Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HEH?-OBAMA Likens His Foreign Policy To That of George Bush Sr., JFK, RONNIE REAGAN!!??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:34 PM
Original message
HEH?-OBAMA Likens His Foreign Policy To That of George Bush Sr., JFK, RONNIE REAGAN!!??
Obama likens his foreign policy to that of Bush Sr., JFK, Reagan

By The Associated Press

Senator Barack Obama said Friday he would return the country to the more traditional foreign policy efforts of past presidents, such as George H.W. Bush, John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan.

At a town hall event at a local high school gymnasium, Obama praised George H.W. Bush - father of the president - for the way he handled the first Gulf War: with a large coalition and carefully defined objectives.

Obama began a six-day bus tour through Pennsylvania, the largest remaining primary prize in the contest with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton for the Democratic nomination. Sen. John McCain is the Republican nominee-in-waiting.

"The truth is that my foreign policy is actually a return to the traditional bipartisan realistic policy of George Bush's father, of John F. Kennedy, of, in some ways, Ronald Reagan, and it is George Bush that's been naive and it's people like John McCain and, unfortunately, some Democrats that have facilitated him acting in these naive ways that have caused us so much damage in our reputation around the world," he said.

Obama faced criticism in January from Clinton and then-challenger John Edwards for saying Reagan had changed the trajectory of American politics - and that Republicans had been the party of ideas for the last decade or more.

...

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=969594&contrassID=1&subContrassID=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing wrong with a bipartisan realistic
foreign policy... he is excluding the neocons and their dreams of empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. When you say "bi-partisan realistic"
what you are actually saying is "Triangulation."

Do you know that?

Do you understand the terminology?

Do you understand the history of that?

Do you doubt that?

If so check into B. Clinton and Z. Biggy.

Great that you are getting played ain't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I'm voter for the lesser of two triangulators in this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Laughing
And here in Never-Never Amerika folkz think they have choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Not as great as putting you on ignore. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. I have a feeling we're all "getting played."
Including you and I. :D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Prematurely fighting the general election didn't work out too well for Senator Clinton...
but hubris will take one on odd tacks.

His repeated citing of Ronald Reagan is like nails on a chalkboard to me; the man was a dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I wonder if Obama remembers contragate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. From hillaryclinton.com...
But no president can do it alone. She must break recent tradition, cast cronyism aside and fill her cabinet with the best people, not only the best Democrats, but the best Republicans as well.. We’re confident she will do that. Her list of favorite presidents - Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Lincoln, both Roosevelts, Truman, George H.W. Bush and Reagan - demonstrates how she thinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. LOL...end of thread.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That was an extremely poorly written and misleading article
She was asked not which Presidents she admired but what traits in Presidents she did admire. She mentioned one trait about Reagan, and thus his name was on that list. But that is way different than admiring a President. I actually admired Reagan's dealing with his Altsheimers and really amdire Nancy's dealing with it, but that doesn't mean I admire his Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. That’s the point exactly. Obama likes certain traits about the Regan’s foreign policy.
How is that misleading!!! :wtf: it's the OP that's misleading. The poster you are replying to, just showed that Hillary admires certain traits about Regan too.

END OF STORY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. She put the article on her web site...
and it seems clearly written enough...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. It claims she admires Reagan as a President
when she didn't. As to posting the article, I don't know why they did that. I wouldn't have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. It says on her web site that Reagan is one of her favorite presidents.
But I am supposed to think that some chap on a message board knows better?

I actually think it is a tempest in a teapot, but it is also BS to constantly get on Obama over things like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Chap. There's an underused word that I'll help you with reviving.
Not bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Geez
I should have posted the usual caveat:

*From a Non-Hillary Person.

Big diff huh?

How's it feel to know you're getting played?

A general question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I don't understand what you mean. getting played?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wrong.....
April 08 edition of the Prospect:

Cover story here - http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_obama_doctrine

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Great article. That's what I like about him, he's a big picture guy instead of just throwing bandaid
s on a problem and hoping things get better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I've read the entire thing
Amazing isn't it that anyone could actually title the article as such and many others would believe that there ever has been any such "challenge" put forth by Obama (or Hillary or McCrazy).

Maybe you could help me and point specifically to Obama's "Challenges to the Foreign Policy Establishment."

All it shows is that how even a centrist-right foreign policy such as is proposed by the Obama camp is considered "radical" in the current political climate.

What speaks volumes here is how the Obama adulants suck this stuff up ignoring all political and historical context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Impressive, isn't it?
Sycophants pretty much hear what they want to hear, though I have to admit, I sometimes enjoy the creativity in their rationalizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
24.  Obama adulants suck this stuff up?
Suck on this.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYBaiXQoI5Q then vote for Nader, or what-E-ver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Wow! Goodby Condi
Hello Susan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. Does "a more traditional foreign policy" mean out of Iraq NOW? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. JFK HAD SUCH BAD FOREIGN POLICY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
27. I got no story at the link... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
28. Not a democrat
But he sure has fooled a lot of people, hasn't he?

He's in it for personal power and gain, just like the rest of them. But the true believers will never see it. Shee-it, the Dimson true believers still think *he's* great.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
29. Samantha Power explains his policy here.Not like senior to me.(before the "m" word thing). Link...
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 06:28 AM by cooolandrew
http://www.members.aol.com/cooolandrew2/outstanding.mp3




He's saying sensible stuff to cover the HRC vote that may stay at home.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
30. Why Obama is exactly what we need:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
31. I was no fan of Ronald Reagan's, but it was during his presidency
a certain wall came down. 41 saved Kuwait, our ally, from being overrun by Iraq. JFK stood strong during the Cuban Missile Crisis - a picture of courage by any stretch of the imagination. Bipartisan is not a bad thing. It's the only way to overcome our current gridlock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC