Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do the Clintons keep talking about Richardson?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:47 PM
Original message
Why do the Clintons keep talking about Richardson?
It only reminds everyone that a respected guy ,who knows them well, decided to back the other guy.
Get over it already.Move on.
Its smart politics to let it die,the quicker the better.
I just can't understand why they keep bringing it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Clintons are fools perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. If I were them I would keep quiet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. To discourage other defections
By character assassinating Richardson, HRC and her husband hope to prevent other (potential) supporters from endorsing Obama.

It's also clear they took his endorsement quite personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Howard Fineman has been talking to people around the Clintons...
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 05:50 PM by polichick
He reported today that their anger is festering ~ they feel very wronged, not just by Richardson but by many people.

(He was on some msnbc show, maybe Hardball.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The new vast conspiracy perhaps?
Thats right their the victims.
How could I have forgotten!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Well, narcissists are ALWAYS the victims...
I knew Bill was a narcissist, but Hillary's outrage at not getting what she wants has been pretty eye-opening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. They feel personally betrayed because the nom wasn't obediently delivered on Super Tuesday?
Not surprised. How dare those VOTERS defy them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. We bad! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Trying to frighten the other SDs.
Scary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. They can't accept that Richardson didn't OWE HRC an endorsement.
They thought they owned him and had the RIGHT to demand his obeisance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Georgie_92 Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's exactly it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. well, IF he did tell them he would endorse Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I'll believe that when you can show me a link where RICHARDSON
says he told them that (no more 'the Clinton campaign says' crap).

He says he didn't tell them he'd endorse her and he hasn't given any of us reason to think he'd lie. Bill Clinton, on the other hand has a well documented history of telling lies and Hillary Clinton is following in his footsteps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. But, as far as anyone knows, he DIDN'T tell them anything like that.
Richardson was always free to endorse anyone he wanted.

(My beef is that Richardson SHOULD have made the endorsement before the California primary, or at least before Texas. Now, it's too late to matter.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Hillary is the one arguing that all delegates are free agents
Even more than the bashing of an honorable man, it is the rank hypocrisy being displayed here that is pissing me off. Hillary, and all of her surrogates, have been saying to anyone who will listen that any and all delegates are free to choose whoever they like. Even if Bill Richardson did promise his endorsement, according to Hillary, he is just as entitled to switch over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. If I must choose between believing Richardson or Clinton,
it's Richardson. No contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Maybe because Richardson is a liar?
But I called that a long time ago when Richardson tried bullshitting everyone about being a pro baseball player.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. As compared to dodging sniper fire in Bosnia...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Yes imagine that. The possibility of a lying Richardson. "There's a nice comfy chair for you Bill.
when I win. Screw the Clintons."

Of course the premise of him winning is at this point absurd. So Richardson will spend his time arguing with a Republican president from a neighboring state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrJJ Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Its part of the plan
He's a MAJOR crack in the Clinton Dam... The camp must crucify the "turncoat" (my emphasis) to keep their other delegates inline. Pretty smart machevellian move on the Clinton camps part. I dont think it will actually work but might as well try it.

Richardson showed courage. Thats for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. He is an example of what will happen to any SD who dares to
back Obama, to stop others from doing the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. If they couldn't control Richardson through past favors, they can't control other SDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. When you betray the Family ... you sleep with the fishes.
They view him as a "made man" ... for life. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noel711 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Distraction... It's not OUR fault, but HIS! Don't blame US!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. The MSM has it in it's grip. Of course that personality magnet Richardson is nowhere to be found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. They're trying to intimidate others who consider crossing them.
It's typical of the way they do business. They trash those who reject them. Their game now is to stop the public procession of high visibility Democrats from coming out for Obama, by implicitly threatenting "this is what we will say about you!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. That's exactly what it is. Intimidation.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdog Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Yes, but don't you think
they have lost a lot of credibility. Their intimidation doesn't weigh that much anymore.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
29. They're trying to make an example of him while casting themselves as victims n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I guess i thought they were smarter than that
they are supposed to be the political A-team, they assembled a crack team of political pro's.
how could they get something so basic,so wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC