Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Hillary were leading Obama by about 150 delegates, would...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:17 PM
Original message
If Hillary were leading Obama by about 150 delegates, would...
...the Obama supporters be calling for their candidate to withdraw from the race?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't forget about Obama not being able to catch up in that scenario.
Edited on Sat Apr-05-08 02:20 PM by anonymous171
And no, they wouldn't be calling for him to withdraw because Obama would have dropped out already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's funny how Clinton people "accidentally" leave out the important parts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. not being able to catch up? She leads him in supers, and the supers are deciding this thing.
You can't preach about pledged until you seat Florida and Michigan. Sorry if that bothers you.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. FL we can talk about. MI, no way.
In MI, many voters were disenfranchised because: 1. Obama and most of the other candidates weren't even on the ballot. 2. Many voters, including Hillary supporters, stayed home because they were told that their vote wouldn't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. If you think Florida was a mess in 2000, just wait until the super delegates..
overturn the popular vote in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are you kidding? They would be yelling, foul, not fair, she cheated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pathansen Donating Member (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Or asking to team up with Hillary...
In retrospect, Obama made a huge mistake when responding to Hillary. Not just because of his talk for "unity" but because now he'll need all the help he can get.

Once the primaries are done, the general election arguments are really going to be popcorn-worthy...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's the thing about that...
...I think Obama probably would have dropped out already. He understands the bigger implications for the country, not just for the Obama family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama would have long since done the math and dropped out
Edited on Sat Apr-05-08 02:31 PM by rocknation
in order to preserve:

a) the chance of him getting picked for a 2008 VP slot, and
b) the chance of him running again in 2012 or 2016.

As far back as last November, I said that the Hillary would have to beat Obama and Edwards early, often, and by demoralizing margins.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. If rolls were reversed, Obama would have had the grace to withdraw quite a while ago.
Edited on Sat Apr-05-08 02:27 PM by AtomicKitten
The Clintons, however, apparently feel they are above the rules and above all sense of decorum and tradition in this process.

FREE RANDI RHODES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. If it became apparent catching Clinton could not happen
and serious divisions surfaced, I wouldn't oppose Obama conceding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. No, but Hillary supporters would be.
Anyone who thinks either side would act any differently if the roles were reversed is fooling themselves in a major way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. If Hillary won 11 primaries in a row...
...Obama would have been asked to retreat to the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. No, but I suspect
the powers-that-be in the Democratic Party would be doing some serious behind the scenes politicking.

For what it's worth, I support Obama but I think Hillary is entitled to continue in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I think she is too...
...but to think that Obama would have continued under the same circumstances is ridiculous...Hillary is viable because her name is Clinton and she was supposed to be inevitable - Obama wasn't and he would have dropped out by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. If the situation were reversed
Obama would have been run out the day after Texas.

I will not support a candidate who is not nominated by the vote of the people, according to the rules laid down by the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erin Elizabeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think Obama would have graciously withdrawn of his
own accord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. If Clinton were ahead by 150 pledged delegates...would
Clinton and her supporters give a damn about Florida and Michigan? That's the better question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. It would seem we should all just let this play out to
get us to a nominee. Let all things be above board so there will be no one that feels their candidate was screwed. I support HRC and if obama were behind I would tell you obama supporters I would want this to play out to the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. If their fortunes were reversed, Obama would have been history
after 11 straight losses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. Senator Obama would have been laughed/forced out after losing 11 contests in a row.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. I know the Clinton supporters would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
24. I would
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. Obama wouldn't have been coddled by the media like Hillary was
He would have been forced out in February, were the primary/caucus results reversed.

How can you tell the candidate who is favored by the media? It's the one whining the loudest about how the media is biased against him/her, and repeatedly getting those complaints aired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC