Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wake Up Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:45 PM
Original message
Wake Up Democrats
Heather Robinson
BIO Become a Fan Get Email Alerts Similar Bloggers
Wake Up Democrats: You Are Hung up on Barack, but Hillary is What You Need
Posted April 4, 2008 | 07:12 PM (EST)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read More: Barack Obama 2008, Barack Obama Hillary Clinton, Barack Oboama, Barack Versus Hillary, Election 2008, Hillary Clinton, Breaking Politics News


Show your support.
Buzz this article up. Buzz up!
Like this story? Get Alerts of big news events. Enter your email address

As a long-term registered Democrat who increasingly identifies as an independent and has weathered a torrid, post-9/11 love affair with conservatism, I am in a good position to judge Democratic prospects this nominating season. And I think we ought to listen to Mama and let Daddy-o go.

Fellow Democrats, there's something I've been meaning to tell you, but I've been a little uneasy bringing it up. Well, here goes. I don't think Barack Obama is for you. And I think we need to talk about it.

Wait, wait, before you get defensive--just


more ...http://www.huffingtonpost.com/heather-robinson/you-are-hung-up-on-barack_b_95181.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Been awake for 43 years - Obama will be the President of the United States in 2009 nt
Edited on Sat Apr-05-08 08:52 PM by asSEENonTV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. The entire article is awfully insulting to Obama supporters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You complain?
After all the insulting articles about Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Please see post #12...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Find me an article I posted that insults Hillary supporters at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. You have not. I hold you dear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Thanks! Now I have more interest in reading it.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
40ozDonkey Donating Member (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Well, then it's right in line with Hillary's campaign.
More wind-pissings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sorrybushisfromtexas Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Awake for 58 years
He will be the next President of the US. I support him completely, with my time, money,and prayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. what a condescending twit. "Sweetie"? Fuck her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. How old was Bill when he took office in 92?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. another PNAC neocon relic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't see this thread going well.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. "a torrid, post-9/11 love affair with conservatism" And this wasn't a red flag?
Meantime, over at politicalmavens.com: http://politicalmavens.com/index.php/2008/04/05/switch-hitting/

Switch-hitting
By Heather Robinson (bio)

Had a little fun tonight over at Huffington Post. Liberals can sure be touchy, even when you write something positive about one of their own!


Looks like Operation Chaos claimed another victim. Congrats emilyg, you got pwned by a right-winger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. She's James Taranto's sweetie
The editor of the WSJ opinion page. The relationship apparently serves her well:
Instead of building her credentials by getting a job at the copy desk of her local Pittsburgh paper (as the daughter of the late Sanford N. Robinson, she could easily afford to get by on a journalist’s salary) and becoming knowledgeable enough about a subject to get assigned to a beat, doing award-winning work on that topic, turning that beat into a column – and then into a nationally syndicated column, Robinson instead took the oldest shortcut in the profession, and now gets published in The Wall Street Journal and on OpinionJournal.com because she has a "personal relationship" with editor James Taranto.

...

As for Taranto, he habitually fails to make the necessary conflict of interest disclosures when he publishes and promotes Robinson’s articles...

http://thestilettoblog.com/2007/10/19/stern-response.aspx


http://heatherrobinsonandjamestaranto.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. this neocon represents the real machine behind Hillary
and why Hillary will nuke Iran. Read some of this woman's articles. She is a fanatic itching for race war in the Middle East. People looking forward to a woman president would be wise to wait for someone other then HC, for the sake of the planet, Hillary may have meant well years ago but she fell into a cesspool.

...............
http://www.stopclustermunitions.org /
film http://npaid.websys.no/item5/eng/1193308434

Cluster bombs and landmines are particularly terrifying weapons that wreak havoc on communities trying to recover from war. They are fatal impediments to reconstruction and rehabilitation of agricultural land; they destroy valuable livestock; they disable otherwise productive members of society; they maim or kill children trying to salvage them for scrap metal. Over 150 nations have signed the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty.

In the autumn of 2006, there was a chance to take a step in the right direction: Senate Amendment No. 4882, an amendment to a Pentagon appropriations bill that would have banned the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas. Amendment No. 4882 was an easy one to vote against: Who'd want to risk accusation of "tying the hands of the Pentagon" during a never-ending, global War on Terror? As is so often the case, there was no political cost to doing the wrong thing. And there was no political reward for doing the right thing.
But Senator Obama did the right thing.

Senator Obama of Illinois voted IN FAVOR of the ban.

Senator Clinton of New York voted AGAINST the ban.

Analysts say Clinton did not want to risk appearing "soft on terror," as it would have harmed her electability. Amendment Rejected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TML Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. Horrible article
It wasn't labeled satire, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Seemed a bit condescending to me.
But she's entitled to her opinion. OPINION. That's what it was. Not fact. Just opinion.

Everyone of us has a boatload of them.

I just don't concur with hers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. You really didn't research who Heather Robinson is, did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. scam artist?

In late 1994, a 16-year-old American girl named Heather Robinson ran an elaborate scam in what she said was an attempt to make her recently divorced mother happy; she obtained access to an Air Force base and used this access to make up an imaginary Col. Cunningham, who then carried on a 3-month virtual relationship with her mother. She even sent her mother a marriage proposal from Col. Cunningham, along with an engagement ring, bought with a stolen credit card.

"We were 16 years old, and I wanted to do something good for my mom," Robinson said. "After the court stuff was done, my mom put her arm around me and said, 'I understand why you did it and maybe some day they'll make a movie about it.'"

And a movie is in the pipeline, masterminded by the same Heather Robinson. This time, she has pulled it off by getting a job at AOL, illicitly finding contact details of Hollywood celebrities and producers, and befriending them under false identities. The family-oriented romcom The Perfect Man is apparently autobiographical. Proof that social engineering pays, or itself a bogus story planted by some Universal Studios marketroid to generate buzz for an otherwise insipid-sounding film?

¶ hollywood marketing scams

http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2004/04/63147
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
22. First of all, any writer who starts off talking about how she switched to the republicans after
Edited on Sun Apr-06-08 12:32 AM by Wolsh
9/11 can fuck off automatically. That means she has about as much political acumen as my coffee table.

Second of all, she shows absolutely zero ability to analyze ANYTHING. She just spouts off lame, tired, Hillary talking points, and adds the word "honey" and "doll" to give her article folksy charm so we think that she's really talking to us.

Thanks emily, for wasting 3 minutes of my night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC