Larry Johnson is a fucking punk.

[americanstranger]

I'll start this by stating unequivocally: Air America Radio is well within their rights to hand Randi Rhodes a suspension. This happens all the time at radio stations all over the country. Randi shot her mouth off, and as much as I love her she has to take the punishment. I also believe that she must realize that a suspension is the right thing for the network to do.

But there's an aspect here that is being overlooked in this whole situation, and that is the movement to have her suspended was spearheaded by someone who is supposed to be on our side - Larry Johnson of No Quarter.

Johnson egged on his readers to push for Rhodes' suspension, and when it happened today he posted an entry on his blog with the headline 'We Did It!' - pretty much gloating that he forced AAR to suspend Rhodes.

I just checked the post again (http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/03/air-americas-randy-rhodes-suspended-we-did-it/) and it looks like Johnson smells blood and wants Rhodes fired - and replaced by pro-Hillary hack Taylor Marsh.

And if you look at the comments in that blog, it looks as though they're going to try to go after another radio personality (whom I've never heard of) named Roland Martin.

Is this what certain liberals have come to - pushing to have people supposedly working for the same side thrown out of their jobs because they said something that these people found disagreeable?

This smells like the last act of supporters of a failed candidate taking out their frustration and claiming a victim, and it's punk-ass behavior, pure and simple.

Is Larry Johnson going to become the arbiter of who keeps their job in liberal radio, based on whether or not they say nice things about Hillary Clinton? What the fuck gives him the right to decide, and how far are good liberals willing to let him take this?

You all better think long and hard about whether you want to be part of this vendetta - and vendetta is the precise and accurate description of what is going on here.

You want to go around ousting liberal radio hosts that say something you don't agree with? Then you're no better than that brownshirt running the No Quarter blog, and you ought to think long and hard as to whether the term 'liberal' even applies to you any more.

Larry Johnson, you're a fucking punk. And the people who are pushing for Randi Rhodes to be fired ought to be ashamed of yourselves. You're letting a punk lead you around by the nose and engage in anti-democratic behavior.

This is not how Democrats are supposed to act. Not ever.

You gonna follow some punk-ass disruptor for the momentary thrill of having Randi Rhodes' head on a pike? Good luck with that, because you're gonna have to live with what you've done.

Rant off.

- as

[Horse with no Name]

1. Larry Johnson is a hero.

I could care less about Randi Rhodes...her kind are a dime-a-dozen.

[DJ13]

3. YAY FOR FASCISM!

Down with people who disagree with my opinion!

I can tell where those who quit the GOP ended up.......

[Horse with no Name]

11. Funny I was thinking the same thing

:eyes:
and just so you know...from the horse's mouth...I have NEVER cast a vote for a republican.
Not even when I was young and stupid. I'm sure you can't tell me the same.
I turned off AAR long ago.
I could care less about Randi Rhodes...if she doesn't know how to behave, then that seems to be her problem, not fascism.

[DJ13]

16. So dont support facist ideas of censorship if you dont like fascism

Anything less is support for it.

[Horse with no Name]

18. Then you are foolishly naive. n/t

[DJ13]

22. Naive would be agreeing with censorship

Thats hardly a Democratic ideal.

Isnt it just a little creepy that you agree with Republicans like Limbaugh and Hannity who preach censorship against those who dare to criticize their politician?

How is your position better than theirs?

[Horse with no Name]

29. Keep that broad brush stroking.

You aren't going to paint me with it.
If *YOU* know how Limbaugh and Hannity feel about something--that tells me CONSIDERABLY more about you.
I have NO idea how they feel, or if they care, or why they care...I find them quite irrelevant and don't find it at all hard NOT TO KNOW what they are saying...or care.
They are as irrelevant for being so right-minded as Randi and her ilk are for being so obama-minded.

You see, this spectrum works both ways for me.

I like to think for myself. I don't *need* some yack-hack shouting praises for my candidate of choice--warranted or unwarranted.
I just like the truth. Plain and simple. I know how to think. It is a trait that seems to be lacking in many these days.

[liberal1973]

46. That's you

You say that you don't listen to AAR ,but you post a message on the topic as if your not going to be called on it.

[Horse with no Name]

47. I'm so glad you made it this easy on me. n/t

[lefty from jersey]

83. Rhodes has no talent

That is why she got suspended, and soon to be fired. She is not entertaining. Her strident positions and her hatred for Hillary and hence any one that supports Hillary does not make for interesting or entertaining radio. Randi can still get drunk and rant and rave, but not on the airwaves on someone else's dime.

Good riddance.

[FrenchieCat]

5. Why is Larry Johnson a hero? What was it that he did that makes him that?

I never knew the "story". Please, do tell.

[walldude]

27. From wiki

On July 23, 2005, when Johnson spoke to the nation on behalf of Democrats in the party's weekly radio address, he said that he believes a letter of recommendation from Republican Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) helped to "open doors" for him at the CIA.<2> A registered Republican who supported President Bush in 2000, in his Democratic Radio Address broadcast on July 23, 2005, Johnson criticized the Bush administration for their role in the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame.<3> In addition to his differences with Republicans in the Plame matter, Johnson is also an outspoken opponent of the Iraq War<4> He was also featured in the 2004 political documentary Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism.<5> Since Robert Novak's controversial disclosure of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative in July 2003, Johnson has contributed to public discourse on intelligence matters, often sparking further controversy. He has been interviewed by both the mass media and the alternative media and published commentary on the Plame affair, the controversy concerning Mary McCarthy, and the resignation of Porter Goss as Director of Central Intelligence.

He has been great for progressives. I may not agree with the lengths he went to on Randy, but I'm certainly not going to start bashing him now.

[FrenchieCat]

31. So he was for the war before he was against it?

:shrug:

[walldude]

35. No he was never for the war..

Where did you get that from? And why are you debating me? You wanted info I got it for you. You're welcome.

[FrenchieCat]

66. I don't see that noted in Wiki.....

After September 11, Johnson appeared several times on FOX News to address the question of military action against terrorism. On 14 November, he defended the FBI's proposal to interview 5,000 students in the U.S. suspected of having information relevant to the September 11 investigations:

I think they should talk to everyone that they feel they have a need to talk to. I mean, look, this is war. This is not a legal proceeding. This isn't the O.J. Simpson trial. The folks that attacked us -- they murdered Americans. And we've got to recognize that in wartime, we should do things differently.<18>

--------------------------------------------------
In May 2003, Johnson joined members of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) in condemning the manipulation of intelligence for political purposes:

It is a misuse and abuse of intelligence. The president was being misled. He was ill served by the folks who are supposed to protect him on this. Whether this was witting or unwitting, I don't know, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.<22>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_C._Johnson

[rusty quoin]

8. Don't you remember we had almost no liberal talk, but Randi?

[Horse with no Name]

13. Is it REALLY liberal talk

when they ONLY talk nicely about ONE person?
Or is that an echo-chamber?

I prefer TALK...you know...they say things, I listen, I form opinions.
Not someone screaming THEIR opinion at me for 3 solid hours.

[rusty quoin]

57. you said in another post that she is a dime a dozen.

Oh God I wish it were true. I rented a van to take my family from Indiana to Colorado. I have XM in my truck, so I can get progressive radio. But between there and back, I changed channels getting Beck Hannity OReilly...you know the norm. Going through St. Louis I got Randi...coming back in the morn..the same station..got Dennis Miller. That was it. The whole trip. Where the hell is the dozen? I would venture to say...taking a great chance mind you..you don't know what the hell you are talking about in this case. You don't like Randi..that is obvious. But she works for many of us.

[Horse with no Name]

58. You have a star next to your name

I have defended Randi and her actions in the past. Do yourself a little search.
There came a time though, that defending idiocy and listening to stark ranting and lunatic raving didn't serve my psyche well--so I stopped.
I equate "ANY" blatant partisan--either rightwing or leftwing--as a "dime a dozen".
They really aren't any different.
The REAL talent lies in those that can tell unvarnished truths--even when those truths might be painful. Those are the ones we need on the airwaves, not the partisan hack-jobs who would support obama/bush if they ate live babies in the WH rotunda. Those people are dangerous--no matter WHO they support.

[rasputin1952]

9. But you don't have to listen to her...others like her...

why should they be deprived of listening to her, especially under a political hack job?

[Horse with no Name]

14. Frankly that isn't my problem. I turned off AAR long ago.

I have not signed any petitions and I won't...I simply wrote a few words on a message board.
If that sways someone, then they should seek psychiatric help.

[rasputin1952]

32. Just my thought here, but why even comment on it if you

haven't listened to it, or to AA for a long time?

You have every right to post about this, but if you have no interest in the situation, why even worry about it?

[Horse with no Name]

34. As a moderator

Are you suggesting that I not post to something?

[rasputin1952]

38. Did you miss the part where I stated you have every right to

post this?

I'm not looking for a hassle, just an answer.

You don't have to answer either, that is your right as well. I just find it interesting that you post that you don't listen, and haven't for quite some time, so I was wondering what your interest in this would be.

[Horse with no Name]

42. Actually if you READ the title of the OP

it says NOTHING about Randi Rhodes.
Larry Johnson has shown himself to be a hero in these dark times.
THAT was the post I was going to respond to.
AND I said that Randi and her type of shrieking yack-hacks were a dime-a-dozen.
And they are.

[rasputin1952]

48. From the OP:

"I'll start this by stating unequivocally: Air America Radio is well within their rights to hand Randi Rhodes a suspension."

The first line in the body I might add.

[Horse with no Name]

49. But I didn't click on the first sentence in the OP did I?

I clicked on the title of the OP.
Does DU have another way that I am not aware of to access OPS?
Because I sure missed where he said Randi Rhodes on what I clicked on...:eyes:

[rasputin1952]

61. But you had to read, (or I hope you did), the first sentence

before you posted a reply.

[Horse with no Name]

63. Yes I did

As I stated before...I didn't click on a "Randi Rhodes" thread...I clicked on a Larry Johnson thread. I know that isn't hard to fucking understand.
Do you not have something better to do than to harass paying members of this site for posting to a fucking thread?
I know some of you mods deliberately look the other way when members are harassed because it suits your political agendas, but to deliberately do the harassing...geez.

[rasputin1952]

64. Sorry, I'm not harrassing you, this just started w/a question...

:)

[Horse with no Name]

65. yeah bullshit. n/t

[rasputin1952]

86. That's the best you can do?

[Horse with no Name]

88. Much more than you deserve. n/t

[Kool Kitty]

23. That's the way I feel about Randi.

I listen to her very infrequently, but I don't want her suspended or fired. A lot of people like her, and I think they should be able to hear her. I have a real problem with people being so ready to censor. This just doesn't feel right to me.

[rasputin1952]

36. Exactly...that's why we have mute buttons, channel changers ...

etc. I cannot fathom why I would listen to someone that would tick me off when i could just turn that person off with an easy flick of the switch.

The problem lies more with some people trying to push their will upon others...:)

[liberal1973]

53. Randi Rhodes

has been a champion for liberal cause for a long time. Waay before this election. The same thing for Malloy back in the 90s.

It's Randi who in West Palm Beach was fired because she was kicking lush limpballs ass in ratings. The people who put Rush on bought the station and replaced her. They rehired her for the 3:00 slot. So she has been taking on the far right for awhile.

[Kool Kitty]

60. Yes, I know that.

[liberal1973]

44. Randi Rhodes is one of the best radio hosts in America.

[TLM]

68. Her kind? Is that a sexist attack?

I mean randi is a woman and you are attacking "her kind".

Is that not the Hillary supporter standard for sexism, any gender specific insult aimed at someone with a vagina?

Or is it just any insult aimed at someone with a vagina named Hillary who is losing a primary?

Oh wait... I probably shouldn't use the word aim, or Hillary might try to spin this post as some heroic military experience.


:puke:

[Horse with no Name]

72. Oh please

I give you a D+ for trying.
Randi and her kind? We were talking about partisan radio announcers, not women.
Or do you think women can't be effective radio announcers?
Talk about sexist.:puke:

[nadinbrzezinski]

2. This is a classic MO for CIA in Latin America, and part of the destabilization manual

don't kid yourself and you're correct, this smells... and expect MORE attacks, no less

Now who is ordering them is a good question.

But I take issue with the punk statement. These were the actions of a pro... and this is starting to smell like a political hit... the kind seen in Latin America

[2rth2pwr]

19. I love reading your stuff, it's always so dramatic and Alex Jonesy.

[AX10]

28. Rhodes suspension is hardly the act of "black ops"

But what can I say, many around here think that Bush was personally behind 9/11.

[nadinbrzezinski]

39. Have you gone to his blog?

What was done is not black ops, you are right... but it is CIA.

Who released this tape?

Why?

Cui Bono?

What will be the effect among "lefty" media?

Connect some dots.

you don't have to sneak in the night and kill somebody with a garrote. Character assassinations work just fine..

And yes, some folks are very naive

[2rth2pwr]

70. cui bono? -cool! This info should be interesting

Charlie Kireker
http://my.barackobama.com/page/dashboard/public/gGg3Fp

Profile

Location: Weybridge, VT
Why I support Barack Obama: He has the character, intelligence and unique upbringing to provide transformational leadership, and unite a badly divided country.
Birth Date: July 5th
Issues: equality / civil rights; peace & social justice; economic fairness / security; environment / conservation; smart energy policy; good government / ethics
Registered to Vote: Yes

[rusty quoin]

4. "This is not how Democrats are supposed to act. Not ever."

I thought so too, but I was very wrong. I have never seen this before.

[DJ13]

6. This is Roland Martin (He's usually on CNN)

[rucky]

76. This is Rowan & Martin (from Laugh-In):

[Goat or Panic]

7. Stuff like this

really has me worried about our party's ability to unify behind our candidate, whoever it ends up being.

[EFerrari]

10. Bravo. I don't favor Rhodes but you are exactly right. n/t

[kerry-is-my-prez]

12. "someone who is supposed to be on our side" - how about Randi? Was she on OUR side

She didn't call John McCain a whore but a Democrat - Hillary Clinton. I would guess just a few months ago YOU would have beeen outraged.

[americanstranger]

15. I said up front that the suspension is warranted.

But what Johnson is doing is going too far, period.

How many liberal radio hosts are you willing to let him ruin? Think about it.

- as

[Horse with no Name]

17. or conversely...how many liberal hosts will do themselves in by becoming their own echo chamber?

That is really the point here.

[kerry-is-my-prez]

25. I don't want her fired either - but I'm not going to call someone a "punk" who calls for her firing.

He's just sticking up for a fellow Dem.

[americanstranger]

26. First off, Larry is a Republican.

Second, he's sticking up for one Dem while ruining another.

You really want to sign off on that type of thing? Really?

- as

[rusty quoin]

33. I never go to his site, and didn't know he is still a Republican. nt

[kerry-is-my-prez]

40. Larry is no longer a Repub. plus I don't feel too sorry for someone who calls women whores.

If I'm going to pick a side - I'll pick Larry in that case. I would maybe call him "mistaken" but certianly NOT a punk. We'll just have to agree to disagree.

Truthfully, I've never been real crazy about Randi - I don't have a lot of respect for women who have to act "sexy" in order to get ahead.

[americanstranger]

43. Fair enough.

I come down on Randi's side, because I think she's done more good for the liberal cause than harm, even if you include her remarks from SF.

But I think you're off-base with the 'acting sexy to get ahead' thing. Randi's on-air persona may be one thing, but you shouldn't let it fool you. She's all about business, and she was successful long before she got to AAR.

- as

[TML]

75. Wrong author

The post was written by SusanUnPC, but who cares at this point. Larry Johnson is a racist, not a hero.

[americanstranger]

78. Yeah, I noticed that. No difference to me.

Larry's blog.

He hasn't made any effort to stop what they're doing, and that's tacit approval in my book.

- as

[JackBeck]

20. And he's a frequent guest on her show.

The plot thickens...

[rusty quoin]

30. That's right. He was on her show several times n/t

[libnnc]

89. I remember she was always kind to him on her show

she always told him what a hero he was and how much she admired him
"Larry Johnson, you rock!" -- stuff like that

It would be interesting to search the archives of the show and listen to those interviews again

why would he do this?

[AX10]

21. Larry Johnson is more a hero than the OP could ever...

try to achieve.

[americanstranger]

24. As if I'd want to.

Whatever he did in the past, he's now actively campaigning to ruin at least one liberal radio host.

One is too many for me. If that's being a hero, then fuck being a hero, okay?

- as

[PBS Poll-435]

87. I love your signiture quote.

Did you get it from JimRob?

[americanstranger]

91. Seems to fit, no?

Maybe I should send it to Johnson.

- as

[PBS Poll-435]

92. Wow

Please get better!!

:puke:

[americanstranger]

93. I'm fine, thanks.

It's supposed liberals taking down other liberals that is sick.

- as

[madfloridian]

50. Larry Johnson has been reduced to doing hit jobs to support Clinton

Many are losing respect for him.

[americanstranger]

52. That's exactly what this is.

Any American citizen is well within their rights to complain about a public figure like Rhodes, and he got the job done - he called for Rhodes' suspension and got it.

But now he wants Rhodes fired and replaced by Taylor Marsh? It all becomes transparent with that action, because Marsh is every bit as biased as people are claiming Randi is.

That's why I called him a punk. He deserves to be called a punk for what he's doing.

- as

[madfloridian]

56. His website is sickening now. I used to read it all the time.

Selling one's soul is not pretty to watch.

[stillcool]

95. I paid a visit there recently..

and I agree it was disgusting. It seems he is pushing...like many others...the idea that Senator Obama is unelectable because he is black. It is truly amazing what Clinton surrogates find offensive.

[lumberjack_jeff]

37. Good riddance Randi.

There are ways of supporting your preferred candidate without destroying the other half of the party.

Kudos. Her airtime can be put to better use.

The major delusion is that she's on the same side. She's not. She's on half of our side, the other half are "fucking whores". We don't need that.

Rush is better. He unites democrats. Rhodes divides democrats.

[walldude]

41. You didn't just go there did you?

"There are ways of supporting your preferred candidate without destroying the other half of the party."

“I think you'll be able to imagine many things Senator McCain will be able to say,” she said. “He’s never been the president, but he will put forth his lifetime of experience. I will put forth my lifetime of experience. Senator Obama will put forth a speech he made in 2002.”

Lemme guess, she was just telling the truth so it's ok.. :eyes:



I thought Randi went too far, and I think Larry Johnson went too far. I think both have been good for progressives and I wouldn't bash either of them.

[rasputin1952]

62. Just asking here...but have you ever listend to RR?...

and the Limbaugh kneel down is repulsive, IMO.

[KaptBunnyPants]

45. Randi Rhodes loved Bill Clinton...

I used to listen, way back when I was home during the day. She would never allow anything negative to be said against Bill without challenging it. She even had a one on one interview with him, which was nothing short of a lovefest. Now the Clintons want her career ended. These are the kind of people some here want to have the power of the presidency? What did you expect her to do when we found out that the whole Canada-NAFTA thing was disinformation? For all of her faults, at least Randi Rhodes is honest. That's more than I can say for most of her detractors.

[Tarheel_Dem]

51. All I can say is that the Repubs warned us about this in the 90's...

but that's when we were all still in love with the Clintons. Now that the scales have fallen from our eyes, it's not a pretty picture. Randi still has friends in the media, she'll be fine. And it's Air America's loss, Randi has been their cash cow. This is a very disturbing trend indeed.

[madfloridian]

54. Yes, many of us were blinded in the 90s.

Larry Johnson, Armando's Talk Left, My DD's Jerome....have turned their sites into almost Clinton altars.

[Tarheel_Dem]

59. Agreed. I find it disturbing that the Clinton worshippers have joined

forces with the rightwing to take out liberal voices. It makes me very uncomfortable. I was disturbed by this when Bill O'Reilly went after Keith with a petition, and this is even more disturbing that "Democrats" are trying to silence the voices that don't toe their partisan line. If I don't care for a show, I choose something else, which is why I don't watch Fox. Seems so simple to me.

[Horse with no Name]

55. If Randi is AAR's cash cow and AAR is bankrupt

what exactly does that mean?

[2rth2pwr]

79. ROFLMAO!

post of the day!

[SunsetDreams]

67. I really do like Randi Rhodes

however, she was wrong for what she did. She should have been suspended. However, I think it is totally taking it too far for them to ask that she be fired. It is up to Air America what they do. Now they are suggesting she be replaced by Taylor Marsh? LOL They only want someone in there who bows down to Hillary.

If Hillary can't take the criticism from progressives disagreeing with her, while she is running for office, she needs to get out. It's not up to us to hold a candidates hand, and gently nudge them along.

I could have agreed with just the suspension, but this is going way to far. So all the people pushing this, really should be ashamed.

[LTR]

69. Rec #10

What Larry did was despicable. I'm appalled that a so-called 'liberal' would stoop this low.

I plan on writing something about this on my blog tomorrow morning (I put up a couple Rhodes-related entries earlier). I also plan on saying some not-so-nice things about Geraldine Ferraro, who also called for Rhodes' firing. Quite frankly, I've got a couple choice words I could direct her way, but I won't say them. Randi already said them for me.

[Garbo 2004]

73. Where do people get the idea that Johnson is a liberal?

He was a long time Republican. Was a Faux News analyst. He got acclaim on the left when he came out against the Administration on the Plame matter. He may have broken with the Republican party but that in itself, even his support of Hillary, doesn't instantly make him a liberal.

[LTR]

74. That's why I used quotes

Though I did feel funny putting the 'L' word in that reply. Hey, it's late.

[anonymous171]

71. Larry Johnson is a corporate dem. Fuck him.

He was a repug until Bush started ignoring congress and the constitution. But he still has those tendencies.

[still_one]

77. Johnson thinks to highly of himself. Rhodes was suspended because she insulted

50% of AAR listeners. If for nothing else, that is bad for business

Calling a candidate a "fuc*ing whore", is unprofessional, and a direct insult to Hillary supporters

A stupid thing for her to do, and I am saying this as an Obama supporters, who can't stand Hillary, but will vote for her if she gets the nomination

However, I also think that the racist statements made by beck, hannity, buchanan, and others should be accountable, and they are NOT. There used to be a code in broadcasting. The airwaves ARE NOT OWNED BY THE CORPORATIONS, BUT THE PUBLIC

[nolabels]

81. The corporations, the radio stations and just about everthing else is owned by the dust

It will cover everything when we are all dead and gone x(

[still_one]

84. very sad, and that was the SIN OF THE singing of the communications act of 1993 /nt

[libnnc]

90. I think it was in '96 n/t

[still_one]

85. very sad, and that was the SIN OF THE singing of the communications act of 1993 /nt

[myrna minx]

80. I am horribly disappointed in Larry Johnson's behavior.

I have watched him on Olbermann and have actually heard him on the Randi Rhodes program in the past, and found him to be a knowledgeable, credible spokesperson for the injustices committed against the Wilsons. While I honor his service to our country, and his unwaivering support of the Wilsons during the I Scooter Libby trial, I have read some of his recent missives that have given me great pause, and I feel embarrassed that I had ever found him to be be an authentic commentator, without guile.

While I completely understand why AAR suspended Randi for comments that were more appropriate for someone's private living room and and not a radio sponsored event, I find it disturbing that Johnson and others would join figurative conga line, celebrating the removal of a liberal talk show host. Pick or pan her, she is one of the only liberal voices out there in a marketplace that has been propped up by conservative investors who will *pay* stations to broadcast the conservative barker du jour. All I can say is that is that the short sighted celebratory dance that some folks are currently having, demonstrates the short sighted vision of not having a primary/caucus plan after Super Tuesday.

I have personally considered myself a Randi fan in the past, but I did find myself grow weary of her self important ego, but regardless, I found her to be an important voice to be heard. Ed Schultz is not my favorite by any means, but I saw a deceptive, yet celebratory thread today heralding the removal of Schultz from a Florida station because he was not a Hillary supporter. (He was, apparently replaced with Thom Hartman) While I in no way will defend what Randi Rhodes said, is this what we really want? Do we savage our own because we disagree? I sometimes think that *some* Hillary surrogates suffer from a perceived Cassandra Complex, that if all the contrarians are eliminated, then everyone will see what they see. Yet after that, all that is left is right wing radio. Perhaps that's unfair, but that is how I feel this night.

edit-spelling

[mmonk]

82. He's been one for awhile now.

[Bolo Boffin]

94. Randi Rhodes stepped over the line. WAY over the line.

Not for her own personal opinion, of course. She is free to have it and express it.

But when she's representing a company, she's got to know where the line is. And she stepped way over.

This is no different than organizing boycotts against companies who advertise on shows we disagree with. It is not absolutely wrong to call for her suspension, or even her dismissal.

Larry Johnson is doing a great job exposing Republican bullshit. So is Randi, for that matter. But eviscerating a fellow Democrat like that is over the line.

[Duppers]

96. I've quoted Larry for yrs. on special stories

I thought him to be true blue, but this is most unfortunate.

[krkaufman]

97. FYI... my comments re: Larry

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5392593&mesg_id=5392593

edit: doy! I see you've already commented there. (nevermind)