Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Real Time Texas Results....Clinton leads by slim margin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:51 PM
Original message
Real Time Texas Results....Clinton leads by slim margin
http://www.burntorangereport.com/

Refresh about every 10 mintues to get new results
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is there any site where they compare the original caucus results with these, side-by-side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The original caucus result site never had complete data.
We'll actually never be able to know the details of this vote, because the Democratic Party of Texas does not release them. Another reason I dislike caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Not sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama better hope those kids turned out and didn't have anything better to do today.
Young people are known to be flakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. And many young people are known to be
conscientious and committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Insulting the youth vote now
That will help your candidate. Any other groups you want to help alienate for her? Friendly little reminder; Bill probably wouldn't have been our President without the youth vote in '92, and by extension your precious Hillary would have been nobody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Clinton people insult the young voters and Obama supporters the old.
We're on a roll! Nothing can stop us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. I am not insulting anyone, I am pointing out an interesting paradigm.
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 06:00 PM by joshcryer
Hillary should not be so close this late in, so something is going on, the youth vote could be part of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Sorry, joshcryer. I didn't mean you specifically. There has been a
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 06:11 PM by Benhurst
tendency of Clinton supporters belittling the young and Obama supporters dismissing the old. NOT a good idea in either case.

You're right. If this holds, something is going on. If the young haven't come through for stage two of the process, then it's an ominous sign for the Obama campaign. It may not turn out that way, though.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Clinton people are challenging the Obama delegates to drag it out and make this as
difficult as possible. It was a concerted plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. What are you talking about, "insulting"?
WTF is wrong with you people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. It's these so called "flakes" that are dying in Iraq because of those who voted for the IWR
The future of our country and the world lies in the young people, and all you can do is write them off


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. This has become REALLY close!
Last report had Obama leading (O: 419 C: 369). When I first started checking, HOURS ago, Hillary had a large lead.

Has it been back and forth all day?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. This is the first time Hillary got ahead in hours after losing her early lead.
It's quite surprising and I'm beginning to believe that the youth vote did not show up for their very important teir 2 caucus event. Unfortunate if that's the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Unfortunate for whom? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I think so.
No doubt it will switch again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nueces County just came in for Clinton at about 2-1 which is
what she won that county by in the primary. Early times yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Umm, no she doesn't, although they are currently tied w/17% reporting.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Clinton 482 Obama 477 in delegates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Old results... look at database results link I've posted.
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 05:01 PM by Melinda
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. As of 4:45PM, 3/29/07 she does.
I'm surprised she came back but I expect Obama to surge ahead soon as the bigger districts come in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Agreed, it will be back & forth... look at the database results link I posted for real time results.
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 05:00 PM by Melinda
edited
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. County Convention Reporting Database: TOTAL RESULTS
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 04:58 PM by Melinda
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pCVgf3tYDGBevq1NB-GJHdw

Oooh, look... HRC is ahead by .01%, or one vote, with 17% reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. It only takes one.
:rofl:

So much for all the threads this week sayin Obama was going to kick ass in Texas. OOOps!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. Latest spreadsheet is 505 to 504. Dead heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. SD 11 and 17 in Galveston Cty - Obama 60%, Clinton 40%
as I said in another post, I *think* that was the overall tally, but it could possibly have been the tally for one of the 2 senate districts in our county.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. I think people were saying
that Obama had an excellent ground game in Texas. I know they had to know how important this date would be. I don't think they would slack off at this point. They would still try to get people in to this today. At least I hope so....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Relax, none reporting from huge Obama strongholds like Tavis, Dallas, and Tarrant counties
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 05:27 PM by Alhena
and only one report from a Harris County SD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. Only 16 percent counted. I wait patiently for the result.
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 05:10 PM by cooolandrew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. Great link, Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildflowergardener Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
29. results
Can someone explain how this all works? There was the original caucus, right which Obama was leading significantly with a certain percentage of the votes in - do they vote again today, or are they just counting the votes today?

Sorry - we don't have caucuses here so I don't quite understand how this all works.

Meg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. The original caucuses picked delegates to go to a second process.
We're watching the second process right now, these delegates will decide the caucused based state delegates to go to the convention. If people don't show up or vote for a different person then it could be bad for the candidate they were supposed to be there for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MediaBabe Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Texas delegate selection - Third step of four
Saturday's conventions are the third step in a four-step process for selecting delegates to the Democratic National Convention.

First was the March 4 primary vote, which Clinton won with 51 percent to Obama's 47 percent. Clinton's victory in the primary gave her 65 delegates to Obama's 61.

Immediately after the polls closed March 4 were more than 8,000 precinct caucuses that selected about 88,000 delegates. Obama appears to be winning that step with about 56 percent to 44 percent for Clinton, according to the state party's unofficial incomplete count.

Today those 88,000 delegates will be winnowed down to 7,294 delegates to the state party convention in June, when the final 67 caucus delegates will be selected to go on to the national convention.

Besides the 126 primary delegates and 67 caucus delegates, Texas has 13 Super Delegates. The AP's latest delegate count gave Clinton and Obama 103 delegates each from Texas.

......

**Disclaimer** I only relate to you what I read elsewhere and hope it helps. I don't pretend to understand the four step process. It seems to be unique to Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NEOhiodemocrat Donating Member (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. Think you better look again...it's Obama 50.52
5:45 PM Clinton Obama
574 586
49.48% 50.52%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC