It's time to toss the FOX, Scaife, Limbaugh, and Drudge supporters off the board.

[chascarrillo]

And out of the Democratic Party while we're at it.

It's amazing that this won't even seriously be considered. Strange times.

[emilyg]

1. You trying to dictate what I can view?

[bhikkhu]

4. What you can post, I would assume.

That is, when Rush or Hannity serve up the talking point of the day, it would be nice not to see it posted here immediately and repeatedly.

Not to accuse anyone at all lately, just my sense of the OP...

[chascarrillo]

9. Although it pisses me off when I see an Obama supporter linking to Drudge or whatever...

It's actually the Clintons themselves schmoozing with Richard Mellon Scaife, Rush Limbaugh, and Matt Drudge. On one side, we have posters on an internet forum. On the other, we have the candidate herself doing this.

No one posting here would get away with what the Clinton campaign has done in praising the right wing hate machine. Time to take a stand.

[bhikkhu]

10. Taking a stand is equivalent to taking back our primary

And I think the worst has passed. I know I check every link and google references, and see others do the same. RW crap usually gets pounced on right away. And hopefully people will realize that this is another reason behind the "let is sink" approach, besides limiting mudfests.

[Hoof Hearted]

19. you plan to take that stand against Obama supporters, as well, I trust.

[chascarrillo]

7. Well, somebody just outed themselves...

[emilyg]

16. I watch all news Chanel's. Sue me.

damn - sp.

[chascarrillo]

22. If you're not supporting them, no problem.

If, however, you're agreeing with Ed Rendell that FOX is the most fair and "balanced" network, then there's a problem with that.

And seriously, I'm not asking that dolks be banned. Instead, it's my hope that people realize that when a Democratic candidate and their campaign sidles up with the gate media machine, that candidate is not working in our best interests.

[DerekJ]

20. You can view whatever shit you want to view.

But if you watch fox, then support it, then tell us, or support the fact that it’s fair and balanced, then… well.. you know what the OP said.

[cliffordu]

2. I'm there. Can we kick them on the ass on the way out??

[emilyg]

38. Where's the unity?

[provis99]

3. whew. At least you didn't mention the Michael Savage fans.

[BuyingThyme]

5. I didn't know Drudge was supporting Hillary.

[emilyg]

39. Drudge hates Hillary.

[Pisces]

6. That would mean most of the Hillary supporters.

[Pernambuco]

11. In fact, Drudge is 100% pro-Obama, and he hates Hillary

When was the last time you saw anything negative about Obama as a top story in the Drudge Report?

[Forkboy]

12. LOL...I'm always glad to see you around. Endless comedy.

[Tarheel_Dem]

14. let me guess, Proud2B or jlake?

I can't keep up with the zombies & sockpuppets lately. :rofl:

[Catherina]

28. I hope not for long n/t

:hi:

[Muttocracy]

15. um, most of us don't read it? nt

[ekwhite]

8. Flamebait. Not recommended

Hillary Clinton supporters have every right to be here and in the Democratic party. I will, of course, reserve the right to ridicule anyone who uses Fox, Scaife, Limbaugh, Drudge, Free Republic, Newsmax, or any other wingnut site to support their point of view.

[chascarrillo]

13. Yes, I am flaming supporters of right wing hate media.

[Tarheel_Dem]

17. BRAVO!

:applause:

[quakerboy]

amen.

No more hate speak here. Wouldnt that be a wonderfull world. One little corner free from that crap. Ah dreams

[Catherina]

29. Bravo. You're not alone! n/t

[2rth2pwr]

18. From Drudge- Murdoch’s Daughter Hosts Obama Fund-Raiser

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/01/murdochs-daughter-hosts-obama-fund-raiser/

[anonymous171]

23. Meanwhile Murdoch himself holds a Hillary fundraiser

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/09/politics/main1600694.shtml

[2rth2pwr]

24. Rupert's paper endorsed Obama

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/01/murdochs-daughter-hosts-obama-fund-raiser/

Mr. Murdoch, of course, is chairman of the News Corporation, which includes under its umbrella Fox News and the New York Post. Mr. Murdoch had a much-discussed rapprochement with Mrs. Clinton two years ago, when the Post endorsed Mrs. Clinton in her Senate campaign and he held a fund-raiser for her. Last year, he even contributed $2,300 to her presidential campaign.

But the Post endorsed Mr. Obama just before the crush of states that voted on Feb. 5 in a bruising editorial that excoriated Mrs. Clinton, causing media observers to declare that the honeymoon was over for this political odd couple.

[anonymous171]

27. Meanwhile MURDOCH, the man himself and not the editorial board of a paper he owns,

held a HRC fundraiser.

[Pernambuco]

32. Is that all you got? A fundraiser?

What about the sharpest headline in the nation for any newspaper in the wake of Hillary's sniper-gate?
What about all the bad news posted in the NY Post about Hillary compared to almost none about Barack Obama?

Murdoch has been pro-Obama during these primaries. A fund-raiser doesn't change that fact. The $3,000 he gave Hillary are worth much less than the news he posted that hurt her.

[anonymous171]

34. WTF!? Being sponsored by the Mastermind of the GOP media isn't a problem?

And, BTW, if you turn on the Wright News Channel (I mean Fox) you will see that it's an Obama-bash fest.

[chascarrillo]

26. Rupert Murdoch's daughter is not Rupert Murdoch.

And I don't share my parents' political leanings. Nice try.

[Tarheel_Dem]

21. the most hilarious thing is they go running to these sites to find anything

anti-Obama, thinking they've proven something. The sites you mention appear to be "supporting" Hillary at the moment, because Rush made public that he doesn't want this primary over because Hillary can bloody up Obama if he's the nominee. They seem to be terrified of Obama. It's one of those...the enemy of my enemy is my friend kind of deals. And rest assured, Hillary is their enemy, but the black guy scares them. :scared:

[Zhade]

25. While not purge-happy, I do recall a time mods would shut the use of such "sources" down.

Personally, I think they're probably overwhelmed at this point. Thankfully, once Obama clinches the nom this GDP madhouse will quiet down (it'll have to, because clinton supporters will be required to not attack him or leave).

[SeattleGirl]

30. I don't think they should be banned, but the use of those sources

should be.

[Pernambuco]

33. Obama supporters lost to post Peggy Noonan articles

This may come back to haunt them, of course.

[chascarrillo]

31. Speaking seriously, I ain't either. I just hope that folks will see that folks playing cozy with hat...

...hate media are not our friends.

[cooolandrew]

35. I did a pro Scaife post but not in that I agree with him but just better not to have him as an

adversory. I wasn't trying to be a tator to the cause. I was mainly saying the less obstruction we have the more legislation we pass.

[McCamy Taylor]

36. Divide and conquer

[Maddy McCall]

37. Since you're telling Skinner how to run his board....

maybe you should consider tossing him a few dollars for the bandwidth this stupid thread is consuming.

Just sayin'.

[chascarrillo]

40. And how much bandwidth are Clinton supporters wasting in propping up a candidate who lost?

I certainly hope that you've taken on a second job to help defray the server costs.

Go guilttrip someone else.