cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 05:55 PM
Original message |
Why I think Hillary could be dangerous as President |
|
I've watched Hillary from the beginning of this campaign with a wary eye. I often defended her here against unfair charges, and I still don't believe she's a neocon or a war monger, but I do believe that she's someone who could be a dangerous President. It's clear that Hillary is determined to show that she can be as tough on foreign policy as any man, and I think it's reasonable to fear that that's not merely a posture for the election, but something she'd bring with her into the White House. Her votes in the Senate are testament to her hawkish stances. Not only did she vote for the IWR and support it for years, she voted for Kyle/Lieberman and against restricting the use of cluster bombs.
So what has Clinton ever done to move the cause of peace forward in her Senate career? Nothing.
Then there's a question of temperment. The thing that's really startled me about watching Clinton is how tempermentally unsuited she is to the office. She is reactive and not reflective. She doesn't plan ahead, as has been made clear by her campaign decisions. She depends on people who are loyal to her, rather than people who speak honestly to her.
She's fiscally irresponsible. Why believe that she can manage the nation's economy when she can't manage her own campaign funds?
All of these things are indicators, and could foretell how she'd operate as President. Nothing is absolute, of course, but I can't ignore these weaknesses.
Having said that, she's no where near as dangerous as McCain, and if she's the nominee, I'll vote for her- albeit with a lot of trepidation.
|
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I agree. Her strategy and behavior is EXTREMELY reactive. But it's better than inactive McCain. |
ClassWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I agree. I wish she'd been this tenacious in opposing... |
|
...the Blank Check for Invasion, two Extreme Court nominees, the bankruptcy bill, etc., etc., etc.
NGU.
|
tabasco
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Why didn't she throw her little temper tantrums about the trumped-up intel and Bush banging the war drum?!
|
meow mix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message |
Liberal Veteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Oh, you and your "facts" and "logical analysis" of her campaign. |
Johnny__Motown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It's a good thing she lost the nomination weeks ago |
Oleladylib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. only in an alternate world. (or alternate state of being) |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. your characterization is inaccurate |
|
I recall Cali defending Clinton to me on several occasions in the past, to the point where I had pegged her as a clinton supporter.
and otherwise, you're being insulting for no apparent reason.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. Thanks, lerkfish, for speaking out on that. |
|
I have indeed defended Clinton against what I saw as sexism or other unfair attacks.
|
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
27. I calls em as I sees em |
|
sometimes I"m mistaken, but I don't like people making crap up.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Every post s/he has done today has pissed someone off (myself included) which I believe is the intent. S/he's got this down to an art form. :thumbsup:
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. oh, yes I have. Back in the fall and through much of Jan I was called a hillbot |
|
more than once by posters on this forum. Funny thing, I don't recall YOU posting here at the time.
And who gives a flying fuck what you believe or don't believe? Not me, dear. So stop your sad little projection. Just because you won't vote for Obama if he's the nominee, doesn't mean that I, much as I dislike Hillary as a nominee, won't vote for her.
|
Emit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. cali is one of the most honest DU posters I know |
|
she has no 'game' -- she's just telling the truth as she sees it. If she says she'll vote for HRC, she will.
|
PylesMalfunction
(362 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
18. I've read several posts by Cali..... |
|
where she was defending Clinton.
|
L0oniX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
20. Who cares about what you say? You haven't even contributed to DU and you haven't been around long .. |
|
enough to know that Cali is one of the better members here.
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. What does contributing to DU have anything to do with this? |
L0oniX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
23. It can say something about a persons intentions here. |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
30. Or it can say they don't have any extra money. |
L0oniX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
31. Heh ...uhm $45 a month for cable but not an extra $10 to donate. hmmm |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 08:34 PM by L0oniX
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
34. That person has a star. Just saying. |
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
22. Remarkable. It's ALL about cali. Just a total personal attack. |
|
"... Cali, You ... your ... You ... you ... you ..."
What an appallingly reprehensible post. Sociopathic. Complete and utter trash-talking and gutter rhetoric.
:puke:
|
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message |
8. "So what has Clinton ever done to move the cause of peace forward" |
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Thats a great post Cali, with all the reasons that those who support her should... |
|
seriously consider. I agree totally with all of your points, and yes she does scare the crap out of me.
|
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Good post, Cali. And true. K&R |
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Hillary Clinton is actually a PNAC stooge |
|
If you look at her votes, look at her rhetoric and look at where she hangs out with The Fellowship, she is willing to be a stooge for Project For A New American Century tactics. It's that simple.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
tabasco
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
Schmoozin' with the likes of Murdoch and Scaife means she ain't no Demmiecrat!!
|
Rosa Luxemburg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
16. The Cluster Bomb Queen! |
sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |
17. She's the Goddess of War |
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I had hoped that some journalist would question Senator Clinton closely about her views on restoring habeas corpus. It is easy for a democratic candidate to say they will reverse the damage that Bush has done to the Great Writ. However, it was President Clinton who did the initial damage to habeas corpus, and opened the door for Bush's "part 2."
|
Mike03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message |
26. Very perceptive post. |
|
I agree with every single syllable of your post. She has many good qualities, but she also has some characteristics of a personality disorder, and that concerns me greatly.
Another very insightful post, Cali.
|
Catherina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message |
29. I would love to think this would change on Day One |
|
That once she got to the top, she'd no longer have to do the tough-as-a-man votes. But habits are hard to break.
|
Tatiana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message |
32. Every enemy that has (wrongfully) attacked her, she's gotten in bed with. |
|
That tells me, when the going gets tough, she's doesn't really fight against the enemy, she joins them.
The latest examples of cozying up to Murdoch and Scaife only reinforce my opinion. These are people who printed vicious lies about her and her family, insinuating that she was either a lesbian or that Chelsea was the result of an affair with Webster Hubbell.
Such slimy individuals aren't fit to tie her shoes, yet she's only too happy to take Murdoch money and Scaife-approved endorsements. Not to mention giving a windfall in madated $$$ to the same health insurance industry that villified her and called her proposed plan "HillaryCare."
|
VolcanoJen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message |
33. I'm concerned about her aversion of transparency. |
|
My biggest concern about a Hillary Clinton Presidency is that I think she'd continue the notorious Bush secrecy. I just don't see her throwing open the gates and letting the sun shine upon the Executive Branch.
It's one of the reasons why I don't think it would bug Bush/Cheney very much if she wins the office. I don't think they'd have to worry about all of their nastiness being exposed.
|
FogerRox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
37. McCain is worse, way worse, but Obama will be a good president |
|
I would vote for HRC in the GE, but I wont have to.
|
LulaMay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-31-08 04:09 AM
Response to Original message |
38. She's the Rock of Gibralter, gracious, doesn't get rattled. Obama reacts emotionally |
|
like turning away when he was with Teddy to avoid talking with her or shaking her hand.
He has been babied by the party, media, and managed to piss off John and Elizabeth Edwards with an ungracious and smug attitude when he met with them. He got into a fight with Elixabeth about health care.
He has a LOT to learn.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-31-08 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
39. Doesn't get rattled? What was the shrieking "Shame on you |
|
Barack Obama", about? It was clearly a case of her being rattled and scared as hell of the Wisconsin primary. How about the self-pitying junk in the debate where she actually whined about being asked questions first?
Hillary gets shaken far too easily. Under an assault as heavy as the MSM one on Obama, she'd crumble in her typical reactive fashion.
And Hillary seems incapable of learning from her many mistakes, misstatements and miscues.
|
Blue_Roses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-31-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
40. "She's the Rock of Gibralter, gracious, doesn't get rattled." |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 09:19 AM by Blue_Roses
O-Kay. :eyes: Denial. Now there's a word that you might not be familiar with.
You must have missed it when Hillary went ballistic time and time again. When something doesn't go her way, her first reaction is to raise that shrill voice of hers. She acts like she's entitled to win this race and that "shame on you Barack Obama," moment was absolutely ridiculous. She sounded like a mother scolding a child. Obama has acted like the "adult" in this campaign by not feeding into her rants.
I always had a lot of respect for Hillary, but this campaign has showed a side of her that is very disappointing.
|
leveymg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-31-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message |
41. OP's hit it. Exactly. Exactly. Exactly. |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 09:30 AM by leveymg
|
Scurrilous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-31-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message |