90% of GDP are Obama supporters

[mudesi]

That means we ought to be seeing about 9 pro-Obama and anti-Clinton threads for every pro-Clinton anti-Obama thread.

These little Clinton "surges" that we're seeing from time to time are obvious and stupid. Clinton herself already lacks all credibility, must her supporters follow suit?

[dsc]

1. and you know this percent how?

I am not saying I know you to be wrong, but I would like some evidence of your claim.

[opihimoimoi]

4. I could see 60%....which woiuld mean 30% would be Pub Ops..but I could be Wrong

[CreekDog]

15. there was a poll last week, it showed 90 to 10 approximately

and that's about right for GDP.

[dsc]

22. at the height of the Hillary boycot

and BTW self selected samples aren't polls.

[CreekDog]

44. DU IS self selected

:wtf: :rofl:

as for the boycott...:rofl:

[Alexander]

57. Even without the lame-ass "boycott", he still gets 90% support here.

During the boycott, he got 92% support, to be precise.

So for all the huffing and puffing those "boycott DU" Shillbots did, they apparently only represent 2% of the votes here at DU. Wow, big deal.

:rofl:

[A-Schwarzenegger]

83. Hillary boycotted GDP?

I didn't even know she was here. I gotta log on more often.

[BlooInBloo]

78. Any other questions?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5357206&mesg_id=5357206

[dsc]

79. Your very own link says 81% not 90%

you underestimated Clinton's support by about half.

[BlooInBloo]

81. I didn't underestimate anything, because I didn't estimate anything...

... You just asked how does one know, and I provided a way. I didn't agree or disagree with the OP.

[dsc]

84. I had assumed you were backing him up

sorry. Clearly you actually proved him wrong.

[BlooInBloo]

87. If you call a self-selected sample "proof". But substitutue the poll's numbers for the OP's...

... does the OP's basic point change?

[Benhurst]

2. Yeah, they should all go away and come back to DU and the Democratic Party

after the general election. Who needs the votes of such stupid people?

[Skip Intro]

3. Not yet enough like a church here for ya?

btw, how do you know what percentage of posters are for what candidate?

[splat]

5. You mean Obamacrats haven't yet run off everybody who disagrees with them?

Horrors.

[Cha]

65. Yeah, you poor poor little hilary victims.

[K Gardner]

6. It seems obvious to anyone looking that this forum has turned into

an infested cesspool, rivaling just about anything I've seen on the internet. That it is still billed as "democratic or progressive" is mind-boggling. No amount of complaining will stop it. No amount of "let it sink" or "not this time" will stop it. The admins could stop it, but they won't for reasons surely I cannot fathom. Reasonable posters could stop it by refusing to respond to the flamebait, the lies, the outrageous, the smears, but evidently that isn't going to happen either.

It is a shame because the format in which this MB was created is one of the easiest to read/search/post of any I've seen, but the content makes it unbearable. Many have already left, for more progressive pastures. I won't be posting here anymore until Obama has been declared enough of a nominee to satisfy the "powers that be" and the infestation has been removed. Although, one wonders - especially when reading about the 'old days' of DU and comparing it to what it is now - if it can ever return to what it once was.

There are other forums out there that do not condone or tolerate what goes on here. Instead of complaining, vote with your pocketbook and your support, or lack thereof. :hi:

[lumberjack_jeff]

9. Clinton supporters = infestation.

That's a new one.

[JimGinPA]

25. Sadly Accurate However

[lumberjack_jeff]

29. You miss the point about elections.

The objective is to get people to vote with you.

It's really a pity that we can't get more republicans to act like this - it'd improve our odds.

[MonkeyFunk]

27. sadly, no it's not

I've seen it used before.

Another similarity to the brownshirts.

[The Night Owl]

31. The people who tag threads with LET IT SINK are part of the problem, not the solution. {EOM}

[totodeinhere]

42. I have often wondered why there are so many pro Clinton posts...

around here when every poll taken here shows an overwhelming majority for Obama.

The Clinton campaign is well known for it's dirty tricks. Maybe this is another one. They might have invaded this forum with pro Clinton insurgents in an effort to disrupt things.

[roseBudd]

95. Start noticing how many either joined after Iowa or have disabled profiles to hide

the fact they joined after Iowa

[TheDonkey]

104. It is clear disruption. They are sock puppets and volunteers

the level of disruption is disturbing. When comparing the straw polls to the amount of Obama hate still present on DU it is clear that there is only a small minority of Shillbots wreaking havoc.

[hfojvt]

54. reasonable people cannot stop it

Let it sink would not work even if universally applied (although it seems to work with my OPs). Take the OPs numbers and assume that there are 2,000 people who post here on a regular basis. That means 200 of them are Clinton supporters. As such, they have enough numbers to K & R all kinds of dreck to the front page, the greatest page and the top of the page.

For example, back in February, the simple one line OP "How many think there IS something cultish about the Obama campaign" quickly got 70 or 80 recs.

Thus, I think it is better to answer even the worst smears with logic and facts. Not that it will convince some of the dogmatic, but at least it's there for the record.

This almost goes back, however, to the "should we have Republicans on this board" argument, where most people agreed that they come here to get away from rightwing nonsense. I guess I prefer an open discussion. If this board only allowed universal agreement, I would have gotten the axe a long time ago.

[Maddy McCall]

68. Have fun over there.

You and the rest of the DU disgruntled should be very happy at the cesspool you just joined.

[tabasco]

76. For example: The Obama holding the door for Hillary post.

That is an example of a post that should have been deleted immediately but was not.

It's that kind of garbage that makes me spend less time here too.

[trekbiker]

90. "return to what it once was"... ??

seems to me these battles have always popped up from time to time. this is one of the more intense ones though. Reminds me of when we used to beat up on the Nader supporters here. Race, religion, athiesm, gender, sexual orientation... there have always been battle on DU. We're not a bunch of lock step freeping Neocons afterall...

[rodeodance]

100. yes, Positive Hillary threads get "infested" with BO fans who crap on them.

[TheDonkey]

103. I agree. Time for DU admin to step up and endorse Obama to end the nonsense

and purge the irrational Obama haters from this forum

[onehandle]

7. Unlike national Democrats, who are more like 45% to 55%.

DU in No Way mirrors reality.

So the Clinton supporters should shut up? How Sig Heil of you.

[Abacus]

8. I think it's more like 2:1 or 3:1 based on our highly scientific polling

[JorgeTheGood]

10. most (not all) of the GDP posters

are anti-Hillary, not Obama supporters -- there is a difference.

Now would be a good time for someone to start a new democratic-meeting-place forum with the charter that DU once had before the invasion of the so-called Obama people which has ruined this forum and suggests the end of DU as it was originally designed and known.

I never thought I would see a democrat (yes Hillary is a democrat) bashed with such outright hatred as displayed on GDP and now it is being taken to the point where the Obama crowd wants to ban from the forum anyone that supports Hillary (yes, it has been suggested several times about me (and others)).

The shark-jumping was when the OprahBama's suggested WE (whoever the f that is) do something to cost Hillary her seat in the senate, ruin her career and get her banned for politics.

The bright side for me ... is when McCain hands Obama his A$$ on a platter in the GE and makes complete fools of the dems, particularily the super delegates that will have made the decision to go with a loser.

[azmouse]

13. It should never, ever be acceptable here to WANT McSame to win.

I don't want Hillary to get the nom but should the worst (to me) happen I WILL vote for her in Nov.

STOP with the vile hatred that would lead you or anyone to WISH defeat on any Democrat.

ENOUGH.

[dogday]

11. For someone with such a cool name, you post a not so cool OP.

I don't have a pick, but I do believe when all is said and done Obama will win. Having said that, I still believe that the rules say 2025 is the magic number and it is yet to be reached. There is a reason for that. Since that number has not been reached, I believe that Clinton has every right to stay in the race. She has put in the time and energy, money, blood, sweat and tears literally. By our rules, she has every right to see this to the end.


At the end of the day, I do believe Obama will win it and we all need to rally around him and beat that old bastard McCain....

[TacticalPeek]

12. If it's so 'over' why don't you and your chums just go to the beach and quit wasting time here?

Huh? Huh?

:)

[barb162]

56. LOL, couldn't have said it better.

[RememberWellstone]

14. Keep this shit up I'll vote McLame

That is no shit. You think you will force feed Obama to us and the primaries are not over? Phuq you, what if something even more damaging comes out about him? We only have Hillary running until the contest is over. I ahve supported her from the getgo and will not be bullied by you Oompa juice drinkers.

[azmouse]

17. See post #13.

[JVS]

19. Hey RememberWellstone, remember Wellstone and vote for the democrat.

[LSK]

20. BOMB BOMB BOMB IRAN

Why the HELL would you do that?

[cali]

21. you make yourself look selfish and ridiculous

This election is a lot bigger than you or I. It's about real lives of real people. That's why no matter how much disgust I have at some of the vile lying hillbots, if Hilly gets the nomination I will vote for her. Get over yourself.

[LSK]

23. well it is about Hillary

Person over country, right?

:sarcasm:

[Umbram]

37. No kidding - seems even the country will get thrown under the bus for HRC.

Threatening to vote for McSame reflects poorly on one's psychological stability.

Not voting at all is certainly an option - but so-called progressives threatening to vote Repub are either suffering from mental illness or else are in desperate need of attention.

[grrr050]

45. Really?

But how many here at DU Obamabots hava already committed not to vote for HRC should she be the nominee? Their immature,disrespectful attitude towards Hillary is despicable. They often times reduce her to an ugly slime which I detest so much so I'm wiling to give my vote to MaCain just to spite them. I will hold my nose and vote for Obama but this Obama children needs to stop. Theyre not democrats.

[Umbram]

47. My point stands for both sides.

Anyone on DU threatening to vote for McSame has mental problems or else simply isn't really a Democrat.

Both sides here are frequently disrespectful. Which side you think is disrespectful is simply a product of your bias and the relative percentages of each side's supporters. If you think Clinton supporters aren't disrespectful then you have your head in the sand. He's been accused of smoking crack, being Muslim, etc HERE on DU by Clinton supporters.

That said, I wouldn't malfunction to such a level that I would vote for McSame because I have enough emotional intelligence to realize what is important - this country. If Clinton is our nominee then I will vote for her. I'm not so intellectually broken that some fools on the internet will cause me to change my priorities so that I can "spite" someone.

Anyone who puts "spite" before the whole damn country needs serious help.

[RememberWellstone]

24. What part of, not bullied

do you not understand? Don't want my vote? Fine, sink it because I support Hillary, go ahead dare us to keep our word in the GE.

These bullying tactics are idiotic.

[cali]

28. What's idiotic is any dem voting for McCain

You aren't fit to bear your screen name if you'll vote for McCain. And you'd fit in to freeperville just fine. Why not just go there now?

[RememberWellstone]

32. Better plan: You leave

Until this becomes Obama Underground and not DEMOCRATIC underground I will stay. Why don't you juice drinkers go and start your own worship board for the great Savior, then you can walk around like lemmings waiting on the call to jump. Suck down every little hope or change speech he vomits out.

[cali]

35. I don't care which DEMOCRAT you support

butif you're planning to support the repuke nominee, you're at the wrong website. I'm not the one who's said they'll vote for McCain. You are. YOU are the cultist koolaid hilly acolyte. Me? I vote for the dem.

[lumberjack_jeff]

33. Stop daring people to become republicans.

The democratic party isn't your private club.

[cali]

36. She announced her plans to vote for McCain before I addressed

her. And sorry, this is Democratic Underground, not McCain Underground.

[lumberjack_jeff]

40. Re read. She announced frustration with Obama's supporters - not plans.

... frustration which I share.

For me, McCain isn't an option, but if you push hard enough, there are democrats for whom he is. Stop pushing.

[RememberWellstone]

53. Well said.

This is not a cattle drive and I will not be bullied.

[RememberWellstone]

50. Keep it up.

You are pushing Hillary supporters away and to think you can win the GE without us is plain stupid. You cannot take for granted ANY democrat vote. Calling my candidate a liar, bich, thief etc..does nothing to bolster your candidate.

[barb162]

63. Obama is such a poor candidate, people will start seeing through his BS

Maybe not around here so much, but in the voting booth.

[Cheap_Trick]

48. go ahead dumbass

vote for McCain. But don't come dragging your sorry ass in here complaining about President McCain afterwards. You won't have that luxury.

[RememberWellstone]

51. Obama sucks

How does that feel? These bullying tactics do nothing positive for your candidate, I suggest you act like him more and less like yourself.

[Cheap_Trick]

58. at least i'm not threatening to vote for McCain

if i don't get my way. THAT'S bullying. I'm just pointing out that if you vote republican out of spite (or at all for that matter), then you have no business being here nor any room to bitch and moan if you don't like the way he runs the country. Deal with it. And lastly, a lecture on "how to act" from YOU?

It is to laugh.....

[barb162]

62. Take bullies with a grain of salt when their candidate is losing ground.

:)

Some people (VOTERS) are getting tired of Obama's arrogance and questioning his judgment, I think.

[DerekJ]

26. Nobody bullied you to do anything. The feeling you are having now is a normal reaction to having to

defend the undefendable, and deny the undeniable. You have to twist facts, lie to yourself, soothe your wounds, and push against the evident at every turn. This creates the illusion that other people are attacking you or bullying you, when in reality they aren't.

[RememberWellstone]

30. God you Oompas suck

seriously..phuq you very much for psycho-analyzing my vote. How many lies do you think it took for Obama to get hwere he is? How many lies do we NOT know about? Quit bullying Hillary supporters, we have our own choice for the primaries.

[DerekJ]

39. You just proved my point

:)

[RememberWellstone]

52. Can you even vote in this election?

If not, stfu.

[DerekJ]

55. What a predictable come back.

You know every time one of you loses an argument to me, He/ She says almost the exact same thing. Funny!!:)

On a second note, your continued rage, and inability to carry on a conversation, shows the deadlocked emotional state you are in. Your angered response shows that I hit a nerve.

Thanks for proving me right again.

[RememberWellstone]

66. I've lost nothing to you.

And can you vote in this election? Are you a secret voter?

[DerekJ]

67. "I've lost nothing to you." , "Are you a secret voter? "

Childish!!
:rofl:

[RememberWellstone]

71. make up your mind

You make a statement then act like you did not say it? Who is the child here?

[DerekJ]

73. Make what statement?

Care to elaborate?
:think:

[RememberWellstone]

74. The little ball moves fast

follow it to the best of your ability.:rofl:

[DerekJ]

82. Incoherent?!!

:shrug:
I really don't know what statement are you talking about.
I am just about to prove you wrong look:

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


I have more little laughing smilies than you :P So I must have a more valid argument.
Pfffft

[bridgit]

34. Are all people that bow before a 'monarch figure' prone to such pop psyche as you are?

[DerekJ]

41. the use of 'monarch figure' is lame attempt to explain why is your candidate losing, which again

proves my point. You are trying to create a group reality that doesn't exist. I have seen some of you still believe Hillary didn't lie about Bosnia, and it was all a big conspiracy against her. The pilots, the girl, the news anchors with her, are all liars.

:)

[bridgit]

46. But you have no point, the "use" of the term 'monarch figure' is meant to address...

your profile status as Canadian...you cannot possibly be that dense oh right, right...you're a BO supporter :spray: :thumbsup:

[DerekJ]

60. Let me get it through your thick skull :)

Phrases like "the second coming", "The anointed one", and “The messiah" only serves to explain to yourselves the reason for the catastrophic and repeated failures of your candidate. You are trying to shield yourselves form the reasons of Obama's success by convincing yourselves that his supporters are hypnotized by the politician version of Ormond McGill.

The irony is that Obama's supporters are most likely to come from the more educated class (Reads: The smarter).

It again boils back to group reality you are creating to soothe the painful truth.

:)

[bridgit]

88. Ah, but of course, Oh Thick One, and I quote from The Oprah...

"I'm stepping outside my pew." "He's The One." "I have seen The Light. And it has lead me to Barack Obama!!" "The One that can HEAL the nation." And then there's your guy, standing round in shafts of klieg lights chin held high, with that far off stare like he's always posing for a bronze statue, no I'm sorry...

You need to turn that jaundiced, myopic, low-powered perception of your's back onto yourself, then cease & desist with the gibberish. Cause others have positioned your guy like the second fucking coming, and he has not done a single thing to discourage any of it

:spray:

[DerekJ]

89. Oprah?!!

You don't understand religious metaphors, or are you actually saying that Oprah believes he is the "The One" (Neo?!!)

Let me know if you actually believe that, because then, I'll rest my case.

:rofl: :rofl:

[bridgit]

91. pft, you need it broken down Barny Style it would seem...

Just where has Oprah been since she positioned BO from within southern baptist strains...so as to say :shrug: I understand you're having a snit over this. Maybe comparative religious metaphors really aren't your forte; you only think they are :thumbsup: You should have been paying more attention to the process all along ;)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QJJOtT32C0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTCWgljr8tY&feature=related

"But when you listen to Barack Obama; when you really hear him you witness (ding!) a very rare thing. You witness (ding) a politician with an ear for eloquence, and a tongue dipped in the unvarnished truth. (insert no-less than benevolent philosopher-king: ding! ding! ding!)"


Yes, I know, you're unmoved by such displays. Listen to the rest of it. I know you have nothing better to do. In the end the board has already been lit up. AA's and others that attend/or have attended southern churches have already confirmed the style Oprah was employing. So we've already been apprised if many of us weren't already, that that is just the way things are.

Personally, if I were a politician I wouldn't care to be introduced as one with "a tongue dipped in the unvarnished truth" I mean come on, as that's quite a mantle to maintain, a cross to bare.

Still, if you're the last to know of such matters that's fine...just so long as you do O8)

[DerekJ]

99. I will explain

"AA's and others that attend/or have attended southern churches have already confirmed the style Oprah was employing"
"Yes, I know, you're unmoved by such displays"


Yes, because by no stretch of the truth, you can deduce that his supporters are treating him as the "Messiah" from any of the evidence you have provided. Speaking in religious tone has always been Oprah's style. Every celebrity that has endorsed Obama has introduced him in a way that is most prevalent to their life experience.
Oprah!! That’s what she does for living.

In all cases speaking in a religious tone to someone or about someone has never ever been taken as a sign of elevating someone to any special religious status.
If I said: "Johnny has been blessed, and his soul was touched by the Lord", I didn't just make Johnny the Messiah, although those phrases were taken right out of the Bible.

Now let’s turn to the sentence that bugs you the most:

"But when you listen to Barack Obama; when you really hear him you witness (ding!) a very rare thing. You witness (ding) a politician with an ear for eloquence, and a tongue dipped in the unvarnished truth. (insert no-less than benevolent philosopher-king: ding! ding! ding!)"

You are not just reading too much into it, you are reading stuff that doesn’t exist.

Hosea 5: 8-9:
8 -9"Blow the ram's horn shofar in Gibeah,
the bugle in Ramah! Signal the invasion of Sin City!
Scare the daylights out of Benjamin! Ephraim will be left wasted,
a lifeless moonscape. I'm telling it straight, the unvarnished truth, to the tribes of Israel.”

The title of Hosea 5 is:
They Wouldn't Recognize God If They Saw Him.

If I am not mistaken, this is where the buzz started. Connect the dots, and it becomes evident how the story was spun to indicate that Oprah was insinuating that Obama is the God they wouldn’t recognize even if they saw.


However, the phrase “unvarnished truth” has gone mainstream probably since the release of the “The Message” version of the bible. It has been used since its inception to describe the integrity of the statements of a person. Nonetheless, the phrase itself has nothing to do with the title of Hosea 5. It is speaking about “Ephraim will be left wasted, a lifeless moonscape.”

Oprah is simply speaking in a religious tone. There are no subliminal messages, and no one can ever deduce from listening to her speaking, that she is sending such a message. Not unless you are looking for something to spin.

You see, when you hate someone for no particular reason, it’s really easy to entertain gossip and rumors about that person, because you want to believe it. You want to find excuses to trash him.
And by that I rest my case.

[bridgit]

102. hahahahaha, whatEVER!!

you got nothin, which is prolly a good thing a good thing cause you can't vote here any-whoooooooo :spray: :patriot:

[barb162]

61. Hillary's leading nationally over Obama; they're pissed he's gonna lose.

Quinippiac poll today. Hillary will be the nominee.

:) :)

[L0oniX]

98. The poll from Mad Magazine agrees with you.

:evilgrin:

[Swamp Rat]

70. We know. You have been saying this for weeks now.

:hi:

[Forkboy]

85. The thread is stupid, but don't compound it by being stupid yourself.

If you let ANYONE online affect your vote it says far more about you than any Obama supporter. :shrug:

[L0oniX]

97. Let me get this straight. You are threatening us that you will become a repuke?

A potential enemy of the Dem party is here on DU? I guess you don't care if you get TS'd. Welcome to my ignore dungeon.

[Kahuna]

105. If you do, you will only be hurting yourself and your children. Stop

acting like a five year old.

[bridgit]

16. your # would seem to prove just how proactively segregationist DU is in spite...

of all protestations to the contrary, good job :thumbsup:

[JVS]

18. Obama supporters are just to classy to keep up with the heinous negativity of the obamahaters

[Orsino]

38. Clinton's supporters *should* be working harder, because she's behind.

There's plenty of room here.

[MyNameGoesHere]

43. Thank you. Spoken like a true Obama supporter of unity

and changing the way politics are run. You can be proud of your true belief in Obama. I lack credibility, and yet my fingers are not pointing like yours are.

[SeaLyons]

49. Yes, it looks that way....

DU has definitely embraced Obama....

One year in the Senate - that's cool!
Rezko - Cool
Wright - Cool
Speech against the War - Cool
Hope - Cool
Voted same as Clinton - Cool
No foreign policy experience - Cool
Healthcare Plan that leaves people out - Cool
Copycat Economic Plan - Cool
Typical White People - Cool
Throw Grandma Under the Bus - Cool
Give America a speech on Racism to end his problems with Extremism - Cool

I'm sure you can add to the list of his accomplishments.

Damn, all these "stupid" Clinton supporters on DU just need to go away. Obama will win the general election on the same free pass he's been given up to now. :sarcasm:

[barb162]

59. Yep, Obama can't fool all the people all the time, can he?

[barb162]

64. BTW, where did you get that statistic?

Do you waste your time counting threads or posts or something?

[LulaMay]

69. And you call this Democratic Underground! Hilarious.

[WolverineDG]

72. just wait til their paychecks bounce nt

[depakid]

75. and you come to that conclusion how?

[Awsi Dooger]

77. DU in general, or GDP itself, are not even close to 90% pro-Obama

You have to be mathematically clueless to accept that, let alone write it. This place won't deviate substantially from any societal norm, whether it's income level or gender breakdown or age bracketing or you name it. It will err toward the internet deviance from the national percentage, but that's about it. An open society of 100,000+ is representative by definition.

Some will assert that Obama as the more progressive candidate grabs a massive atypical share since posters on a site like this tend to be more liberal than Democrats in general. Let's just say I'd thrill to wager against them, if we had a secret ballot of every DU member. Or even every regular GDP poster. It would be far more balanced than anything that appears on these laughably low attended polls. Wagering on Hillary to do better than anticipated in a widespread DU poll would be a simple pickup, similar to taking her to win CA and OH at even money.

It's a 1 or 2 point race nationally in popular vote and you're asserting 90/10 here? LOL. No wonder we have so many simpleton projections of landslide, winning red states right and left.

It's simple to chortle when your team has a clear path to victory. That's similar to late in a sporting event when the always-brilliant "overrated, overrated..." chant shows up, diminishing your own accomplishment by mocking the opponent as less than advertised. And that's all I see from Obama supporters here, a comforting release of me-too euphoria, bashing Hillary and pretending it's feel-good necessary before the clock winds down. Democrats haven't been flooded with winners the past few decades so it's natural not to know how to act.

And the Hillary supporters stay away, partially stunned and partially not wanting to subject themselves. But it's high hilarity to understate their sum.

I'm wrong 44-45% of the time in Las Vegas. It's been that way for 20+ years. So I'm hardly running away when I'm wrong again. And BTW, wrong in a sporting sense is verified by field performance, points on a scoreboard. This is nothing similar. It's simply majority opinion, and opinion doesn't always attach to astute judgment. In the NFL draft we can see Team A pass on one player but he's taken by Team B, and you follow the careers to determine which opinion was correct. Here we have nothing of the same. There won't be parallel Obama and Hillary presidencies to evaluate.

DU opinion matched the primary voters, placing weight on speeches and vague call for change, and eager to punish anyone who voted for the Iraq resolution. I think it was inept handicapping, that either Hillary or Obama will win in a pro-Democratic year but Hillary and the '90s economic clarity would make the superior president. My instinct the previous cycle was fairly decent. In '03 and early '04 I posted Kerry was "just good enough to get you beat."

[jconner27]

80. It only proves

Obama supporters are more in tune with the Bush followers... No one speaks ill of of the smiling idol and lives ha ha ha.

[Forkboy]

86. Your post is obnoxious and does nothing to help DU or Obama.

[BootinUp]

92. Do you feel comfortable being with the "in-crowd"? nt

[NC_Nurse]

93. Some of us don't post much.

Why add to the fray? I only post when I have something positive to say about the campaign I am working for.
Otherwise, I only answer other's posts.

[mrreowwr_kittty]

94. I've got 90% of Clintonland on ignore at this point

The Obama-bashing threads are still vastly disproportional.

Odd, that.

[BlooInBloo]

96. Actually, it's somewhat nearer to 81%...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5357206

[JoFerret]

101. How dare anyone

post a pro Clinton message on this board. There is a quota for undesirables.