Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's the deal: Legitimate criticism of Hillary does not constitute "hate"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:13 PM
Original message
Here's the deal: Legitimate criticism of Hillary does not constitute "hate"
That is all. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. And if you can spin a little misogyny in there it's all to the good
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Will do.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Just leave out the race-baiting. That's bill's territory
Don't want to step on any jack-booted toes, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Love you sig line!!!
That pretty much sums up this primary season for me this year too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
38. Me three n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LowerManhattanite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. To paraphrase “Fat Clemenza” from “The Godfather”...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Your are right...I think we all get carried away sometimes...but these
hate posting are not good..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have a question
Your point is fair, but I'm wondering if it's necessary.

The impression I get is that Obama has it sewed up. Am I wrong? If that's true, then why not win with class and not throw stones?

That's a sincere question, not trying to give anybody a hard time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Perhaps b/c the Clinton supporters are throwing stones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Natural reaction
Hillary is losing with utmost crass.

If she was doing her best Huckabee impression right now, touting her policies (most of which are pretty good) and otherwise running a campaign in keeping with the ultimate goal being a Democrat being elected in the GE, not only a Clinton so help her God, no one would have any problem with her whatsoever.

Its the Kamikaze mission she is on which brings out the rancor, not to mention the low tactics some people simply did not expect or believe of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. very well said.
I hate to say it, but yes, Huckabee has shown much more class than Hillary, and that's really disappointed me. He even refused to join in on the Wright controversy. It was beneath him, as it should've been beneath her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezy2736 Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. It was an interesting moment for me when I realized how I'd probably rather be friends with Huckabee
than Hillary. Then again, that's nothing to elect a president based on. It really made me wonder how much of politics should be ideological and how much should be character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. She's trying to steal the election by going after pledged delegates.
She's not going away until the last dog dies and until then, don't think we have nothing to worry about.

Its like when they declared Florida for Gore and we all thought it was won...and then we thought we'd get the recount and win it...but Bush owned the Supreme Court and they gave him the election.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. And stating True Facts uncomplimentary to Hillary does not make one a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thank you.
Sadly, your post will go unheard by the people who most need to hear it, but I appreciate you saying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. I couldn't agree with you more.
Well said :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thank you.
She's a big girl, and she's using big Republican tactics of dividing by race. Look at the Geraldine Ferraro fiasco.

Fuck you, Hillary. Fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TML Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Agreed
If we see something that needs to be vetted, we'll do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. THANK YOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. Who cares? We don't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erin Elizabeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. Amen.
You said it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. But any qualms about Obama are still apostasy
Just wanted to clear up any doubt here: despite his voting history, tactics and associates, any hint that he might not be the fearless populist giant is calumny. Worries about his vulnerabilities are quivering cowardice, and any dislike of his positions is merely the fake outrage of partisanship.

Iceberg schmiceberg; I say 22 knots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. and illegitimate constant distorted ugly attacks
constitute the norm on DU.


That unfortunately is ALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. Time for this thread to see the light of day once more
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. I stopped caring what the
hilarys thought about anything a few months ago but it became crystal clear their "debate" was loaded with red herrings and WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. but distorting and twisting everything
said by or about her is. Calling her a "fucking whore" is, and cheering on those who call her a "fucking whore" is. Using every right-wing smear from the 90s against her is. Believing the absolute worst about her on the flimsiest of evidence is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. believing the worst, smearing, distorting, and twisting would fall under the category of politics
calling her a whore is sexist though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Did you believe
that the Clintons trashed the White House on their way out? That they stole furniture? That they stole silverware off Air Force One?

People here believe the new lies with the same amount of substantiation - i.e. none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. And support of Obama does not necessarily constitute worship.
But then sometimes it's the illegitimate criticism, aka bashing of either candidates that bug their respective supporters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
29. Absolutely right, but...
just how much of what goes on here is "legitimate criticism"?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. But smears on her, and her family, and attacks on her supporters do
Edited on Tue Apr-08-08 12:48 AM by niceypoo
That is all. :)

A http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smear_campaign">smear campaign is an intentional, premeditated effort to undermine an individual's or group's reputation, credibility, and character. "Mud slinging", like negative campaigning, most often targets government officials, politicians, political candidates, and other public figures. However, private persons or groups may also become targets of smear campaigns perpetrated in schools, companies, institutions, families, and other social groups.

Smear tactics differ from normal discourse or debate in that they do not bear upon the issues or arguments in question. A smear is a simple attempt to malign a group or an individual and to attempt to undermine their credibility.

Smears often consist of ad hominem attacks in the form of unverifiable rumors and are often distortions, half-truths, or even outright lies; smear campaigns are often propagated by gossip spreading. Even when the facts behind a smear are shown to lack proper foundation, the tactic is often effective because the target's reputation is tarnished before the truth is known.

Smears are also effective in diverting attention away from the matter in question and onto the individual or group. The target of the smear is typically forced to defend his reputation rather than focus on the previous issue.

Smear tactics are considered by many to be a low, disingenuous form of discourse; they are nevertheless very common.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
31. Absolutely not.
The problem here is that many DUers are couching their legitimate criticism of either candidate in hateful language (and a very few are just being hateful).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struck_dumb Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
32. Any topic that starts with "here's the deal..."
does constitute a definite stance has been taken by its author. If you are even handed and non-judgemental enough to dole out 'legitimate criticism' then you shouldn't need to enflame your topic in that way.

Has any Clinton in the last 20 years ever been able to deflect or ignore criticism?????? Her life has been public and an open book for basically all of her life. She has been abused and she's still here. I guarantee you that even with his bi-racial appearance and lifestyle, Barry has never ever had the sustained pervasive abuse that a family with a life-long history of public service like the Clintons have endured. And cheerfully, too.

So, yes, she can be criticized and she is criticized and probably always will be criticised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Hey great siggie line you've got there
Edited on Tue Apr-08-08 04:34 AM by 48percenter
Really nice. Stay in the UK.

"I moved to the UK the year W took office. I am still appalled at the turn of politics since then. Barry the Builder with his stolen slogans of a simpleton. He's winning because America is guilty-guilty-guilty of its racist past and in denial of its racist present. Barry is a no more impressive and just as annoying as a high-school PE ballhog. 'Pass the ball, Barry. Yes, to a girl, Barry.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
33. Fascism abounds here
can't say anything negative about she who would be coronated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struck_dumb Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. clarification
Hi, 48% what does coronated mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Look to your Queen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
39. what about saying "I fuckin' hate her"?
does that constitute hate?

What about recommending such a post, as 133 DUers did. Does that constitute hate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
40. Correct. Keyword Is "Legitimate"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC