I have noticed a lot of ageism in this primary, from both sides. I was browsing the comments on CNN earlier, and I found this comment, which made my blood boil:
"This really is simple. Obama cannot win. Only Hillary can win against McCain. If the children in college in this country cannot vote according to who's the better candidate, then perhaps we should raise the voting age so they can't continue to vote without understanding what's at stake or who will make this country better. This is not American Idol Presidential."Nobody here on DU has said anything that bluntly, but I get the sense from a lot of Clinton supporters that they resent the influence young people have had in this election, and somehow view us as less able to make a rational decision than our elders. I have gotten this reaction when canvassing and doing voter registration for Obama as well, and it's really insulting. I am not saying there have not been some derrogatory comments from our side about older people too, but there is already a thread on here today addressing that, so I want to focus on the people who treat people my age like we don't know what we are doing. I am curious how many people here agree at least to some degree with the comment above (maybe not the part about raising the voting age, but the rest of it)? I am hoping we can have an honest discussion about this (which probably confirms the stereotypes about people my age being naive!) and would like to hear some older DUers and Clinton supporters weigh in on this.
I was subject to the same sort of resentment four years ago, when I volunteered for Dean. Sometimes I am afraid to canvass for Obama because I am afraid that because I fit into some of the stereotypes about his supporters - young, relatively well-off (though I think Starbucks coffee is a waste of money), and idealistic - that I will do Obama more harm than good. A few weeks ago, one woman I talked to in Philly said to me that she thinks a President Obama would be the worst thing that could possibly happen to this country. I told her that I respected her view, and since I felt just as passionately that Obama's election would be the best thing to happen to this country in my lifetime, we'd have to agree to disagree. But she was not content to let it stop there. She shook her head and said "I just can't understand it. I really hope you've thought about what you're doing." I got similar condescending comments from a few other people, and I try not to let it get to me, but it's tough. Last weekend I took my grandparents with me and somehow I felt a lot more credible as an advocate for Obama.
Sometimes I let the media narrative get to me, and I wonder if I am naive and stupid in supporting Obama. I wonder if I am too idealistic and have too much faith in the American people to transcend racial prejudice and think beyond the 5-second soundbyte. Sometimes I wonder if I am being unrealistic about Obama's chances in the general election, or about what he might be able to accomplish as president. But then I talk to my 50-year-old mother, who is as rational as they come and often overly pessimistic, and she is even more passionate about Obama than I am.
People constantly complain about low turnout among young people in this country, but then when we do turn out, we are subject to resentment and hostility if we turn out in large enough numbers to actually impact the election, particularly in a primary. So which is it, folks? Do you want us to vote or not? And if we are so irrational and immature that we can't understand the issues or apply logic in deciding who to vote for, why are people under 30 the
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html">only age group that voted for Kerry in 2004?