Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Philadelphia’s largest gay political group endorses Hillary:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:07 AM
Original message
Philadelphia’s largest gay political group endorses Hillary:

Dem presidential hopefuls battle for gay votes in Pa.





By LOU CHIBBARO JR., Washington Blade

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton won the endorsement of the Liberty City Democratic Club, Philadelphia’s largest gay political group.

<snip>

The Clinton endorsement by the Liberty City gay Democratic group came a few weeks after a gay Pittsburgh group, the Steel City Democrats, also gave its endorsement to Clinton.


“We are proud to endorse Senator Hillary Clinton in this important primary cycle,” said Matthew Woodcock, a spokesperson for the Liberty City group. “Her record of accomplishment is proof positive that she’ll be a fighter for the LGBT community in the White House and that’s what we need.”


Tobias Wolff, a University of Pennsylvania Law School professor and head of Obama’s gay campaign steering committee, acknowledged that Obama is the underdog in the Pennsylvania primary and that Clinton appears to have the support of the state’s established gay groups.

http://www.washblade.com/thelatest/thelatest.cfm?blog_id=17382








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes the Clinton record of DADT and DOMA. Cool, I cannot wait!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yea, I can tell you lose a lot of sleep over LGBT civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Other people always know what's best for gays
Doncha know.

What's your problem? Don't you enjoy being patronized? Obammy not cute enough for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent, thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Gee...
who would have thunk it? Gay, corporate loving racists. Will Obama supporters start attacking the gay community? You bet, if it serves their purposes. If you haven't noticed, they will attack, and magically transform anyone who does not kneel at the alter of Obama into the very thing they have used thus far, in order to insure a victory. Logic, and Obalogic, the ultimate oxymoron. Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Ridiculous.
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 05:54 AM by tasteblind
The gay community is free to support whom they choose. The simple fact that people think it is against their best interest does not constitute an attack. No one on DU is attacking the gay community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. The "Gay Community" is not a monolithic group.
We Gays are not all the same. Using the term "Gay Community" leads to heterosexual people thinking (and MSM promoting) all GLBT people think, act, dress, and talk alike. We don't.

Some heterosexuals laugh at us--that all gays own Cher, and Barbara Streisand CDs, and watch "Will and Grace." I do not do. Yet, some gay people do. Shit, my heterosexual Christian Sister-in-law loves Cher, Streisand, and "Will and Grace." She still can't believe that I, as a gay man can not tolerate those CDs or, even worse, that odious TV show, "Will and Grace."

Imagine, reading a serious post where a DUer offhandedly wondered why "ALL straight people love war, poverty, and have children that they refuse to take care of." The absurdity would be obvious and the post deleted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Didn't mean to imply that I thought that.
In this particular case, a gay leadership endorsement is being seen as representative of gay individuals' political leanings.

But the poster I responded to seemed to think all Obama supporters were going to start attacking gays because of this, which is ridiculous. I'd think you'd find their comment more offensive than mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Welcome to DOMA, and separate but equal.
Yay.


(fight my ass)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. It would have helped had he fleshed this part out a little:
>>“We are proud to endorse Senator Hillary Clinton in this important primary cycle,” said Matthew Woodcock, a spokesperson for the Liberty City group. “Her record of accomplishment is proof positive that she’ll be a fighter for the LGBT community in the White House and that’s what we need.”>>>

"Record of accomplishment" ? Specifics please.

"proof positive", etc. ? Sound like his evidentiary threshhold is a bit low...to put it mildly.

But maybe not; let's hear about that record of accomplishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yea, to be honest....I'm not sure what the record of
accomplishment is either, per se.

But one thing is clear in my opinion:

She'd be more trustworthy than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Based on what? Hillary and trustworthy don't belong in the same sentence.
Hillary is about as trustworthy as Richard Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. My point is I believe you're going to get what you get
with Hillary.

I'm not defending her as some great LGBT advocate.

But Obama, on the other hand, has already displayed he will throw gays under the proverbial bus if it's politically advantageous.

I believe he'd do it again in the White House, despite any of the promises and/or pledges he's made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. You forgot to add
"But I'm an Edwards supporter."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I know.....I keep forgetting so many people here keep
calling me a Hillary voter.

They're so wrong with their information, they'd be qualified to work for FOX News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. thx!
k&r!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well
As long as they endorse the democratic presidential nominee...I could give a shit who they endorse in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. The politically savvy always
tend to back her.

They recognize and empty suit when they see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. That's A Non Sequitur But I Think You Know That
Why would a savvy person back an incompetent person for any position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. This is a great boost for Hillary! The GLBT community knows who will work for them!
Hillary Clinton has always worked for human rights and the GLBT knows the difference between talk and action!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. A lot of us were heartbroken with President Clinton
And I have to admit, that's why I am hesitant to trust that Senator Clinton would do much for our community. We worked hard for Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996 on the hope that he would make good on his promises to the GLBT community. Most of his promises fell by the wayside after he was elected.

DOMA was mostly a republican effort, but "Don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue" was original with Bill Clinton. And after eight years in office, the quote that still haunts me is "I wish I could have done more."

I say good for Senator Clinton, and good for the Liberty City Democratic Club, but don't place bets on much positive coming out of this.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Actually, DADT was courtesy of Sam Nunn
It was a compromise between the overtly hostile environment in the military in the 80s (when I was serving) and the people who recognized that it really isn't impacting military readiness. At the time, it was, "I know the Israelis allow gays in their military, and they're one of the best fighting forces in the world, but we're more modeled on the British who don't allow it." Then when the British allowed open service, it was, "We're really not modeled on the British after all."

Through it all was the recurring theme of, "We can't use the military to perform social experiments." This in spite of the fact that racial integration of the military was a "social experiment" that was imposed before it was widespread in American society.

It's all a load of horse pucky that the bigots hide behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Good info on DADT, thanks
And I thought all long it was original with President Clinton. The DADT message is clear, though: If you want to serve your country, you had better do it in the closet or not do it at all.

I like Senator Clinton, but after President Clinton (whom I also like), I was tired of chasing carrots on a string.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I wasn't aware that Nunn had veto power he chose not to use
:wow: I learn things every day on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. On defense issue he pretty much did
also, the law needed changed to let gays in, not to keep gays out. Sodomy was a crime, and might still well be a crime, under the military code of justice, which is a congressionally passed set of laws. Clinton needed Congress, and thus Sam Nunn, to change the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. Someone else falling for the "fighter" lie.
Oh well. I respect their decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC