Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ALERT: CLINTON CAMPAIGN SEEMS TO BE USING ROBO-CALLS TO TELL TX DEL CONVENTIONS CANCELLED!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:02 PM
Original message
ALERT: CLINTON CAMPAIGN SEEMS TO BE USING ROBO-CALLS TO TELL TX DEL CONVENTIONS CANCELLED!
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 05:46 PM by Dems Will Win


No doubt Mark Penn and Howard Wolfson at work again!

Dear fellow Democrat,

In recent weeks, the Texas Democratic Party has seen an unprecedented surge in participation, particularly in our Convention process. Thanks to our two outstanding candidates, Texas saw up to a million people participate in their Precinct Conventions, and we are expecting historic turnout at tomorrow’s County and Senatorial District Conventions.

If you were elected as a delegate or alternate to your County or Senatorial District Convention, make sure to attend tomorrow. You can click here for more information, including a list of convention locations. Thanks to tremendous enthusiasm from grassroots Democrats, I am confident that these Conventions will be an unparalleled success.

Unfortunately, that enthusiasm may sometimes lead people to act irresponsibly. We have heard reports that misinformation is being spread about tomorrow’s County and Senate District Conventions, perhaps using the name of the Texas Democratic Party. Some delegates have reported receiving emails saying that conventions have been cancelled. We have also heard unconfirmed reports that someone is placing robo-calls, claiming to be from the Texas Democratic Party, suggesting that county or district conventions have been cancelled.

The Texas Democratic Party has not been informed that any county or district convention has been cancelled or postponed. If you have heard otherwise, please plan on attending your convention as scheduled unless you receive information from your Democratic County Chair or the official Texas Democratic Party website.


As we begin the next step in the convention process, all eyes are once again on Texas, watching and waiting to see the outcome of our Conventions. I am confident that the vast majority of Democrats will conduct our convention business in the fairest, most professional, and most impartial manner possible, as we work to convert the enthusiasm driving the convention process into Democratic victories from the County Courthouse to the State House to the White House.

Your friend and fellow Democrat,

Boyd L. Richie

http://ruralvotes.com/thefield/?p=961


The TX Dem Party gave the 88,000 state delegate names only to the campaigns! So it was either Obama or Clinton.

According to spokesman Hector Nieto of the Texas Democratic Party, "the information that we gave to the campaigns was information given to us by the individual precincts."

Plus the Clinton campaign used robo-calls in Iowa just before that state convention:

I had reported that Iowa county delegates pledged to Obama were receiving robocalls from the Clinton campaign in the run-up to the coming county conventions (when such delegates can switch their allegiances).

http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/03/28/guess-what-obama-is-not-poaching-delegates-in-texas.aspx

These "mysterious" robo-calls come after the Clintons lost their demand to delay the conventions!

FROM 1776Forever:

Democratic Party Refuses Clinton Request
March 17th, 2008 at 4:49 pm

http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/index.php/2008/03/17/democratic-party-refuses-clinton-request

The Texas Democratic Party this afternoon flatly rejected the Hillary Clinton campaign’s request to delay the county conventions. The Clinton camp claims that volunteers for Barack Obama committed numerous acts of fraud on election night. The campaign had requested a delay to verify that the roughly one million caucus goers on March 4 were eligible to participate.

But the party is having none of it. In a forceful letter released this afternoon, party Chairman Boyd Richie wrote: “Texas Democratic Party will not do as suggested by one campaign and circumvent Party rules to set up an unnecessary, ad hoc ‘verification’ process that could effectively disqualify delegates selected at their precinct conventions after the fact. The Party has never stated any intention to set up a verification process of this nature because Party rules already provide for ‘verification’ through our credentials process. Candidates who wish to disqualify delegates must pursue formal challenges based on evidence filed appropriately in accordance with our party’s rules.”

While conceding the caucuses were not perfect, Richie brushes aside allegations of fraud. “These problems are not unique to Texas. Similar problems, in proportionately similar numbers, occurred in pure caucus states like Iowa and Nevada. The overwhelming majority of problems reported in Texas do not affect the legitimacy of delegate allocation.”

He then states that the county and state conventions will go on as scheduled.


THat's the same guy Boyd Richie who signed the letter above.



IF YOU THINK THIS IS A CLINTON DIRTY TRICK RECOMMEND!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. God, I hate those two fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Batshit Crazy Bullshit
I am a delegate to the Sen. Dist Convention and I got the same call. And I assure you, I am not on the Obama delegate list.


Plus my convention is on Sunday because the ineptitude of the party in my area. They couldn't book a fucking Holiday Inn ballroom for a few hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. They didn't expect crowds like this.
They don't have the biggest budgets, TX Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. Crowds?
There are the same # of potential delegates in each precinct as there was in 04. Fuck the crowds. The people that are there to do what they are there for should be considered first. They want to fuck with the process because they are worried about accomodating the mob? You didn't see them move the Anna Nicole trial outside because they were worried about space for the crowds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. OK, you have a good point.
*sigh*

I really did want to participate this year. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. What happened? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. I was irresponsible.
I moved, and when I went to do the early voting, they asked if I was in the same precinct. I said I didn't know, and (STUPIDLY) assumed that she was checking to make sure... she handed me a ballot and I went to vote... and didn't find out until it was time for the precinct conventions that I had voted in the wrong precinct, and not on a provisional ballot. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. I am really sorry to hear that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. Thanks...
I'll miss it... but I hope your experience is much more enjoyable from here on out. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #53
130. There will be other years and other times.
I am so glad that people are engaged in the process and the reality that by showing up in an elementary classroom in the spring, you are helping to choose the next President and the trajectory of our nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Actually it's a bit difference
Since it's still a heated race, you know that the delegates for both candidates are going to show up. As opposed to years past when by this point there was only one candidate left and really only their supporters were going to show up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. Well, who knows who whill show up now...
They shouldn't have messed with the date. It is just like the Rove flyers in Cleveland 04 telling Dems to vote on Wednesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. Hopefully the precincts in Collin County
Can get a hold of all their delegates. I've had my precinct call me and my county chair.

I'm sure it was a tough decision for them, but obviously they felt it was more important to have room to accommodate all the delegates and others by moving it one day. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #58
129. I hope they can too;
For whatever side you are on now, we are all on the same side tomorrow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
86. Easy, there - they planned this stuff last year -
and normally - no one showed.

Our SD team is having to dig deep - and fund raise to come up with a few GRAND more.

It's rough to do that with little notice.

these folks have been in the trenches for ages ALONE.

That's why these calls anger me - I have new folks eager to play - and they might be confused.

I've called mine - but something foul is going on here.

We need to find out. Because if it's not her - it's them.

Maybe that would finally give us a common enemy, eh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #86
133. So it is ok to automatically assume that the evil Hillary Clinton is
Plotting against you? Jeez. I can assure you that Hillary and her campaign are not doing anything like you "assumed" they were. Second of all, They have only had three weeks and three days to find an empty bingo hall to run this thing in. They should probably not move the convention to the wrong day (according to the TDP) in order to accommodate disrupters and the like. I will say again. They didn't move the Anna Nicole/Hunt trial outside so that they could better deal with the crowds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #133
138. You're out of line
You said in your post that the local Dems were incompetent.

My point was that before you bitch - you do it.

Get off your Hillary loving ass and organize it yourself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #138
160. They ARE incompetent.
No, I am not out of line. I am also not the county chair. They had plenty of time to work something out. They didn't. Now, nearly everyone that I call is confused. Hillary's people are telling them different things. Obama's people are telling them different things. This is a fiasco.

And to use the ADA and the "crowds" arguement is a total and complete cop-out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
106. But of course you are committed to Hillary
And so you are committed to this type of Karl Rove politics at its worst. Winning is all. By hook or by crook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #106
131. Dream On, Oh Presumptuous One.....
I feel sad that you can't separate yourself from your chosen candidate to realize that the entire situation is "F"ed Up! I am sure that my candidate, as well as myself, do not condone cheating, rigging, tricks, or anything else like it. I am not the one who changed the day of the convention. Hillary didn't even win my county/senatorial district in the real primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #22
124. rovian ethics are a national cancer
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 12:50 AM by crankychatter
voter disenfranchisment?

real role models
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #124
132. Is that a Haiku? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
161. I would think that a high school gym could be used.
Provided there aren't other activities scheduled. But would think that 1/2 the high school gyms are available. Even a Junior HS or Middle Grade school should be big enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #161
162. Exactly.
At least you are thinking! The whole crowd thing is just a cop-out, though. The real intent was to upset the process by switching days, keeping the location unknown to most. What are they trying to pull?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. can he post one of these 'emails'
of which he speaks? Or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
115. seems they could check the "message source"
it isn't shown in the regular email, but can be seen by clicking on
"view message source" on the email program.

The emails could have gone through some sort of anonymizer, but
its still worth checking.

Surely they have done this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #115
119. You'd think, but you'd be surprised how few people know this
Even people who should. We geeks should all be working in data forensics I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
144. IF it's true, I think it's voter suppression and a crime
just guessing

I don't think the GOPers from Texas that called and misinformed Democrats
in Ohio in '04, were ever prosecuted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. you dont know if it is true yet you post in anyway nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. What makes you think it is Dems doing this?
Boyd didn't say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I said "seems to" -- It cannot be Obama, he wants the conventions to happen.
And McCain would not interfere. She has already threatened to challenge the credentials. This is organized and the Dem party itself had to put out this announcement to keep the whole thing on track.

This is the whole MO of the Clinton campaign, using false robo-calling, as they did in NH on choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Bush "seems to" be human
But he's a chimp.

Your post is seems to have an element of libel.

Whoever did it, and I'm certainly not going to point an uncertain finger at anyone, apparently took a mucousy page from the Rovian book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
123. All chimps have told me that they
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 12:43 AM by Kool Kitty
now hate you. They are easily offended and much smarter than Bush. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
38. You wrote "seems to" to imply an opinion other than your own. THAT would be phrased "I THINK", FYI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconicgnom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #38
128. "seems to" -- "I think"
"You wrote "seems to" to imply an opinion other than your own. THAT would be phrased "I THINK""



Yes, and that's good to keep in mind when all that's seen everywhere is flying mud.

It seems like some kind of axiom that the Democratic candidates *should* prove themselves by busting McCain's ass, and likewise their supporters *should* follow that lead, and whoever strikes low blows against fellow democrats is way out of line.

Here's what's probably a well-known fact that I can't quite get my mind around. By JedReport via Daily Kos:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/24/14518/2213/544/463202

"Hillary Clinton's chief strategist is Mark Penn, and Charlie Black, John McCain's top adviser, is chairman of BKSH, the DC-based lobbying subsidiary of Burson-Marsteller -- of which Mark Penn is CEO.

Yes, this is the same lobbyist Barack Obama was referring to when he criticized John McCain for allowing lobbyists to conduct their business on board his bus."

IMO that fact is decisive. It shows poor judgement. So I know how I'd vote if I were a US citizen.

But also IMO that's all that should matter. I mean, there's no point in wasting bile on recriminations & insanely escalating family spats. Not right when that family needs to be united for battle.

Energy is better spent explaining why the generally coherent and balanced approach (to matters of internal/external social justice) of the Democratic candidate is more worth abiding by than the strictly militaristic approach taken by Bush/McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #38
157. "seems to" & "I THINK" are summarized by....
"As far as I know."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
113. If Pigboy could get Rethugs to vote for Clinton, why couldn't the Rethugs be doing this?
For exactly the same reason, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #113
121. Well, supposedly...
...only the campaigns received the names of the delegates.

Could've been leaked though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. maybe...could be the thugs
not going to jump until some real proof shows up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hillary is not dumb enough to try something like that
*checks Hillary's behaviour in last few weeks*

Okay, she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Some supporters are crazed enough to pull a rovian stunt like this
I find it fascinating that some rabid clintonistas say they will vote for McCain if Hillary is not our nominee and then call Obama supporters a cult.

Projection, another neocon trait we see too much of this campaign season.

You're right. When we check HRC's (and Bill's) behavior recently, hard to rule any stunt out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. This a lot of emails to the delegate list - who had that list of emails and phone numbers
Who else but the Clinton campaign would even be able to get that together and be so organized in their execution?

Then there was the confcall yesterday where Bill warned the TX delegates all could be lost if Obama wins it big. THe NY Daily News listened in by mistake!

The Clintons are "terrified" about tomorrow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Yep, had to come from somebody in the campaign
Somebody needs to use tranquilizer darts on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
73. I don't agree...but Penn is that dumb .nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. The OP Title Is Pure Speculation & Really A Stretch - You Should Change It...
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 05:15 PM by JimGinPA
I scream at Mrs. Clinton's supporters all the time here for this kind of serial conclusion-jumping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Only the campaigns were give the list of delegates and their numbers and emails
So it was either Obama or Clinton.

According to spokesman Hector Nieto of the Texas Democratic Party, "the information that we gave to the campaigns was information given to us by the individual precincts."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
114. And Repugs don't infiltrate?
Your scenario is higher probability, but not yet demonstrated to be fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #114
151. what possible
purpose could the repukes want to do this?

seems to risky to attempt with little to nothing to gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. I really gotten to hate Hillary and her Brownshirts!
She and her husband should form their version of the Peronista Party and be gone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Texas DUers - CALL YOUR FRIENDS & MAKE SURE THEY KNOW!
Geez Louise...like we didn't have enough problems...

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. how long have you been hiding this up your butt?
because that is where you pulled it from.

Don't puke the word "seems" back at me either like you did upthread to someone else. I call you on your outright made up complete BS insinuated accusation.

No one is fooled at all by your intent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Oh come on, who else has a motive to do this? (Crickets)
Maybe you think Rush Limbaugh got the e-mails and phone numbers and set this up himself to help Hillary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. The GOP.
The more lingering animosity between Dems in Nov, the better (for them).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
36. let's walk the cat back, shall we?
he claims he has 'reports' that people have gotten emails, but doesn't post one so we know what they look like. He claims he has 'reports' that poeple are getting phone calls, but not one person is listed by name. The names of delegates are on the record already, not one person who got a call is willing to put their name to the accusation? This is a crime, you know? If anyone deleted the evidence from their voicemail or inbox, they shouldn't have. These emails should be forwarded to the Texas Rangers or da's office, they are evidence of a crime.

Show me a name of someone who got a call and will sign a criminal complaint. Show me an email. This is a crime, and anyone who doesn't report it is complicit in covering it up.

What? No one will put their name to these accusations of criminal behaviour? How odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
81. It's in the news - and posted by the party....
Reports of phony phone calls to Democratic delegates
March 28, 2008 - 3:28PM
James Osborne
McALLEN - The Texas Democratic Party has received reports of unknown persons calling and e-mailing delegates to incorrectly inform them their county and senate district conventions have been cancelled, said party spokesman Hector Nieto.
Nieto said several delegates had reported incidents to party officials, but he did not know where in Texas they hailed from. He said party officials were investigating who's behind the misinformation campaign.
http://www.themonitor.com/articles/party_10340___article.html/democratic_delegates.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #36
82. early days yet.
This one has legs.

This may be the end of Hillary here.

Hell hath no fury like a pissed off Texas Democrat, baby.

I plan on channeling Molly Ivins, Barbara Jordan, and Ann Richards.

Don't mess with the TEXAS Democratic Party. We don't cotton that NY salsa down here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. I am now through being nice.
It's on.

Let's go get her - and her little dog, Bill, too.

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. If this is true, Hillary and Penn should be thrown in jail. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. are you suggesting that the Clinton people are doing something dishonest?
If you are...


Thanks for that.....


Recommended the post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. I believe Clinton is up to this
Recom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. So no evidence at all
just your rampant, unfounded speculation that Clinton's behind this, and the mob jumps on it.

There's no difference between you guys and FreeRepublic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I don't believe it was the Clinton camp. This would be classic Rove...
divide, divide, divide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. could be both?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Could be aliens.
Occam's razor. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
48. Rove and the GOP don't have the delegate list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. I can't be sure of that.
They've got their dirty little fingers into all sorts of things they shouldn't have had access to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canucksawbones Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #50
89. rethugs
Oh, Carville probably got the list from the Clinton's, he passed to his rethug wife, who is bound at the hip to Rove, so the rethugs could well be doing it, via Clinton's campaign. Carville is a well known traitor.

GK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #89
92. Actually, that's not a bad point. Carvile leaking to Matalin, it's certainly happened before.
Interesting, canucksawbones!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #92
98. An assertion with no evidence
based on one thin tale told by Bob Woodward.

He provides no evidence that Carville "leaked" anything. Why did the campaign inform Carville? He wasn't part of the campaign. Was it supposed to be kept secret? Nobody knows.

Nobody in the campaign has ever made this charge - not even the famously outspoken Teresa Heinz Kerry. But people here believe it without hesitation, just like they believe this bulshit OP without question.

It's mob mentality run amok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #98
102. You're right. Carville's such a good guy.
:eyes:

Stop with your "mob mentality" smear... it's growing old, and rusty.

Here's some non-anecdotal evidence that probably makes you uncomfortable... he did Clinton far more harm than good when he dubbed Bill Richardson "Judas." You probably agree with him, but just out of curiousity, how many superdelegates has Hillary picked up since then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #102
104. I think he is a good guy
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 10:09 PM by MonkeyFunk
and most people here did once upon a time, too.

The fact is, you guys fall for and repeat lies time and time again. You do it so often you start to believe them.

There's this thread now with 100 recs that's based on absolutely zero evidence - but it attacks Clinton, so you guys love it.

Mob mentality at its finest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #104
107. Well, I used to like Carville, too.
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 10:21 PM by VolcanoJen
After 2004, not so much. My growing dislike of Carville began the moment he started suggesting that Chairman Dean should be overthrown in favor of one of the DLCers. I'm a Dean-Crashing The Gate-50 States Democrat, so that put me at odds against Carville long, long before Clinton's presidential run.

But speaking of mob mentality... you know Clintonistas have written off John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Caroline Kennedy, Maria Shriver, Keith Olbermann, Bill Richardson and countless others in the name of Clinton Loyalty.

You might call it mob mentality, but in the case of Clinton supporters and the way you've slashed and burned some of our most beloved Dems, most of them actual office holders and public servants rather than loyalist hacks like Carville, well, to me, it resembles illness.

Blind loyalty is treasured by some... but certainly not me.

Edit: Out of morbid curiousity, who do you think is responsible for these emails and robo-calls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #107
109. I certainly haven't written them off
and many here also wrote off Joe Wilson, George McGovern, et. al.

The fact that so many people automatically believe this unfounded smear against Clinton and cheer it on shows a mob mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #109
111. It goes both ways.
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 11:10 PM by VolcanoJen
It's a mob mentality, and a fact, that so many Clintonistas (doesn't matter if you weren't among them) wrote off celebrated Dems for the High Crime of not endorsing Hillary Clinton.

I'll defend Joe and Valerie Plame-Wilson and George McGovern (my mother made me wear McGovern buttons to 1st Grade, ask her about it sometime, she's a DUer too) until the bitter end. Who are the "et. al."?

So you say mob mentality, I say potato. You're far too absolute in your denunciations and defense of Carville. Try to look at it through different eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #98
134. the same crew that
ignore fact!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #98
148. "An assertion with no evidence" that Clinton did this, same as with Carville.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #89
155. Hypothetically speaking, that would explain everything.
Can we kick him out of the party yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #48
77. The Government
Has been spying on us ya know and it wouldn't be hard to get any info if need be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
97. OMG - I love your new avatar!
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. Clinton Tries to Delay County Conventions - Party Refuses Clinton Request
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 05:30 PM by 1776Forever
Clinton Tries to Delay County Conventions
March 15th, 2008

http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/index.php/2008/03/15/clinton-tries-to-delay-county-conventions/


The Associated Press is reporting that the Clinton campaign has asked the Texas Democratic Party to postpone the county conventions scheduled for Saturday, March 29. The conventions are the next stage in Texas’ convoluted caucus process.

In a letter to the party late Friday, the Clinton campaign stated it had received more than 2,000 complaints of violations during the caucus process, in which a million Texans came out. The campaign wants the eligibility of the caucus-goers double checked before the process continues.

With about 41 percent of precinct caucuses reported, rival Barack Obama was ahead with 56 percent to Clinton’s 44 percent.

The party has apparently already told the Clinton campaign it can’t verify the voters before March 29. They have not announced a decision on the Clinton campaign’s request for a delay.

The Obama campaign responded to the request with the following:

“We don’t think that the record-breaking number of Texans who stood up to be counted on March 4th would appreciate the Clinton campaign’s attempt to disenfranchise them and silence their voices just because the outcome wasn’t politically beneficial to Senator Clinton” – said Obama spokesman Dan Pfeiffer.

For now, it looks like what was a historic night for Texas Democrats could well end up as a nasty court battle.

...........

Democratic Party Refuses Clinton Request
March 17th, 2008 at 4:49 pm

http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/index.php/2008/03/17/democratic-party-refuses-clinton-request/

The Texas Democratic Party this afternoon flatly rejected the Hillary Clinton campaign’s request to delay the county conventions. The Clinton camp claims that volunteers for Barack Obama committed numerous acts of fraud on election night. The campaign had requested a delay to verify that the roughly one million caucus goers on March 4 were eligible to participate.

But the party is having none of it. In a forceful letter released this afternoon, party Chairman Boyd Richie wrote: “Texas Democratic Party will not do as suggested by one campaign and circumvent Party rules to set up an unnecessary, ad hoc ‘verification’ process that could effectively disqualify delegates selected at their precinct conventions after the fact. The Party has never stated any intention to set up a verification process of this nature because Party rules already provide for ‘verification’ through our credentials process. Candidates who wish to disqualify delegates must pursue formal challenges based on evidence filed appropriately in accordance with our party’s rules.”

While conceding the caucuses were not perfect, Richie brushes aside allegations of fraud. “These problems are not unique to Texas. Similar problems, in proportionately similar numbers, occurred in pure caucus states like Iowa and Nevada. The overwhelming majority of problems reported in Texas do not affect the legitimacy of delegate allocation.”
He then states that the county and state conventions will go on as scheduled.

So is this heading to court? That would seem to be the logical next play for the Clinton campaign. Asked for comment, Clinton campaign spokesperson Adrienne Elrod said, “Our only concern is that the caucus outcome accurately reflect the voices of those who were eligible to participate.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. -1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkz Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Reported here LIVE last night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
33. Dirty trick? Yes. Clinton sponsored? No proof at all.
And to ask for recommendations is a little weak. And pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
34. I suspect Republicans. Why do you suspect Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. Answer below:

BECAUSE ONLY THE 2 DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGNS WERE GIVEN THE LIST WITH THE NAMES AND EMAILS OF THE 88,000 PEOPLE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
108. The Republicans would not gain from this...
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 10:32 PM by TwoSparkles
Clinton gains from this.

After the Iowa County Convention, Hillary is worried, and she should be. Obama gained an additional 9 delegates
from the state of Iowa, due to what happened at the County Convention. Obama gained supporters from the initial
Iowa caucus, up until the vote at the Iowa County Convention, which was three weeks ago.

Remember when Clinton sent out her "Obama is in a downward spiral" press release? She did this a couple of
days before the Iowa County Convention. The Convention clearly showed that Obama gained and Clinton gained
nothing. Clinton was forced to stop her "downward spiral" meme after Iowa.

The second phases of these caucus processes---will most likely showcase momentum for Obama. I talked with many
Hillary delegates in Iowa--at the County Convention--who switched to Obama.

They're doing this because of Hillary's dirty campaigning and also because she has so openly insulted
and degraded the states that have caucuses. Many delegates are state party loyalists, who are very involved
with organizing, volunteering for and ensuring the fairness of the caucuses.

Look at the facts! Hillary tried to get the Texas County Convention delayed! She knows the Texas results
will mirror what happened in Iowa.

She doesn't want her eroding support demonstrated, going into PA.

Hillary Clinton and Obama were the only ones who had the delegate phone numbers.
Republicans do not benefit from this. Clinton sure does.

This is really appalling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #108
125. Well, Iowa and Texas conventions are not apples and oranges
A lot, if not all, of the delegates Barack picked up in the Iowa county conventions were former Edwards supporters. Edwards came in second (though barely) in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toys4kitty Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #108
158. Are you sure the Repub's wouldn't benefit from this?
If you take into account the so-called "limbaugh effect" and the general theory going around that
the Repubs would rather have Hillary be the nominee because she's easier to beat- then why wouldn't
they benefit?
As much as I support Obama and despise some of the horrible things that have come out from the Clinton
camp, without proof of WHO'S behind it, I actually give Clinton the benefit of the doubt here. This
really does not help her at all.
Regardless though, it's very disturbing and really makes me question what is going to become of our
party. I can visualize a dark room filled with Repubs grinning from ear to ear with this new juicy
tidbit. We are truly doing their work for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
35. This is a GREAT THREAD!...
for the conspiracy nut forum at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Not at all - only the campaigns were given the phone numbers
and emails. So it's either Obama trying to stop a convention that he is certainly going to win or Clinton trying to stop a convention she is certainly going to lose.

Take your pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Do you have one of those Emails, since they seem to be flinging around?
cut and paste? No?


MmmK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
59. This came in just 30 minutes ago from the official Dem Party
Something's going on and the dirty tricksters must be stopped by people being aware the conventions are NOT cancelled.

Not going to let the king of robo-callers Penn get away with this one!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. I'm not sure the two are mutually exclusive
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 05:39 PM by Cali_Democrat
It could just be Rush's Ditto Heads stirring up trouble. I'm not sure we should jump to conclusions and blame Clinton for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #39
51. There's no evidence the calls are even taking place
much less that Clinton's behind them.

I should start a thread saying Obama's selling drugs out of his Senate office. There's exactly the same amount of evidence for that as there is for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. It'd get locked.
Because of herdalert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #51
83. ARE YOU CALLING MY STATE PARTY CHAIR A LIAR?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #83
141. Why?
Will we have to step outside?

I said there's no evidence presented that these calls have even taken place, much less that they're from the Clinton campaign.

It's a fucking mob around her lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #83
163. YOU Are out of line. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #39
60. Do we know for certain that no temps work anywhere near those lists?
You know... like those temps at the State Dept? With the passports?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
46. This is pure speculation on your part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. Yep.
:hi: Granny. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
55. No evidence Clinton is involved; surrogates (think Carville election night 2004) perform...
dirty tricks all the time without the candidates knowledge. Hell, it could be the GOP for all we know... lists get shared, afterall. Sorry, can't recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
57. From "Burnt Orange Report" (Texas Blog)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #57
72. wow. That is effed up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Georgie_92 Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
61. Wow unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
62. Oh, sure. Riight. Axelrod is really getting desperate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
63. What this tells me is that 50+ dumbasses are posting at DU.
Recommending a thread based on nothing but speculation, because they want to only believe the worst about Hillary Clinton.

No one even knows whether or not this has truly happened. Anyone have a recording of the robocall? Multiple copies of the email?

I didn't think so.

So it's a leap to even claim that this is really happening. One must abandon all logical thought to think that Hillary could be behind it.

50+ dumbasses. That's all this thread demonstrates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. do`t count me
with out proof it`s bullshit... maddy i do agree with you on this.. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. I don't.
I know you better than to think you'd support this silly allegation.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. Don't Mess with Texas or our Democratic Party Chairman
You are implying he is lying. I received the email from him. Now granted he did not say WHO was responsible for this mayhem, but he did write about it in his mass email.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. No, sweetheart, I don't "imply." I say what I've gotta say.
Show the evidence of the calls and email. Where's the recording?

As for "Don't Mess with Texas," I agree with you there. You're not the only Texan on this board.

(I live in Mississippi, but I was born in San Antonio and raised in Texas...a state that's very dear to my heart.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #69
136. Why would the state party chairman
(in the establishment of a state party that is supporting HRC, btw) go to all the trouble of sending out an email to EVERYONE if there were no such robo-calls or emails being made. Granted, I didn't receive one, but I was not home yesterday because I was working on the credentials committee. (I did, however, receive a delegate-poaching phone call on Monday or Tuesday.) The only ones who have personal knowledge of the emails are the party chair, other party officers & those folks who received the emails & phone calls. You could call up Boyd Richie & ask him yourself, but I think he's rather busy this weekend & probably won't return your call.

Until then, since all the crap in Texas came from one campaign (the one that threatened to sue the party), don't jump all over those who assume it was HRC. It wasn't in Obama's interest to make such calls.

dg

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #63
74. someone upthread posted this link..
http://www.burntorangereport.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5475

From the Texas Democratic Party:

"It has come to our attention that someone, perhaps in the name of the Texas Democratic Party, is spreading misinformation about upcoming County and Senate District Conventions. We have received reports from delegates who have received e-mails saying that conventions have been cancelled. We have also received unconfirmed reports that someone is placing robo-calls, claiming to be from the Texas Democratic Party, suggesting that county or district conventions have been cancelled.

"The Texas Democratic Party has not been informed that any county or district convention has been cancelled or postponed. If any delegates receive information to that effect, I urge them to plan to attend their convention as scheduled unless they receive information about a postponement or cancellation from their local Democratic County Chair or the official Texas Democratic Party website.

"As we begin the next step in the convention process, all eyes are once again on Texas, watching and waiting to see the outcome of the delegate count that will be determined by our County and Senatorial District Conventions and State Convention. I am confident that the vast majority of Democrats will conduct our convention business in the fairest, most professional, and most impartial manner possible, as we work to convert the enthusiasm driving the convention process into Democratic victories from the County Courthouse to the State House to the White House."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #63
75. Your expectations are too high
This thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4641977

accusing Obama of smoking crack cocaine while receiving oral sex from men made it to the Greatest Page.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #75
99. and that thread was locked!
As this one should have been, but blatant lies against Clinton seem to be allowed here, while one must tread lightly around St. Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
64. When Obama debates McCain he should challenge him to robocall-free campaign n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
65. I received a call from Barack, alright it was actually a robo call
Making sure I show up tomorrow at my SD convention.

I plan on calling ALL the delegates at my precinct to remind them about tomorrow. I'll ask them if they have received any emails or robo calls, and if they will give me whatever info they might have.

Oh Sheesh, I'm SOOOOO fair to both sides, when it really isn't suppose to be my responsibility.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. Can't imagine anyone not calling all of them.
That could be considered cheating.

I commend you for doing the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
71. There's no evidence the Clinton campaign is behind this
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 06:44 PM by KingFlorez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #71
79. No evidence - but if the GOP got an internal party list
who does that benefit? only Clinton or the GOP


And who had access? Clinton


I'll wait for the evidence. But she doesn't look good on this one.

If someone in her camp got wild and leaked it - then she looks like she can't run her campaign.

It's pretty damning.

And I'm really angry about this one - because we have so many new people in the Texas Party.

This is something that I want to see investigated - and if she's involved, charged with fraud.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #79
116. There was Obama campaign screwup before the WA state caucuses on 2/5
People started getting robocalls telling them to be sure to go to the caucus on Sunday 2/6. Turned out not to be a dirty trick--the same outfit was doing the robocalls for both Maine and Washington, and got the two messages mixed up. Maine's caucus was on Sunday, and ours was on Saturday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #116
137. What's the point?
That telling the wrong time is equivalent to telling this NOT THIS TIME?

???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #137
139. The point is that we need more information to find out what is really going on n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
76. If this is coming from the Clinton camp, my money is on a few overzealous campaigners.
Its like that Clinton campaigner at the University of Texas who worked a caucus and wrote down Hillary's name after telling naive Obama supporters that they were supposed to leave it blank. Its just a few people who want Hillary to win so badly that they decide to do petty things like that. I don't think there is much of a larger conspiracy. I can't imagine for one second that Hillary Clinton would give her blessing to such behavior.

A lot of Clinton supporters are going to be seriously heartbroken when she steps down. That makes people do some unethical things that they wouldn't otherwise do. Its sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #76
85. Unfortuately, I have a much more vivid imagination that you nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #76
95. If there are indeed robo calls then it can't just be a few
Hillary supporters. It costs money to run them. Someone has to order them and include content etc. It would have to be the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #76
117. That happens in any large campaign
It's hard to keep track of what really large numbers of supporters are doing, and there will always be a few of what a friend of mine calls "whacktivists" who get majorly out of line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
78. Can anyone explain the difference between the hill camp and bushco?
Damn, they seem the same to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. No, I can't.
Although, I'd bet it's more fun at the Bush dinner table than at the Clinton table.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
84. No Doubt
she has more shit up her sleeve.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ronnie Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
87. This could get sillier,
but I don't see how. I'm pretty sure, though, if I check back in an hour, I'll see something even sillier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. Bump anyway for the Texans at DU
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
90. A stupid and disgusting post
for painfully obvious reasons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanUnity Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #90
101. "Stupid" is backing a liar and selfish candidate like HILLARY - who'll do or say anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #101
143. Americanunity
nice irony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biglefthander Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
91. One of the first rules of detective work is...
...when seeking the perpetrator of a crime, find out who the greatest beneficiary of the crime is.

Who benefits from this? Only one party: Hillary '08. And she tried to sue and have the conventions delayed.

This crap is straight out of the Nixon Dirty Tricks playbook, what they called "RAT-F@CKING" or cancelling Democratic events on the sly. I will not be surprised in the least if Clinton's surrogates are behind this. Despicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #91
103. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
93. Dirty Tricks of '72 - recommended reading
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 08:35 PM by bhikkhu
http://www.woodstockjournal.com/elections.html

this is a write up of the Repugs involvement in the Dem primaries of '72, and a real eye-opener. I add it here mostly because of some doubt and "conspiracy theory" dismissiveness on the thread. So read a bit about what happened then, realizing this is only what is known, and probably far from a complete story.

Dismissing the notion that Hillary did it is probably smart, but that someone is doing it and will continue is a safe bet.

edit to say thanks to McCamy Taylor for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
94. I sure wish someone would get a copy of the email and post it! Then we can have a civilized debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ronnie Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #94
112. Have at it. Notice the words, "perhaps" and "uncomfirmed."
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 11:12 PM by Ronnie
"

Dear fellow Democrat,

In recent weeks, the Texas Democratic Party has seen an unprecedented surge in participation, particularly in our Convention process. Thanks to our two outstanding candidates, Texas saw up to a million people participate in their Precinct Conventions, and we are expecting historic turnout at tomorrow's County and Senatorial District Conventions.

If you were elected as a delegate or alternate to your County or Senatorial District Convention, make sure to attend tomorrow. You can click here for more information, including a list of convention locations. Thanks to tremendous enthusiasm from grassroots Democrats, I am confident that these Conventions will be an unparalleled success.


Unfortunately, that enthusiasm may sometimes lead people to act irresponsibly. We have heard reports that misinformation is being spread about tomorrow's County and Senate District Conventions, perhaps using the name of the Texas Democratic Party. Some delegates have reported receiving emails saying that conventions have been cancelled. We have also heard unconfirmed reports that someone is placing robo-calls, claiming to be from the Texas Democratic Party, suggesting that county or district conventions have been cancelled.

The Texas Democratic Party has not been informed that any county or district convention has been cancelled or postponed. If you have heard otherwise, please plan on attending your convention as scheduled unless you receive information from your Democratic County Chair or the official Texas Democratic Party website.

As we begin the next step in the convention process, all eyes are once again on Texas, watching and waiting to see the outcome of our Conventions. I am confident that the vast majority of Democrats will conduct our convention business in the fairest, most professional, and most impartial manner possible, as we work to convert the enthusiasm driving the convention process into Democratic victories from the County Courthouse to the State House to the White House.

Your friend and fellow Democrat,

Boyd L. Richie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
96. FUCK THE CLINTON AND ANYONE THAT SUPPORTS THEIR TACTICS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanUnity Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
100. As an RFK volunteer and Democrat this PISSES ME OFF! Get lost HILLARY!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TML Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
105. Another reason
Why I will never vote for Hillary Clinton. If you can't win my vote honorably, you can't win it period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
110. It was also Bill Clinton who gave out incorrect TX caucus information
One of our local radio stations caught it and outed him..he was telling people that the doors to caucus sites would be LOCKED at 7:15 and no one could get in if they arrived after 7:15 pm and that the caucus start time was 7 pm.

In reality, start time was 7:15 and the caucus would NOT start til the last caucus goer had signed in. And you couldn't even start signing in til the last primary voter on site had cast their primary vote.
His comment could have led people to think "man, it's 7:20 (or 7:30, etc...), forget it, let's not even go up there, they won't let us in, anyway."

If other precincts were anything like mine, long lines for the primary voting prevented the caucus from starting on time so even if you showed up at 9 pm (like mine!!) you could still be there in time to caucus!

All you had to do was show up at 7 pm, look at the Dem voting line and they could give you an estimate on how long it would be before the last voter would reach the voting machine. In our case, at 7:15 we were told it would be 1.5 hours til the last voter was done and they were right on the money. She cast her vote at 9 pm and got a LOUD round of applause from those of us who had been waiting there for 2 hours for her to do so.


---------------
And it was also Bill who was pleading with HRC supporters to "vote twice" because "it would be a shame for her to win during the day, only to LOSE at night"


He and the rest of the HRC camp knew what was going to happen, they knew they had no chance with the TX caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
118. Ack!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
120. I don't think even Bush and Rove would stoop this low.
It's foul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
122. That's our gal!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
126. CREEP Dirty Tricks from 1972 Robocalls designed to look like they were from Muskie
http://www.woodstockjournal.com/elections.html

In the days before the March 7 New Hampshire Primary
blue collar workers in Manchester, NH
found their phones ringing after midnight
with fake Muskie questions.

There were two types of calls:
1. when the caller identified himself as a member of the
“Harlem for Muskie Committee:
and promised that Senator Muskie would deliver “full justice for
Black people”
2. when the caller identified himself as a Muskie pollster, and asked
the midnight call recipient for whom he or she was voting
Then quickly the fake Nixon pollster would call back 2, 3, 4 times
with the same question


From the same link, CREEP had many ways to retrieve secret info from campaigns including moles (Lucianne Goldberg was a paid mole w/ a Dem campaign) paying cab drivers and others to copy papers. Nowadays, the WH had access to FISA and warrantless spying.

Therefore, given the high level of RNC dirty tricks this primary season directed at the Democrats, this is most likely another one of Karl Rove's operations. When Obama supporters blame it on Hillary w/o evidence they increase friction between the two camps and only increase the resolve of the Hillary's supporters (who feel that they are being unfairly accused) to continue the fight all the way up to the convention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
127. Read my new journal "The Top 10 RNC Dirty Tricks Against the Dem Primary" so you can spot these
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 01:07 AM by McCamy Taylor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
135. Remember: Clinton supporters vote on Tuesday, Obama supporters vote on Wednesday.
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 05:37 AM by DemVet
There are no dirty tricks in politics. There are just politics. Stay on the porch if you can't run with the big dogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
140. They better fully investigate this!

And prosecute whoever is involved. This is BS! If Hillary is behind
this, then she should be exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
142. The fact that many people are ready to believe that the Clintons are...
capable of this just shows what terrible regard many in the party have for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #142
145. Or it shows
the utter gullibility and lack of critical thinking skills of the Obamamob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #145
146. And so you found the need to insult Obama supporters.
Both candidates themselves are fair game. But we have got to stop insulting each other if we are going to come together after the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #146
147. Sorry
I'm pissed this thread wasn't locked yesterday. People post unsubstantiated accusations about Obama, and they're locked in no time.

This should have been, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #147
159. No need to apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
149. It is true that there was widespread fraud by Obama supporters in Texas
stolen lists, minutes, fake calls made, the list is endless. Of course, they lie through their teeth and deny any of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
150. Rove just LOVES gullible people like the ones on this board!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #150
153. if i were to bet on anyone
it would be one of his students
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
152. well after googling every different combo of words
as of this morning no one has come forward to show the emails or go on record that they received a call. the other confusion about delegates was the result of entry errors on the spreadsheets.

the only thing that COULD BE remotely lead to clinton is the threat of the lawsuit over the verifying the delegates before today. that is NOT ENOUGH to come to a concussion on who if anyone did this or worse made the whole thing up..

until there is an actual copy,a name of a real person,and all these are verified then this story is a hoax

if there is an actual copy-a real person then i will retract my opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
154. It 'seems'? Really? Is this like the bullshit here the other night blaming the
Clintons for someone getting into Obama's passport files?

You will be sorry. All of you will be very, very sorry if your boy Barrie does get the nomination. You will need Clinton supporters desperately. And I have no doubt in my mind that a lot of them will tell you to go fuck yourself (as someone else once said so crudely but effectively).

P.S. I can't stand either one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amb123 Donating Member (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
156. Hillary's dirty tricks even WORSE that Karl's
This is proof that the Hillary Clinton Book of Dirty Tricks is even MEANER AND MORE CRUEL than the Bush/Rove Book of Dirty Tricks.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #156
164. No
this is proof only that Clinton-haters will believe ANYTHING, no matter how baseless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
165. I first saw this post this morning, I can't believe it's still going on after I'm
home from work,and still there's no proof of anything just people who love to hate. Like I said before, Rove loves gullible people like you guys you'll believe anything he throws out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC