Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton portrays calls to quit as chauvinism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:14 PM
Original message
Hillary Clinton portrays calls to quit as chauvinism
Faced with a growing chorus to abandon the uphill battle against Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination, Hillary Clinton is falling back on what she sees as her trump card - her gender

During a weekend interview with the Washington Post - arranged at her request - she was asked whether Mr Obama could beat John McCain, the Republican nominee.

She responded: "I'm saying I have a better chance. You cannot as a Democrat win the White House without a very big women's vote. What I believe is that women will turn out for me."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/03/30/whillary130.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's why Obama said she should stay in "as long as she wants."
Thus preventing Hillary from rallying the womyn vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Really, as prone to dividing as hilary
is..it looks like her latest scheme is calling the women to arms. Wonder how much that strategy set her back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
43. If Obama can successfully connect with the working PA voter,
her change in tact will cost her dearly. I don't think working democrats want an annoying victim in the Whitehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sun rises in east - details at 11
Sure, Hillary, women couldn't possibly vote for a man - we're all as sexist as you! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. She portrays everything as chauvinism.. I suppose my post is chauvinistic too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. You bet..ya
misogynist, you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. No Hillary...it's called facing reality and being able to count and add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayFredMuggs Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Skills women who went to Wellesley College didn't have to do!~
They were TOO IMPORTANT to have to add.

Now Hillary doesn't pay her campaign bills either, she's TOO IMPORTANT for that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Ack!
I think you are going to be in trouble over that one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarienComp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ugh.
You know I might be willing to concede that both candidates have, to varying degrees, tried to use their "non-white-male" qualities to their advantage... but man, Hillary does it with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. well this old woman won't be turning out
and many more! They can see she is just a coattailer, opaque and a misleading Lucretia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Ditto
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 06:26 PM by DeschutesRiver
Neither will this 50 year old women. She has become the kind of woman that pisses me off - I have no respect for this lying, cheating, bill-welching small minded, power grubbing candidate whatsoever.

And if she keeps up this "gender" card crap, yet still thinks strong women like me would fall for it, you can add "stupid" to that list as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. I saw Chelsea on CNN this afternoon. Same message. The men
are out to get poor little Hillary. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayFredMuggs Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Actually I like Chelsea better
of the two women in the Clinton campaign, she'd get my vote, but she's too young to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. She seems to take after Bill in the smooth department. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. Edmund hilary dissed chelsea when she lied about
her Fire by Sniper Story in Bosnia. It puts chelsea in a spot where she, either, has to lie and support her mother or say her mother doesn't remember right. And what was that lie about where chelsea was when 9/11 happened? Poor chelsea..I guess she didn't stand a chance with two world class liars as parents.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/hillary.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Gotta get the "gurl-power rangers" fired up
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 06:28 PM by SoCalDem
maybe she'll crank out a few tears for the cameras:)..or break a heel:)..or twist her ankle... or get a case of the vapors




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Quite the victim lately, aren't we, Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yep, she can use her gender when it suits her; Obama, OTOH,
cannot make his race an issue. Who has a leg up on this? It doesn't seem to be helping her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. She's trying to pull a NH. Won't work though--
The "Kitchen Sink" ruined any chance she had of looking the "victim."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. No Hillary, those calls are coming from "reality"
Get on board, and get out of wonderland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hillary's a sexist
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 06:32 PM by Upton
women do support Obama you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. This Is What I Said a Month Ago When People Were Calling For Her to Drop Out
And Obama supporters hissed at the notion that it would be seen as sexist.

It's natural for people to look at history and remember that these types of calls have never been made in the past with two or more candidates running so closely. In past seasons, other candidates have carried their campaigns, even obviously losing campaigns, to the convention.

So what's different this time? Gosh, a female candidate just happens to be neck and neck with the front-runner. Sure looks like people are demanding she throw it and let the guy win.

I wrote just two days ago about what a colossal mistake it is for Dems to lean on Hillary to drop out of the race, and obviously they figured out that mistake for themselves or Obama wouldn't be working so hard to distance himself from those calls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Which campaigns are you speaking of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Wikipedia Is Your Friend
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 07:05 PM by Crisco
Feel free to use it to look up prior Democratic presidential campaign seasons, especially where delegate counts going into the convention are listed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. So your saying your
you don't have to be specific? How can I know what your talking about if you only issue generalizations and then don't back them up with facts.

If WIKI is my friend it is yours also. Do your own research and then get back here with one or more specific Democratic conventions that you want to discuss. Otherwise you are just blowing smoke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. dont mean to butt in
but the dem convention im afraid to see repeated would be the '68
where the party took over and forced a candidate on the people
anyone remember nixon?
he won because the "party elders" wouldnt nominate mc carthy
they stuck hubert humphry on the ticket
this stolen convention almost killed the party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. That is a point well taken and
one of the reasons the party elders fear another convention like 68.

While I think it is certainly early for either candidate to concede eventually something has to give and hopefully before a big floor fight or worse a backroom deal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #31
40. I'm Saying If You Disbelieve, Then Look It Up Yourself
and stop being an ankle-biter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. And I'm saying
stop throwing shit against the wall and then refusing to clean up your stinky mess.

I would have debated with you about the value of a brokered convention but not if you use silly tactics like telling me to wiki to figure out what the hell your driving at.

In my opinion people that use that tactic, you included, simply are spouting that which they have heard elsewhere and have no real knowledge on the subject. Your just a parrot and I won't bother with you again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. The kindest thing
one can say about organized calls to quit is simply trying to counter her present campaign style and certain strategy hopes that won't fly. Once those calls start coming from the higher ups then the general chorus strengthens.

The better course, in my opinion, is to concentrate in face saving or more anti-GOP de-escalation. That too is VERY hard to do since the rhetoric as gone so far. Stepping back not only delineates a change of strategy but a complete fold just as bad as dropping out, maybe more expensive.

So expect a lot more sniping though Hillary may in fact, for the good of all, be scaling back the "scorched earth" attempts and not putting so much pressure or useless armlocks on the remaining things still available. If she does it well everyone will still be fighting only not as much. If not she will look defeated or in fact drop out. Money may force her hand- the ugliest reality.

The chauvinism complaint whatever its merits is a mere detail in the current grind. It is not even a strong background. She shores up her base, etc. She fights back. She signals no defeat. That is her due as a candidate. Haven't we seen all too many candidates forced out with no chance to meet the voters? I appreciate the terrible trap she is in and that dropping out is not the fairest answer- just the shortest. The DNC ideal of having a cheap short coronation primary(mostly) is dead as a doornail. Going the distance- fairly as possible in this imperfect process- offers a better democratic voice to our choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. So now she's disses the male gender of the species?


What's hilary's penchant for LYING called(I mean besides "misspeak"), Freakin' Pathological?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. If it looks like bullsh*t and smells like bullsh*t,
it's bullsh*t.

Buh-bye Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
26. Math is sexist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. Yep. People wanting her to quit doesnt have anything to do with the fact that shes LOSING.
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 07:10 PM by bunnies
Its all because shes a poor little "girl". You know. She has a vagina. :eyes: Those big boys are picking on little hilly again.

Shes a woman manipulating women. heh. Not THIS time!

edit: sp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
30. You can't be a fighter and a victim at the same time.
Pick one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Exactly.
She says she has met the "Commander-in-Chief" test. Okay.

Then she says that people want her to quit just because she a woman/victim. Okay

Which one is it, Senator?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Or "ready to lead on day one," then complaining about getting debate questions first.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. I know.
There just seems to be so many contradictions there. A few, well, I would have no problem with that. Everybody can contradict themselves at times, but saying you're strong (and I do believe she is) on the one hand, and then saying (even via surrogates) that you're being picked on because you're a girl is not good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. Everything that isn't actively promoting Hillary is sexist to her.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayFredMuggs Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Woman must rule the world
It's the Clintonian way !

Any man who makes sense, gets more votes, and doesn't toe the Hillary line is a disciple of "Judas"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyHatedByBothSides Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #33
42. You mean like Nancy Pelosi? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
39. This woman's voting for Obama. Why wouldn't other women?
If Hillary's out, then the argument to vote for a woman is moot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
44. So women will only vote for Hillary...


Is that what she is saying? If so, that's very sexist and arrogant of her... to act as if women will only vote for her and not for Obama in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC