cooolandrew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:29 AM
Original message |
If Richardson had gave his word not to endorse Obama, I wonder why did he get visited 5 times. |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 10:44 AM by cooolandrew
Smells like somethink hinky to me.
|
Neshanic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message |
1. He likes the attention. He the Gov of New Mexico for goodness sake. |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 10:31 AM by Neshanic
|
NDambi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. but Clinton camp side Richardson' endorsement wasn't important..then why so upset |
islandmkl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message |
2. it's norman hsu, not hsi... |
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message |
3. That smell is the crap in your diaper |
cooolandrew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. Awww thanks mom. We'll forget he ran against Clinton the once presumptive winner. |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Good point. Smells hinky to me, too. The fact that the |
|
Clintons are trying to ruin this man's reputation by claiming he lied is despicable to me. If lies were a barometer, they'd be retired.
|
Laura PourMeADrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. I tell you what - if they came to me, I'd have a tape recorder running |
|
the whole time ! Rather Bush-esque, isn't it. Anyone who disagreed with them got pilloried. Richard Clark and Joe Wilson immediately come to mind.
|
NDambi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Didn't the Clinton camp say Richardsons' endorsement wasn't important or had no impact?
If that is the case why go to him five times to ask for it and why did Bill get so upset about his endorsement of Obama?
Man, they talk out both sides of their necks in that circle jerk of a campaign.
|
meow mix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message |
7. desperation. they were still after him |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I could care less if he lied...Bill Clinton has some nerve calling out somebody who lied. |
crankychatter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message |
11. It's a question of character and credibility |
|
we know who has it and who doesn't
|
Bake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
Glad to see you got your daily talking points.
Bake
|
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Edited - as I have been corrected - Clinton was not convicted of perjury |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 01:26 PM by Debi
He was only disbarred and fined and admitted to knowinly giving misleading testimony.
(that was the agreement he struck in order to avoid criminal prosecution)
Much better....
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. I stand corrected - Clinton wasn't convicted - he was just disbarred |
|
and had to pay a $25,000 fine and admitted to 'knowingly giving misleading testimony'in an agreement in order to avoid criminal prosecution.
Thank you for reminding me of that.
|
crankychatter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message |
12. It's been noticed that Clinton's had only ONE significant SD endorsement since Richardson... |
|
...came out for Obama.
So much for minimizing the Governor's prestige and importance
that has to sting...
|
VolcanoJen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. As far as I know, Clinton's had ONE superdelegate endorse her since Super Tuesday! |
|
Murtha's the only one that comes to mind. There might be a handful of others... does anyone know for sure?
Whatever shifting argument the Clintons use (there's a new one every day), it's clear that it's not working with superdelegates.
|
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. Here's a great site - go to the bottom and it gives up to date changes |
writes3000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Hmmm, maybe Superdelegates don't like being bullied. n/t |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 01:04 PM by writes3000
|
thevoiceofreason
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-03-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Tricky things, those facts! Like numbers, they'll sneak up on you! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:39 PM
Response to Original message |