Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quick Question..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Murdock Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:40 AM
Original message
Quick Question..
Forgive me for such an elementary and basic question, but I haven't been paying as close attention as I should be to these primaries. I am honestly curious about this though.

Why does Hillary Clinton still at this point in the race have greater Superdelegate support than Obama? Why hasn't he caught up in Superdelegate numbers yet? For all the hand ringing, for all the "concern" amongst the party, Why pray tell is she still in the Superdelegate lead?

What does Clinton's continued lead in Superdelegate support say about the party's position on the primaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because those were the superdelegates already
pretty much committed at the start of the campaigns. For example, Terry McAuliffe is a superdelegate who is working on the Clinton campaign. Like our Democratic leaders, most of the supers are keeping their powder dry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Murdock Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. ..at the expense of the party?
Huge pricetag for dry powder.

For all the handwringing and general unease, I keep on waiting for the mass break of Supers for Obama, Where is it?

Why hasn't it happened?

What's stopping them?

All I can summise is that the party legitimately wants the battle to go to the Convention floor.

Why haven't the Supers broken for Obama en-mass yet? Can someone fill me in here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indy Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Simple
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 08:26 AM by Indy Lurker
They (the superdelegates) are waiting for a better offer.

The closer the race is, and the closer it gets to the convention, the more valuable their votes become.

They are holding out for the promise of a really nice appointment or position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. My understanding is that the function of the superdelegates is to keep the best interests of the
Democratic party uppermost and to pledge their vote accordingly. Apparently, they don't think that we have reached the point where the party is in jeopardy so they are not announcing their choice yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Exactly, and..
it's very difficult for people who have already made committments to go back on them. Especially since these *aren't* elected public officials and are a lot less visible to the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexanDem Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Her lead is not elected but appointed by party
I have noticed this a good while back. The elected people, i.e, Senators, Reps., governors, etc, who have committed are divided about equal. The only category she is ahead in are those business people and whatever they are that have been appointed SD by the party. I've thought that an interesting fact that I haven't heard brought up til last night and Chris Matthews actually made mention of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not_too_L8 Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. in the past 6 weeks Obama has picked up over 100
super delegates and Clinton has picked up less than 25
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. In NYS only the bold stand up for Obama over Hillary
Everyone scared shitless that the Clintons will destroy them if they fail to support her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. because a majority of those superdelegates endorsed her before Iowa
thus she had initial party support for her run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC