acrosstheuniverse
(224 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:17 AM
Original message |
Can you envision Hillary running on a third party if she loses nomination? |
|
How likely do you think that may occur? She seems very determined.
|
krawhitham
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:21 AM
Response to Original message |
1. not if she goes all the way to the convention, She would not have to to get on all the ballots |
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:22 AM
Response to Original message |
|
She's a Democrat through and through.
|
acrosstheuniverse
(224 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
and she can bitch and moan about Florida and Michigan being unseated and how unfair it is and thus deny Obama the ability to be elected so she can run again in 2012.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. If she thought she could win she would do it. You don't think so? |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. And in what universe do you think she'd believe that? |
|
It'd split the vote. McCain wins. Simple.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
17. Exactly. So she'd pass on the indy run because she can't win, not because she is a loyal democrat. |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 04:06 AM by dkf
Thank you for making my case.
|
InAbLuEsTaTe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
22. In a heartbeat. But she can't win, so she won't. |
JackORoses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
32. Hillary is loyal to noone. It's time that you realized this. |
|
Your dream-version of Hillary is a far cry from the real one the rest of us have to deal with.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message |
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message |
6. no, it's utterly absurd and delusional conjecture. |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Like how she's a racist hack? |
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. No. She's not that either |
|
what she is,dearie,is someone who was willing to try and frame Obama as a fringe minority candidate who wouldn't play well with white voters. And that's quite bad enough.
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Thought you said that once upon a time, sweetie. Should've known better. :hi:
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
never said it. You keep falsely accusing me of saying it though. That doesn't make it any truer.
|
acrosstheuniverse
(224 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Well you can say staying in the race is an absurd and delusional behavior. |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 03:32 AM by acrosstheuniverse
I wouldn't put it past her if she makes a case that the Democratic Party is really undemocratic and she makes the DLC a separate party and uses that to destroy Obama's chances on a platform saying he shouldn't win anyways due to the Wright Controversy.
|
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. 'and she makes the DLC a separate party' |
|
Exactly how would she do such a thing?
|
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 03:39 AM by elleng
dupe
|
anamandujano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Don't spend any time trying to understand the hypotheticals around here. |
|
The Obamabots don't have much to think or talk about. They get weirder every day.
|
greguganus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
36. Great pic! I need to find mine of Hillary dressed as his bride! n/t |
crankychatter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
15. some sort of split is coming but it's not going to happen in that way |
|
You're not off the mark entirely
don't let the hostility here bother you
read the list of corporate contributors to the DLC, same as the RNC
it is truly a party within the party
then review their platform, which is antithetical to the progressive values of the Democratic Base
and notice how, if they suspect they can't get Clinton in, they are trotting out Al Gore...
who, although a brilliant statesman, is another DLCer, marginally more electable than Clinton
they probably won't need to do that... because they will take it to the limit with the pony they already bet on - I'm saying she will probably win.
the race/gender/religion ruckus is the sideshow and you put your finger on the REAL issue with this question
howard dean initiated a system that enabled the party to bipass traditional, questionable campaign financing practices
the nomination of Obama is a continuation of that process
with impending loss of net neutrality, this new phenomenon may well be nipped in the bud, and be added to a long list of dirty tricks they have used to keep the power... to keep the party small... and to politically marginalize the majority of Americans that are anti-war, anti-nafta and FOR change... after years of justifiable cynicism, the tide is rising
This is about Iran among other things
Now I have a question for you, and if you are a premium member (and I am not) you may email it, so we dont' get distracted
if Clinton is nominated (and I beleive she will be) what would YOU suggest, the democratic wing of the democratic party DO, to address this coups d etat'?
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 04:06 AM
Response to Original message |
|
don't be stupid.
The idea that she would do this is just moronic.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 05:07 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
greguganus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
37. Is that a cigar on Bill's lip? n/t |
Political Heretic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 05:18 AM
Response to Original message |
20. Not really. I think she would fear doing terminal damage to her image |
InAbLuEsTaTe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
23. The damage is already done. |
Political Heretic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
27. I think she can recover. |
InAbLuEsTaTe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-31-08 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
susankh4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 05:26 AM
Response to Original message |
|
She is a Yellar Dawg Dem, thorugh and through. Of this I have no doubt.
Obama, OTOH... yes, he might mount a third party ticket if he doesn't get the nod.
|
TomClash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 05:53 AM
Response to Original message |
24. She can say goodbye to her Senate seat nt |
enigmatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 05:55 AM
Response to Original message |
Asgaya Dihi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:00 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I know it's not a popular idea here but what I'd worry more about is her running with McCain. Not saying it's likely, but it's more likely than third party I'd think. They are both pretty big on crossing the isle and there's been enough talk in the country recently about how the partisan divide is a problem, from a purely political standpoint that would be a tough ticket to beat. Hard enough to beat that it might be somewhat attractive to both if he's looking bad otherwise and she loses here.
|
workinclasszero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:16 AM
Response to Original message |
28. No but I can see her running as McCain's VP (nt) |
Franks Wild Years
(687 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
|
It would guarantee a McCain defeat. Republicans are already skeptical of his credentials and adding Clinton & Clinton as second and third in command respectively, particularly with She-Clinton likely to take over if McCain's health doesn't hold up, would see a massive chunk of the Republican base flock to Obama.
It would look like the ultimate hissy fit tactic, too - "I COULDN'T WIN MY PARTY'S NOMINATION SO I WENT TO THE OTHER!!!" which could be easily exploited. Of course, it goes without saying that any Democrat who voted for that ticket would be a slice of humanity far, far below a piece of shit in the middle of the street.
So I don't think that will happen - Even if the Clintons wanted to - and I don't think they would - McCain wouldn't be stupid enough to ruin his campaign in such a manner.
|
Butch350
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:32 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Joe Lieberman did - didn't he - when he ran for the senate?
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:33 AM
Response to Original message |
sendero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message |
|
... but she's not stupid. If she loses (and she will) she will go back to her senate seat and wait for another opportunity.
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 07:14 AM
Response to Original message |
34. Stupid, stupid, stupid question. |
Kokonoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message |
35. If she does, it will be called the real democratic party. |
|
Regardless of the realities.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message |