leftofcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:51 PM
Original message |
Real Time Texas Results....Clinton leads by slim margin |
|
http://www.burntorangereport.com/Refresh about every 10 mintues to get new results
|
flor de jasmim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Is there any site where they compare the original caucus results with these, side-by-side? |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. The original caucus result site never had complete data. |
|
We'll actually never be able to know the details of this vote, because the Democratic Party of Texas does not release them. Another reason I dislike caucuses.
|
leftofcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Obama better hope those kids turned out and didn't have anything better to do today. |
|
Young people are known to be flakes.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. And many young people are known to be |
|
conscientious and committed.
|
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
16. Insulting the youth vote now |
|
That will help your candidate. Any other groups you want to help alienate for her? Friendly little reminder; Bill probably wouldn't have been our President without the youth vote in '92, and by extension your precious Hillary would have been nobody.
|
Benhurst
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
22. Clinton people insult the young voters and Obama supporters the old. |
|
We're on a roll! Nothing can stop us!
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
32. I am not insulting anyone, I am pointing out an interesting paradigm. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 06:00 PM by joshcryer
Hillary should not be so close this late in, so something is going on, the youth vote could be part of it.
|
Benhurst
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
33. Sorry, joshcryer. I didn't mean you specifically. There has been a |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 06:11 PM by Benhurst
tendency of Clinton supporters belittling the young and Obama supporters dismissing the old. NOT a good idea in either case.
You're right. If this holds, something is going on. If the young haven't come through for stage two of the process, then it's an ominous sign for the Obama campaign. It may not turn out that way, though.
:hi:
|
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
35. Clinton people are challenging the Obama delegates to drag it out and make this as |
|
difficult as possible. It was a concerted plan.
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
31. What are you talking about, "insulting"? |
|
WTF is wrong with you people?
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
28. It's these so called "flakes" that are dying in Iraq because of those who voted for the IWR |
|
The future of our country and the world lies in the young people, and all you can do is write them off
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message |
3. This has become REALLY close! |
|
Last report had Obama leading (O: 419 C: 369). When I first started checking, HOURS ago, Hillary had a large lead.
Has it been back and forth all day?
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. This is the first time Hillary got ahead in hours after losing her early lead. |
|
It's quite surprising and I'm beginning to believe that the youth vote did not show up for their very important teir 2 caucus event. Unfortunate if that's the case.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Unfortunate for whom? nt |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
leftofcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
No doubt it will switch again
|
featherman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Nueces County just came in for Clinton at about 2-1 which is |
|
what she won that county by in the primary. Early times yet.
|
Melinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Umm, no she doesn't, although they are currently tied w/17% reporting. |
leftofcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. Clinton 482 Obama 477 in delegates |
Melinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
18. Old results... look at database results link I've posted. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 05:01 PM by Melinda
n/t
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. As of 4:45PM, 3/29/07 she does. |
|
I'm surprised she came back but I expect Obama to surge ahead soon as the bigger districts come in.
|
Melinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
20. Agreed, it will be back & forth... look at the database results link I posted for real time results. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 05:00 PM by Melinda
edited
|
Melinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
17. County Convention Reporting Database: TOTAL RESULTS |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 04:58 PM by Melinda
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pCVgf3tYDGBevq1NB-GJHdwOooh, look... HRC is ahead by .01%, or one vote, with 17% reporting.
|
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
:rofl:
So much for all the threads this week sayin Obama was going to kick ass in Texas. OOOps!
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Latest spreadsheet is 505 to 504. Dead heat. |
Lisa0825
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message |
19. SD 11 and 17 in Galveston Cty - Obama 60%, Clinton 40% |
|
as I said in another post, I *think* that was the overall tally, but it could possibly have been the tally for one of the 2 senate districts in our county.
|
my3boyz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message |
21. I think people were saying |
|
that Obama had an excellent ground game in Texas. I know they had to know how important this date would be. I don't think they would slack off at this point. They would still try to get people in to this today. At least I hope so....
|
Alhena
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
27. Relax, none reporting from huge Obama strongholds like Tavis, Dallas, and Tarrant counties |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 05:27 PM by Alhena
and only one report from a Harris County SD.
|
cooolandrew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Only 16 percent counted. I wait patiently for the result. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 05:10 PM by cooolandrew
|
Alizaryn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
wildflowergardener
(863 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Can someone explain how this all works? There was the original caucus, right which Obama was leading significantly with a certain percentage of the votes in - do they vote again today, or are they just counting the votes today?
Sorry - we don't have caucuses here so I don't quite understand how this all works.
Meg
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
30. The original caucuses picked delegates to go to a second process. |
|
We're watching the second process right now, these delegates will decide the caucused based state delegates to go to the convention. If people don't show up or vote for a different person then it could be bad for the candidate they were supposed to be there for.
|
MediaBabe
(610 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
36. Texas delegate selection - Third step of four |
|
Saturday's conventions are the third step in a four-step process for selecting delegates to the Democratic National Convention.
First was the March 4 primary vote, which Clinton won with 51 percent to Obama's 47 percent. Clinton's victory in the primary gave her 65 delegates to Obama's 61.
Immediately after the polls closed March 4 were more than 8,000 precinct caucuses that selected about 88,000 delegates. Obama appears to be winning that step with about 56 percent to 44 percent for Clinton, according to the state party's unofficial incomplete count.
Today those 88,000 delegates will be winnowed down to 7,294 delegates to the state party convention in June, when the final 67 caucus delegates will be selected to go on to the national convention.
Besides the 126 primary delegates and 67 caucus delegates, Texas has 13 Super Delegates. The AP's latest delegate count gave Clinton and Obama 103 delegates each from Texas.
......
**Disclaimer** I only relate to you what I read elsewhere and hope it helps. I don't pretend to understand the four step process. It seems to be unique to Texas.
|
NEOhiodemocrat
(624 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-29-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message |
34. Think you better look again...it's Obama 50.52 |
|
5:45 PM Clinton Obama 574 586 49.48% 50.52%
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message |