Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debunking more Hillary spin. Her co-chair stopped the revote, not Obama. Also truth about DNC ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:40 PM
Original message
Debunking more Hillary spin. Her co-chair stopped the revote, not Obama. Also truth about DNC ruling
The meeting of the DNC rules committee August 2007, what they knew about Florida, Clinton co chair opposed Fl revote.

Florida knew they had 30 days to make an alternate arrangement with the party. They did not do so. Florida KNEW they would lose all their delegates. It was all out in the open and aboveboard.

Here is a video and article from CBS about that meeting on August 25, 2007.

DNC Panel: Florida's Primary Is Too Soon

But many members of the committee said Florida Democrats had not proven they did all they could to prevent the date change and, regardless, the DNC had to enforce the rules to preserve some sense of order to a process that has become increasingly front-loaded.

James Roosevelt Jr., the committee's co-chair, said the legislative record demonstrates their point. "It makes it clear that the Republicans were the moving force behind the selection of a date that violated both the Democratic and Republican rules, but the efforts to oppose that were form over substance," he said.

Donna Brazile, who sits on the committee and is most known for managing Al Gore's 2000 presidential campaign, said she sympathized with Florida, but couldn't back them.

"I understand how states crave to be first. I understand that they are envious of the role Iowa and New Hampshire have traditionally played," she said. "But the truth is that we have a process and, whether some of us are mum or some of us shout it, we uphold it."

Others on the committee noted that other, larger states resisted the urge to move up their primaries in violation of party rules. "Rules are rules, and California abided by them and I believe Florida should as well," said Garry Shay, a committee member from California who noted that his state decided against trying to hold a primary in early January.


Florida knew they were required to act in good faith and oppose the GOP. If Florida had acted in good faith, tried to fight the GOP on the vote....the delegates would have counted. Instead they voted 115 to 1 for the early primary.

Here is some of the information the rules committee had in front of them when the delegation from Florida presented their case.

The rules committee knew that FL had not tried to fight the GOP

Here is the letter from Geller, the "bramble bush" video guy...to Dean.

The Democratic Leadership in the Florida Senate and House of Representatives attempted to adhere to the rules of the DNC by offering amendments to keep the presidential preference primary on February 5, 2008. A copy of the amendment offered by myself and the Senate Democratic Leader Pro Tempore is included with this letter. An identical amendment was filed by the House Democratic Leader and the House Democratic Leader Pro Tempore. But as we are still the minority party in a Republican controlled Legislature, our amendments were overwhelmingly defeated. Simply put—we were outvoted, a scenario which - I’d like to caution - will be difficult to change should you move forward with any sanctions because of the primary date change.


No, Steve, voting 115 to 1 is not being outvoted. It is being complicit.

More the committee had:

The DNC members had handouts that included quotes by House Minority leader Dan Gelber brushing off Howard Dean, and the following transcript of Steve Geller making the motion to move the primary to Feb. 5:

Geller: "...So the Democratic leader and the Democratic leader pro tem are jointly making this motion, which we will duly show them later, that we tried not to have the election on, um, before (Feb. 5).

President: "And so Sen. Geller are you urging a negative vote or would you like us to pass this vote?"

Geller: "Oh no sir. We really, really want this. Don't we senator? (sarcasm and audible laughter in chamber).


Gelber said he did not represent Howard Dean, and he blew him off in public when asked to follow the rules.

Florida did not act in good faith. They went before the committee and pretended they had. The committee had done their homework.

Now to debunk another lie being spread by the Clinton campaign. They are sending emails saying Obama is the one who stopped the revotes in FL and MI. Let's stop the Florida lies right now.

Hillary's campaign co-chair stops Florida revote...Hillary blames Obama

I'm glad that the party has reached the same conclusion that was reached by the congressional delegation a week ago," said U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Florida.

A supporter of Sen. Hillary Clinton, Wasserman Schultz had staunchly opposed a re-vote.

..."Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida, has called for a new Florida primary, although he thinks the national party should pay for it. But Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz says another election would be too expensive."

....""The potential of a do-over is slim to none," said Wasserman Schultz, a national co-chair of Clinton's campaign. "The cost of a do-over is beyond reach. A do-over would be unfair. We still have nerves that are very raw from the 2000 recount in Florida."


For shame, Hillary Clinton, I expected better from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If you think I am lying, alert on me. Please do.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Did ignore spew some more vitriol??
Now you know why they are dead to me.

Give 'em hell Mad!! You rock!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. Yes, the democrats didn't vote to just move the primary, they voted for paper ballots, too.
And paper ballots trump some primary shit any day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Florida Clinton surrogates opposed any sort of re-vote - links here
March 18, 2008 on CNN:

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- After weeks of negotiations, the Florida Democratic Party said Monday it will not hold a second primary in the state.

"We researched every potential alternative process -- from caucuses to county conventions to mail-in elections -- but no plan could come anywhere close to being viable in Florida," said state party chairwoman Karen Thurman in an e-mail sent to Florida Democrats late Monday afternoon.


"I'm glad that the party has reached the same conclusion that was reached by the congressional delegation a week ago," said U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Florida.

A supporter of Sen. Hillary Clinton, Wasserman Schultz had staunchly opposed a re-vote.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/17/florida.primary.decision/





Hillary's National Party Co Chair is Rep Debbie Schulz Wassermun, of Florida.

Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm endorsed Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton for president.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Are you responding to me?
I don't know what you're saying. I'm not debating that Clinton supporters stopped the revote. But I do wonder where the idea that Obama started it came from. I think the original *blog posting* was confusing MI with FL, but I could be wrong.

I await the gossip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Thanks.
for more links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
37. Democrats made no effort to stop it, laughed their own amendment off the floor
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. I'd laugh too. There's no way the GOP would pass it after having *just* passed the primary date...
..change that was tied with the paper balloting initiative.

You people really are dense. Or liars. One of the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. No, that was "name removed" (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. "Alert"? Why? There's no rule against what you've done.
You made up a headline that isn't supported by anything in the contents of your post to make Clinton look bad, and Obama look good.
Traditionally, that'll get you 30 recs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. If you are going to call me a liar, after all I have seen here at DU today...
then by gosh...alert....please do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:40 PM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
60. Oh geez here we go with your usual sympathy-seeing "you called me a liar" routine. lolol
Got a guilty conscience or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #60
98. They have no problem calling others liars.
But they do have a problem backing it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #98
125. It's what DUbamas do.
They post fiction, they wait to be called on it, and they alert anyone who notices for calling them a "liar".
It's a shameful misuse of DU, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. Good Job, madfloridian!
One more Tombstone served up hot!
Poster #1 disrupted poorly.

Thanks!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
150. floridian
as a fellow sunshine stater i want to thank you for truthfully reporting the events occuring
i look forward to your reports for the FACTS
im of the "we went laughing to vote 115-1" camp and dont think any of our delegates should be seated
i just wated to take a minute to let you know how much your work is indeed appreciated

keep it up for us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
155. Obama killed the revote on Mich - and would not agree on mail in in Florida - Obama killed revotes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. If you're going to call madfloridian out for dishonesty, please debunk her post
with proof.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. OK. 1. read the headline. 2. read the contents.
Post self-debunked.
You are now better informed than you were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I'm waiting n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Send me your phone number, I'll read it out loud for you.
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 01:25 PM by MethuenProgressive
We're here to help you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
148. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
67. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #22
128. For Someone So Passionate About the Truth
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 07:21 AM by Grinchie
You certainly have very little to say about fact to disprove or persuade anyone.

There is an old saying that says: "A empty barrel makes more noise."

You have done nothing but confuse and frighten me, and I don't consider that well informed.

MadFloridian is only posting what is available freely on the Internet and YouTube, I suggest you research it yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
33. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. GIVE EM HELL MAD!
Wish I could rec more than once!

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. The truth is that the MI and FL Dems are going to be pissed off if their delegates aren't seated!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Tough
They need to let their own STATE party leaders know how displeased they are with their caving in to the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
51. That's apples and oranges when...
...enough Democrats in those states stay home for the GE and those states go for McCain. Howard Dean is a dunce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. Let them stay home then.
If it makes them happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Thet'll be seated. Hill will drop out after Indiana. No more MONEY!
.........and then we seat Michigan and florida and move on to November united and strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Cry me a river
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
50. I will...
...after both Florida's and Michigan's electoral votes go for McCain in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. That has nothing to do with the Barrett piece or the truth behind the DNC ruling n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Delete *dupe*
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 01:03 PM by wileedog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Delete *dupe*
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 01:04 PM by wileedog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Should have thought about that last year.
Plus, one of the most econonically depressed states in the union (MI) is not going to vote for a guy who has already declared himself economically illiterate.

Enough with the scare tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gal Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
47. The rest of America will be Pissed if they are seated!
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 03:33 PM by gal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
68. Understandable, but they should be angry at the people who actually caused it.
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 09:11 PM by Zhade
Which isn't the DNC or Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
70. Yes, and they know Hillary has been pushing for them, not BO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #70
80. Hillary has been pushing for nobody but herself.
It was her own surrogates who set this fiasco up, in an effort to undermind the DNC and Dean, because they have effectively supplanted the DLC as the primary power block in the party.

Hillary is not a Democrat. She is a DLCer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. "Hillary is not a Democrat" You have hit the bottom of the stink barrel with this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #83
92. The entire raison d'etre of the DLC is to prevent progressive
populists from having any say in the party - they have staked out a claim on a "third way" - well, if one way is Democratic and the 2nd is Republican, then the third way must, by definition, be neither - therefore, the DLC are not Democrats.

Fuck em.

I want my party back - I want progressive populists standing up for civil rights, women's rights, gay rights. I don't want corporatists standing up for oppressive government, conservatism, compromise with the fascists.

FUCK THE DLC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #92
93. well said....



I consider myself a moderate dem, and even I feel like Hill and Bill pulled this country too far to the right in an attempt to triangulate the 50% +1 formula. I'm sick of it.

The DLC is willing to destroy the party... Dean's 50 state strategy is working, and proving more powerful than the old party elite machine. The old style smoky back room dealing power players have been out maneuvered, out organized, and out funded by grassroots level activism armed with small donations and the internet.

Dirty tricks is all Hillary and her people have left.

I fear her slime machine has just started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #92
108. the DLC's goal was to win national elections
something the progressive side of the party had shown itself to be... not so good at.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #92
120. FUCK THE DLC.
Well said.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #92
129. The DLC is the Brain Slug Attached to Hillary Clintons Head.
It can't be removed because it would destroy what little reasoning she has left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #92
137. You're two paragraphs speak for me. It's an excellent way of saying it. The DLC
is a third way. It's Republican heavy, not even lite.

I want progress in what this country needs and has promised. Not contentment through a handshake and sit down with corporatism *fascist at that" - and a little wave to the people out here with me who are in the process of being completely owned by fellow humans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
78. And now they have an appropriate target for their anger nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
purji Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
136. no I'm not.
and I don't know any one in michigan who will be either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
151. no
we arent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks Mad. You'll probably have to re-post your excellent info one bazillion times more. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
61. Or more...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Butbutbut... Hillary said Obama doesn't want them to vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. kicking for the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good faith...
I will have to keep my post kicked probably. I have learned I am the leader on being on ignore lists. What an honor.

"In the event a state shall become subject to subsections (1), (2) or (3) of section C. of this rule as a result of state law but the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee, after an investigation, including hearings if necessary, determines the state party and the other relevant Democratic party leaders and elected officials took all provable, positive steps and acted in good faith to achieve legislative changes to bring the state law into compliance with the pertinent provisions of these rules and determines that the state party and the other relevant Democratic party leaders and elected officials took all provable, positive steps and acted in good faith in attempting to prevent legislative changes which resulted in state law that fails to comply with the pertinent provisions of these rules, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee may determine that all or a portion of the state’s delegation shall not be reduced. The state party shall have the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that it and the other relevant Democratic party leaders and elected officials took all provable, positive steps and acted in good faith to achieve legislative changes...."

http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v001/democratic1.download.akamai.com/8082/pdfs/20051210_commissiontranscript.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. You mean the DNC Rules and By-Laws Committee are allowed to take ALL the rules into consideration
when they make a decision? Not just the rules the Clinton campaign supporters want them to use? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
43. You got it, Debi.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skywalker Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
117. Kick for you, Mad! :) NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
139. Another Kick
and an 'R'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. Caught in another lie. When will this end? Does she think she can
spew 'misspeaks' and no one will notice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
106. The source for this "lie" isn't even provided.
The topic of the post does not cite the first claim. Anywhere. It goes to a blog, which links to Hillary's site, but the link is broken. If you go to the site, you will be unable to find the suspected innuendo.

In other words, the OP is a farce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
26. K&R for truthifying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. A response to your outright lies.
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 01:37 PM by joshcryer
"Florida knew they had 30 days to make an alternate arrangement with the party."

The only concievable "alternate arrangement with the party" was a firehouse caucus which the DNC would pay $800k for. It would only pay for 150 caucus sites which would have only covered 150k voters.

The primaries covered 1.7 million.

The DNC's "alternate arrangement" was a farce.

"Florida KNEW they would lose all their delegates."

Not when the vote was changed they didn't, they thought they'd lose half. It was only after the DNC *increased the penalty* and demanded that they hold firehouse caucuses (which would disenfranchise 9/10ths of the states voters) that they finally gave up on the DNC.

But your innuendo allows you to take the turn of events and place it at the start of your post, as if it happened in the beginning, rather than the essential end of the process.

"Florida knew they were required to act in good faith and oppose the GOP. <...> Instead they voted 115 to 1 for the early primary."

FL dems voted unanamously to change the vote to Feb 5th. This was ignored by the DNC even though FL dems were in a complete no win situation. In fact, you yourself will quote the FL gop's analaysis over the situation over the legislation that proves their intent.

You also conveniently leave out the fact that the vote with 115 to 1 was over a balloting initiative that would make all of FL have paper ballots. An initative that if ignored would have costed them their consituants, as Greber wrote to Dean when he urged them to be fair about it.

Dean and the DNC ignored these pleas.

Thus fragmenting the party in FL further, no doubt.

"The rules committee knew that FL had not tried to fight the GOP"

Innuendo with no facts. They showed good faith by voting to move the date to Feb 5th. They were in a no-win situation, had they "fought" and pitched a fight, as Gelber notes so elequoently to Dean, the balloting initiative would have been jepordized, and their constituants would be very angry.

Except for people like the OP who have no problem with the national party dictating policy procedures to people in their states even if it costs the party seats.

"No, Steve, voting 115 to 1 is not being outvoted. It is being complicit."

He is clearly talking about the move of the vote to Feb 5th! But your innuendo makes it look like he's talking about the original balloting initiative. They voted unanamously to change the date, and you know it. But you use the FLGOP provided video to 'prove' that they weren't 'really' acting in good faith.

Well guess what, they were outnumbered, I'd laugh too. It was a no-win situation. I'd laugh my fucking ass off. The outcome was predictable, nothing could be changed. Yet these observations to Dean and the DNC went on deaf ears. No compasion, no compromise.

"Gelber said he did not represent Howard Dean, and he blew him off in public when asked to follow the rules."

What part of the party rules say that one should "represent Howard Dean"? He represents his state Democratic party, and there's nothing here to show otherwise. Your innuendo attempts to portray this vote as some sort of evil thing when in fact they voted unanamously to change the date. They laughed because they were outnumbered, and this is even evidenced by the quote, "But as we are still the minority party in a Republican controlled Legislature, our amendments were overwhelmingly defeated."

Of course they fucking were. Of course they fucking *would be*. They had no choice. They were completely owned.

"Hillary's campaign co-chair stops Florida revote...Hillary blames Obama"

I'm not sure about Obama blocking a FL revote, but he certainly blocked the MI revote: http://www.observer.com/2008/ickes-obama-campaign-blocking-michigan-re-vote

BTW, the link to "Hillary making that claim" is not working, and I was unable to find it on her site, so I'd be appreciative if someone could back up their innuendo with actual facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gal Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
48. Fair to ALL voters...
Do you have a problem with the re-vote being held so it would be fair for all voters in Michigan or just some?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #48
94. No, it's a Democratic Primary and they can afford to represent only so much.
Making it an Open Primary as Obama is attempting to do is illegitimate and wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
71. All these "facts" and "counterfacts"..
... makes me have to decide between the integrity of Howard Dean vs Hillary Clinton.

It's not even close, I trust the DNC and Dean over HRC 10 to 1.

Florida got what it deserved, END OF FUCKING STORY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #71
95. Dean is a good man but he fucked up on this one.
I suspect it wasn't just Dean, but the committeee chaired by Donna Brazille who realized that these two states would go Hillary and ruin Obama's momentum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #95
131. Delusional doesn't convince people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
72. Wow, you lie and then call her a liar?
We're not stupid, dude.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #72
96. Show me where I lied, you liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
82. You misuse the word "disenfranchise" ...

There is no "right" to vote in a primary. The method of candidate selection is entirely the decision of the political party in question. They could just treat state legislators as delegates and let them decide.

The primaries work alongside caucuses to choose a candidate who would be well equipped to win the general election.

The actions of Democrats in Florida in Michigan effectively killed their say in the nominating process. There are no delegates to seat. No delegates were chosen under sanction of the Democratic Party in Michigan and Florida. I sympathize with their plight, but if the Democratic Party violated their own rules, they would open themselves up to lawsuits. Sticking to the rules means it will at least be settled at the convention as opposed to in court.

Hopefully Hillary will be done after the Indiana vote and we won't have to worry about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #82
97. The point is their GOP parties fucked them and the DNC ignored their efforts to comply.
Yes in FL they didn't "fight" but there was nothing to "fight."

The DNC dismissed this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #97
121. They voted for it ...

They voted for it. Based on the rules, the committee in charge was obligated to decertify Florida's delegate selection process.

This is one area where I think the Republicans have it right. If Michigan and Florida were going halfsies instead of losing all their delegates, I don't think this would be fight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #121
123. I do believe that will indeed be the compromise, and no one can say it's unfair.
Those were the original consequences that the parties all agreed too, being stripped after the fact was a bad move, especially when both states made efforts to reverse the primaries that their state GOP set up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #123
142. If these are indeed the rules ...

If the half rule IS the rule, I think all parties should be satisfied by it in Florida. The problem in Michigan is that Obama's name was not on the ballot after all parties signed off on removing their name. Hillary signed that pledge. There is ZERO chance of counting Michigan ... AT ALL unless Hillary concedes to give all the "undecided" votes to Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #142
157. MI can have uncommitted seated for Obama, it's not all that hard.
Rules at the DNC can be made up on the fly, and this is the likely outcome (even though it would be unfair to Edwards who got 15% of the vote according to exil polls).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #121
140. I have to agree. The 1/2 compromise at least gave FL and MI a voice.
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 10:06 AM by Spiffarino
I think the DNC would be wise to look at this solution. That way the people who didn't bother to show because they knew the delegates didn't count would not be quite as screwed, and the people who did show up would have some sway.

I support Obama and I believe that MadFloridian makes a good - and truthful - argument. However, I think this compromise is better for the party and will give some well-deserved comfort to voters in both states. I have and will continue to urge the DNC to strongly consider it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #140
158. I have no doubt that the OP is truthful about FL dems.
But the OP neglects to recognize the powerlessness of FL dems and how any politician in their situation would've had to do things the same way. When you're in a very small minority it just so happens in politics that you can't always come off as perfect and have to compromise.

The original penality was the one that FL dems knew they were going to get and accepted it (go to the FL dems website and read their archives, it was an acceptable loss). Once they got their delegates stripped and then were required to run caucuses which would represent 1/10th of the voters, they then decided to say fuck it to the process since the DNC were the ones who were in fact not working together with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #158
164. Let's hope, then, that the DNC and the candidates
...will work out a solution.

IMO, this goatfuck was orchestrated by the FL GOP. Everyday Democrats had zero say in the matter, and it seems Dean and the candidates agree this is where we are. There has to be an answer that will, if not satisfy, at least soothe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #28
110. Some inaccuracies
"Florida knew they had 30 days to make an alternate arrangement with the party."

The only concievable "alternate arrangement with the party" was a firehouse caucus which the DNC would pay $800k for. It would only pay for 150 caucus sites which would have only covered 150k voters.

The primaries covered 1.7 million.

The DNC's "alternate arrangement" was a farce.


Actually, the DNC first suggested that the FDP hold a non-binding primary with a nominating convention later. The FDP said no. Then the FDP said no to a caucus. Then the FDP said no to a revote. The FDP has simply refused to compromise at all, 30 days or no.


"Florida knew they were required to act in good faith and oppose the GOP. <...> Instead they voted 115 to 1 for the early primary."

FL dems voted unanamously to change the vote to Feb 5th. This was ignored by the DNC even though FL dems were in a complete no win situation. In fact, you yourself will quote the FL gop's analaysis over the situation over the legislation that proves their intent.
FL Dems voted unanimously, eh? In a voice vote that failed without debate offered? Who told you that they voted unanimously? It was a voice vote. That means there's no record of how Dems voted.

"The rules committee knew that FL had not tried to fight the GOP"

Innuendo with no facts. They showed good faith by voting to move the date to Feb 5th. They were in a no-win situation, had they "fought" and pitched a fight, as Gelber notes so elequoently to Dean, the balloting initiative would have been jepordized, and their constituants would be very angry.
Didn't Gelber and Geller both publicly state that their amendments were specifically intended to prove to the DNC that they'd made an affort and not to actually change the date? I'll look for the documentation of that.

"No, Steve, voting 115 to 1 is not being outvoted. It is being complicit."

He is clearly talking about the move of the vote to Feb 5th! But your innuendo makes it look like he's talking about the original balloting initiative. They voted unanamously to change the date, and you know it. But you use the FLGOP provided video to 'prove' that they weren't 'really' acting in good faith.

Well guess what, they were outnumbered, I'd laugh too. It was a no-win situation. I'd laugh my fucking ass off. The outcome was predictable, nothing could be changed. Yet these observations to Dean and the DNC went on deaf ears. No compasion, no compromise.

Um, no. The FL Dems didn't vote unanimously for the plan to move the date to 2/5. Seriously, if you have any kind of corroboration at all of your statement, I'd love to see it. Everything I've read says the measures failed in voice votes without discussion. And I wouldn't frigging laugh if the amendment I was introducing was the one way that I could clearly show that I was at least trying to comply with DNC rules.

"Gelber said he did not represent Howard Dean, and he blew him off in public when asked to follow the rules."

What part of the party rules say that one should "represent Howard Dean"? He represents his state Democratic party, and there's nothing here to show otherwise. Your innuendo attempts to portray this vote as some sort of evil thing when in fact they voted unanamously to change the date. They laughed because they were outnumbered, and this is even evidenced by the quote, "But as we are still the minority party in a Republican controlled Legislature, our amendments were overwhelmingly defeated."

Of course they fucking were. Of course they fucking *would be*. They had no choice. They were completely owned.

You seem to be missing the context that Gelber's response came as a result of phone calls from Dean asking Gelber to work with him to solve the problem. And again, please corroborate your claim that FL Dems voted unanimously (or even in a majority) to change the date. They did have the choice to make an effort in some way that they were trying to comply or that they would compromise with the DNC in some way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #110
114. Some clarifications since you miss the point.
"Actually, the DNC first suggested that the FDP hold a non-binding primary with a nominating convention later. The FDP said no. Then the FDP said no to a caucus. Then the FDP said no to a revote. The FDP has simply refused to compromise at all, 30 days or no."

Where did anything in what I say contridict this? The point is that the FDP considered the DNCs "solutions" to be unfair, and they were, as the FDP made a good faith attempt to revoke the date change. And the DNCs "solutions" all resulted in less people getting their voice heard in the polls.

"FL Dems voted unanimously, eh? In a voice vote that failed without debate offered? Who told you that they voted unanimously? It was a voice vote. That means there's no record of how Dems voted."

In Gelber's letter: The Democratic Leadership in the Florida Senate and House of Representatives attempted to adhere to the rules of the DNC by offering amendments to keep the presidential preference primary on February 5, 2008.

"We really really want this."

Comments that the OP will use via innunendo to imply that they didn't 'really' want the vote to go through. But uh they just passed a vote to change the primary, am I going to be told to believe that the FL GOP would then, right after passing a vote, change the vote again? Maybe if they were out of their mind.

"Didn't Gelber and Geller both publicly state that their amendments were specifically intended to prove to the DNC that they'd made an affort and not to actually change the date? I'll look for the documentation of that."

Absolutely, but that's what the rules required of them. They had no power, what are they going to do? Spend all year politicking on something they have no power over and if they screw anything up the balloting initative that they want gets reversed because they're a 1/3rd miniority and have absolutely no power?

"Um, no. The FL Dems didn't vote unanimously for the plan to move the date to 2/5."

First you admit that they voted to change the date to show as an effort to the DNC then you deny that they voted unanimously. I don't know what sort of spin you're trying here but it makes no sense.

They voted to change the date initially because it had a paper ballot law. Then they added an ammendment which was shot down by the GOP, which the FL dems all voted on to show good faith to the DNC that they opposed the date move up.

But what is said is innuendo. They didn't 'really' mean to change the date. They weren't 'really' fighting.

Uh, of course not, this is politics and they have no power in the situation. But does the DNC recognize this fact at all? Nope.

"And I wouldn't frigging laugh if the amendment I was introducing was the one way that I could clearly show that I was at least trying to comply with DNC rules."

You wouldn't laugh because of rules you could not comply with? Are you serious? You wouldn't see yourself being unduely punished? I damn sure would.

"You seem to be missing the context that Gelber's response came as a result of phone calls from Dean asking Gelber to work with him to solve the problem."

Read his letter for yourself: http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_politics/2007/05/geller_to_dean_.html

So you're outvoted your ammendments are shot down, and you laugh about it, you're instantly villified by people like the OP through innuendo and lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #114
163. No, you seem to be missing the point.
Point 1: You described DNC attempts at solutions as a "farce." The FDP refused a non-binding primary with a nominating convention later, a caucus, and a revote. What would the FDP have accepted as a compromise?

Point 2: There is no evidence at all that FL Dems voted unanimously to change the primary date as you repeatedly claim.

Point 3: How can we be expected to believe that Geller and Gelber were actually making a good faith effort? They both acknowledged that the effort was only to appease the DNC--that's not a good faith effort. Isn't one of them responsible for calling the four early-primary states, "terrorist rogue states?" And wasn't one of them seen in public wearing buttons mocking NH and IA? Can you not see that those aren't really conciliatory actions?

Point 4: No, I didn't say that they voted to change the date. I said they introduced an amendment (that they themselves laughed at) that was then voted down in a voice vote with no debate offered. There is apparently no basis to the claim that Dems voted unanimously or that anyone at all voted for the amendment, and there's really no basis to assert that the introduction of the amendment was a serious, good-faith attempt to change the primary date to comply with the party rules. The DNC didn't require the FDP to succeed in changing the date back--it required that they actually work toward doing so. There's no evidence that they did so.

Point 5: No, I wouldn't laugh at my own amendment. I'd be furious, and I'd at the very least make the point on the floor that voting no could cost FL Dem voters their voice in the primary.

Point 6: I read the letter. Geller claims that the FDP was the victim of the state republicans, ignoring the fact that a state Dem was one of the sponsors of the initial move.

Maybe you should read this email from Jon Ausman, Tallahasse Democrat, talking about the issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. Kick
for the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
34. Hillary's co-chair opposed the revote. More quotes from Wasserman-Schultz
And that campaign had the guts to blame Obama? Left hand right hand not knowing about the other??

More from Wasserman Schultz:

"“Let me assure you, there might seemingly be increasing talk of a do-over. But there is not realistic talk about a do-over,” Wasserman Schultz said. “A do-over is unworkable, too expensive, unfair and not logistically possible in a state our size this late in the game.”

“From all the people that I’m hearing from, on all the different sides, there does not appear to be an appetite for a new election. And there doesn’t appear to be any way to pay for it either,” Wexler said.

Wasserman Schultz, a Weston Democrat is a national co-chairwoman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign."
http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2008/mar/07/no-democratic-do-over-mahoney-others-are-saying/

""It was clear that a mail-in was not going to work. It was too risky. You don't want to start experimenting with a new voting method when the stakes are as high as a presidential election," said Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz. "There were a variety of major problems with it."

Wasserman Schultz said that the congressional delegation is talking with the DNC and both campaigns to find another solution to seating Florida's delegates, including an idea that would take into account the January vote among other factors.

"Now we have to turn our focus to a solution that will make sure the Democratic nominee is selected by voters from all 50 states," she said.

http://wjz.com/xcampaign08/florida.primary.failed.2.679049.html

There might seemingly be increasing talk of a do-over. But there is not realistic talk about a do-over," said U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Weston. "A do-over is unworkable, too expensive, unfair and not logistically possible in a state our size this late in the game."

Wasserman Schultz is a national co-chairwoman of Hillary Clinton's campaign.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sfl-flbprimary0307pnmar07,0,4649936.story

Who has a copy of the email from the Clinton campaign that Obama was trying to stop this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. I'd like the copy of that email too, since it isn't linked anywhere here.
A more credible source than someones blog would be appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksquire Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
91. But where's the real evidence? hahah j/k. nice post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
41. Dean has an interview on CNN in the 4:00 hour. Guess he wants to preach unity again.
Good luck on that, Howard. Good luck on unity when one of the candidates is manipulating the truth about the FL revote.

It is his job to preach unity, but there is one person who will not have it. Can't blame him for that.

I missed the interview earlier today with Norah O'whats her name. Anyone have a video?

Link from CNN

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/01/dean-democrats-will-unify-around-nominee/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Feel free to provide the link illustrating Hillary's blame of Obama on the FL revote.
I'm pretty sure he was trying to fuck over MI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Thanks for the heads up! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. And supposed to be on CNN again in the 8:00 hour.
On election central.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not_too_L8 Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
44. Keep up the good work...K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
46. Hey!!!! madfloridian ..Yah... You
:yourock: ... :yourock:
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. I hear Dean rocked on CNN today. Recorded it, but haven't watched it yet.
Heading that way now. Someone said he mentioned the FL and MI stuff.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #49
81. Dean made a complete ass out of himself.
Of course, that's not difficult given that he's responsible for this whole delegate debaucle.

Nobody is buying his "explanation" and you'd better be prepared for the backlash against Dean and probably Obama too for his refusal to agree to a revote in MI.

People aren't going to take too kindly to their votes not counting.

Got news for ya, the delegate in FLA will be counted but NOT after the candidate is chosen. The votes will count as part of the popular vote and will help the candidate who won FLA and will give that candidate FLA's delegates.

Nobody is pleased with Dean's leadership and after he steps down as chairman he'd better go back to Vermont and hide.

It's not very American to disenfranchise voters, especially Florida's because of what happened when Bush was appointed by the Supreme Court.

You really ought to be ashamed of yourself, madfloridian, for trashing the voters of MI and FLA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. I am so ashamed.
I will hide my head in shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #81
107. Hate to break it to you, but there's a LOT of us who are pleased
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 12:28 AM by NCevilDUer
with Dr Dean's standing up to the DLC and their misbegotten power play in MI and FL. They knew the rules. They had ample opportunity to comply with them. They have nobody to blame but themselves - but of course, they WANTED to create a crisis because they WANTED to try to discredit Dr Dean. It was the LEGISLATURES that disenfranchised their own voters.

You ought to be ashamed of yourself for lying about it.

ON EDIT:

I forgot -- FUCK THE DLC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExPatLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #81
119. Oh, so is Dean the latest on the list of people to hate?
One question: Where was the outrage for the FL and MI voters when Hillary signed on to "disenfranchise" them?

Spin and false outrage can only go so far before people see right through them. I think that is why Hillary is becoming more and more unpopular. It's sad, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #49
84. Dean is looking weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. He is looking great. Hillary is not looking so good.
I intend to keep posting truth with sources. She lied about who did not want the revote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #86
99. And your source for that? Still waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
52. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrJJ Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
54. MI before the vote
October 11, 2007
Flashback: Does Michigan Matter to Clinton?

Hillary Clinton, during which she was asked about the Michigan primary:

"I personally did not think it made any difference, whether or not my name was on the ballot. You know, it's clear, in this election they're
having, it is not going to count for anything."

http://www.youtube.com/user/MDRUDGE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Ah, thank you. I am always losing that quote. Flip flop...
Bookmarking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndependentDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #54
63. this single quote is more important to me than the rest of this thread...
It shows that she had no problem at all disenfranchising voters when SHE was the presumptive nominee-- Why didn't she fight for the voters right to be heard then? Back when the majority of the US thought that she had it in the bag-- back before Obama fucked up her plans.

But now that she is losing she wants to act like she cares about the voters... all she cares about at this point is winning. This whole Obama doesn't want your vote to count bullshit is crazy. HE is the one that has ran a grass-roots campaign, HE is the one that has focused on every state instead of only the big states, HE is the one that says YES WE CAN instead of YES SHE CAN.

This shit is getting old! Let me make this clear-- I DO NOT want Clinton to drop out of the race. But, I would like it if she would stop making shit up and twisting the truth and straight out lying to all of us-- its like she thinks we are all idiots and we will just take her word for it. I honestly don't think that she understands the power of the information available on the internet.

:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #54
100. Yes, no one thought it would make a difference or count.
Everyone thought it would be over earlier than it is. Obama thought he'd take Feb 5th in a landslide just as much as Hillary did.

I don't see what's controversial in these statements.

But they make great for innuendo and gossip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
56. Thanks for the post madfloridian

You are a great asset to DU and I really appreciate all the hard work you do in
keeping us informed on the FL situation. Too mad MSM can't do the same quality
work you do. Maybe you should apply!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
57. Kicked & Rec'd
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irishonly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
59. Thank you
I seem to say that a lot to you. I first became interested in this mess when the out of state religious nuts were trying to get the prop on the CA ballot discriminating against GLTB again and you reported the DNC may have to go to court.

Thank you for all of your research. It's because of you (I always give credit to you and link to your journal) I can try to pass on information to those who don't know. I just linked to your journal again with your new (to me) information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
62. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychmommy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
64. hey mad, you are killing them.
you know when they are hating and insulting-you have struck a chord. i love it. i think i heard some heads explode from the cognitive dissonance. keep it coming mad. i used to like debbie and meeks too. not anymore. vote them suckers out fl-they don't deserve you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #64
90. If my goal were to be liked....I have failed miserably.
I am on so many ignore lists. I never believed the Clintons would act like this. It just never occurred to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #64
104. I have not said anything insulting to the person in question.
Unless you consider being called a liar an insult, in which case it would be prudent to defend yourself rather than hit alert and cry victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #104
146. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
65. And while we are at it.....let's debunk the MI and NH stuff.
I see posts all over DU talking about NH and the other 3 states who were given permission to go before Feb. 5....were all allowed to move forward with no penalties.

Of course they were allowed to....they got permission first. They worked with the DNC and got permission. NH was threatened by Carl Levin of MI....

AND it was Michigan who moved ahead of NH. Then and only then did Gardner move up NH's primary....when MI butted ahead of them.

It is almost impossible to see a big picture because of the Clinton campaign's close involvement with FL and MI now. She is using them as a tool, to manipulate the voters.

Here is more about what actually happened about MI and NH.

Levin threatened to make MI first before NH

Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) threatened "to hold Michigan’s presidential nominating contest on the same day as the New Hampshire primary in order to end New Hampshire’s 'cockamamie' first-in-the nation role," The Politico reports.

"While Michigan recently passed a law saying it would hold its primary on Jan. 15 -- causing New Hampshire to say it would go no later than Jan. 8 -- Levin said Michigan Democrats now could hold a caucus and move up to the same day as New Hampshire."

Meanwhile, New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner continues to say he is "prepared to keep New Hampshire first and once again raised the possibility he could hold the primary in December of this year... Gardner has the ability to beat other states to the punch because, over the years, he has learned how to hold his primaries very quickly."


Michigan did make the move in September 2007. They moved ahead of New Hampshire who had not moved. Michigan butted.

Michigan Makes Primary Move Official

The calendar chaos continued today, with Michigan's governor, Jennifer Granholm, signing the legislation to officially move her state's primary to Jan. 15.

In a statement, Granholm said the early primary will "lead to greater emphasis on issues that matter to all Americans." It will also no doubt bring a greater emphasis on Michigan, which is exactly what she wanted.

But the ramifications are likely to be huge: Michigan is now officially a week before the New Hampshire primary -- a fact that the Granite state officials cannot, by law, abide. Their primary will soon be moved.


That will force Iowa to move, though just how early the caucuses will be is uncertain. The betting right now is that Gov. Chet Culver will hold the caucuses sometime in the first week of January.


Four states were in the period before February 5th, where before there were only two. Governor Dean and the rules committee took pride in having added two diverse states in addition to IA and NH.

But FL and MI soon took care of that. They threw the primary system into turmoil for their own designs.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
66. Kick for truth
Kick

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
69. LOLOLOL! "Deleted message" said this would get 30 recommends. He "misunderestimated."
:kick: back to the top!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #69
101. Actually when he said that it was at 29 recs exactly.
Lies getting recommended is a typical occurance here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #101
122. Wrong! It was the first post and you hadn't showed up yet to spin.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #122
159. Well when *I* got here it was at 29 recs.
Hopefully people read the other side of the issue that is too often ignored here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diana Prince Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
73. Thank you
I enjoy reading the truth. I have learned quite a bit about FL primary since reading your posts. I have family members in MI and they new from day 1 that their votes would not count and believe they shouldn't because those were the rules. Wish all people believed in fairness. Keep up the good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
74. Thanks Mad
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
75. August 2007?
I know your forte is stringing together a bunch of unrelated facts (well, "facts" in your mind, anyway)to make up some sort of anti-Hillary screed, but this is a stretch, even for you...


For shame, MF, I expected better of you.


ps - not really....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. I am so ashamed of myself I am banging my head against the wall.
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #77
109. you should be ashamed
you are one of the most intellectually dishonest posters on this board.

your constant attacks on Democrats and the Democratic Party have the potential to do real damage.

of course, no one with half a brain takes you seriously, so there's not much chance of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychmommy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #109
143. i have a whole brain
she is very knowledgeable. adds proof (more than one ) to all of her posts. i go and read each and every one. plus i remember when all this crap was going on. there was no talk of disenfranchisement when fl & mi were doing this crap. it was all over the national media. everyone including all of the nominees knew this wasn't going to count. fl & mi counted on the dnc caving. to send the fl & mi voters into a tizzy now with dishonest rhetoric is disgusting. everyone is trying to cheat the game with their own dishonest bs. take it somewhere else. we know the truth here. take it to your state party leaders and demand they fix this situation instead of whining on du and attacking mad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #143
152. sure, whatever you say...
you've got a pretty low threshold for "truth", though.

you want to know what's going to send the voters of Florida and Michigan into a "tizzy'?

Being shut out of this process.

They may even tell old Howard Dean to take his "rules" and shove them up his ass.

Figuratively speaking of course.

We lose Michigan and Florida this November and there's a good chance we lose the general election.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychmommy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #152
153. do what you have to do. sit home.
too many people died for me to waste my vote. take your misdirected anger and speak to your reps. the hillary spin doesn't work here. you guys knew your vote wouldn't count. now you wanna blame the rules because your state broke the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #153
161. hey, psychomommy
I never said I was going to sit home.

and I don't live in FL or MI.

the rest of your post is the usual drivel.

I'm through with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
76. Thanks for the truth
and the facts to back it up.

K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #76
87. facts?
Did you read post 28?

As for Clinton blocking the FL revote, that makes no sense. Clinton says that she wants the original vote in FL to stand or a revote to take place. Do you think she has been encouraging some of her supporters (e.g., Nelson) to fight for a revote in FL and others (e.g., Wasserman) to fight against it? The Obama campaign has argued for splitting the FL delegates 50-50. I suspect that with Obama's support the revote would have happened. Instead Plouffe (sp?) even went so far as to suggest that a revote would have to be cleared by DOJ. The Clinton campaign has charactetrized Obama's resistance to a revote as passive aggressive. That strikes me as pretty spot on. No lies by Clinton here that I can see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #87
89. Fact: Wasserman Schultz fought the revote. Case closed.
Fact: Wasserman Schultz is Hillary's national campaign co-chair.

I did not analyze it, but I do see ulterior motives.

There is just no denying Debbie's words. Sorry about that.

I would love to see the email Hillary's campaign sent out. I have seen it talked about all day.

There is truth, and there is untruth. And that is a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #89
102. Yes, who cares about that, I want the link where Hillary claimed Obama stopped it.
Obama stopped MI, this is indisputable. You're trying to deflect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #89
118. kicking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
79. MadFloridian, you have been such an excellent resource to us on the MI/FL question!
Your research is impeccable. I think you should consider starting a blog about this issue exclusively... you'd get hella traffic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
88. Markos posted the Geller "bramble bush" video...it made him see the light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #88
103. Yeah, and this can't be interpreted as them laughing about the futility of it.
Yeah, because they were overwhelmed and outnumbered.

Instead Obama supporters quote the FLGOP YouTube Analysis: Watch as Florida Senate Democrat Leader Steve Geller presents a sarcastic amendment during the 2007 Legislative Session in an effort to "prove" to the Democrat National Committee that Florida Democrats are faithfully trying to abide by the national party's rules. What a joke! (though DNC Chairman Howard Dean probably didn't find Geller's sarcastic remarks very funny...)

---

There is nothing lower than chosing the GOP analysis over your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #103
105. There is nothing more dangerous than groupthink perpetuating lies.
Especially if those lies come from the words of the FLGOP themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guyanakoolaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #105
112. Hillary as President would be more dangerous.
She'll never spin away the fact that she voted for war with Iraq. Or how she was so willing, even after that huge mistake, to jump on the neocon's push to war with Iran.

Clinton is a warmonger.

She has lost.

Would you like a tissue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #112
115. Nah, I know she won't win.
I just defend the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #115
133. Keep Ranting On Dude, Pretty soon you'll be in the room all by yourself
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 07:38 AM by Grinchie
How much does the Clinton Campaign pay you to spew such empty rhetoric?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #133
156. I wish I got paid to post the truth.
That'd be a good job to have.

But you don't get that kind of job in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvme Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
111. This one Stinks of Karl Rove
I can not think of a more appropriate venue to act this little farce out than in the wee bitty swamps of Florida. This is too nasty to be from either Dem's camp. It was going to play out. This is exactly the scenario the Repubs hoped would be played. a long drawn out cluster-fuck by the dems. It is a plain as day. I may not like hillary, but this is not one i want to hang around her neck.The repubs managed to disenfranchise 1.7 million people here in our quiet lil state. That is what has happened and if we continue back biting we will see another 4 years of the same. I can see this nastiness continuing on to the convention floor . I see dems walking out. thats what i see all because we didn't, say " NO NOT THIS TIME". I wont vote for this one or that one, all the while the Repubs are laughing and solidifying their base. they chuckle as we "snatch defeat out of the hands of victory." It is a brilliant strategy on their part kudos to them. Dems whatever the case is obama doesnt want revote or hillary doesnt/ matter. What matters is that we dial back the rhetoric and try and comtemplate the fact that a democrat can win this. I would love to see Obama take the oath of office and be sworn in, but if someone how Hillary pulls it off I will grudgingly vote for her. I cannot continue living under a republican administration. We have lost too much. let the pundits talk their crap but in the end a dem must Win!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
113. I get sick of hearing the following:
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 02:59 AM by davidpdx
Howard Dean is bad.

Donna Brazile is bad.

How about for once, just once, some of those who criticize Dean look at the mistakes Clinton and her campaign have made. If you take the states where HC had no strategy and change the outcome (meaning assuming Hillary Clinton won them), this would be a whole different situation. Why? Because Hillary Clinton would actually have a commanding lead. The campaign, her supporters and contributors have no one to blame but themselves.

Everyone knows that Florida and Michigan will have a seated delegation at the convention in some form or another. To say otherwise is complete bullshit. What the people who complain are pissed about is that these two states won't count in terms of the outcome of the nominee. As for that specific complaint, tough luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meowomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
116. K&R from a Florida resident
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
124. OP says, with no proof at all: "Her co-chair stopped the revote"
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 06:56 AM by MethuenProgressive
Please provide proof, or ask admin to delete this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #124
127. For crying out loud read the thread and
please understand that she can not be allowed to lie with impunity any more.

What the hell are we going to do with this expert liar as president. You'll never know where the hell the truth lies with her, ever! Mark my not so subtle word, she will crash and burn with us along side her if she wins.


Someone needs to help her to understand the value of the truth. Sheesh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #127
132. OhioBlues: The person mentioned in the OP's headline can't do what the OP says she did do.
Debbie is just a State rep, with no secret power to stop the entire State of Florida from holding a re-vote. The link offered to "prove" what the OP shouts leads to some blogger on an anti-Clinton website claiming he saw a post (an un-named post on an un-named website) that say she stopped it.
That's just silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #132
147. The Clinton camp said Obama did it....he's just a "senator"
Your argument is with me. If I said the sky was blue, you would say it is gray.

I used Debbie's own words that she opposed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #147
160. That's untrue and completely false, the Clinton camp never said it.
And as I pointed out before you're unable to source this claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fyddlestyx Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
126. K & R
Nice work, Mad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
130. K*R
as always, thank you MF! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #130
134. Bill Nelson
doesn't look human~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
135. Big K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
138. I talked to an Obama national staff guy from Florida last weekend
who was working for the FDP when all this went on. I asked him just what the hell happened, and why didn't the FDP try harder. He whined that the Republics control the legy and that they "tried" but the Republics outvoted them. Someone else standing there pointed out that Democrats voted with the Republics when they tried to change the date. He gave a weak response, something about having to vote with the Republics sometimes to protect theirselves. I let it drop there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
141. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
144. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
145. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
149. There is NO Hillary Spin Here....
None whatsoever!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
154. Shame on you
for expecting better from Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
162. Hmmm...
Bet she's afraid she'd lose this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC