Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wes Clark for Vice-President 2008!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:46 PM
Original message
Wes Clark for Vice-President 2008!
I think this man is the key to a resounding win on November. A General. A well respected, well recognized man. We wouldn't lose any needed House or Senate seats. He would neuter McDubya-the war hero, and bring REAL foreign policy experience.

Would he take the spot with Obama?

Obama would be a fool not to have him on the short list, even though he is a staunch Clinton supporter. Once we have a Nominee, we are all Democrats again, including General Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. No. Fucking. Way.
No Clintonistas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Who then? Richardson?
He has FP experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I'm not a big fan, but Sam Nunn would be a perfect choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. That ticket could very well win GA.
He isn't very charismatic, but not many will be next to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. What??? No Zell?? LOL
Sorry, I jest, of course. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. Well then maybe you won't get the Clintonistas votes in November (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I suspended my candidacy last week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would SO root for a Obama/Clark ticket.....
...hell, I'd pinch my nose and get behind (at least moneywise), a Clinton/Clark ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ned_Devine Donating Member (996 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I would too. Always liked Clark. The question is;
Would he abandon ship once the nomination is made or will those ties continue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. I suspect that once we have a nominee
Gen Clark will get behind the nominee no matter who it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. There is just something slightly creepy about the General
I think he is a smart guy and a good man, just not a great campaigner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. He doesn't have to be a great campaigner, Obama is.
I guess we could do better to have two great campaigners---who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree.
I Also think it would be an important symbolic gesture for bringing the two sides together, while avoiding the liabilities of having Hillary be on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. what swing state can he carry for us? what elected office has he held?
I like the guy, maybe Sec. or Defense or something.. not VP.

He does not pass the "one heartbeat away" test and he does nothing electorally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Electorally, he removes the "inexperience" argument on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. He has had an extraordinary military career, but has never held an elected office
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 09:13 PM by Johnny__Motown
I just don't see it.


Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Who would do better?
As to states....you gotta think nationally too. Clark solidifies Obama's national defense and security credentials against McCain. This is Obama's biggest weakness. This helps him across the board in all states, including the pivotal ones.

Clark compliments Obama in many ways. He is older, more mature compared to Obama's youth. He is foreign policy experienced, has negotiated with world leaders directly. He has a reputation as a moderate, but in his heart he is more progressive than Hillary or Obama. McGovern called him a "Democrat's Democrat" when he endorsed him. Michael Moore also endorsed him. Clark, like Obama, has the ability to appeal to people from more than one side of the political spectrum.

I think Clark is the perfect choice. He is liberal enough to keep Obama in line, yet has the persona of being a moderate for the election.

I do wish he hadn't supported Clinton. However, I understand loyalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clinton-Clark
Unbeatable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Beaten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Sure fire winners
without a doubt.

Good looking too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think Clark has been a too vociferous and vocal Clinton backer to be on Obama's ticket. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. I am afraid of that as well.
He has said a few things that seemed to nix the idea. Who then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Myself, I'd rather wait until he actually has won the nomination to speculate on a VP.
He could use somebody with foreign affairs, and/or defense experience, somebody who is from an important and needed state who is also a good campaigner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. He already insulted Obama when he said Obama was not ready to be commander in chief
Why would Obama allow him to be VP? There are plenty of other well-qualified individuals that didn't insult him. As far as I'm concerned, Clark can go fuck himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Who do you like for the spot.
I know Clark said some insulting things about Obama. Richardson? Who else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. To be honest I'm not sure right now
It's still premature. But no Clark, no way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. we don't need a fucking general.
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 09:00 PM by bowens43
this whole 'we need a military man' thing is bullshit. A military man is the LAST thing we need. There is no room in a civilan government for a man who spent 30 years of his life planning military solutions to diplimatic problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I respect that point. What Diplomatic Foreign Policy
folks could help to balance the Experience argument. I would prefer Diplomacy. Who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Clark has spoken out repeatedly about regional solutions to the Middle East/Iraq....
Opening up communications with the entire region.

This is not so far off from Obama's wanting to talk with our enemies....

Of course, Hillary thought that would be "irresponsible and frankly naive...."

Clark believes in communication and negotiation. Hillary believes in blustering and sabre-rattling. Clark's beliefs are more consistent with Obama.....he would be a great choice as VP. (I think his only reason for supporting Hillary is loyalty)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. There is no man who believes more strongly in war as a last LAST resort than Clark
Clark knows first hand that war is hell. He spoke to Congress AGAINST the IWR while Hillary didn't even bother to read the intelligence briefings, let alone listen to Clark's warnings about Iraq.

There are some reasons why George McGovern and Michael Murphy endorsed Clark....check them out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. You again!!!
You just can't resist bashing Clark for four years now. That sure is a big chip your carrying. What's your problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4nic8em Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. Like him or not...
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 09:39 PM by 4nic8em
General Clark has been working his ass off for the democratic party long before shit-for-brains got re-elected as Pretzeldent. I can think of no one who has done more to encourage,support and promote REAL Democratic candidates in all elected postions at every level across the country. He has been continually involved in all sorts of grassroot political movements to grow the status (and majority) of our party with true anti-neonut candidates. I don't give a damn who he wants for president. This dude has been walking the walk for a very long time, he knew exactly what shit-for-brains was up to and tried very hard to stop it. Wes knew that Iran was the ultimate wet dream that Cheney and numbnuts was after, Remember? Wes Clark has consistently pushed the liberal agenda...IMO, like our future depends on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. In my dreams!!!!
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC