Casandra
(270 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-06-08 02:49 PM
Original message |
|
Now I know I'm slow in the 'Math Department'...a bit challenged... but the tax return itemized numbers for the Clintons don't add up to the total figure displayed. Did I miss something? Apparently all the news organizations are missing it too.. No one is saying a word about it. Anyone got any kind of clue what's going on here..??? Can anyone help me with this math problem?
Also, just wondering how 'interesting' it is that the 2007 return is being 'extended. Hmmmmmmmm.. Kinda makes ya wonder, doesn't it??
|
AJH032
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-06-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |
1. my guess is that they "phased out" |
|
Edited on Sun Apr-06-08 02:51 PM by AJH032
There are limitations on the total itemized deductions one can take. I forgot what the phase out rules are dependent on, but that could be the reason for any discrepancy.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 13th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message |