Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Senator Obama said no. He basically turned his back..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:55 PM
Original message
"Senator Obama said no. He basically turned his back..."
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 05:02 PM by redqueen
From Hillary's interview with Greta last night.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,342151,00.html


We wanted to go ahead and let the people actually exercise their franchise, one of the most precious rights we have in our country. Senator Obama said no. He basically turned his back — I mean, here is somebody, you know, who runs a campaign about empowerment and all of that.

Well, hello, what about giving the people in Michigan a chance to have their voices and votes heard? Nobody knows how it would turn out. We know he has got a lot of resources. He could run a very vigorous campaign. But he doesn't want to give the people in Michigan that chance.

Similarly, we have been trying to support what is going on in Florida, because the people there want their voices and votes to be heard. And again, you know, Senator Obama doesn't want to support that.

But Michigan is really the clearest example of getting right up to the brink of doing the right thing and having Senator Obama say, no, I won't do it.



The part in bold was said with that snide, mocking tone she uses so often against Obama. I wish she'd use it more often against McCain.


Is this characterization honest? Is it all Obama's fault that the revotes aren't going to happen. I think not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where did you get that crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Transcript of her interview with Greta:
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 04:59 PM by redqueen
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,342151,00.html


There are links to the video around, if you'd like to hear her snide, mocking tone for yourself.

I find it so uplifting. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
40. I hope you showered afterwards!!! And thanks for taking one for the, ah, team...
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 05:36 PM by here_is_to_hope
Luv ya!:hi: :hi: :hi:

edited because I had the "eeeuuuwwwssss"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:59 PM
Original message
Fox news interview.
with Gretta van whatsherface
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. from her shameful interview on FAUX last night
She was on Greta's show. The video is on the board somewhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
53. Obama did Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. She's a Psycopathic Carney Sheister..( heard it on Schultz.. it fits)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
44. You are Epic Fail
Here is your present:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. I agree. Hillary has failed epically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. I'm not talking about Hillary
I'm talking about YOU.

YOU are EPIC FAIL with the kind of divisiveness, rancor, and disunity you spread with your posts. Again, here you go:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. She said it on Fox, to Greta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. The Op should add that, it's sort of misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. How is it misleading?
:shrug:

Added ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Thanks
until you read through the whole thing you don't realize that it was a quote from Hillary, it appears that it's coming from Greta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Oh, I see.
Hah... if only it was. Unfortunately...

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama should bless a primary where he wasn't even on the ballot.
Sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's called following the rules. Oh yea...
never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. As if you care,there was no rule against being on the ballot.
AND Obama and Edwards made a POLITICAL choice to REMOVE their names from the ballot. They did this to avoid the "appearance" of a Clinton victory in MI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Nothing wrong with that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Yes, they were faithful to their party. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. bull...

Kucinich Files Affidavit To Remove Name From Michigan's Primary Shortly Before Deadline

October 10, 2007 8:19 a.m. EST
Ayinde O. Chase - AHN Staff
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7008781843
Dover, NH (AHN) - The Kucinich for President campaign Tuesday afternoon officially requested that Kucinich's name be withdrawn from the Michigan Democratic primary ballot. The affidavit came by way of to the Michigan Secretary of State's office.

The Ohio Congressman and Democratic Presidential candidates National Campaign manager Mike Klein said in the statement, "We signed a public pledge recently, promising to stand with New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina, and the DNC-approved 'early window', and the action we are taking today protects New Hampshire's first-in-the-nation primary status, and Nevada's early caucus."

The statement continued: "We support the grassroots nature of the New Hampshire, small-state primary, and we support the diversity efforts that Chairman Dean and the DNC instituted last year, when they added Nevada and South Carolina to the window in January 2008. We are obviously committed to New Hampshire's historic role." Klein who actually recently moved to Dover said, "We will continue to adhere to the DNC-approved primary schedule."

Governor Granholm and other Michigan Democratic leaders have openly criticized the decision by several presidential candidates to keep their names off the state primary ballot.

The Michigan lawmakers are taken back by Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John Edwards and Bill Richardson's decision to withdraw their names from the January 15th ballot.

The only ones who remain on Michigan's primary ballot are Hillary Clinton, Mike Gravel and Chris Todd.
-----------------------------
The DNC has threatened to punish states that break tradition and the rules by challenging Iowa and New Hampshire as first to pic. The committee has threatened to unseat the delegates of states that go ahead defy the primary rules set by the party





Editorial: Follow DNC rules on seating delegates
February 25, 2008
By Editorial Board

On September 1, the campaigns of Clinton and Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.) issued press releases stating that they had signed pledges affirming the DNC’s decision to approve certain representative states and sanction others for moving their nominating contests earlier. But now that the race is close, Clinton — whose top advisor Harold Ickes voted as a member of the DNC to strip Florida and Michigan of their delegates — is pushing for the delegates to be seated.


Her argument is that not doing so disenfranchises the 1.7 million Florida Democrats who voted and that her pledge promised only that she wouldn’t campaign in the states, not that she wouldn’t try to seat the delegates. However, the results of the contests in Florida and Michigan are not necessarily representative of the voters’ preferences in those states. Given that most of the candidates removed their names from the Michigan ballot, and that many voters stayed home from the vote in Florida with the understanding that their contest would not affect the final delegate count, the delegate totals that the candidates accumulated in these states may not accurately reflect the will of the voters. Had there been no restrictions in Michigan and Florida, the turnout, and thus the results, may have been different.

The Four State Pledge all candidates signed on Aug. 28 stated, “Whereas, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee will strip states of 100% of their delegates and super delegates to the DNC National Convention if they violate the nomination calendar... Therefore, I ____________, Democratic Candidate for President, in honor and in accordance with DNC rules ...pledge I shall not campaign or participate in any election contest occurring in any state not already authorized by the DNC to take place in the DNC approved pre-window.” When the candidates pledged to campaign only in approved states, they were also agreeing to the terms listed above, which explicitly mentioned stripping noncompliant states of their entire delegation.


http://daily.stanford.edu/article/2008/2/25/editorialFollowDncRulesOnSeatingDelegates



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
45. The rule was to not "campaign or participate"
In order to follow the rules, Obama and others took their names off the ballot. It is hard to believe someone who pledges not to campaign or participate in an election, then leaves their name on the ballot anyway. And claims victory afterwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. PSTD can come back, years after major combat experience
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abacus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. lmao
The chastity belt is a nice touch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about we just follow
the agreement She made with the rest of the cantidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Who said this?! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Hillary Clinton
said it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. You know...
I didnt want to assume she said it because I try to give her the benefit of the doubt. And I thought this sounded like a low blow, even for her.

Goes to show what I know. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Someone who is Desperate?
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 05:02 PM by billybob537
Got any clues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. She's barely better than McCain
Maybe she'll finally go Independent and join Lieberman for a 3rd Party run in 2012. She's quite a "Fox".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
51. She's worse
At least McCain admits he's the enemy. As long as Hillary walks around with 'D' after her name, she seems to think she has a free pass to be as appalling as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. If I were Obama I'd do exactly what he's doing. Likewise for Clinton...
though if I were Clinton I might recognize that I'm beating a dead horse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I object to her characterizing this situation as all Obama's fault.
From what I recall, Obama was fine with MI's first plan - which was to hold a caucus. At that time it was SHE who was standing in the way, and saying, "No, I don't want the people of MI to be heard."

Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. No doubt it's a load of crap, but few people really gives a shit what she
has to say about it. But if I were in a political race like this it would be tempting fodder. I can't say I wouldn't give it a go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. Getting all pop-eyed
about the disenfranchised in FLA and MI and in the very next breath... reminding us that pledged delegates aren't bound to their pledged votes.

I would think she'd at try to insert some distance between the two statements, so the jarring dissonance wouldn't be so crashingly obvious. Like, in a different interview. In another state. On a different date. In another election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Yes, that's another thing... the sheer LUNACY of her 'argument'.
Yes, forcing MI and FL to abide by the rules they agreed to - that's disenfranchising.

But pressuring delegates to forget what the voters said and vote for her instead - that's... not?

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTam Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
42. I would like to see some proof
I would like to see where you get your info on her reminding us that pledged delegates arn't bound to their pledged votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Are you freaking kidding?
She's been saying it for weeks now!

That's what her fatcat donors threatened Pelosi for... for not backing up her divisive talk of disenfranchising voters via flipping delegates!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Don't know why I'm bothering
but it's only the source of this thread's topic:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JofnY6xue8s

And as redqueen says, this isn't the first time, it's been one of the latest themes in her Calvinball campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. So, what did Obama really say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Clinton really said she "wouldn't accept" a caucus in MI. That was their first plan.
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 05:14 PM by redqueen
I guess when she has problems with a proposal to revote, that's different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Why does she say Obama said no? What did Obama really say about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. IIRC, he said he had concerns about a privately-financed revote.
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 05:33 PM by redqueen
And that the DOJ would have to have a look at the plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. The states are broke HRC is talking as if Obama runs both states it is the most outrageous BS so far
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. Clinton doesn't give a crap about the people of Michigan.
She is just grasping at any straw in an attempt to get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
31. That video was posted. A real look at the nasty Hillary behind the public facade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. She's despicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
36. Was it Obama's interview?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Did Hillary compromise over the states?
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 05:35 PM by Life Long Dem
On the voting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. I'll give ya three guesses, and the first two don't count.
Hint: She said she wouldn't accept a caucus, after MI submitted it's first proposal to do just that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
47. The problem in MI and FL is the fault of
the state parties. Period. If they want their delegates seated, come up with a way to do it that conforms to the rules of the national party. That's not Obama's job, and it's not Howard Dean's job. It's the job of the state parties. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
48. Hillary Clinton: Desperately pushing for votes that...
... will be overwritten by Superdelegates.

Way to empower the people, Hil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
49. Of course it is not true
Obama is not responsible for that mess - take your choice and blame Fl and MI or Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
50. HRC has no problem with Obama basing his campiagn on empowerment...
...as long as she's the one being empowered. This quote by Orwell particularly apropos.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC