Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING - AP: Obama would have LEFT if Wright stayed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:22 PM
Original message
BREAKING - AP: Obama would have LEFT if Wright stayed
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 09:27 PM by Skip Intro
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080328/ap_on_el_pr/obama_wright


WASHINGTON - White House hopeful Barack Obama suggests he would have left his Chicago church had his longtime pastor, whose fiery anti-American comments about U.S. foreign policy and race relations threatened Obama's campaign, not stepped down.


"Had the reverend not retired, and had he not acknowledged that what he had said had deeply offended people and were inappropriate and mischaracterized what I believe is the greatness of this country, for all its flaws, then I wouldn't have felt comfortable staying at the church," Obama said Thursday during a taping of the ABC talk show, "The View." The interview will be broadcast Friday.

In his sermons over the years, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright has railed against the United States and accused it of bringing on the Sept. 11 attacks by spreading terrorism. He also has said the government invented AIDS to destroy "people of color" and has shouted "God damn America" for its treatment of minorities.
-------------------------------------

When Hillary said she'd have walked out, she was chastized here big time. Now Obama has said the same. It only took him twenty years.

I'm curious what all the Obama-supporters who damned Hillary for her comments now think that the chosen one has echoed those remarks.

And how does this fit in with his speech last week saying he could no more disown his preacher than his white grandmother. Hey grandma, make room under that bus for the good reverend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama does nothing but lie, day and night. He attended that church, by choice, for 20 years (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Middle finga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:25 PM
Original message
So did he have some epiphany after twenty years? Or is he just another politician in shiny new paper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
32. !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
42. He must have decided Wright is not advantageous to his career anymore..
It took a presidential primary to jog his conscience. What about his children's exposure to the HATEFUL comments made by Wright? How is he going to fix that? BAD JUDGMENT! All the way around. Obama is a disgrace to the nomination process and to our country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #42
53. HATEFUL -- that really IS dramatic!!!11!!! As is BAD JUDGMENT!
I'm converted. Fuck Barack. Go Hillary!11!!1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #42
105. And did Hilly stand by her man Billy to help her career even though he adulterized repeatedly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #105
141. Is, 'Hillary,' the only defense Obama supporters can ever come up with for Obama??
And they wonder why he is seen as an empty suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #105
163. At least she can keep a vow and promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #42
123. Taking Shots From Imaginary Bullets In Bosnia
how's that working out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #123
142. Has nothing to do with the subject at hand...
Your avoiding the issue by trying to change the subject
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
135. I vote "just another politician in shiny new paper." Oh and a liar too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:21 PM
Original message
Well-said.
Come on - NO ONE would tell me to completely reject my pastor and leave my church. Those that keep this ridiculousness going - the attack on Rev. Wright - have NO credibility with me, particularly in light of my many years of research on the very dangerous religious right, with whom Hillary has an intimate association (a much more serious matter than Rev. Wright's talks).

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/09/hillarys-prayer.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Where does he find time to eat and sleep amidst all that lying?
Sounds grueling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Middle finga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Like Hillary don't lie, give me a break
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
45. perhaps I should have included this
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
124. Maybe He Was Sleep Deprived
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 01:02 AM by otohara
sound familiar? :sarcasm:

Or maybe he was stoned! :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Ahh.. this coming from a person supporting the candidate who
claims to have "taken fire" a few years ago.

Pot, meet kettle? I suppose it's OK to "lie" when it comes to completely making up scenarios to inflate your "status" on the campaign trail, but to say what you might or might not have done in a situation like Obama's is an OUTRIGHT LIE? One that obviously can't be proven either way, because the reverend DID retire.

Yeah.. Obama is obviously the biggest offender here. :eyes:

Seriously.. if you're going to rant about a candidate "lying".. let's go ahead and examine yours first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
73. I've examined her. She misspoke. End of story (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #73
121. 4 times? About a traumatic, violent-sounding experience?
That's not a slip of the tongue. That's a LIE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
138. Trying to change the subject?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #138
143. Nope.. staying precisely on point..
The OP was about candidates who lie. I pointed out that Obama didn't lie - he said what he would do in a certain situation that will never occur. Clinton DID lie.. she said what happened in a situation that DID occur, but what she said didn't actually happen at all.

That's not a mis-speak.. that's a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Do you have sermons from the last 20 years?
Or just he one's from last year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. But you don't know that this was a regular thing at that church for 20 years
If it happened a couple times in 20 years I wouldn't call it a pattern and no I don't assume that it was happening most of the time since so far we can only come up with a few examples, and of those examples only one was perhaps racist or prejudice.

The news media investigated this church and said they found no evidence that the church was a racist organization. The church has members of all races, you think they are all subscribing to a racist message? I doubt that.

Anyway, you can believe what you choose, for me and many others, changing our minds will take evidence and what there is does not represent 20 years of racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Yawwwnnnnnn
Duckkkkk
Sniper fire coming your way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
70. Pretty funny coming from a SLICK HILLY fan. Try looking at CONTEXT here before judging.
If he was asked something like, "Having now heard these controversial statements, and if Rev. Wright was still the church pastor, would you remain with the church?" You see, we are talking about time juncture issues here and a progression of events LONG after the time he first joined the church some two decades ago.
You must ALWAYS look at the context of the statement and just how the question was asked. With the qualifiers and considering the timing, I don't see a whole lot inconsistent here. Obama has already repeatedly said that GIVEN that Wright has now retired from the church and that there is a NEW pastor, he has chosen to maintain his affiliation with it. And he has ALREADY taken Wright off of his role in the campaign. Is that inconsistent with anything?? NO ! THAT is NOT inconsistent. OBVIOUSLY, given the nature of some of these controversial statements and the flap it has caused, Obama as a presidential candidate and potential POTUS could not stay in the church unless the conditions Obama stated were met. He was being very honest, realistic, fair, and consistent here. In fact, ANY such candidate would have said the same thing being honest. It doesn't mean he would be disowning the man. It would mean he would be removing himself and his candidacy from such a controversy, much as he has already done by denouncing the statements and taking Wright off the campaign. (As to those who keep talking about 20 years, that's exactly right. Obama became involved in the church 20 years ago. This was a personal relationship he had with both church and pastor. Hillary stayed with Bill even though he aldulterized repeatedly. On both accounts, we can't go back decades and second guess the nature of these very personal and complex relationships.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #70
147. That may all be true.
But politically speaking, it was still a stupid thing to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
75. Everytime he hits a bump in the road he has to go back and
do his twisting and turning act. I first noticed it in SC. Michelle is on tape with her little snippet, how's he going to explain that away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #75
85. Gee, how does SLICK HILLY explain away her being in combat in Bosnia??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
145. It is good he attended it, Wright is a free thinker who disliked United
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 08:33 AM by harun
States foreign policy. Don't most of us here on DU have at least a few issues with it as well?

Would you rather they talk about genociding the non-believers or world domination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indio55555 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
152. Stop it.
You are liar. See you lied about saying Barak lied.

Yes he attended church by choice same as your choice. But consider this for the 20 years he's been there (631,138,520 seconds) you can only provide a 90 second video footage? Most of Wrights stuff was video taped, so don't bring up that this was the only DVD.

I bet your priest, pastor had a brain fart in his life also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL
but... but... I thought Wright never said anything wrong or offensive. I thought he told the truth that needed to be told!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You haven't been paying attention, have you?
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. His supporters here have been saying that
for a long time now.

So who's wrong now? Obama or his supporters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Obama has steadfastly condemned the most controversial remarks.
Not sure which Obama supporters you are talking about but, personally, I tend to agree with Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. And that's exactly how he characterized them, the "controversial" remarks
Didn't mention any of them by name. Only condemed the ones that became "controversial."

Is that a man of character or a politician saying he's against things that people find offensive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
47. What exactly are you worried about?
That Obama will win the Presidency and round up white people into camps? That he will fund experiments to inject white people with syphilis?

Maybe he will start a war with the garlic noses in Italy?

Seriously, if you never ever heard of Wright, would it even ever have crossed your mind that Obama is a 'racist'? Has he ever uttered once sentence, one offhand comment that made you think he was planning to supplant Congress with the Black Panthers?

The man is half white. DO you really think he sat though 20 years of sermons every single Sunday just like the one or two YOU have been exposed to?

And if he has, why don't you voice your fears? What EXACTLY are you worried about here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #47
164. Obama is not a racist.
He uses other's racism as a tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
52. so what are you saying?
that every sermon the Reverend gave over 30+ years was controversial. Or, even the sermon those excerpts were taken from. Did you find that sermon controversial? Or just those few statements that have been played ad nauseam for the last few weeks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
118. Hey Skip Intro
I see a lot of opinion and spin, but what exactly can you point to that says Obama doesn't have more character in his little finger than the sleazy-queasy Clintons have in their entire pus-bloated bodies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
50. who is wrong?
Obama has stated from the beginning of this manufactured outrage, that he strongly disagreed with the language heard on that tape. Now he is saying that if he had been present at the time the words were said he would have left. What's the problem? Now me? I have no problem with the words the Reverend said, so I wouldn't have to leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
95. Anybody who doesn't love Pastor Wright has an agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. I didn't know that he "acknowledged" anything....is that tape on YOUTUBE? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemzRock Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ok, now that REALLY does sound like a lie.
He would have left his mentor? Yeah, right.

As I keep saying, all pols incl. Obama are liars.

I think Hillary's Bosnia lie was a much dumber one though.

Oh, well, liars or not, they're both better than McCain who tells the truth when he says he wants to stay in Iraq for 100 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
54. Read the words as they appear on the page...
Obama strongly disagreed with the statements that were excerpted from a sermon the Preacher gave. Had he been in the Church at the time the Preacher made those statements he would have left. Got it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. He said that a week ago, in his blog post
And what we were upset about was Clinton going out of her way to bring it up and keep it in the news when it was finally starting to subside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Hillary's followers get all Pavlovian at the mere mention of the Pastor.
Lap it up like little puppy doggies. That thin gruel is all they have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. She was asked about it in an interview
How is that "going out of her way" to bring it up?

And why is Clinton obligated to help quell Obama's PR problems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. McCain didn't have a problem doing so
Even fired a staffer over bringing it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. wrong
he suspended (not fired) a staffer for pushing a very racially-charged video, not for bringing up Wright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. He has also meticulously avoided all questions about it
And made it quite clear he has no intention of going there.

She didn't.

As for the staffer, semantics. McCain made it clear he wasn't going there, not that he was going to go a little there but not that much (if that makes sense).

While she tried to take the high road for a couple of weeks, when it was obvious Obama wasn't taking the hit she hoped for and her Bosnia fiasco reached the airwaves she didn't extend the same courtesy as a friggin Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. it's not her responsibility
to help Obama dig himself out of his PR messes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #46
84. Nor is it proper for a fellow Democrat
To throw more dirt in the hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #84
111. They're running against each other.
What don't you understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #111
120. I understand the point is to put a Dem in the White House
And one candidate is hopelessly behind. Having the candidate with the extremely remote chance of winning tar and feathering the candidate who is by far the most likely nominee is fucking stupid.

Not kind of stupid. Not medium stupid. Totally fucking stupid.

What part of that are you not getting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #120
126. "tar and feathering"
by saying Wright wouldn't be her pastor?

You guys are too sensitive for politics. I suggest crocheting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. democrattotheend you are a liar, Hillary did not go out of her way to bring it up.
She was asked the question many times over the week and then 2 days ago she was asked again and so she answered. Try to spin your way out of this by making terrible excuses to justify your vile hatred towards Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
36. She didn't
was asked a direct question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. She'd been asked the same question for a week. She chose to answer for the first time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #49
56. and she answered with the mildest of answers
but you guys wouldn't be satisfied unless she said "I support Rev. Wright. In fact, later today, I'm joining his church, and I promise to make Rev. Wright my Secretary of Goodness when I'm elected."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
140. Going out of her way to bring it up????
She ANSWERED A QUESTION!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well then I will never vote for Rev. Jeremiah Wright
Wright is not running .... Obama is. Now team Hillary
is hooked into Fox, Rush, and Ricahrd Mellon Scaife in
trying to make Wright the issue.


Give it up .... hillary is toast .... she is the red headed
step child on the rented mule .... the Washington Generals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. This story is almost dead, Another week or so.. enjoy it while you can and be sure to watch out for
SNIPERS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. And watch out for "goat herders."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here's the difference: Obama is talking about HIS church
Hillary should have kept her mouth shut.

By the way, has Obama personally commented on Hallucinationary's sniper fanstasy? No. And he has been asked.

One candidate tries to stay above the fray, the other is rated 37% positive and 48% negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. How did he disown him? He just said he would have left the church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
67. Obama said that Wright was like family to him and sometimes you disagree with your pastor.
Now he reveals he was part of a putsch to force the pastor out of his post because of his political sermons.

As the former parishioner of several pastors who were deeply unpopular for their social gospel, one of whom
actually got arrested for defending El Salvadorean political refugees, I cannot in good conscience vote for
someone who views his pastor as part of a religious test for public office and machinates to switch churches
or get his liberal pastor fired in order to get elected. FUCK THIS SHIT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. Looks like he is laying the groundwork for more "distancing"
This does not bode well. He was right in his speech and should continue that.

I believe he is making a mistake if he tries to "triangulate." Either people understand that his pastor is not him or they do not and let the chips fall where they may.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
71. He knows what's coming down the pike better than anyone. One has to
wonder why he brought it up again. More distancing sounds about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. But 20 years of listening to him is cool...no problem...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
74. . . .and he was part of the campaign until the shit hit the fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. DUers need to aim at John McSame's boys, John Hagee & Rod Parsley.
They've spewed equally venomous crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. Neither one of them is McCain's
pastor, and McCain doesn't attend their churches, much less have done so for 20 years. You guys love to keep mentioning them as if there's some sort of equivalence, but there's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Bwahhahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Ah, repuke talking point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #44
58. Believe it or not
not everybody who doesn't support Obama is a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. The only respones
Reverend Wright was insrumental in my salvation. I owe him so much. and while I disgree with things he has aid. Trinity is much larger than him. Anybody who goes to church instinctibely undersatnd that it hard to leave " what we call "family".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
25. God you Hillbots are lame.. From a candidate that is a pathological liar....
I think the big mistake that Barack made was even defending this bullshit... He should have dredged up the crap that hillary has been involved in and run with it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
57. No shit. If this is all they have on him, they have nothing.
Trying to crucify Senator Obama for things his pastor said...not Obama mind you, his pastor. Sad, sad, sad.

THEY HAVE NOTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. This is the politically expeident response.
Because that is what politicians do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. On MSNBC today they were talking
about Obama making another race speech because Wright issue was getting out of hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
61. the Reverend has been getting..
death threats. A 67 year old man, that has been preaching in the same church since 1972. He served in the Second Marine Division of the U.S. Marine Corps from 1961 to 1963, achieving the rank of private first class. In 1963 he graduated as valedictorian from the Great Lakes Naval Training Center, and from 1964 to 1967, he served as a cardio pulmonary technician at the U.S. Naval Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland.
During 1965 and 1966, he was awarded with three Presidential Commendations from President Lyndon B. Johnson.

and now...because he was Obama's pastor he is getting death threats. Americans should be so proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #61
68. No, now, because he's full of himself drunk with power and turned into a Lunatic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #61
77. So does David Duke, one would suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
65. yeah, if he can SELL IT! But, Nobody's buying it..
It took 20 yrs to dislodge his buttocks from a seat in a place where he listened to HATE Speeches week in and week out. By Obama's presence in that Church, he affirmed and condoned everything Pastor Wright had to say. It's fine he said "HE WOULD HAVE LEFT" if the Pastor had stayed. Obama also said: "HE WOULD HAVE VOTED AGAINST THE WAR", if he had been in the Senate at the time of the vote.

I'm sick of hearing Obama's shoulda, woulda, coulda, pronouncements about his VOODOO POLITICS..

Obama is too weak a candidate for the nomination.. I don't care who is for him...Kennedy, Shmennedy, the DNC... what did they ever do for me? Lose elections? Pelosi? She worked for 100 days and nothing since. Same with Reid and all the rest of the gaggle of worthless DNC politicos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #65
72. I agree.
"Obama is too weak a candidate for the nomination.. I don't care who is for him...Kennedy, Shmennedy, the DNC... what did they ever do for me? Lose elections? Pelosi? She worked for 100 days and nothing since. Same with Reid and all the rest of the gaggle of worthless DNC politicos."

This is why I am an independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #72
79. I don't think either candidate is particularly strong, and I think that McCain is worse.
This is a critical time for our country, and all we can come up with are these three?

Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #79
96. Hillary has to be strong. The msn has been promoting Obama since he announced.
The msm is Republican based. They prefer Obama to be our Nominee because he is the weakest of the Three candidates. Hillary will be formidable against McCain and stands a better chance of putting him away than the vulnerable Obama and all his unearthed skeletons yet to surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #96
97. I have never been a fan of the Clintons.
However, I agree that Obama has not received the same level of scrutiny that Clinton has.

I'm looking for FDR and I don't see him. Or her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #97
104. Well, it's like puppies. Theres always one thats the pick of the litter..
and she IS the pick from all the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #72
107. We're all Indy until we vote...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #65
92. By hanging around with Coe, and listening to HIM,
has Hillary condoned everything he's about? I'd like to know - for Coe is simply one of the most dangerous, theocratic men around. If she did 'condone' Coe and the Fellowship by PRAYING IN A FELLOWSHIP CELL for years, then I'll hold her accountable for that just as you've held Obama responsible for everything his pastor said. If we play that game, I'll win.

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/09/hillarys-prayer.html

The Fellowship is a vile religious right extremist organization that advocates a change from representative democracy to theocracy - a bit more extremist than Rev. Wright, I'd say.

Please, you are spouting such crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #92
101. Here's the difference. Coe and all her other religious friends were not her mentors..
Unlike Obama who was co-dependent on Wright as his Spiritual mentor. Hillary is not mentored by any one religious entity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #101
106. Wrong.
I guarantee you that the members of her "cell" and "prayer group" had more influence over her than Wright ever did over Obama. Moreover, her association shows how far she is willing to go for political power. Please. Try again.

Besides, have you seen Rev. Wright's resume? He's helped every disadvantaged group out there - and has an outstanding reputation in the community. I certainly have no objection to Rev. Wright being Obama's mentor. I hope that he ignited a passion for justice in Obama equal to his own. Rev. Wright supports marriage equality: http://www.nbjcoalition.org/about/supporters.html.

You can keep on trying to sway people with this drivel; but, I urge any readers of this thread to investigate Chuck Colsen's Prison Fellowhip (and its notorious favoritism of some inmates over other inmates in a notorious program). The Prison Fellowship is part of the infamous "The Fellowship," which is disturbingly authoritarian and theocratic. Moreover, google "The Fellowship," and find out about its properties, and who frequents those properties. Then, compare that horrid organization with Obama's church, which has fought for many kinds of social justice for decades. See which association bothers you the most. I know which one bothers me the most.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #106
112. I amnot impressed with Rev Wright no matter how you repackage him..
He's a radical nutcase! end of story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #112
154. HeeHee.
You'd never last with my pastor then; she takes your mind to many adventurous places - gets you to see things from many points-of-view.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yeah, right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
34. He knows how gullible the obamatized have become. He knows they
will swallow all of his shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
93. are you salivating over
another shot at the Preacher man?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #93
130. It is reprehensible that some make excuses and rationalize for
such a despicable Hate monger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #130
179. I don't make excuses for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rene Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
35. You'll never convince me is was only one or two sermons....and watch the
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 09:42 PM by Rene
congregation.....they were ALL into the clapping, stomping, cheering. That inflammatory rhetoric, was the environment purveyed to and shared by, the entire group. I don't fear it..I despise it. Barry Obama is lacks a backbone and can't make decision.....120 PRESENT votes noted - no firm decisions...and his moral compass only showed up when the church environment was exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #35
100. Ah...so you have a problem ...
with all those people in the church eh? You are disgusting.
and if you want to bring up those "present" votes...
SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON should probably be forgiven for not remembering the course on the state Constitution that she would have had to take as an eighth grader in Illinois. But had she remembered it, she would have known that Senator Barack Obama was not ducking his responsibility in the Illinois Senate when he voted “present” on many issues.

Unlike Congress and the legislatures of most other states, each chamber of the Illinois Legislature requires a “constitutional majority” to pass a bill. The state Senate has 59 members, so it takes 30 affirmative votes. This makes a “present” vote the same as a no. If a bill receives 29 votes, but the rest of the senators vote “present,” it fails.

In Congress, in contrast, a bill can pass in either the House or the Senate as long as more people vote for it than against it. If 10 people vote in favor and nine against, and the rest either vote “present” or don’t vote at all, the bill passes. It can actually pass with just one vote, as long as no one votes no.

In the Illinois Senate, there can be strategic reasons for voting “present” rather than simply no. A member might approve the intent of legislation, but not its scope or the way it has been drafted. A “present” vote can send a signal to a bill’s sponsors that the legislator might support an amended version. Voting “present” can also be a way to exercise fiscal restraint, without opposing the subject of the bill.
------------------------
It never occurred to me or to any of my critics that I was ducking responsibility for a making a decision. Mr. Obama was an outspoken member of the Illinois Senate, and not someone known for dodging questions, whether they were on ethics, police responsibility, women’s choice or any other hot-button issue.

Even if Senator Clinton does not remember the constitutional majority requirement in Illinois, one of her advisers might have explained it to her. When I was White House counsel, President Clinton frequently reminded me that he had taught constitutional law before he ran for public office. I would hope that he would assume that another constitutional scholar — Barack Obama — would be aware of his voting responsibilities as a state legislator.


Abner J. Mikva has been an Illinois state legislator, a United States congressman, a federal judge and, from 1994 to 1995, White House counsel. He now directs the Mandel Legal Aid Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/opinion/16mikva.html?ex=1360818000&en=9417ee6115534086&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss



Friday, January 25, 2008
'Present' votes defended by Ill. lawmakers

In most legislatures, lawmakers vote either “yes” or “no” on bills, but in Illinois, senators and representatives can hit a third button for a “present” vote. Now that quirk — not unique to Illinois — has sparked heated exchanges among Democrats vying for president.

The two main rivals of Illinois’ U.S. Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination accused him during a debate Monday (Jan. 21) of ducking important votes by voting “present” about 130 times during his eight years in the Illinois Senate.

But Obama’s former colleagues who still serve in the Illinois Capitol say that the attacks are off-base and that either Obama’s opponents don’t understand how things work in Springfield or they are deliberately distorting his record.

-------------

The “present” vote in Illinois is sometimes cast by state lawmakers with a conflict of interest who would rather not weigh in on an issue. Other times, members use the option to object to certain parts of a bill, even though they may agree with its overall purpose.

“The ‘present’ vote is used, especially by more thoughtful legislators, not as a means of avoiding taking a position on an issue, but as a means of signaling concerns about an issue,” said state Rep. John Fritchey (D), an Obama supporter.
---------
In Illinois, the “present” vote works as a vote against a measure during final action.

State Sen. John Cullerton (D) calls the “present” vote “a no vote with an explanation.” Legally, there’s not much difference between the two votes, but practically, it can let the sponsors or other legislators know of problems with the bill that should be corrected.

That’s not how U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) characterized it in a debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C., this week.


Those remarks angered Cullerton, who is also backing Obama. He stressed that voting “present” is different than not voting at all.

“There’s not one Republican, there’s not one member in the history of the General Assembly who is still alive today who would criticize voting ‘present.’ There’s not one member of the General Assembly who’s alive today who has ever not voted ‘present,’” he said.

Fritchey, the House Democrat who chairs a committee on civil law, said he often used the “present” vote when he thought a bill had constitutional or other legal problems.

That’s also the reason Obama, who taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago, gave during the debate for voting “present” on a bill he originally had sponsored.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
43. He would've left, but there were snipers outside.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
89. Ever been to the South Side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #89
117. Yes, I have.
Your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #89
131. No point, just a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
48. K&R
good post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
51. OK class it's time to talk abut Hill's wacky religious cult.
Does anyone have the link? I can't wait for the MSM to flip this around and dissect Hill and McCain and their crazy ministers. Personally I am for the separation of church and state. Since most here don't agree I say we just roll around in the whole *hit pile instead of stomping on the periphery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #51
94. Here you go .... please see my post above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #94
132. Thanks for that.
This Wright thing is like the Kerry swift boaters. Part of me wants Obama to blast a full barrel back at Hill and the other part thinks that he has addressed the problem in way that a thinking human should understand. It is threads like these that make me wonder. Even my mother who is a right wing fundie is not too upset about the Reverend. She has her own troubles with her pastor. Go figure. Peace, Kim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #132
156. Well, that's the thing ... if they don't like what Rev. Wright says ..
these authoritarians (who insist that people talk within certain confines) definitely won't like any of my ministers (I go to a UU service ... and we talk about EVERYTHING from MANY points-of-view); furthermore, if anyone doesn't like me listening to them ... they can KMA (kiss my ..).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
55. The Taylor Marshites are out in full force
AGAIN.....

Why don't y'all move with James carville and Mary WAR CRIMINAL McCheney to New Orleans...oh and take Billary wid ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JKaiser Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
59. We need to stop talking about Wright! It looks bad for our party! Go DEMS!
I love Hillary Clinton, I love Obama! We need to support who win! We need to beat the republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
60. Get a life, Wright isn't running, Obama is and Hillary
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 10:06 PM by goclark
IS running and she can't even remember that there were no snipers in Bosnia.

Let's talk about her paster who praised Rev. Wright.

Let's talk about the "Fellowship" how about it!

Thanks for encouraging me to make another donation tonight to www.moveon.com

:bounce:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
62. An honest assesment
I hope that is mis-characterized. It would be, for me, disheartening, lessening what I think is the potential greatness of the Senator.

I still see what Hillary said as far more offensive, more comparable to how I would react if Barack was behind and started tossing off comments re Lewinsky.

But if it is an accurate characterization, it looks like pandering to a racist contingent that I would find unfortunate, and I expect better of Obama.

That is my honest reaction. I would not like it. It is nowhere near vote changing level for me, but would contribute to my general jadedness regarding politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
63. Nonsense! First "had he not acknowledged that what he had said had deeply offended people" Second,
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 10:06 PM by ProSense
context is everything:

The candidate explained, "Part of what my role in my politics is to get people who don't normally listen to each other to talk to each other, who crazy things, who are offended by each other, for me to understand them and to maybe help them understand each other."

"I think he's saddened by what's happened, and I told him I feel badly that he has been characterized just in this one way, and people haven't seen this broader aspect of him," Obama said.

Obama Defends Wright on ABC's 'The View'




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #63
76. No, Obama just said he expect Wright to apologize AND retire. That's McCarthyism at the CHURCH DOOR
And NO I am not a Hillaryite. Hillary is anathema to me.

It is sad to see Obama destroying his integrity by throwing the no religious test provision out the window and replacing it with "I was amongst the people who made sure Wright apologized "AND" was fired."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #76
80. His pastor was already retiring...
Didn't you see the Easter Sermon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #80
87. Yes but he didn't say retire OR apologise, he expected him to do both. Even if its just ass covering
It sets a dangerous precedent for US History -- the very OPPOSITE of the precedent JFK set.

Did JFK win office by promising to renounce the Pope and call for his removal?

Did Kerry win office by bowing to the requests of conservatives that he denounce moderate Catholic priests and embrace the Pope?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #87
91. well yeah...
he is already retiring. I don't recall another candidates priest getting death threats over excerpts out of one sermon, out of 30+ years of Sermons, do you? Maybe the apology will save Reverend Wright's life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
64. then Obama is a liar. As a Christian, he has no business Blacklisting his Pastor, McCarthy style.
This is modern day McCarthyism and Obama just violated the message of his speech. Fuck that!!!!

And Fuck Hillary Clinton for asking him to.

Obama just went down about 10 notches in my respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #64
88. Cool your head. At least look for some context first. Also, he already fired him from the
campaign and has said repeatedly that he is staying with the church because Otis Moss is now the pastor and Wright has retired. He now constantly refers to Wright as his FORMER pastor. He was probably responding to a hypothetical, and he a gave a response with fair and realistic qualifiers. Christ, just how the hell was he supposed to answer. NOTHING inconsistent, unrealistic, or unfair here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
66. He's making it much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
69. and you believe that? how funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #69
82. You Hillaryites are ignorant -- the story here is McCarthyism. Hillary has successfully proven that
Obama is like her in every respect -- she has gotten him to commit to support the firing of his own pastor, etc.

Non-religious folks and cafeteria christian conservative democrats (like a lot of Hillary activists) who believe that religion must defer to the "interests of the united states" wouldn't understand. Religious tests have no place in public office and political patriotism tests have no place in church. The church is NOT subordinate to the US Govt and parishioners have no business going church shopping for a church that is "pro-US". Christianity is about theology and the gospel, PERIOD. Anyone who tries to tone down the gospel to be "pro-America" is a false pastor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
78. First his Granny, now his Pastor


Who else is he willing to sell out to get to the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. his family, his granny, his supporters and anybody else who
gets in his way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #81
90. TOTAL CRAP coming from SLICK HILLY folks whose candidate has a list of lies out her ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #78
108. Us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
83. flargaty barghttyiopsbnjdbjsbd Gads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bevoette Donating Member (609 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. exactly (nm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #83
99. easy for you to say........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
98. waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
The hillary camp have no shame, her list of negative/rap sheet is
as long as the San Francisco Golden Gate Bridge.

bwahahahahaha! !

:rofl:

They say talk about what matters to the country, you say
attack Obama with Tonya Harding knee-capping.

Keep up the good work you down right bigoted disgusting
no clue religious family cult.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
102. Obama, you need to talk about the issues, why are you so



obsessed with this crazy Uncle Wright?

Time to move on. Sheeeeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
103. Isn't that good though? I thought you didn't like his "hate speech"?
Concern individual who lives underneath a bridge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
109. How is this important?
What does this do to help us remain a unified force against the GOP?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
110. I wonder if it has anything to do with this house
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 11:09 PM by 2rth2pwr
crazy Uncle Wright is building in a gated community.

Reverend Wright-"White folks' greed runs a world in need."



FOX News has uncovered documents that indicate Wright is about to move to a 10,340-square-foot, four-bedroom home in suburban Chicago, currently under construction in a gated community.

While it is not uncommon for an accomplished clergyman to live in luxury, Wright’s retirement residence is raising some questions.

“Some people think deals like this are hypocritical. Jeremiah Wright himself criticizes people from the pulpit for middle classism, for too much materialism,” said Andrew Walsh, Associate Director of the Leonard E. Greenberg Center for the Study of Religion in Public Life with Trinity College in Hartford, Conn.

“So he’s entitled to be tweaked here. So the question really is, how unusual is this? Somewhat unusual,” he said.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/27/obamas-former-pastor-builds-a-multimillion-dollar-retirement-home/#comment-254991

edited to fix pic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
113. It's all rhetoric
for political expediency. Her statements. His. I don't see why people get so riled up about it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
114. obama said he wouldnt have been comfortable, or do you have a more complete quote?
politicians who say they wouldve left their church over being offended by a pastor sounds absurd to me, as someone who isnt religious. i thought the point of being christian was saving your soul...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
115. THere's nothing there that indicates Wright isn't part of his church still, the title is false on...
...it's face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
116. I don't get this story he just defended Wright in his major race speech and pretty
much told everyone fuck you he's my buddy and I'm not turning my back on him. So why bring this up again and now saying that he would have left if Wright would have stayed! Geez, this guy has no experience in how to handle himself. Obama just shut the fuck up man and move forward. When he keeps yapping about it the story continues to stay in the news. Just shut up already. Real dumb mistake on his part and his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #116
122. ya think maybe they asked him specifically about it? ya think??????
this was on The View.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
119. The great thing about the bus it's going to the Whitehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #119
137. Yeah, a tour bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pringles Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
125. *shrug* He's a politician. Same continuum as George Bush. They all are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanUnity Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
127. Idiots!! WHO LIED? Hillary-Northern Ireland, NAFTA, Bosnia, SCHIPS, even her first name HILLARY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
128. KEYWORD: "SUGGESTS"
Obama has made it clear that, had he heard the same remarks being replayed on TV, he would have spoken to Wright about the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
129. no surprise nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
133. What a positively stupid thing to say. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
134. Sorry if my thread was a dupe
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 08:05 AM by susankh4
I did not see yours.

But here's the one I posted in Editorials and other articles this AM:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x348718

Just so we can keep an eye on both!

This is a serious matter that needs to be discussed if we are going to be able to deflect GOP criticism in the run up to November.

K&R:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
136. You do realize that this religious test bullshit is unconstitutional right?
Time to shut the fuck up or put Doug Coe in the spotlight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
139. Yeah, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
144. The "Wright is right" crowd must be outraged!!!
I'll be holding my breath waiting for them to criticize the savior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #144
160. Don't hold your breath. The Wright is Right crowd gets mad only when...
...Clinton supporters criticize radical cleric Jeremiah Wright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
146. Oh for the love of god - try to be honest
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 08:50 AM by merh
and try to use some common sense.

I'll repeat what I wrote in another thread about this, guess I should be sure to keep a copy of this so I can repeat each time someone whats to twist words. - BTW, I'm watching the interview to see if this is all he had to say, it seems that his comments are cut off in the article.

I'll listen to the hypothetical posed and his response in their proper context, then I will decide.

===
Relative to his interview, Obama said he would not have been comfortable staying at the church if Wright had not retired and had "he not acknowledged that what he had said had deeply offended people and were inappropriate" - what's wrong with that? He never said he would have left, even the article you linked to doesn't go as far as you have gone. It properly depicts his words -- "he suggests" and what was he supposed to do? It was an answer based on a hypothetical question -- we know that Wright retired. His response was not based solely on "if he hadn't retired", it included acknowledging that the words did offend some.

If he had said in the interview that he would have stayed you would have been all over that. There is nothing he can say that will make you happy.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
148. You know, whether Wright stays, goes or flies to the moon isn't
going to end the war, fix the economy and get those of us who need it healthcare. The Wright issue has proved a no-go for Hillary in the polls. No one really cares all that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
149. It is seriously intellectually dishonest to keep making this an issue
As the polls have indicated, Obama's numbers have gone UP since all this nonsense. He is more popular now. The ruse that it was an issue has BACKFIRED. The right-leaning lazy MSM and some Hillary Clinton supporters seem to think this is an "issue", but people with reasonable sensibility aren't buying it.

Obama will be the nominee. Let's focus on McCain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #149
151. "I did NOT have CHURCH with that man!"
That there is serious intellectual dishonesty - Wright from BO's mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
150. Hill: "I would've walked out," called "BITCH!" on DU. BO "I would've left," called "brave" on DU.
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 08:45 AM by MethuenProgressive
DUbamas are a funny bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
153. This is typical of this election... Obama the All-Mighty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
155. what a pandering liar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #155
158. He didn't lie at all. Why don't you point out any inconsistent statements he made?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
157. He didn't HEAR such controversial things while he was in church. If he had, it would've been proven
by now and played all over the MSM and internet. He ALWAYS said if he knew about those most controversial comments, he would've left. But he didn't. So he didn't.

Hillary and her people said they would NOT comment on this issue and only DID after SHE got into trouble over "sniper-gate" and wanted to change the subject. She had Wright sitting right next to her during the Lewinsky scandal when Bill was up there PANDERING to him and others. He HAD to have been vetted before being allowed into the WH. Wright gave the Clintons spiritual counsel. Obviously Wright was NOT some crazy, anti-American preacher or the Clintons would've known about it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
159. When it came time to leave the church, Obama voted present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #159
161. What a stupid comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #161
166. Actually,
It is spot-on. It's not the judgement, it's the ability to freaking make a decision in a timely fashion, not 5-7 years later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #166
167. Actually,
no it's not. If he's lying about being in the pews during any of those very controversial statements, proof would've come out by now. He just heard about those comments like he said and nobody has proven otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #167
169. If you honestly believe that...
When the invitation to appear at Barack's presidential-run announcement was cancelled or otherwise recinded. Obama knew he was a liability because of his statements.

BTW, I was the real inventor of Post-It Notes. It was stolen from me. And since you can't prove otherwise....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #169
173. Obama didn't know about Wright's worst sermons until they were SHOWN to him.
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 01:16 PM by jenmito
And like he said, he DID hear controversial sermons, but none like the ones looped on youtube. It would be easy to prove if he was in the pews during those sermons-just see where he was on those days. They already TRIED to prove he was there during one of those sermons (newsmax reported it) but they were proven wrong when it was shown Obama was in Miami on that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #173
174. I am not going to argue what he knew, and when he knew it.
This is freaking ridiculous. This is the same word-parsing bullcrap that people want to thrust upon the Clintons. There is no way for you to know, one way or the other, if he knew, since the beginning, about Wright's worst words and that they were toxic. But to make the decision 15 months since he first knew (realized) Wright was a liability smacks of old fashioned, poll-driven, finger-in-the-wind political expediency. Some things will never change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #174
175. That's important, though, to know what he knew and when he knew it.
And you KNOW people were digging through 20 years of sermons to try to prove Obama WAS there during those sermons. He did NOT know of his worst words and when he DID he told Wright not to be at the ceremony. He also addressed these comments over a year ago but it got no coverage. Nobody cared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #175
176. It is admirable that you want to defend your candidate
And you believe and take every word of his at face value. To say that he knew some of the "code yellow" and "code orange" statements of Rev. Wright, but had no earthly idea, and was shocked, sickened and saddened about the "code red" ones is more than a little hard to believe.

It has been my experience that it is better to be slightly skeptical than blindly naive when dealing with politicians. It wouldn't have been so crushing when Gore and Kerry rolled over if I hadn't believed that they were infalable and would fight to the death for my vote to count.

You have been civil and gave me the courtesy of a reply. So to that, :thumbsup: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #176
177. Thank you, but
the reason I believe what he says is because he hasn't been disproven. His records are public...unlike mine or yours. Of course people would be able to prove him wrong by finding sermons given and matching them with dates he was in attendance.

I am NOT blindly naive or even sightedly naive. If proof came up to show he lied I'd acknowledge it. But thanks for the compliment. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
162. Didn't he retire like this year?
It takes the better part of a decade to decide that it was time to go? Was he chanting "Not This Time, Not This Year" for 5-7 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
165. How could BO possibly know the content of his mentor's "sermons"?
Just because he was there for twenty years? You expect too much of the Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pewlett Hackard Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #165
168. BHO
could care less about any "sermons". he was there for the connections and networking to advance his political career in Chicago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
170. That's a politician's answer, and it disappoints me...
...as did the first part of his famous speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
171. he felt that Reverend Wright had "jumped the shark"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #171
178. More like Rev. Wright HUMPED the shark! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flyfish Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
172. How can such an insecure person fool so many people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC