Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forgive me, but I don't understand...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:42 PM
Original message
Forgive me, but I don't understand...
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 05:48 PM by Labors of Hercules
What exactly is it that Obama HIMSELF has said or done in this campaign that you disagree with? I'm not talking about regurgitated spin that some ignorant, narrow minded hack became irrationally offended by.

I'm talking about his words, in context. I'm referring to his actions and responses, delivered in reference to time and place.

Because everything, (and I mean EVERY little pitiful ridiculous snarky grumbling crumb of negativity I have seen directed toward him) has evidenced NOTHING in his words or actions that I have a problem with.

Not one damned thing, and I've been looking... HARD.

Obama is even making me feel somewhat self-conscious for assuming that every politician is a constantly cheating, underhanded narcissistic egomaniac... :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DarienComp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, Labors, you gotta want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just pretend that he agrees with Wright about everything Wright has ever said.
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 05:45 PM by redqueen
Problem solved!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
3.  A Lot of these Clinton supporters
can't accept the fact that their choice for a democratic nominee is losing. A lot the "Obamaites" as they call us supported someone else before Barack Obama. WE accepted that our guy wouldn't be the nom but apparently they can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. A Cubs fan should go easy on calling people cultists
Also, a Hillary supporter should soft-pedal the idea that he is prone to backing losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Their whole thing has been tone deaf from the git go. Believe me, I WANTED to give HC some grace,
because she is an intelligent woman, but their campaign got off on the wrong foot (by pretty much just ***telling*** everyone to support her because "she is going to be the winner", rather than ***asking*** for our support) and then they only compounded that error with incidents that just kept me wondering "Who's in charge over there?", anyway, these things, her bad judgement on the IWR vote, my concerns about the people working for her and the big money in her campaign just made it so that it didn't work for me, even though I bounced back and forth for a while after John Edwards got out of it. I kept reality testing and her campaign kept failing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. You put it very well.
The Clinton campaign built up a year's worth of hubris and arrogance based on their "frontrunner" status, which alienated a LOT of people. I still remember how apalled I was during one of the early debates when she basically said that she wasn't going to discuss what she would or would not do when she was president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Guilt by Association is the only way to attack Obama
If you can't attack him, attack his supporters and people around him. The media has bought into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. seems to be true...
Cuz all I'm hearing are crickets from the Hillbot side of the fence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. his praise of ronnie ray-gun,, his comment that the repukes are the party of
ideas, his comments about "the excesses of the 60s", his arrogance in stating that all of hillary's supporters would come over to him, but his wouldn't go to her, his support of a woman's right to choose, so long as she makes the decision "prayerfully", his disingenuous comments about how he never heard jw make those remarks, although he heard jw make "some" controversial remarks, his comments about what sort of chief executive he would make, and the latest "stuff" comment, arrogance supreme. oh, and the "sweetie" comment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Got some potatoes to go with that gravy?
because I'm sorry, but a simpleton's list of fluffy headlines pulled out of context just doesn't do it for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. you asked for reasons, you got them. rather than acknowledge the list,
you chose to name-call and make a snarky, snide comment.

how EVER will I bear up under your disdain?

try again, or go back to cleaning the stables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. LoH's point was that you're talking spin, not facts.
He didn't praise Reagan, he said Reagan changed politics more than any other recent president.

He said that the Republicans had been the "party of ideas" in the sense that they'd been driving the debate.

I'm sorry, there weren't any excesses in the '60s? Nothing at all?

Hillary's supporters WILL come over to him, or at least most of them. But she can not bring in the new voters that he can.

The "prayerfully" comment has been twisted ridiculously far out of context, and that spin is used to obscure the fact that he was defending abortion rights in an interview with Pat Robertson. And doing it well when you consider his point was that if your religious beliefs don't allow for abortion, you don't have to have one.

So he's disingenuous for saying he didn't hear Wright make the comments that were aired? When there's actual travel schedules that place him in Florida that day? How, pray tell, is that disingenous?

Hillary has never commented about what sort of president she'd be?

Trust me: you don't want to argue about campaign arrogance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Nelson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. What/where was the "prayerfully" comment?
I'd like to see that... and, I do like him, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. I don't have a link, but...
It was during his appearence on the 700 Club. Him and Roberton were talking about abortion, and Obama said that it was something that shouldn't be taken lightly, but was a matter that was between a woman and her beliefs. "Prayerfully" is the only word I ever see quoted out of the interview, so you can tell that it's not a big deal, or the Obama bashers wouldn't have to so totally strip it of context and try to create a new one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. It's rare we get an opportunity to sum things up like this.
Let's see:

"his praise of ronnie ray-gun"

Which "praise", specifically? His statement that Reagen put America "on a fundamentally different path"? Was he wrong? Do you disagree with that statement? On what grounds? Were you talking about some other "praise"?

"his comment that the repukes are the party of ideas"

What he said was that the for a while the Republicans WERE the party of ideas. Again, on what grounds do you disagree? Is he saying they had excellent ideas that he wants to implement? No. He's just saying that for a period of time the Republicans were presenting new ideas and the Democrats weren't. If you want to go into a rage over that statement then tell us why it's such a horrible thing to have said. If you're just one of those people who go into a blind tantrum if anyone says anything non-insulting about the opposition whether it's true or not then that's a whole different matter of course. You'll just hate Obama, he's really not about that. At all.

"his comments about "the excesses of the 60s"

Which comments about the excesses of the 60s? What were they, and what about them was inaccurate or objectionable?

"his arrogance in stating that all of hillary's supporters would come over to him, but his wouldn't go to her"

Excuse me? He said this where and when? You wouldn't be making things up now would you?

"his support of a woman's right to choose, so long as she makes the decision "prayerfully"

Where and when did he say that? I've seen him say he thought that women who had abortions didn't make the decision frivolously. I have not once seen him say he thought the right to choose should be dependent on that. Are you perhaps misrepresenting his statement?

"his disingenuous comments about how he never heard jw make those remarks, although he heard jw make "some" controversial remarks:

Unless you have some evidence he actually DID hear him make those remarks, which would be big news, then you're just maligning his character here without any basis by calling his remarks disingenuous. Do you have such evidence?

"his comments about what sort of chief executive he would make"

Again, specifics? Where, when, what, and the reason you find it objectionable?

"and the latest "stuff" comment"

You have to be kidding me. You're holding staying "stuff" against him?

"oh, and the "sweetie" comment."

If that's the best you've got I'd be re-evaluating my position were I in your shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. This should be interesting
:popcorn::beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Don't expect many well reasoned responses. Most sensible Clinton supporters hang out in
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 05:59 PM by izzybeans
other DU forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. and any responses that are given are derided immediately. says so much
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 06:06 PM by niyad
for obama's supporters, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Don't complain about right wing talking points then turn around and use them
You'll get a more serious discussion that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. RW talking points to describe Hillary's health care plan, for one. and those were
directly from his mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Those RW Talking Points Were Her Own Statements...
Directly from her mouth.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well, that whole "being black" thing is pretty offensive.


(yes, :sarcasm:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unbowed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. He's creating a new paradigm of political reality that scares the shit out of some people.
That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. Typical White Person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
24. Lauding Bush I and Reagan's foreign policy
isn't exactly something I find reassuring....

Though I wonder whether (hope that) he's simply being disengenious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. non universal healthcare, no ban on military contractors (blackwater) and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. You think Hillary's going to ban Blackwater? She's not. Not even close.
Remember, her CHIEF STRATEGIST is Blackwater's PR man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
30. Okay:
"I'm not against all war. Just dumb wars." And then he proceeds to repeatedly support the "dumb" war. I respect people who walk their talk. I want the war ended NOW, and I want politicians who say they want the war over to stop voting to fund it.

<snip>

“Let me make this clear,” Obama said in a speech prepared for delivery at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. “There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al-Qaida leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20070536/

I never supported the war on terror, don't support it now, and don't support unilateral military action in another nation.

He supports merit pay for Public Education; i don't:

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama today endorsed the idea of merit pay for teachers before an audience hostile to the idea, the giant National Education Association, but he softened the blow by telling the union's national assembly that he would not use "arbitrary tests" to link pay to performance.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/8335627.html

As a teacher, I take public education seriously. This is a deal breaker with me, and so is his willingness to use vouchers:

<snip>

Senator Obama said this week that he is open to supporting private school vouchers if research shows they work.
"I will not allow my predispositions to stand in the way of making sure that our kids can learn," Mr. Obama, who has previously said he opposes vouchers, said in a meeting with the editorial board of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. "We're losing several generations of kids, and something has to be done.


http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/2/20/105444/139

Obama wants to work with private insurance and pharmaceutical companies on health care. I want universal, single-payer, NOT-FOR-PROFIT health care.

There's more, but these are at the top of my list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ronnie Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
31. He said that merit pay should be looked at.
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 08:32 PM by Ronnie
Putting aside the weasel words, merit pay just will not work. I taught where they more than looked at it. They tried to do it. It was a very short-lived trial. There are just too many variables. They have tried it now in Texas for a year, and they are shocked, shocked that it doesn't seem to have the "expected" outcome. In fact, opting out has been a common reaction. Districts couldn't deal with the funding formula. Merit pay is just another governmental attempt to educate on the cheap.
What did Senator Clinton say? She said that the only way to improve education is to raise teaching standards, raise teacher pay, and lower class sizes. Public school teachers know that this is true.
For me, that was it. Hillary knows. Barack doesn't know, but he said something anyway - something that actually meant nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC