NJSecularist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:40 PM
Original message |
Rasmussen Wisconsin - McLame: 50, Clinton: 39 ; McInsane: 48, Obama: 46 |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 03:49 PM by NJSecularist
|
featherman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Ras polls tilt GOP so that is encouraging to be at 50% |
BeyondGeography
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message |
2. She'd either lose there or spend so much time making up for the terrible campaign she ran in Feb. |
|
that she'd be compromised elsewhere.
|
NJSecularist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Yup. We would prefer not to defend our own turf. |
|
We will have to do it in Pennsylvania, but every dollar spent in Wisconsin (should be a safe Democratic state) is a dollar not spent in Pennsylvania.
|
KansasVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |
4. LOL....I love your McCain names! Perfect! LOL! |
jezebel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message |
5. You've got the #s wrong. It's Obama 46, McCain 48. And Clinton 39, McCain 50. nt |
NJSecularist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. You are right. My bad. n/t |
Tribetime
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. I'm seeing 44 obama 43 mccain |
|
only 11,000 seperated Kerry/B*** 2004 with 35% dems and 38% rep. voting. www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/WI/P/00/index.html
|
Ysabel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
obama will win wisconsin...
|
jgraz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Wow, McInsane is a much weaker candidate than McLame |
Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. There's probably some truth to that, we need to paint him as McInsane |
|
McLame may be able to pull off 270. If people really see that he's McInsane, I think we can crush him.
|
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I don't really trust rasmussen anymore. |
Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message |
11. I'd take all polls with a shaker of salt at this point |
|
Voters make up their minds in September and October, not in April. That's one key thing to remember.
Also right now, all indicators point to Obama being the nominee. If it were the other way I'd imagine that Clinton would poll a bit better, not sure how much better.
McLame is getting a free ride from the media right now because he's not really running against anybody yet. Clinton and Obama are having to deal with negative press coverage because there is still a race going on.
This race is going to be neck and neck in most of the swing states later on in the primary season. The good news is that we will be able to compete in more red states than last time.
|
NJSecularist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. We will? I don't see many. |
|
I don't consider states like Colorado, New Mexico and Iowa red states. Those are swing states.
Which red states (reliably red states) do we have a chance to win?
|
Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Colorado, Missouri, possibly Virginia |
|
These states were close last time but Kerry basically conceded them before election day. That won't happen this time.
|
NJSecularist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. Colorado isn't in the South. |
|
Obama won't win Virginia, but he'll come closer than Kerry did.
That leaves Missouri. Which isn't a red state. It's a purple state.
I don't think Obama puts in an solid red states in play.
|
fujiyama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Wisconsin is the kind of state Obama should do well in |
|
It's in his backyard for one, as it borders Illinois. I expect Obama to have an edge over Hillary in the mid west...
|
Ysabel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. yes he will do well here as he did well in the primaries... |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 04:48 PM by Ysabel
- there are a lot of former illinoians here such as myself i grew up in illinois many of the students here are from chicago...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 10:25 PM
Response to Original message |