Obama’s Support Softens in Poll, Suggesting a Peak Has Passed

[StrongBad]

Don't shoot the messenger Obama folks, I'm on your side. This is in today's NY Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/04/us/politics/04campaign.html?em&ex=1207454400&en=8d54d037b5e28a75&ei=5087%0A

Basically it claims that as far as Democratic support is concerned Obama has maxed out. I really don't know if this should be considered a story at all as it makes sense that Democrats would choose either side by now.

[SoonerPride]

1. I think it has more to do with the lull between primaries.

We're in a holding pattern here.

Momentum will pick up as we get to see more votes occur.

[easy_b94]

2. NYtimes sure.......did they endorse Hill???

[AX10]

3. Hopefully, he has.

[anonymous171]

4. It's just another "They're tied [except in delegate numbers and in the popular vote]" article

[Eurobabe]

5. it's the lul between primaries STUPID!!

Not you, the dumbass Times. :eyes:

[backscatter712]

6. Today's polls have encouraged me.

Sure we're not ahead by ten points, but it looks like Clinton's counter-surge has also peaked, and assuming the trends continue, Obama's gonna have a steady 5 point lead for the time being.

Don't let your guard down, but Hillary is definitely having trouble keeping up.

[AnarchoFreeThinker]

7. snicker...NYT endorsed her. all the new polls show the opposite.

[tabasco]

8. Well, if it's in the Screw York Times - - IT HAS TO BE TRUE,

Damn it.

What time is Obama's concession speech today?

[NewHampshireDem]

9. I think the March fundraising numbers are sufficient evidence to the contrary

[FogerRox]

10. important point, & the first thing that came into my mind