Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Richardson had gave his word not to endorse Obama, I wonder why did he get visited 5 times.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:29 AM
Original message
If Richardson had gave his word not to endorse Obama, I wonder why did he get visited 5 times.
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 10:44 AM by cooolandrew
Smells like somethink hinky to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. He likes the attention. He the Gov of New Mexico for goodness sake.
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 10:31 AM by Neshanic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. but Clinton camp side Richardson' endorsement wasn't important..then why so upset
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. it's norman hsu, not hsi...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. That smell is the crap in your diaper



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Awww thanks mom. We'll forget he ran against Clinton the once presumptive winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good point. Smells hinky to me, too. The fact that the
Clintons are trying to ruin this man's reputation by claiming he lied is despicable to me.
If lies were a barometer, they'd be retired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I tell you what - if they came to me, I'd have a tape recorder running
the whole time ! Rather Bush-esque, isn't it. Anyone who
disagreed with them got pilloried. Richard Clark and Joe
Wilson immediately come to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not only that...but
Didn't the Clinton camp say Richardsons' endorsement wasn't important or had no impact?

If that is the case why go to him five times to ask for it and why did Bill get so upset about his endorsement of Obama?

Man, they talk out both sides of their necks in that circle jerk of a campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. desperation. they were still after him
obvious yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. I could care less if he lied...Bill Clinton has some nerve calling out somebody who lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's a question of character and credibility
we know who has it and who doesn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. The GOP thanks you.
Glad to see you got your daily talking points.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Edited - as I have been corrected - Clinton was not convicted of perjury
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 01:26 PM by Debi
He was only disbarred and fined and admitted to knowinly giving misleading testimony.

(that was the agreement he struck in order to avoid criminal prosecution)

Much better....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Neither one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I stand corrected - Clinton wasn't convicted - he was just disbarred
and had to pay a $25,000 fine and admitted to 'knowingly giving misleading testimony'in an agreement in order to avoid criminal prosecution.

Thank you for reminding me of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's been noticed that Clinton's had only ONE significant SD endorsement since Richardson...
...came out for Obama.

So much for minimizing the Governor's prestige and importance

that has to sting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. As far as I know, Clinton's had ONE superdelegate endorse her since Super Tuesday!
Murtha's the only one that comes to mind. There might be a handful of others... does anyone know for sure?

Whatever shifting argument the Clintons use (there's a new one every day), it's clear that it's not working with superdelegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Here's a great site - go to the bottom and it gives up to date changes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hmmm, maybe Superdelegates don't like being bullied. n/t
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 01:04 PM by writes3000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Tricky things, those facts! Like numbers, they'll sneak up on you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC