Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Addressing the tone of discourse in GD: P

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:56 PM
Original message
Addressing the tone of discourse in GD: P
We have all seen the crap flinging going on over the last many weeks and months, steadily escalating in intensity and general stupid childishness day by day. There have been people in both camps from the beginning who have had trouble keeping things civil but it's been spreading and poisoning the atmosphere of the entire forum as it does.

A while ago some people launched the "Let it sink" initiative on the Obama side. On the one hand as a response to genuine trolls and disrupters that's a good policy. On the other hand it tends to get out of hand and applied as a response to any post that says anything that isn't pro-Obama, and doing that isn't productive or helpful. Ignoring people with serious concerns isn't going to change any minds. You want to get them on board you need to talk to them and explain where you think they're going wrong in their reasoning. On that front the "Let it sink" tactic is hindering things, nobody responds well when they post a serious question and the other side immediately responds with a declaration that they are to be ignored. So... by all means ignore obvious trolls, but try to maintain a little objectivity and recognize that not every post or thread critical of Obama is automatically in that category.

Now, beyond that, I think the "Let it sink" strategy is flawed for another reason. It doesn't accept responsibility for the tone of the message coming from our own camp. And I'm hoping Clinton supporters are listening to this part too because this applies to both sides. If we really want to see this forum become more mature and civil and issue-based then we cannot get there by only calling out the people on the other side who pull childish petty disruptive crap. That doesn't work, especially in an environment this polarized. An Obama supporter is going to have little to no luck getting someone acting like a 6 year old on the Clinton side to straighten out and act like a grown-up by confronting them, and the same goes for any adults on the Clinton side trying to straighen out an Obama disrupter... people acting like that want to get a rise out of the other side. That's the whole point. What they do NOT want to do is become an obvious and visible pariah to the people they're claiming to be on the same side as, that ruins their fun. So if we really want to clean things up in this forum the way to do it is to make the consequences of unacceptable uncivil behavior something that those engaging in it don't derive satisfaction from.

Obama supporters, if someone posts something clearly offensive and disruptive just to get a rise out of the Clinton people WE should be the ones to call them out on it. WE should be the ones sending the message that that is not what the Obama campaign is about. WE should make it clear that anyone pulling that crap needs to reconsider their approach.

Clinton supporters, same goes for you. I know there are level headed civil people over there. I've seen you posting. I know you hate this rhetoric flinging crap as much as your counterparts on this side of the debate do. Do something about it. Please.

Here is what I am proposing. If you are sick of the childish antics of certain people on both sides of this issue then sign up right here for a joint effort between both the Obama and the Clinton camps to start cleaning up this forum for the benefit of all involved, with the Obama people taking responsibility for calling out anyone who posts out of line comments about the Clinton people, and Clinton people taking responsibility for calling out anyone who posts out of line comments about the Obama people. If someone posts something idiotic and petty about Clinton or her supporters there should be an Obama person there, clearly identified AS an Obama person, making it clear that the wider community of Obama supporters don't stand for that. If someone posts something similar about Obama or his supporters there should be a Hillary person there taking them to task for giving their camp a bad name.

Will this stop trolls from being trolls? No. But it will create an atmosphere of common purpose and reconciliation among all the NON trolls on both sides if they can come together to oppose trollish behavior engaged in in the name of their own factions. It will make trolls less effective, it will marginalize them. And that's in everyone's best interests who really cares about this primary, this community, and future efforts in the GE.

If you're on board, let me see you check in below. For my part I'm getting started now, I've called out two people today so far who I saw making comments that served no purpose but to provoke the Hillary camp (one delightful individual called me Hitler for doing it, I kid you not...) and I'll keep doing it where I see it.

Anyone with me? I won't speak for the Clinton camp's motivations, but Obama folks... how about we look to his example? Reach across "the aisle" and get things done that are in the best interests of those on both sides instead of drawing lines in the sand and digging in for pointless partisan battles between Democrats of all things. Let's make it clear we're not just going to silently condone anyone undercutting that principle from our end. Let's not rely completely on the Mods to clean up the act in here... that's top down thinking. They work hard, but there aren't enough of them and there's only so much they can do. If you want to really get things done on the ground it needs to be bottom up. If we should have learned anything from his campaign that's it. We can do a lot of our own housecleaning if we put in the effort.

Or I could get 50 responses calling me an anti free speech fascist for daring to suggest we hold the community to a higher standard of discourse and then we can watch the trolls continue to whip the entire forum into a frenzy all the way until a nominee is finally official. Let's see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. A sincere thanks for trying -- but I'm afraid it'sfutile
But, I really do mean the thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Perhaps. But if we don't try...
...then we can stop fearing it, and be certain it's futile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've called out people on both sides
for posting asinine things. So I'm down with what you're saying.

:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am willing to try
but honestly I am all but fed up with the whole entire thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am an orphan Democrat as I have no candidate but will
vote for the candidate that wins the nomination... I must say that both camps leave a bad taste in my mouth... All these little kid games being played by adults, intelligent adults at that... Such a freaking shame...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. "games being played by adults, intelligent adults at that."
That assumes:

1. a lot of these posters are adults; and

2. that they're intelligent.

Seems to me there's ample reason to assume the opposite....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yes I know, I would like to give my fellow
members and Democrats the benefit of doubt... :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. It would be nice
I like Senator Obama and have nothing bad to say about him. Hillary is my choice for President,but as long as we get a Democrat in office its all good.:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Count me in. I'm tired of all the poo flinging and name-calling that I've been seeing.
I sometimes feel like I've gotten into a "cuss fight" between grade schoolers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. And..... kick. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. I agree to do my part to call out flamers on the Obama side
I still agree with the 'let it sink' strategy as it was originally conceived. If it is a deliberately inflammatory post, just let it sink to the bottom - don't bother responding. Not responding to any post by any Clinton supporter is another thing altogether.

With that being said, if I am participating in a thread and an Obama supporter makes a nasty comment, I will call them on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. If Hillary will stop lying and attacking, I will stop flinging. Promise.
If Hillary returns to running a positive campaign, there would be a *lot* less anger in here, and everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Just explain this to me.
How does your flinging crap in here HELP anything?

I'm not arguing with you that if Hillary toned down her approach that would lower tensions in here. But you don't control that. What you do control is how you react to it here. You are apparently choosing to react by heaping abuse on her supporters and calling her names.

Why? Explain to me what effect you think this is going to have that helps. Is it going to get Obama more votes? How so? Is it going to convince Clinton supporters that they should give Obama a shot? How so?

How does "flinging" trump mature, calm, reasoned argument in accomplishing whatever it is you want to accomplish? Just lay out your reasoning for me here if you don't mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Perhaps it's because anyone who would support Hillary at this point...
deserves abuse. I'm sorry, but that's the way I feel. They're supporting a mean, lying, unpresidential individual and if they don't know it, they're nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Feeling recognized...
...but that isn't exactly what I asked. How is heaping abuse on them helping rather than hurting? I trust you are an admirer of Obama's character and approach, try taking it into consideration here. The last thing he'd advocate doing is screaming and yelling at people just because you don't like what they're saying. That doesn't get us anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Explain to us again, how the Clinton supporters are the ones who have poisoned the well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. And it's just so easy to do from the keyboard in your parents' basement ...
Nice post, Stevie. You're NOT "the man," though.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Did you read the OP....
what planet do you live on????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Earth, the one where the next President of the U.S. is Obama. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. I built a SANCTUARY
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 01:20 PM by blogslut
Unfortunately, it's sparsely populated. Everyone is welcome there. We are talking about art and movies and the occasional jab at John McCain:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5308115
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Having a candidate's own supporters disagree with contentious posts is a great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is one of the best posts I have seen in a long time . Gladly K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Anti free speech fascist!
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 01:25 PM by BlooInBloo
:)

More seriously - trying to get any kind of comity on DU is like herding cats. Retarded cats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thank you for this.
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 01:43 PM by lumberjack_jeff
One of the problems is differing definitions of "clearly offensive".

I'm not going to try to claim that I'm unbiased. I'm sure that there's stuff coming from the Clinton supporters that I find benign, to which Obama supporters take mortal offense - such as an observation that Rev Wright has done pretty well for himself.

I earned at least one ignore by objecting to the idea that Obama has been chosen "by God, destiny or providence". His supporters are often genuinely surprised that this creeps some people out.

A recent big vote-getter here (30 recommends so far) is the thread saying that Hillary is working behind the scenes to convince people that Obama is "unelectable because he's black" It's basis? A blogger posted his interpretation of an interview posted two-sites removed between a journalist unconnected to the Clinton campaign and a radio host. The journalist opined that Hillary considers Obama unelectable for reasons which include race and is trying to make that case to the superdelegates.

Whatever you think about superdelegates, the system was developed to prevent rank-and-file Democrats from selecting an unelectable candidate - nominating another McGovern.

I find the fairly obvious claim that Clinton is a racist to be offensive. With 30 recommendations for the thread, it's unlikely that self-policing will do any good.

It is all about winning. This simple statement qualifies as "clearly offensive" to some.

FWIW, I think that Obama is electable, and has a good chance in the general election. My problem with him is squishy policy, especially health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. this is my answer to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. The first test of your proposal is taking place in this thread...
If Obama supporters are taking your proposal to heart, then I'm sure that many of them will rebuke Stevie and the attitude he is exhibiting in post #10 and other posts he has made in this thread. I am waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I'm still waiting. {EOM}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Waiting for what?
Posts 15 and 20?

Or are people supposed to dogpile him even though he's already been addressed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
26. Clinton and Obama supporters had teamed together to let ALL Clinton and/or Obama nasty posts sink.
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 03:26 PM by kerry-is-my-prez
It was really difficult to maintain - we probably needed to get more people to help.

Red Queen (Obama supporter) and I (Clinton Supporter) tried to do it. If anyone's interseted - we could get a team together....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. I'm willing to team with you, as an Obama supporter.
I'm not a frequent poster, but I will help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
29. I really appreciate this thread. I have scolded Obama supporters for
crossing the line, but now I just try to stay out of the overtly inflammatory threads and leave it to the Thunderdome die-hards on both sides. I will make the effort to take care of my own. I, too, initially signed onto the "let it sink" concept to let the obvious flame bait drop out of site, but unfortunately it became a mantra for *some* to stifle criticism. There are many Hillary supporters here that I am fond of and some Obama supporters that I find obnoxious. I will do my part to try to elevate the discourse around here. Again, I really appreciate your effort to bring civility back to this snake pit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC