Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If a substantial number of superdelegates were to endorse Obama, they would NOT be anointing him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:59 PM
Original message
If a substantial number of superdelegates were to endorse Obama, they would NOT be anointing him
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 11:10 PM by milkyway
the winner.

An argument made frequently is that if a substantial number of supers were to endorse Obama, they would be derailing the electoral process before all the voters have been heard. They should let the electoral process play out.

In fact, the opposite has already happened. According to demconwatch.blogspot.com, Clinton currently leads by 34 superdelegates. Her lead with supers has been the only thing keeping her candidacy alive for the past month. Most of the Clinton supers endorsed her early in the campaign, giving the appearance that Clinton was the clear leader. But once voting began in Iowa, Obama has always been the leader in pledged delegates. It was only Clinton's 100+ advantage in supers that masked the true results, with mainstream media outlets like CNN misleading viewers--by giving a delegate total that included both pledged delegates won through voting and superdelegates, with no distinction made between the two--into thinking Clinton was the frontrunner.

This race was pretty much decided with Obama's remarkable run of 11 straight victories after Super Tuesday, all by at least 17 points, culminating on February 19 in Wisconsin and Hawaii. Yet Clinton's lead with supers helped disguise this.

If, for instance, 20 supers would endorse Obama this week, the media would declare the race over, while the Clinton camp would complain the supers should let the voters' voices be heard. But those 20 Obama supers still would not negate Clinton's current lead with the supers, largely built when her supers tried to anoint her before the first votes were even cast.

And most ironic of all, Clinton wants all the voters' voices to be heard...only to then try to convince the supers to not listen to them and give her the nomination instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. And in addition to all the good posts in you OP... It would seem that Obama may come out...
of Texas looking pretty damn good as well. Texas has a very weird political system when it comes to Primaries/Caucasus... But it would seem that the Clinton people had good reason to want to delay any outcome from that state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. a.m. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC