Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tom Toles: Hillary was correct about the sniper fire.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:23 PM
Original message
Tom Toles: Hillary was correct about the sniper fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ha!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Heh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I guess she never said the fire was incoming...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. HILLARIOUS.... but I did notice something that I bet the Hillfolk won't like besides the message
(I feel the need to preface this by saying I am very much for Obama and I do not care in the least for Hillary.)

How come the cartoon has Hillary as fat and squat? I mean if the artist drew all people as fat or squat (think Dilbert, Ziggy, Lil'Bush), I'd say that's just his drawing style. But Obama is clearly drawn with relatively realistic proportions. Silly ears, but within the ballpark of realism.

Evidence of sexism comes in subtleties, not overt messaging and maybe this qualifies. Consider: What's the "worst" thing in the world for a woman to be? Fat and ugly. Being "unattractive" to men in society makes you practically irrelevant. The butt of endless jokes. Disregarded. Discarded.

The term "sexist" has been WAY WAY WAY over used and falsely used in this campaign. But I can see how some would claim sexism on this one. It was an extra dig at her that didn't need to be there. She's not fat or ugly, so why depict her as such?

The cartoon would have been just as funny, if not funnier, if Clinton actually looked like Clinton instead of a sumo wrestler in a wig. And no one would be able to cry sexism and have a leg to stand on.

Anyone else feel me? Or have the constant claims of sexism warped my fragile little mind? Am i reading too much into a silly cartoon? All are viable possibilities at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC