Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rev. Wright in a different light

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:24 AM
Original message
Rev. Wright in a different light
Rev. Wright in a different light

By William A. Von Hoene Jr.
March 26, 2008


-snip-
I have been a member of Trinity, a church with an almost entirely African-American congregation, for more than 25 years. I am, however, a white male. From a decidedly different perspective than most Trinitarians, I have heard Wright preach about racial inequality many times, in unvarnished and passionate terms.
-snip-

I do have a bit of personal context. About 26 years ago, I became engaged to my wife, an African-American. She was at that time and remains a member of Trinity. Somewhere between the ring and the altar, my wife had second thoughts and broke off the engagement. Her decision was grounded in race: So committed to black causes, the daughter of parents subjected to unthinkable prejudice over the years, an "up-and-coming" leader in the young black community, how could she marry a white man?

Rev. Wright, whom I had met only in passing at the time and who was equally if not more outspoken about "black" issues than he is today, somehow found out about my wife's decision. He called and asked her to "drop everything" and meet with him at Trinity. He spent four hours explaining his reaction to her decision. Racial divisions were unacceptable, he said, no matter how great or prolonged the pain that caused them. God would not want us to assess or make decisions about people based on race. The world could make progress on issues of race only if people were prepared to break down barriers that were much easier to let stand.

Rev. Wright was pretty persuasive; he presided over our wedding a few months later. In the years since, I have watched in utter awe as Wright has overseen and constructed a support system for thousands in need on the South Side that is far more impressive and effective than any governmental program possibly could approach. And never in my life have I been welcomed more warmly and sincerely than at Trinity. Never.
-snip-

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-oped0326trinitymar26,0,2414760.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Terrific story!
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for this post, wndycty. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for posting this (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Big time Obama donor trotted out to rehabilitate Pastor "US of KKK-As" Wright image.
Don't you guys have Google?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Its good your here though to remind us of wrights quotes like that...
makes hillary look great! It really does help put wrights words in context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you! Nice story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why all the anti Jew and anti Israel hate from this pastor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. We can all agree that Pastor Wright has distorted views on Israel and the U.S.
On that, we can all agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. What exactly did he say that was anti-jewish? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I don't know that Pastor Wright has said anything bad about Jews, but the fact that...
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 08:17 AM by The Night Owl
...he doesn't consider Israel to be a state indicates to me that he is probably a raging antisemite. And, I would really like to know what he meant when he said that Israel is a dirty word. Of course, because Wright is dodging reporters, no one can get anything out of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Oh please...
There's a huge fucking difference between being anti-Israel and anti-Jew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Hatred of Israel is often the refuge of closeted antisemites. {EOM}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #26
40. And it often has to do with their treatment of Palestinians
I'd say that rightly or wrongly, a lot of anti-Israeli sentiment has to do with their sudden imposition into the Middle East, and their subsequent treatment of Palestinians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
42. accusing people who hate the policys of israel of being anti -semites...
is often the refuge of closeted anti-semites. Although the semites in question now would be the palestinians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #42
52. True. {EOM}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
47. BULLSHIT!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneofthepeople Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
68. No, hatred is just ignorance
Disagreement with Israel's methods is just that disagreement.

Closeted antisemites? Back to ignorance in statement and deed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #68
70. Hatred is sometimes the result of ignorance, but it is more often the result of...
irrationality and/or psychological problems. One can present an antisemite with as much truth and knowledge as can be mustered and that person will probably still cling to his or her hatred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. maybe hes one of those people who thinks it sucks israeli independence and security...
from further genocide came at the cost of palestinians. Kinda sucks from the palestinian point of view, no?

Rest of the world to palestine, 1948: Ya, um, we cant seem to stop killing jewish people, and we sure as hell dont want too many of them in our countries, so, HERE YA GO! (rest of the world runs away...).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iiibbb Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #21
58. I thought that it was a sudden event as well...
... then I married a Jew.

The history of the Diaspora and their repatriation in Israel is a long one. 1948 was when the British gave up trying to control it, but Jews had been moving back to Israel since the 12th century and in earnest in 1881. Prior to WW2 Jews were 1/3rd of the population of Palistine.

Jews and Palestinians have been arguing/warring for almost since WW1.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. im not arguing jewish people wanted an israeli homeland for a long time...
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 09:12 AM by george_maniakes
im arguing in 1948 that homeland came at the expense of quite a few palestinians, and one of the undeniable reasons that state got the blessing of the rest of the world was because jewish people just went through a holocaust. So germans murdered millions of jews, and who lost their homes, palestinians? How is that fair in the eyes of a palestinian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
39. do you know what "Semite" means? through ignorance this has been twisted into a smear
Especially considering that we are all related.

Origin
The term Semite means a member of any of various ancient and modern peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, Arabs, and Ethiopian Semites. It was proposed at first to refer to the languages related to Hebrew by Ludwig Schlözer, in Eichhorn's "Repertorium", vol. VIII (Leipzig, 1781), p. 161. Through Eichhorn the name then came into general usage (cf. his "Einleitung in das Alte Testament" (Leipzig, 1787), I, p. 45. In his "Gesch. der neuen Sprachenkunde", pt. I (Göttingen, 1807) it had already become a fixed technical term. (The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume XIII)

The word "Semitic" is an adjective derived from Shem, one of the three sons of Noah in the Bible (Genesis 5.32, 6.10, 10.21), or more precisely from the Greek derivative of that name, namely Σημ (Sēm); the noun form referring to a person is Semite. In modern English the negative form of the adjective, anti-Semitic, is almost always used to mean "anti-Jewish" specifically.

The concept of "Semitic" peoples is derived from Biblical accounts of the origins of the cultures known to the ancient Hebrews. Those closest to them in culture and language were generally deemed to be descended from their forefather Shem. Enemies were often said to be descendants of his cursed nephew, Canaan. In Genesis 10:21-31, Shem is described as the father of Aram, Asshur, and Arpachshad: the Biblical ancestors of the Arabs, Aramaeans, Assyrians, Babylonians, Chaldeans, Sabaeans, and Hebrews, etc., all of whose languages are closely related; the language family containing them was therefore named Semitic by linguists. However, the Canaanites and Amorites also spoke a language belonging to this family, and are therefore also termed Semitic in linguistics, despite being described in Genesis as sons of Ham (See Sons of Noah). Shem is also described in Genesis as the father of Elam and Lud, although the Elamites and Lydians usually thought to descend from these spoke languages that were not Semitic.

The hypothetical Proto-Semitic language, ancestral to historical Semitic languages in the Middle East, is thought to have been originally from either the Arabian Peninsula (particularly around Yemen) or the adjacent Ethiopian highlands, but its region of origin is still much debated and uncertain. The Semitic language family is also considered a component of the larger Afro-Asiatic macro-family of languages. Identification of the hypothetical proto-Semitic region of origin is therefore dependent on the larger geographic distributions of the other language families within Afro-Asiatic.

Ancient Semitic peoples
The following is a list of ancient Semitic peoples.

Akkadians — appear 4th millennium BC and amalgamate with non-Semitic Mesopotamian (Sumerian) populations into the Assyrians and Babylonians of the late Bronze Age.<1><2>
Assyrians (Aššūrāyu) — 27th century BC,<3> amalgamate with Babylonians and Aramaeans,<4> during Neo-Assyrian period, the remnants of which became the modern Assyrian people.<5>
Babylonians — 18th century BC
Chaldeans (Kaldu) — 8th to 6th c. BC.<6><7>
Eblaites — 23rd century BC
Akhlames 14th century<8>
Aramaeans — 16th to 8th century BC<9><10>
Ugarites, 14th to 12th centuries BC
Canaanite language speaking nations of the early Iron Age:
Amorites
Ammonites
Edomites
Hebrews — founded the kingdom of Israel and Judah, the remnants of which became the Jews
Moabites
Phoenicians — founded Mediterranean colonies including Carthage
Old South Arabian speaking peoples
Sabaeans of Yemen — 9th to 1st c. BC
Ethio-Semitic speaking peoples
Agazi (Ge'ez speaking people) — 9th c. BC to 7th c. AD
Aksumites — 4th c. BC to 7th c. AD
Arabs, Old North Arabian speaking Bedouins
Gindibu's Arabs 9th c. BC
Lihyanites — 6th to 1st c. BC
Thamud people — 2nd to 5th c. AD
Ghassanids — 3rd to 7th c. AD
Nabataeans — adopted Arabic in the 4th century AD

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #39
48. What makes you think I don't know what a Semite is?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Your accusations are vile and disgusting
This man has been smeared in the most morally reprehensible ways imaginable. When one set of vile lies and slander have been disproved you start up with a new set. I can't help but feel that you may have some racial motives behind your attack.l
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. Ben David, are you loyalties with the USA or with Israel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. is that really a fair question?
obama could have a soft spot for kenya but still be a patriotic american.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. It's a hell of a lot more fair that judging an AMERICAN's
attitude to another Country. As an American I find it repugnant that ANY candidate would be judged on how it would help another Country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
41. but the US sends Billions each year to Israel for military purpose
and then it gets recycled into the pockets of the wealthy
military contractor pockes.

Many countries do not allow foreign countries to lobby their
government like we allow in our country.

Why do you think we're so screwed up?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #41
45. Yeah that's pretty much it
Don't forget they are number one in foreign aid, as well. So they take our own money to lobby for yet more money. If you combine the military and direct money aid, it wouldn't shock me to see we spend more per capita on Israeli citizens than we do US citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. LOL! I love how some DUers magically transform into Lee Greenwood when anyone expresses...
...love or support for Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Another poster who puts Israel ahead of the US
It's disgraceful to see Americans willing to sacrifice our nation for the good of another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #34
56. You don't think I can love the US and other countries equally and at the same time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. It's impossible to EQUALLY love two different Countries
Eventually their self interests differ and one is forced to pick one or the other. The question is, which one would that be????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. Another poster who puts Israel ahead of the US
It's disgraceful to see Americans willing to sacrifice our nation for the good of another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #30
43. come on, i dont want to google lee greenwood. Just tell me what you mean. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
38.  Obama: Pastor has 'distorted' views on U.S., Israel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #38
46. newsflash: obama's viewpoint is not neccessarily everyone elses.
is that how the hillary campaign works? She believes something so by default you believe that too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. I make the point to illustate how easily DUbamas can be led to argue against their leader.
It's not really such a dificult trick, since so few DUbamas know where Obama stands on any issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. Thats hillarious! you think your leading me into disagreeing with obama?
you really are full of yourself arent you?

1. newsflash: not marching lockstep with your candidate is a GOOD thing.

2. for Gods sake tell me you dont agree with hilary on everything, otherwise you really are a nut.

3. the only trick your pulling is showing how you think disagreeing with your candidate on an issue is a BAD thing. What does that say about you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Some of the most hateful churches in America are welcoming.
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 07:54 AM by The Night Owl
Churches usually want new members because new members means money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Another post from someone who has probably never set foot in that church
It's easy to label a church as "hateful" when your only knowledge of that church is what is portrayed about it in the media, isn't it?

Nevermind all of the first-hand accounts that have been pouring out from people who actually attend the church. Instead, keep paying attention to what the media tells you. Keep letting talk-show hosts form your opinion for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. So, by your logic: You can't hate the Klan unless you've been to a rally?
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 08:10 AM by MethuenProgressive
So, you must not hate the Klan, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. That's bullshit logic
Last time I heard, Rev. Wright's church had never been connected with any acts of violence or intimidation.

You also completely dismiss any and all of the reports coming out from church members who portray Rev. Wright in a different manner. Since these reports don't fit the small handful of clips that you've seen on YouTube, you simply cast them aside.

Sorry, your response holds no merit whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. You can call your bullshit logic by any name you choose to.
Except "logic" really. Your thinking on this bears no resemblance to logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
44. It is bullshit logic, and anyone here can plainly see that - except for you
You're trying to compare Rev. Wright's church to the KKK? Nice try.

One has a proven history of murder, torture, rape, vandalism, racial intimidation, and voter suppression.

The other occasionally has occasional sermons that YOU find hateful, although by many accounts, even these sermons make up only a tiny percentage.

I'll let you try and figure out which one is the KKK, and which one is Rev. Wright's church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #44
66. All I see of whom you're responding to is ignored.
I have a very limited ignored list... This one I'm sure is well deserving ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Same here, I wish I could see what was going on. . .
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashrob123 Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Churches usually want
loyal tithing members because they are the backbone of a strong congregation. New members rarely give enough offerings to hold the church together. Is it painful to be this hateful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. so are you calling this church one of the most hateful in america? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. I think that most of the people who attend TUCC are probably good and decent people, but...
...I am convinced that Pastor Wright is a hateful individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Can i ask what your basing your conviction that wright is a hateful individual?
I mean i could tell hitler was a hateful individual and i never met the man, but what words did wright speak that convinces you he is a man who regularly spread hate?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Pastor Wright's comments about Israel and 9/11. {EOM}


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #36
49. As in what, american forein policy is partly responsible for anti-american extremism...
in the world? Those comments? And what did he say about israel, you'll have to enlighten men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #36
50. Most of what Rev. Wright has said about 9/11 has been echoed here on DU for years
Funny how before, such attitudes were accepted here on DU, but now that a Hillary opponent says it, it's suddenly hateful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. What happened today with Wright????
MSNBC is talking about Wright wrote an article in Trumpet Magazine, ran by TUCC, something about white people running the country and italians, not sure what he said about italians. I missed that. I wasn't paying close attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. he said italians ( as in roman empire) didnt like jesus once upon a time...
and they had garlic noses...i dont even know what that means. Is that an insult?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Insult? Garlic Noses? What if he said something similar about Asians or...
...a white pastor said something similar about African-Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. I dont know, is calling a roman occupying force in the holy land from 2000 years ago...
"garlic noses" an insult? Maybe 2000 years from now, iraqi's will be talking about those americans "looking down there (insert condiment or herb here) noses"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #25
53. I know! We'll be known as the latte-drinkers!
And if someone refers to us as latte-drinkers, then we can label them RACIST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. So the quote would be " the americans for the most part looked down their coffee drinking noses"
...doesnt have the same punch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #55
60. The correct quote is "latte-drinking, Prius-driving, Birkenstock-wearing, trust fund babies"
You see, making sweeping statements like that is okay when Hillary supporters do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is a great story and needs to be spread
This why it's a bad idea to believe anything that comes from the right wing lie machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. nomad, I have no idea what the right wing has to do with it.
MSNBC said it was in Trumpet Magazine, a newsletter ran by Wright and TUCC. That said, italians have garlic noses, well, that is kinda true, LOL They do have pudgy noses. I think it's just a trait in the genes. Nothing personal to any italian on GD-P. However, if Wright said that, it is funny. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. The right wing smear machine
grabbed hold of the Wright "story" like a pit bull on a T-Bone. With out it, the story had no legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
59. So it's OK to marry a white person, but if you vote for Hillary Clinton you are betraying your race
because "Hillary ain't never been called a n****r" whereas "Barack knows what it means living in a country and a culture that is controlled by rich white people."

Got hope? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. Yes, that's exactly what it means
You forgot the part about where we're all sexist pigs if we don't vote for Hillary.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
63. Wright is still the story because
they have nothing else. If they had anything, and I mean any other substantial "dirt" about Obama, we all know they'd be using it. All this hype over NOTHING gives me confidence that I am indeed supporting a candidate with integrity. It's so exciting because so few politicians ever display this quality. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
64. nice try, wndy. don't you wish we could bus these guys to chgo?
let them see what it is like here. imperfect, sure, but miles and miles down the road of racial tolerance and equality.
sigh, but these people are nuts. i suspect they wouldn't recognize it on their doorsteps.
it's gonna be a long haul to PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #64
65. Yes it is
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
69. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC