|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 02:14 AM Original message |
Richardson: I never promised Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 02:16 AM Response to Original message |
1. Bill Richardson bucking for an Obama VP spot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:19 AM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Obviously, if he.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
31. He'd make a damn good one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:17 AM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Yeah, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:40 AM Response to Reply #40 |
62. you know all about dispicable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 07:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
49. Looks like the Clinton's weren't willing to repay expected Richardson loyalty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky 13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
72. No... just defending himself from the Clinton slander machine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
83. absolutely. and i think that convo totally took place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
2. Methinks the Clintons are fibbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
28. The Clintons are liars? I'm shocked! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polpilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 07:40 AM Response to Reply #28 |
53. Bubba: (pointing, red-faced, trembling...'He promised me...HE PROMISED ME 5 GAZILLION TIMES...AWGGG' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:50 AM Response to Reply #2 |
67. It's a vast Left-Wing conspiracy this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
3. Uh oh, Eagles songzzz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
4. I never promised you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric Condon (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
5. "The Clintons should get over this." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 02:37 AM Response to Original message |
6. Really this endorsement diminishes Richardson far more than it enhances Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 02:47 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Now, now. He's well liked by NM, those who voted for him, AND... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 02:58 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Saracat's just mad that Obama took Edwards' place as the liberal alternative to Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:40 AM Response to Reply #10 |
25. Obama's not liberal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #25 |
66. He's actually rated the most liberal in the Senate. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:30 AM Response to Reply #66 |
89. No. He rated the best at posing as a liberal in the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
114. And boy does she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 03:08 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Well, if the Clinton's didn't lie about him I'm sure he'd be a memory by now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Very true, and he really seems to like the spotlight. You'd think he would stop, but he can't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:46 AM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Are you talking about Bill Clinton or Bill Richardson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rene (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:23 AM Response to Reply #6 |
20. You're right....Richardson is already a loser...very few votes. Noone wants him in office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:55 AM Response to Reply #6 |
32. Nonesense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:07 AM Response to Reply #6 |
36. Richardson doesn't count. Small states don't count. Caucuses don't count.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #36 |
69. Little people don't count n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 07:14 AM Response to Reply #6 |
48. Yeah, his endorsement doesn't count right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 02:46 AM Response to Original message |
7. No wait... not Eagles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 02:52 AM Response to Original message |
9. Richardson is a bandwagon jumper. Just like Chris Dodd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 03:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Same with Kennedy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:39 AM Response to Reply #12 |
24. Ted Kennedy over-reacted to Hillary's positive comments about LBJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:50 AM Response to Reply #24 |
68. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kmsarvis (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #12 |
100. OR JIMMY CARTER??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 07:15 AM Response to Reply #9 |
50. In that case why did the Clintons lobby so hard for all of them not to endorse Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 07:39 AM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Because so-called high-profile endorsements make a difference to the media. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 03:27 AM Response to Original message |
13. How very mature. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ForeignSpectator (970 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 04:04 AM Response to Original message |
14. "The clintons should get over this"... that's perfect! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaurenG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 04:57 AM Response to Original message |
15. Bill Clinton went to Cali to threaten super delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:50 AM Response to Reply #15 |
29. Rove must be very proud of his students. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:07 AM Response to Original message |
16. I'm almost feeling sorry for Mr. Richardson now .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:32 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. seriously, why do you think "he owes everything" to the Clintons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:56 AM Response to Reply #21 |
33. Cali, Cali. -- Practically every last word out of Richardson's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:34 AM Response to Reply #33 |
44. Yes, he got experience as Clinton's ambassador and a cabinet member |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaurenG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:40 AM Response to Reply #16 |
46. You can't possibly be serious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 07:36 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. If I didn't believe Richardson is in this simply for a job, I'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 07:50 AM Response to Reply #51 |
54. you are blinded by your irrational hate of Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #16 |
99. The Clinton's got him elected to the US Congress in 1983? really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rene (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:21 AM Response to Original message |
18. Richardson's an lying opportunist. he has his own hide in mind...cushy position promise like VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:37 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. New Mexico went for Clinton by less than 1% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indimuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:10 AM Response to Reply #18 |
37. yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAbuchan08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 08:14 AM Response to Reply #37 |
56. If we followed the Obama camps logic on SD's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:39 AM Response to Original message |
23. Yeah, I just bet Obama, if selected, and elected, would put a judas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:51 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Bill Clinton is a proven liar. period. don't even try to dispute that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:56 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Smearing a good man like BR is the last straw for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:31 AM Response to Reply #23 |
42. Did you honestly just say "Why would Bill lie"? It depends on the meaning of "is" I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:47 AM Response to Reply #23 |
64. you're actually running with the judas thing? do you guys realize how stupid you look? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bklyncowgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 05:45 AM Response to Original message |
26. "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Who has the credibility problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #26 |
101. I was actually thinking about the perjury charge and loss of his license to practice law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my3boyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:04 AM Response to Original message |
35. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:11 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Hey may not have promised the Clintons -- if that's what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAbuchan08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 08:15 AM Response to Reply #38 |
57. loyalty is a contract written in blood apparently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kmsarvis (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:54 AM Response to Reply #38 |
106. DID YOU USE TO HANG OUT......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:03 PM Response to Reply #38 |
111. From the looks of it, you sadly misunderstand what loyalty is (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pompano (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:12 AM Response to Original message |
39. It is sorta funny...I suppose... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidpdx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:31 AM Response to Original message |
41. Hello, Judas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crankychatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
43. Bill misrepresenting the facts too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 06:38 AM Response to Original message |
45. The Clintons have used Bill Richardson as their personal fire hydrant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
47. actually Clinton never said Richardson promised TO ENDORSE Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pompano (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:37 AM Response to Reply #47 |
61. Doesn't that sound just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. actually my presumption is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pompano (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:17 AM Response to Reply #63 |
79. I understand ,but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:39 AM Response to Reply #79 |
91. asked a group to not endorse Clinton after they refused to endorse him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pompano (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Then tell... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #93 |
94. he owed them honesty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pompano (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #94 |
96. fair enough/i disagree but respect you opinion n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #96 |
98. that is all I can ask. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nine (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #47 |
115. I noticed the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrJJ (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
55. I Believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
58. We may never know what this one said to that one or exactly how many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
59. delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JayFredMuggs (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
60. I have to Laugh at the Clintonista's reaction on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
65. Right. Richardson by his association with Obama now is pure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NDambi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
70. The "death" of the Clintons entitlemen to the WH can't come soon enough.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 09:58 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. The selective memory of a presidency of peace and prosperity ignored by classless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NDambi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Say what you will..but thank God Bill and Hillary aren't going back to the WH...Hallelujah!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:10 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. Amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Well Obama is not going to grace the doorway of the WH either. Unless he's invited to lunch by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NDambi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:31 AM Response to Reply #78 |
90. We only know a few things for sure at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NDambi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #75 |
80. Hallelujah!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BornBlue (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:54 AM Response to Reply #71 |
105. BILL IS NOT RUNNING AGAIN!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
74. Who do I trust: Bill Richardson or Bill Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #74 |
81. Clinton wouldn't lie to us, would he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:51 AM Response to Reply #74 |
92. Spoken like a true democrat... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #92 |
104. Are you implying that Richardson is not a democrat???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
76. READ THIS: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #76 |
84. That source would have had to have heard this from Bill Clinton...as we know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #76 |
102. If the Clintons said it - it must be true! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
77. Bill Richardson.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:21 AM Response to Reply #77 |
82. Does the phrase, "Pot calling the kettle black" mean anything to you? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #82 |
85. No, not in this context... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:27 AM Response to Reply #85 |
87. What - it only applies to gas stoves, not electric stoves? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
86. You've got nothing to defend Richardson you are a free American nothing more to say than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #86 |
95. Exactly right. He's getting sucked in to low political discourse by responding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
88. If Richardson gave this promise why did he have to go 5 times fess up Clinton camp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
97. Bill: "I was promised an endorsement by that man... Judas Iscariot." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #97 |
103. Which one was convicted of perjury? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #103 |
109. It's too late to edit my post - but I want to clarify that Bill Clinton was not convicted of Perjury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwenu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
107. Richardson is not a slave. He has free will and the right to express his conscience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
108. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
110. Good words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
112. His recounting of events is much more plausible than that of the Clinton's, IMHO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-03-08 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
113. Who knew Guv Richardson had decided not to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC