Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Hillary Clinton wins PA by 12%...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:02 PM
Original message
If Hillary Clinton wins PA by 12%...
she'll be in even worse shape then she is now.

When people say she needs to win every contest by 30%, give or take, from here on they ain't just whistling dixie.

Right now Obama's got a 162 pledged delegate lead.

Obama- 1,415.5
Clinton- 1253.5

There 566 pledged delegates left up for grabs.

If she wins PA by 12%, and their 158 pledged delegates by the same margin, she'd get 88 pledged delegates and Obama would get 70. Making it:

Obama- 1485.5
Clinton- 1341.5

So she would close on Obama's lead, but the pool of pledged delegates up for grabs would only be 406, and she'd still be down by 144 pledged delegates.

So then she'd need to win the remaining states by some 35%, given a 12 pt win in PA. Her chances actually go down.

So that's why we're not fooling when we say Clinton needs a 30% pt win in PA. And she doesn't win the nomination if she does it, she'd just be on the right track. She's also need to win by 30% in North Carolina, West Virginina, Indiana, Oregon, etc.

Boy, I sure hope nobody gets upset. It's just simple math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. But, math is HARD.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. there ya go again with your facts and math
ya wanker..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nobody denies that Obama will enter the convention with more delegates
It comes down to how the superdelegates will vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. So you're saying PA doesn't count.
Doesn't that disenfranchise the voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Of course not
Hillary may very well end up with the popular vote by the convention, in which case the "will of the people" support her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Oh yeah, it's that pesky super delegates thing...
But but but but, the soooooper delegates!





Will pledge Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. They will? Why haven't they?
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 01:26 PM by Lirwin2
One would think that with this whole nomination battle "wrapped up," the supers would rush to Obama and end this thing. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Even in such a case, she'd need more than 60% of remaining superdelegates
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 01:11 PM by ButterflyBlood
She currently has less than that, and since Super Tuesday they've been breaking for Obama at an insane rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. One has to ask...
If Obama has this thing wrapped up, why havent the 300+ remaining superdelegates rushed to support him? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. And if they're such Hillary lovers, why not rushing to support her?
Please note that roughly 70 of the remaining superdelegates haven't even been chosen yet. Obama doesn't even need a majority of the remaining ones, Hillary needs well over a superrmajority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Good question!
The answer to that, is that many simply don't know who they will vote for yet. This is why claims by Obama supporters that Hillary has a "math problem" and could NEVER win is so false. Hillary will most likely win the vast majority of the remaining states, and may end up with the popular vote. I'm not saying she will, I'm saying she might. If I were an unbiased superdelegate, the popular vote + a string of last-minute wins, would probably heavily influence my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Hillary's "math problem" is that she needs far more.
If things go 50/50, she still loses, even if she wins the remaining states in landslides. And in fact, many superdelegates though their identities haven't been chosen yet, are pretty much in the bag of one candidate. Those are the "add-on" superdelegates, elected by either the state Democratic Committee or at the state convention. The state conventions elected by caucuses...which Obama overwhelmingly won. The ones elected by the state committee are still in the air, but this has been benefiting Obama. After all, of the states that have elected their's so far, the Obama states (Alabama and Connecticut) elected Obama supporters, while the Hillary states (Oklahoma, Arkansas and Tennessee) all elected currently uncommitted ones.

So Hillary needs an even larger number of truly in play superdelegates than the number currently shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Nobody denies that it's an uphill battle for Hillary
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 01:47 PM by Lirwin2
But I think you would agree that the race is FAR from "over".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. So why have a primary?
I mean if the supers are going to overturn the delegates then hell why not just give Clinton a golden crown and call this the kingdom of America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Well hang on a minute...
You Obama supporters are so keen on enforcing the "rules" when it comes to disenfranchising florida and michigan, yet not so keen on enforcing the rules when it comes to superdelegates voting for Hillary. Superdelegates can vote for whomever they wish, for whatever reason, as those are the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. so if HRC wins Pennsylvania
you will insist that all Superdelgates from Penn vote for her? since, you know, doing otherwise would overturn the will of the people? cause I have to tell you, if people should vote the way their states did, then Clinton picks up 35 Obama SuperDelegates in just California and Massachusetts alone. 3 more in New Hampshire, 8 more in New Jersey (cancelled out by 8 clinton to Obama people from Maryland and DC) 4 more in Ohio (with ten uncommitteds, total of 14) fact is that more populated states, and more traditional democratic strongholds have more SuperDelegates to play with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. HRC people don't need no stinkin' facts....
They've got indignation and outrage on their side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Let me play devil's advocate
If Clinton wins PA by 12 and then goes on to win KY and WV by 25+ and Indiana by 10 or 15, and only loses NC by 10 and wins Puerto Rico by 20, she may perform well enough to convince enough SDs to jump on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Dont forget Poland-er, Oregon!
Where Hillary will get smoked by 30 percent or more....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Math is SEXIST!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. The daughter had a talking Barbie that would say, "Math is hard."
I threw the damned thing away. I replaced it with one that said no bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. LOL! I also remember a Simpson episode where Lisa had the same doll
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 01:19 PM by quantass
..when Simpsons were funny (anything prior to season 7).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. But but math hates Clinton!!!111!!!
My guess is Obama will get that down to 5 percent before primary day. He is going steady while Clinton continues to make mistakes. If he stays strong and gets it down to 5 while remaining strong in delegate rich areas.. The day will be yet another disaster for the Clinton campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. But no doubt she'll still spin it as a stunning victory
As she would even if she got 50%+1 vote. And I doubt anyone in the media will call her on it. They're still saying she won Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R Simple math always the best. thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is obviously misogyny by the numbers
What nerve! You must be afraid of strong women that lie a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. And, doesn't Arkansas remain the only state she's won with 60% of the vote?
While Obama's won eight states by that margin and more?

Math is hard! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. Rocky don't do math
or know when to quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. Nerd alert: Every 3 ppts below 65% in PA requires an additional 1.33% in all remaining states ...
Senator Clinton needs 65.2% of all pledged delegates in all remaining primaries to catch up. For every 3 ppts below 65 in Pennsylvania, she'll need an additional 1.33% of the take in all remaining primaries:

If PA goes 65% Clinton, then Clinton needs 65.0% in all remaining primaries (stays even)
If PA goes 62% Clinton, then Clinton needs 66.3% in all remaining primaries
If PA goes 59% Clinton, then Clinton needs 67.7% in all remaining primaries
If goes PA 56% Clinton, then Clinton needs 69.0% in all remaining primaries
(that last one is Clinton +12 as described in OP)

... as far as I know.

:dunce:

(for those who will argue, "But you didn't mention superdelegates" ... I also didn't mention Tea in China.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
30. Why is she even campaigning any more? She should focus ONLY on the Super Delegates.
Take the campaign straight to Them. She CAN'T win with PD's so why even bother?
Time to send cousin Guido to the supers for a visit, I say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Now THAT is what a good point looks like
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC