Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why I think Hillary could be dangerous as President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 05:55 PM
Original message
Why I think Hillary could be dangerous as President
I've watched Hillary from the beginning of this campaign with a wary eye. I often defended her here against unfair charges, and I still don't believe she's a neocon or a war monger, but I do believe that she's someone who could be a dangerous President. It's clear that Hillary is determined to show that she can be as tough on foreign policy as any man, and I think it's reasonable to fear that that's not merely a posture for the election, but something she'd bring with her into the White House. Her votes in the Senate are testament to her hawkish stances. Not only did she vote for the IWR and support it for years, she voted for Kyle/Lieberman and against restricting the use of cluster bombs.

So what has Clinton ever done to move the cause of peace forward in her Senate career? Nothing.

Then there's a question of temperment. The thing that's really startled me about watching Clinton is how tempermentally unsuited she is to the office. She is reactive and not reflective. She doesn't plan ahead, as has been made clear by her campaign decisions. She depends on people who are loyal to her, rather than people who speak honestly to her.

She's fiscally irresponsible. Why believe that she can manage the nation's economy when she can't manage her own campaign funds?

All of these things are indicators, and could foretell how she'd operate as President. Nothing is absolute, of course, but I can't ignore these weaknesses.

Having said that, she's no where near as dangerous as McCain, and if she's the nominee, I'll vote for her- albeit with a lot of trepidation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree. Her strategy and behavior is EXTREMELY reactive. But it's better than inactive McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree. I wish she'd been this tenacious in opposing...
...the Blank Check for Invasion, two Extreme Court nominees, the bankruptcy bill, etc., etc., etc.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. You got that right!
Why didn't she throw her little temper tantrums about the trumped-up intel and Bush banging the war drum?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, you and your "facts" and "logical analysis" of her campaign.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's a good thing she lost the nomination weeks ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. only in an alternate world. (or alternate state of being)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. your characterization is inaccurate
I recall Cali defending Clinton to me on several occasions in the past, to the point where I had pegged her as a clinton supporter.

and otherwise, you're being insulting for no apparent reason.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Thanks, lerkfish, for speaking out on that.
I have indeed defended Clinton against what I saw as sexism or other unfair attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. I calls em as I sees em
sometimes I"m mistaken, but I don't like people making crap up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Boy, Mags is GOOD!
Every post s/he has done today has pissed someone off (myself included) which I believe is the intent. S/he's got this down to an art form. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. oh, yes I have. Back in the fall and through much of Jan I was called a hillbot
more than once by posters on this forum. Funny thing, I don't recall YOU posting here at the time.

And who gives a flying fuck what you believe or don't believe? Not me, dear. So stop your sad little projection. Just because you won't vote for Obama if he's the nominee, doesn't mean that I, much as I dislike Hillary as a nominee, won't vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. cali is one of the most honest DU posters I know
she has no 'game' -- she's just telling the truth as she sees it. If she says she'll vote for HRC, she will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PylesMalfunction Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. I've read several posts by Cali.....
where she was defending Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Who cares about what you say? You haven't even contributed to DU and you haven't been around long ..
enough to know that Cali is one of the better members here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. What does contributing to DU have anything to do with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. It can say something about a persons intentions here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Or it can say they don't have any extra money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Heh ...uhm $45 a month for cable but not an extra $10 to donate. hmmm
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 08:34 PM by L0oniX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. That person has a star. Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Remarkable. It's ALL about cali. Just a total personal attack.
"... Cali, You ... your ... You ... you ... you ..."

What an appallingly reprehensible post. Sociopathic. Complete and utter trash-talking and gutter rhetoric.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. "So what has Clinton ever done to move the cause of peace forward"
well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thats a great post Cali, with all the reasons that those who support her should...
seriously consider. I agree totally with all of your points, and yes she does scare the crap out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good post, Cali. And true. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hillary Clinton is actually a PNAC stooge
If you look at her votes, look at her rhetoric and look at where she hangs out with The Fellowship, she is willing to be a stooge for Project For A New American Century tactics. It's that simple.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Agree with your
post, zulch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. Durn tootin' she is!
Schmoozin' with the likes of Murdoch and Scaife means she ain't no Demmiecrat!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Cluster Bomb Queen!
enough said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. She's the Goddess of War
Or Gwar for short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. The Great Writ
I had hoped that some journalist would question Senator Clinton closely about her views on restoring habeas corpus. It is easy for a democratic candidate to say they will reverse the damage that Bush has done to the Great Writ. However, it was President Clinton who did the initial damage to habeas corpus, and opened the door for Bush's "part 2."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. Very perceptive post.
I agree with every single syllable of your post. She has many good qualities, but she also has some characteristics of a personality disorder, and that concerns me greatly.

Another very insightful post, Cali.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. I would love to think this would change on Day One
That once she got to the top, she'd no longer have to do the tough-as-a-man votes. But habits are hard to break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. Every enemy that has (wrongfully) attacked her, she's gotten in bed with.
That tells me, when the going gets tough, she's doesn't really fight against the enemy, she joins them.

The latest examples of cozying up to Murdoch and Scaife only reinforce my opinion. These are people who printed vicious lies about her and her family, insinuating that she was either a lesbian or that Chelsea was the result of an affair with Webster Hubbell.

Such slimy individuals aren't fit to tie her shoes, yet she's only too happy to take Murdoch money and Scaife-approved endorsements. Not to mention giving a windfall in madated $$$ to the same health insurance industry that villified her and called her proposed plan "HillaryCare."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. I'm concerned about her aversion of transparency.
My biggest concern about a Hillary Clinton Presidency is that I think she'd continue the notorious Bush secrecy. I just don't see her throwing open the gates and letting the sun shine upon the Executive Branch.

It's one of the reasons why I don't think it would bug Bush/Cheney very much if she wins the office. I don't think they'd have to worry about all of their nastiness being exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
37. McCain is worse, way worse, but Obama will be a good president
I would vote for HRC in the GE, but I wont have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
38. She's the Rock of Gibralter, gracious, doesn't get rattled. Obama reacts emotionally
like turning away when he was with Teddy to avoid talking with her or shaking her hand.

He has been babied by the party, media, and managed to piss off John and Elizabeth Edwards with an ungracious and smug attitude when he met with them. He got into a fight with Elixabeth about health care.

He has a LOT to learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Doesn't get rattled? What was the shrieking "Shame on you
Barack Obama", about? It was clearly a case of her being rattled and scared as hell of the Wisconsin primary. How about the self-pitying junk in the debate where she actually whined about being asked questions first?

Hillary gets shaken far too easily. Under an assault as heavy as the MSM one on Obama, she'd crumble in her typical reactive fashion.

And Hillary seems incapable of learning from her many mistakes, misstatements and miscues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. "She's the Rock of Gibralter, gracious, doesn't get rattled."
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 09:19 AM by Blue_Roses
O-Kay. :eyes: Denial. Now there's a word that you might not be familiar with.

You must have missed it when Hillary went ballistic time and time again. When something doesn't go her way, her first reaction is to raise that shrill voice of hers. She acts like she's entitled to win this race and that "shame on you Barack Obama," moment was absolutely ridiculous. She sounded like a mother scolding a child. Obama has acted like the "adult" in this campaign by not feeding into her rants.

I always had a lot of respect for Hillary, but this campaign has showed a side of her that is very disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
41. OP's hit it. Exactly. Exactly. Exactly.
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 09:30 AM by leveymg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
42. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC