target you agree with.

I love how some people ride the roller coaster. He's a hack, he's a genius, he's a hack again.

Bah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
56. Pretty free with reading your own meaning into another person's post
Because I criticize the endless, petty coverage of Clinton's gaffes and lies and "misspeaks" that makes me a Clinton supporter?

You might be all black and white about the campaigns. I'm not. I don't like either one of them. I defended your guy when PreacherCrap hit. That was unfair and made up and meaningless, too. But you musta missed that.

Keep your knee in check. It jerks sometimes ...... I'm just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. Sorry about that.
I just get sick of the trashing of good people, on both sides.

I defended Murtha. And Joe Wilson is a good man. And obviously I used to be a Clark person. None of these people deserves being trashed because they support Hillary.

And neither do Kerry, Kennedy, Richardson, Olbermann, et al.

These people are not trash because we disagree with them. That's all I'm saying really.

Sorry I aimed that at the wrong target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rjbrooks Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
34. Olberman
It sure seems the only people invited on KO's show are the Hillary bashers (Dana Milbank, Jonithan Alter, Margaret Carlson) As a lifelong democrat active in the County Democratic Party who fully intends to support our candidate whoever it is, I am getting really turned off by this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
57. That is ***exactly*** how I feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
98. He had those very same people on his show before the primaries started.
I guess you hated him back then, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
100. That's why you have a remote control.
You can change the channel. He runs a news commentary show and he and his producers can run the show anyway they like. And their viewers can either watch it or turn it off.

Oh and BTW, KO has the highest rated show on MSNBC and he is enjoying the best ratings his show has ever had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
35. Oh good Abrams is on
Oops, he's starting off with Clinton and all her "misstatements"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
36. To the KO Bashers...
Keith Olberman

Randi Rhodes
Ed Schultz
Thom Hartmann
Rachel Maddow
Stephanie Miller

Just about everybody in the liberal media has no patience with Hillary any more. Don't go blaming Keith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. John Kerry, Teddy Kennedy, Bill Richardson
It's amazing who become losers and idiots as soon as they endorse someone other than Hillary. Suddenly they're not true Dems, or in the case of the media, they become hacks, even though on other subject we agree with them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #39
60. Hey Knee Jerker .....
.... read this ...... then tell me what you were saying ..........

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=5193627
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. Read my response under your comment
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fliesincircles Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
158. These guys ACTUALLY voted on NAFTA
How do you think they voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #36
58. And it is all just as tiresome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheozone Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
38. I think he has it in for Hillary since she complained about
what's his name that made the remark about her pimping out Chelsea. He has gotten really bad, hard to watch him anymore. I'm now kinda' sorry that I bought his book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksoze Donating Member (635 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #38
68. David Shuster
and I agree that seemed like a turning point for the beginning of his hate club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
40. then stop watching
you fucking dingleberrys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #40
54. We have. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #54
156. not the ones who are still whining about it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
41. It's not just Olbermann. Look around. Every pundit once identified as "liberal" is now anti-Hillary.
It's not a conspiracy, folks. It's people observing, thinking, analyzing, and coming to a rational conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #41
71. honest to God... Jesus!
Do people actually think that there's some kind of Anti-Hillary Conspiracy, where Rhodes, Olbermann - those two don't even know each other - and all the superdelegates who support Obama - Kennedy, Daschle, Kerry, Pelosi - meet in some deep dark secret place every Friday night at midnight, wear funny hats and dip chickens in blood, to plot Hillary Clinton's downfall? WTF is this? They are speaking out because - and I'll throw that really malleable can't-think-for-himself-"hack" Mike Malloy into this mix - they SEE what's she's doing, her poisonous campaign tactics, and are CALLING HER OUT FOR IT because it's destroying the party. I don't understand what it is that people can't see about that! Malloy bashes Obama ALL THE TIME, but he sees very clearly how nasty she has run this campaign and he says so - every night. Is he a hack too? Is he in on the great Hate Hillary conspiracy too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #41
74. Put me in that camp ...
I have always stuck up for Hill ... Coming into this, I was a Wes Clark guy, then when he didn't come in, I was kind of open, maybe leaning toward Obama as it went ... But, a D who would definitely support any candidate ...

And, Hill has just just wore out every last bit of patience I have ... I have alwasy said that the right wing hates her and Bill so much because they run like Rs, and beat them at their game ... Well, this campaign has proven that out with no doubt ...

Flat lies, disembling, parsing, bullying, spinning ...

It just is a disgrace ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
50. Keith Olbermann tells the truth -- if you can't stand the heat ...
Hillary Clinton has every bit of this coming -- and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #50
62. If **I** can't stand the heat?
I said she ought to drop out of the race. Yesterday.

You're jumping to conclusions due to your CandidateCult induced blindness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #62
78. *I'm* jumping to conclusions? LMAO! I'm not even a cultist
My nominee was Edwards. My only interest now is preserving the DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

Husb2Sparkly, you've been a vocal Clinton proponent for months now. You might have accepted reality,
but you still have your opinions.

All I want is any candidate OTHER than a Clinton ... it's the same way I felt in 1992, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #78
84. Show me a pattern of supporting Clinton.
C'mon ..... show me the posts that lead you to your false conclusion.

Remember ..... a **pattern** of long standing ...... not a single post or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #84
114. I'm PM'ing you three -- there are dozens more - anyone who wants to see them, PM me
I can't link directly to them because that's against DU rules.

You've clothed your Clinton support in attacking Obama and his supporters, but it's very clear you're a Clinton person
from the first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #114
120. No, that would be your assumption
To do what you're doing is stretching it ..... a lot.

I do, indeed, dislike Obama. No secret there.

But ya know what ..... I'll work for him if he wins.

By the way, did you find where I called for Clinton to drop out of the race? "Supporters" don't usually do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #120
122. Several high profile Clinton supporters have called for her to drop out
So yes, supporters do that all the time.

I will vote for ANY Democrat who wins nomination.

You are choosing to attack Obama supporters with epithets like "cultists". You aren't helping matters -- you
are hurting them with that kind of attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #122
127. Cultists
Is how many act.

I'm hardly the first to say that or use that word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #127
129. Continuing the epithet doesn't help matters
Perhaps some are cultists. Or perhaps they seem like cultists to you because they have enthusiasm for a viable
candidate that we don't. Most are just people like you and me -- they're Democrats. Democrats aren't the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #120
126. C'mon Husb2Sparkly
How is she going to win this thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #78
96. there are members of DU who attempt to stop the attacks on Hillary...
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 10:00 PM by grasswire
..not because they are her supporters but because the attacks are hurting the party and our chances in the GE. D'oh. Stinky is one of many here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #96
104. No problem as long as you are also trying to stop the attacks...
on Obama that are hurting the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #96
110. "Sparky" called me a "cultist" for disagreeing about Clinton - how does this help?
I have every right to express my rage over what this individual is doing to my party.

Sparky (and you, by defending Sparky) is carrying on personal attacks against DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #110
138. baloney
and that's being polite (I never was in the Navy).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #138
142. That's a personal attack not a refutation
And it's as unsupported an argument as the DU pack mindset seems to prefer these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
55. He has blown any chance to actually matter
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
59. I Was Never Really That Into Him In the First Place
He did something about a year ago I thought was just great, otherwise, he's a showman - as much as Bill O and Rush are showmen. And he's got a schtick I'd be into if I really wanted a showman.

Ever notice how they never brought back Phil Donohue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
73. Why are you still supporting that pathological liar?
What do you see in Clinton after she lied to our faces multiple times? She's almost as bad as Bush.

You're still supporting her to the point of flaming Keith Olbermann?

Talk about delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #73
87. "Flaming" (hahahaha) KO is not the same as supporting Clinton.
But make up any shit in your mind that you want to. Don't let facts get in your way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
79. Hillary, not Keith, Jumped the Shark MONTHS AGO.
You just can't stand it that he's not the typical MSM lapdog for the Clintons. I suggest you stick with Blitzer as his head is so far up her ass that it's unclear which is talking when she opens her mouth.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
86. BREAKING NEWS: KO eats own demographics for breakfast w/milk & brown sugar
buttered, 9 grain toast & jam :9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #86
111. Ha!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
93. No not like Obama has had any bad press. Have you seen the Bill Clinton endorsement of McCain...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
95. I don't think it's a big deal. He's followed by Dan Abrams who is very pro-Clinton. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #95
109. you are correct, Abrams is silly for Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
99. Husb2Sparkly
Your opinion. How is she going to win the nomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #99
128. Condom
I think she should drop out.

I've been saying that for a while.

Don't you feel silly for asking me that question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #128
130. My mistake.
I'm red-faced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #128
131. My mistake.
I'm red-faced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
117. I love Olbermann more every day. And when the time comes he will tear up McCain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
137. Keep up the great job Keith!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
140. He devoted the first 27 minutes of "Countdown" tonight to trashing Hillary.
Now I'm an Obama supporter -- and I expect KO to have a serious place in the history of our country. I'm not touting Clinton or turning against KO. I am turning against his using half of his hour to trash Hillary, when she has been trashed on MSNBC the previous three hours by Tweety, et al. I know MSNBC is now "the place for politics," but IMO we need, and expect, more from Keith. He's so much better than the rest of the MSNBC line-up. And Bush is not gone yet, Cheney is still in office.

And if KO objects to tearing down a potential Dem nominee? It's not probable, but it's possible that Hillary will be that nominee, and not Barack. Anything can happen. Is it okay, then, to destroy her?

I don't question KO's sincerity. He quite obviously detests Hillary, or is a very good actor. He quite obviously thinks her danger to our country is at this point greater than the danger from a still-in-office Bush (or a potentially elected McCain), or he wouldn't lead his show with her every night.

Or -- I don't want to think, but I don't dismiss the possibility, that his bashing Hillary is to some degree simply ratings-driven: substituting her as the villain his show format needs, as a replacement for the outgoing Bush.

Maybe ratings will soar from a groundswell of Hillary hatred. Or, maybe viewers will just get tired of the same thing on MSNBC, the same Hillary hits over and over, even if they're coming from the great KO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #140
144. Perhaps in your trying to be so middle-of-the-road, 'Mom,
you don't recognize that Clinton has invited the criticism. It's odd because I think he speaks the truth.
What has she done to elevate her right to be prez besides trying to tear her Dem opponent down? Their platforms are pretty similar, so it does get down to personalities sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #144
145. I'm sorry we disagree on this race...
babylonsister. Our posting here side by side is a joy to me, and our supporting each other from time to time a treasure.

The fact is, I have some personal connections, and some personal feelings, that affect my view of the Clinton family, and I also have loved ones I live with and respect, my immediate family, who are divided in support of both candidates. (I also have a dear, dear friend who is as passionate in her opposition to Hillary as you are, and has sent some sparks flying my way more than once, but our common support of Obama sees us through pretty well.)

I respect both your commitment to what we all hope for for our country, and your opinion. We need your strong stand, and your posts supporting it. I see myself not so much as middle-of-the-road as maybe a bit of a peacemaker, here and in "real life" (and also as a hopeless news-junkie passer-on of news, just as it comes from the source). And maybe that's okay, too, I'm hoping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #140
155. WRONG. I have it on DVR, and just checked.
The first 15 minutes were spent on the following:

1. An update on what BOTH candidates did today;
2. A report on the current delegate status, with analysis of the various possibilities (and some analysis of the implications of the letter to Pelosi);
3. An analysis of the NBC/WSJ poll released yesterday.

No Hillary bashing there.

After the commercial break, he then devoted seven minutes to analysis of the fallout from Hillary's Bosnia fabrication. After that he went on to approximately 10 minutes on unflattering coverage of McCain.

27 minutes? Not even close.

The Bosnia lie--and it WAS a lie--deserves coverage. It's newsworthy, and he's covered it fairly.

I am sick to death of seeing Olbermann and other commentators ON OUR SIDE being trashed here because they dare to utter a critical word about Hillary (and the suggestion that he's not also been critical of Obama when it's called for is absurd). It's disgusting.

**The usual disclaimer that I'm neither a Hillary supporter nor an Obama supporter, but was an Edwards supporter who will support the eventual nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #155
159. I considered the coverage of both candidates to be in the category...
of negative coverage for Clinton, just in the way it was reported. I'm not bashing Olbermann. He's a great hero to me. What I'm doing is voicing my own personal opinion that I wish he hadn't gone off in this direction, of, IMO, covering one of our candidates very differently from the way he covers the other.

And, repeating my disclaimer, I do support a candidate, Obama, though I'm not as negative toward Clinton as others.

Also, when I watch tonight (if I can), if I take note of story time within the hour, I'll pay close attention. I appreciate your informative post, and your opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #159
160. Your opinion grossly misrepresents the broadcast, though.
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 02:34 PM by Shakespeare
You may not have liked the way it made Hillary look, but it was thorough analysis that covered BOTH candidates.

I don't mean to unload on just you, but it galls me to see people on DU turning on Olbermann and anyone else who dares to criticize Hillary. He's been tough on Obama, too (his post-TX/OH coverage was really scathing, and for several days thereafter portrayed the Obama camp as inept, which they kinda were for a time).

He's been tough on both of them, but I don't think he's ever been unfair. One of the things that has always set center-left journalists apart from the howler monkeys on the right is that they're just as quick to criticize their own side when events warrant it, and I happen to think that's a healthy and admirable thing. That's part of what makes us BETTER than the other side, and it just kills me to see the venom directed at Olbermann (and Maddow and Ed Schultz, etc. etc. etc.) in this forum.

edited to add: Just so I'm completely fair on this--it also pisses me off to see the Obama supporters turn on Krugman (of all people!). :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #160
161. I'm sorry, Shakespeare --
I promise to look at tonight's show, or the next one I'm able to watch, and try to see it through your eyes. I know how it feels to be terribly frustrated at something you feel is just dead wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #161
162. It's both sides that are making me batty right now.
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 02:58 PM by Shakespeare
I think the Hillary supporters have a slightly longer list of center-left journalists they now consider personae non grata, but both sides are guilty of overreacting and being a little too sensitive about criticism directed at their candidates.

We FINALLY have reached a point where the media isn't completely dominated by right and center-right journalists, and we should be just a little more supportive and protective of them.

Salon.com, one of my favorite news sources for over 10 years, was openly nasty to Edwards in their coverage (although Walter Shapiro did some nice pieces on him), but I didn't write them off and cancel my subscription. It's just the way things go. :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #162
163. And I'm obviously still watching KO!
Have fun in Hollywood -- I visit out there quite a bit, and I LOVE IT!

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
143. Wow. Coming from you, I find this odd. Or not. I still believe him,
and trust him, whether you do or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
153. Keith's gone over the deep end.... poor thing.
At least there's still Joe! And he's gaining credibility all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
157. Those who say that Olbermann has jumped the shark...
have jumped the shark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unbowed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
167. He goes after evildoers.
If Clinton is behaving badly she's gonna hear it from KO. Wal-Mart is being taken to the woodshed tonight...second night in a row...and he just vowed to keep on their ass till they repent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC