galaxy21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:15 PM
Original message |
Is it arrogant for Obama to come out and say 'I'm the nominee'? |
|
All the experts say, barring a major scadal (like him being revealed to be client 10 or something) or something happening health wise, he probably will be the nominee this Autunm. Mccain is now acting like he's the nominee, the rest of republicans are acting like he is, and even most in the Clinton camp are acknowledging this to be the case.
Is it arrogance or just being realistic?
|
democrattotheend
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
That would backfire big time.
|
galaxy21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. how? Are people going to say 'hey he assumed he had it in the bag, let's not vote for him!' |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
20. Does anyone have an actual quote from Obama on this....... |
|
Because otherwise, keeping this thread going is a fraud...doncha think?
|
C_U_L8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message |
2. If you 'believe' in math |
mountainvue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. If you believe in math, |
|
your candidate ain't going anywhere either without the superdelgates.
|
mountainvue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message |
galaxy21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Obama can't piss off the superdelegates anymore than Clinton already has |
Hieronymus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
my3boyz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I think that if after all the states have voted and he is still |
|
ahead and he has enough supers on board to get him to 2025, he should be referred to as the presumptive nominee.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Rendell said this--a Hillary surrogate quoting Obama. I think Fast Eddie |
|
is full of shit. The latest coordinated attack against Obama is now to call him "arrogant". Please don't fall for it, Obamites.
|
BklynChick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message |
9. this is from Ed Rendell? well then I doubt that's exactly what he said. Rendell lies |
galaxy21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. Obama needs to make it clear he's looking past Hillary and onto mccain |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 03:24 PM by galaxy21
No disrespect to Hillary, but he can't keep wasting his time with her. She's in a world of her own now..and is going down ugly.
|
BlueCaliDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
21. You're so right. It's time Obama focuses on McBush because MSM sure aren't! |
|
"Teflon" McBush has been getting a free ride from MSM (excluding MSNBC because of "Hardball", "Countdown" and Dan Abrams' "Virdict") and although the Clinton supporters don't want to face the fact that Hillary will NOT be the nominee as the tide is turning real ugly against her now, fact is, Obama needs to go on the attack of McBush a.s.a.p.
There's an already very false assumption of this so-called "maverick" who, according to his votes that bely his rhetoric on the Senate floor and Repub-friendly weekend media, he's as right-wing as the rest of the Republicans.
Also, in attacking Obama those weeks, why wasn't the fact that Hillary being a member of some cult-like faith-based camp/organization that has members like Sen. Sam Brownback, not been reported on? I've only seen a small segment with the investigative reporter, I believe, on CNN around 10:30 in the morning PST, and perhaps a little on MSNBC "Hardball".
Otherwise, "mums" been the word regarding this.
|
slinkerwink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message |
10. no, it's realistic. Clinton can't get the nomination according to party rules based on delegates. |
thoughtcrime1984
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message |
11. That'd be awful strategy, but what he CAN do is |
|
focus on McCain. Go into GE mode, toss Hillary an occasional reference, but by all means GO AFTER the Republican candidate- John McCain! Continuing to flesh out his stances, like he did with economics, is also a winner.
|
TexanDem
(786 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message |
12. as an O supporter - no, he definitely should not say that. |
|
And we as his supporters shouldn't say it either.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. He probably didn't say it. Fast Eddie Rendell is trying to paint him as arrogant. |
TexanDem
(786 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
29. I thought it was a hypothetical question.... |
|
I haven't heard anybody say he IS the nominee, but that he will probably be -- even when I hold my nose to see what they're saying on Faux News! Maybe I missed something. I would be extremely surprised if O literally tried to put on the crown before Hillary was out of the race. Sounds like more rumors and twisted facts to me.
|
featherman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |
15. A second hand retelling by a Clinton supporter is what it is |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 03:26 PM by featherman
Who can say what Obama's phrasing was or if it was arrogant. I doubt it was anything but a realistic assessment in a conversation between two pros. Everybody needs to get a grip in the "arrogance" thing about people. Basically it's a cheap shot that can be leveled against anybody at anytime.
|
galaxy21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. If he is arrogant at least it's justified...unlike Clinton telling couric 'it will be me' before |
|
there's even been any primamries.
|
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
17. honestly, i'm ver surprised that he hasn't already |
|
He should do as soon as possible. It paints Hillary as an even wackier person.
|
Life Long Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
18. When is Hillary going to quit? |
Moondog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
Life Long Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
30. I'm asking that question a lot :-) |
|
I don't expect an answer from the question to drop out. But I remember how the media hounded Edwards to drop out. That was the only question they asked him for the last weeks of his run. And at the time they were setting up a two man round table debate - leaving him out.
But this isn't revenge or anything about that. It's about what she needs to do at the convention when she tries to take it away from the "will of the people". See where I'm going with this? Is that what democrats are about? Trying to take it away from the will of the people?
But even though this subject is in the news. They are not hounding her like they did Edwards.
|
Blue-Jay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
19. You have a clip of him saying that? |
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Yes, but I won't object |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 03:33 PM by OzarkDem
He will continue to turn voters off with this kind of arrogance.
It also makes him look like a naive "rube".
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Hillary is ARROGANT for continuing to run |
|
Why the fuck do people give her so goddamn much slack. IT'S OVER. She only has the potential of winning 3 states. It won't matter. She's done. I don't know why she thinks she has any business to continue running except pure ARROGANCE.
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
33. She's a political fighter. |
RestoreGore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
35. It's called Democracy. Look it up. |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message |
25. That would hilary and |
|
bush's department..Obama is too classy and is able to frame it so people understand even more where he is coming from.
|
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message |
26. What makes a factual statment, backed up by math and reality, arrogant?? |
|
Its time we stop enabling the Clinton fantasy world.
|
Starbucks Anarchist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
28. No more arrogant than Hillary offering him the VP slot awhile ago. |
truedelphi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
34. You typed the words right out of my fist!! n/t |
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message |
31. Yes. Clinton's "poor me" squad would be all over it. |
RestoreGore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
loveangelc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message |
36. He shouldnt have to SAY it but start attacking mccain like he is... |
IamyourTVandIownyou
(446 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
37. Two weeks ago, Hillary (who is losing) was offering him the VP position? |
peacebaby3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
38. No more arrogant than this: |
Buzz Clik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
39. I don't understand. Obama hasn't said anything similar, nor has anyone else. |
|
"I'm the nominee."
Why do I get the impression that this thread has the singular purpose of creating a problem.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:37 AM
Response to Original message |