Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary & Obama both need to let go of their egos & team up.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:29 PM
Original message
Hillary & Obama both need to let go of their egos & team up.
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 02:30 PM by KillCapitalism
This is the only way I can see us winning in November. Either Obama should be our nominee and Hillary as his running mate, or vice-versa. McCain is more popular than Reagan was in '84, and it will take a united effort by two big-name Democrat candidates to even have a chance to beat him. So really, I wish they would focus on doing whatever it takes to win in November instead of fighting each other.

That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. If I was Clinton I sure wouldn't want to be his VP. I'd stay as far
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 02:52 PM by bellasgrams
away from that trainwreck as I could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If I was Obama I wouldn't want Clinton as a running mate.
He needs someone with strong foreign policy credentials. Biden would be good.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:56 PM
Original message
Like Obama would want her on his ticket, dragging him down.
Please, get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is neither Obama nor Clinton who have the ego problem. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sure, make her his VP
and send her to every single meaningless ceremony all over the world for 8 years. And make up some post for Bill, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. It makes exactly ZERO sense for either to be the other's runningmate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why do you think either way is a good ticket?
I don't get it when people say they think it's a winner, despite two big names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's the last thing I'd want to happen.
I don't want a Clinton or a Bush near the White House ever again..we've had enough of them. It's time for new blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. If not on the same ticket
100% side by side with one giving full endorsement and campaigning with and for the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well then...
I guess you all won't mind seeing President McCain being inaugurated next Jan. 20th.:popcorn:

Winning is everything this November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yep it seems the only path and thankfully Obama seems a forgiving man...
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 04:48 PM by cooolandrew
..I would advise they lay out ground rules for the offset so they avoid any unesscary conflicts and work in the same direction. I think they should divide their tasks so that no-one overpowers the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Thankfully Obama isn't a stupid man

and why Hillary will never be his VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hillary on the ticket = Rush Limbaugh's wet dream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. McCain is not more popular than Reagan in 1984
In fact until HRC decided to raise the CIC issue saying she and McCain are good, the Democrats were both significantly ahead.

The fact is the issues are still on our side. Instead of fighting over bowling, Bosnia and other strange topics, read some or watch some of today's SFRC Iraq hearing - the truth is worse than any Democrat or Republican has said. The economy is in more jeopardy than in any time in almost all of our lives. This is what the Republicans did. (and if any Democrats thought losing 2000 or 2004 was worth it for future positioning - they need to think of where we are.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. I agree, but that's already been tried and the "uniter" said it was a race of which only one could
win. And Obama was not running for VP.

And that was the first weak link in Obama's broken chain. Politics or not, that was a gigantic blunder. Since then, Obama has been going downhill, like a skier on a slalom.

Every politician is going to have skeletons in the proverbial closet. I don't blindly take everything from the media at face value, but I don't entirely disbelieve it. Most of us know, before the media really started coming out with the "goods", that such a duo would win in a landslide. For whatever reason, Candidate Clinton reached out and he said "no". People noticed, though Clinton's mistake was attempting the team-up when Obama's numbers started passing hers. Seems experience isn't the perfect crutch to rely on either... circular logic. Cool, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't think that's the way to go.
This stopped being a workable option quite a while back. The final nail in the coffin of a joint Obama/Clinton ticket was probably put there by Hillary when she decided to use the joint ticket idea as a campaign ploy against Obama by suggesting he could have the VP slot while she was trailing him in the race. If it had been a clear joking remark or something it would have been different, but it wasn't. She dangled the idea out there in all seriousness when she was in no position to be making those kinds of suggestions about the frontrunner in the race. She left him with no choice but to shoot down the idea or let her get away with portraying herself as the one on the inside track to the nomination even though she was clearly losing... and also pretty effectively torpedoed the option of him offering it to her later considering it would just come off as condescending doing it after she put it on the table for him in that manner. But it's pretty dead even without that. The bottom line is Hillary doesn't really help Obama that much as a VP at this point. There's been too much visible hostility between them and her negatives are way too high. They do not make a good team on the ticket. They might have if Clinton had let it go after Ohio and Texas but not any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Democrats don't much want it, either

Clinton Less Appealing Than Obama as Potential V.P.

PRINCETON, NJ — Only 42% of Democrats nationwide want Hillary Clinton to be the Democratic vice presidential nominee if Barack Obama wins the presidential nomination, while 55% think he should pick someone else. By contrast, the majority of Democrats — 58% — would like to see Obama nominated as vice president if Clinton heads the ticket.



Thus, if the Democratic electorate has its way, Obama will be on the Democratic presidential ticket this fall, as either president or vice president. Clinton’s chances of being on the ticket seem more likely to end if she loses the nomination — at least according to Democrats’ weak support for an Obama-Clinton unity ticket.

-snip






http://www.gallup.com/poll/105943/Clinton-Less-Appealing-Than-Obama-Potential-VP.aspx


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. sorry, it's not personal, she would sink a ticket regardless of which side of it she is on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Team up? No frigging way.
Obama doesnt need Hillary. He'll kick McCains ass more handily without her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. Sadly, common sense seems to be short supply around here

Nevertheless, I gave your thread a recommendation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Is this the bargaining stage?........n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. Obama/Edwards or Obama/Kucinich.
We can't lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
21. My SO has been saying for weeks now, that they need to decide who is
#1 and who is #2 and get on with the campaign against mclame. It's true tho I think, Clinton can't win without Obama supporters and Obama can't win without Clinton supporters.We need to get it together folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. Two reasons why this sort of idea might actually be possible, IMO--
1) Although recent tradition has it that the P and VP candidates should be 'pals', there is no reason why this has to be so. Barack and Hillary could run on the same ticket without agreeing on everything, and without even being particularly fond of each other. In the original constitution, IIRC, VP was just the one with the second most votes. That was amended later, I believe, to say P and VP would run as a ticket. Nowhere is it written that they have to be lovebirds--just that they are on one ticket.

2. With Cheney having run his own (quite evil) foreign policy from the office of the VP, that office no longer carries quite the wimpy stigma that it used to. Thus, neither Hillary (likely) nor Barack (less likely) need to feel that it's unseemly to run for the position of VP.

What I'm saying is that I think that, partly (and ironically) due to fuckhead Cheney, it could be possible for Hillary and Barack to run on the same ticket but as strong and independent individuals, unlike the model we saw for the last several decades (or even centuries).

Just my 2 cents, if anyone is interested, which I doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. DUers need to let go of their egos and address this issue.
The Democratic party needs all the supporters of both candidates in order to prevail in the GE and beyond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC