Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SF Chronicle: B. Clinton Had “Meltdown” in Private Meeting With Superdelegates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
monicaaida Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:50 AM
Original message
SF Chronicle: B. Clinton Had “Meltdown” in Private Meeting With Superdelegates
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 09:50 AM by monicaaida
Attendees tell the paper that at a meeting with about 15 supers in California last weekend, he went on a tirade about Richardson endorsing Obama, the media and the entire nomination process.

“Five times to my face (Richardson) said that he would never do that,” a red-faced, finger-pointing Clinton erupted.

One superdelegate: “It was one of the worst political meetings I have ever attended.”


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/04/02/BAVNVU2PJ.DTL&type=printable


http://thepage.time.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Then no wonder Carville called Richardson a "Judas."
Did Clinton get it wrong five times? I highly doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, Clinton is a pathological liar. He has his own reality. Just like Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I agree, how repulisive of Richardson. I do believe Bill on this one.
And, anyone thinking Richardson is going to help Obama in the GE has another thing coming. The majority of Latinos take loyalty very much to the heart.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. trouble is we KNOW conclusively that Bill Clinton is a serial liar
and we have absolute proof of his dishonesty to his wife, to his family to his friends and to the entire nation. We don't know that about Richardson. It's ridiculous to give lying billy the benefit of the doubt. He is a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. You can bank on the part about Latinos taking loyalty very seriously.
Stabbing someone in the back is how this will be viewed. That was the opinion out and about in Mesa the other weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Araxen Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Like the Clintons are above stabbing someone in the back lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. If it came down to me believeing Bill Richardson or Bill Clinton
I'd take Richardson anytime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. So how do Latinos feel about the Clintons doing the same thing
Does the name Lani Guinier mean anything to you? The Clintons didn't lose any sleep when they cut her loose:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lani_Guinier#Nomination_for_Assistant_Attorney_General_for_Civil_Rights

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Think what you like, but there's a reason why Latino support is so high for Clinton.
They love the Clintons, the Clintons have been good to them and they do not forget.

Obviously I'm not going to change anyones mind, but we'll have to see what happens come November.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyLoochka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Exactly why should Latinos
be "loyal" to the Clintons anyway? They didn't do anything of any substance for Latinos. I can't remember them ever taking a tough stand on their behalf, or proposing or pushing any legislation that might be helpful to their issues of being exploited etc

Maybe I'm overlooking something - but I just don't get why a significant number of Latinos roll over for the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. In this case, Richardson called them before endorsing
even if he had said 100000000 times he wouldn't endorse, there could be things that Clinton does, Obama does or world events that would render his previous certaintly meaningless. Had he said 5 times he wouldn't and NOT called before endorsing, I could see Clinton's point, but he did call. He also spoke of the intense praise the Clintons gave McCain over Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. So, what you're saying is that you selectively believe Bill when it suits your needs.
Care to tell us which of Bill's lies you didn't believe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatnHat Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
34. Richardson is an Opportunist
simple as that. Richardson is out for himself, he doesn't care if the majority of Latino's have close ties with the Clinton's. He couldn't care less about his voters in his own state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. "I did not have sexual relations with that Woman" (said with finger pointing)
Sorry, but just because Bill gets red in the face and points the finger and repeats himself doesn't mean he's telling the truth....in fact, based on past experience, it means he's lying....

Loved Bill Clinton's policies as President...no respect for his personal actions and how he handled himself and lied.

Sorry, but I believe the woman Superdelegate and others who witnessed this Bill meltdown...The fact that Art Torres, the head of the CA Assembly called her and apologized says it all right there....Bill screwed up and the stress is showing the cracks in the campaign of Hillary Clinton....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Finger wagging is important..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Hahaha! LOL!
The perfect comic illustration to my point.... :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatnHat Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. Wonder if Michele Obama
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 01:18 AM by CatnHat
is still proud of America??? you know, since her husband became a candidate---pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think the Clinton campaign was expecting the Richardson endorsement at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe Bill ought to think about why Richardson switched
instead of freaking out about it.

He must have seen things that us regular people didn't see, and it must not have been pretty.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toys4kitty Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. 2nd that thought!
Sometimes it's too easy to overlook the obvious. Although I can imagine Richardson explaining his decision to the Clinton's if they asked why. The question then becomes - would they hear what he said, or hear what they wanted to hear?
Oh to be a fly on the wall for that conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Does this explain why we haven't seen him in awhile? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. anger management
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. lol rof, he better chill


if Richardson had to repeat himself 5 times he must have been wiggin-out already...
"Five times to my face (Richardson) said that he would never do that,”

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. And Hillary melted down on the Art Museum steps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. If I was there I'd be thinking "and this is what we look forward to if we elect Hillary"
Not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. Its called intimidation...
...when one is screaming "red faced" and "pointing fingers" at others in a small private meeting, its called intimidation, which is what he was doing, and probably has been doing in these "private" meetings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. It's a tactic that works until the victims get a chance to do some thinking.
Some will stay afraid, but in others it only ignites a permanent anger and mistrust. I wonder how many of the people involved were men and how many were women. Women especially are subjected to the anger of powerful men in the work place. We put up with it as needed to protect our jobs (which is the same as protecting our children - no job = no food & shelter for the babies), but we are skilled in waiting for the best time to respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Yes, exactly. Some will cower under...
...but intimidation will often create antagonists, from former defenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
17. Me! Me! It's all about ME!
This is my problem with the Clintons. Is it all about them, or is it about our country, and what is best for all of us? The whole thing just seems so personal for them, and the process ABOUT them. It completely turns me off.

I am really, really over the Clintons and Bushes and Buchanans, McCain, freaking tired old pundits like George Will and Krauthammer and so many others (yeah, Kennedys too). Tired, tired, old bullshit. A quagmire of status quo-ism that has brought us to where we are.

:puke:

300 million people in this country. Time to rotate the stock. It's the democratic thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
31. Amen....you just stated exactly how I feel about the Clintons and the whole crowd of pundits &
politicos we see day in and day out on the TV sqawking away...Me, Me, Me! It's all about Me! That summarizes it perfectly and your right, its not about them, its about our country and what's best for all of us.

Time to rotate the stock alright....Time for BIG CHANGES.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. So? Bill's disappointed and feels loyalty wasn't duly served
I think we knew that.

also Bill has a temper. I think we knew all that from many anecdotes about his time in the WH passed to the media and historians/biographers.

People who care are going to have strong feelings. Sometimes they will be unhappy and say so in private among people who they think are like-minded. I think that's actually a sign of life.

It's not like emotion is strange to participants of this forum.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
22. What Richardson did was put Clinton off five times. It was only
in Clinton's own mind that Richardson made any promises. It's a sample of the blindness that is enveloping this campaign. Hillary may be behind by just a few votes, but by all counts she is going to stay behind. A close second is still second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
23. lets see, who do I believe, Bill Richardson or Bill Clinton?
ummm Bill Richardson! DUH!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
27. Clinton seems to have developed anger issues...

they are acting more and more like the elitists they have become. When they can't have their way with the people they get angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
33. Clintons act like Richardson was married to them and cheated on them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC