Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary’s Labor Pains

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:36 AM
Original message
Hillary’s Labor Pains
Hillary’s Labor Pains

By Geoff Earle April 8, 2008 --

WASHINGTON - Powerful union bosses, including a key backer of Hillary Rodham Clinton, urged her to sack chief strategist Mark Penn just days before she axed him, it was revealed yesterday.

Clinton backer Gerald McEntee, who heads the powerful AFSCME union of government workers, says he told her that Penn needed to go.

"I talked to her on Saturday and asked her to do something about this Mark Penn fellow," he said.

Penn had come under withering union criticism after it was revealed last week that he met with representatives of the government of Colombia to discuss a trade deal the country is promoting, even though Clinton opposes it.

Penn, who throughout the campaign has retained his role as president of Burson-Marsteller, a global p.r. firm, apologized for the meeting, and the Colombians nixed his firm's $300,000 contract.

"He can't wear two hats or three hats. He doesn't even seem to be able to wear one hat," McEntee said.

Even before the Colombia meeting, Penn had been on the outs with labor leaders because of anti-union tactics of Burson-Marsteller clients, which include defense contractor Blackwater.

But Penn was still taking part in campaign activities yesterday, prompting Teamsters President James Hoffa, who supports Barack Obama, to demand Clinton sever ties with Penn "completely" if she wants "any credibility" on the Colombia trade issue.

"There's been warning signs about Mark Penn for over a year, and she's been notified of it," Hoffa said.

"You can't have two masters. You can't be taking money from anti-union employers, foreign nations like Colombia, at the same time advising potentially the president of the United States," he said.

McEntee said that Penn's continued role was "just kind of a way of saying goodbye" and that he wasn't a big player anymore.

Penn has been a trusted adviser to the Clintons for more than a decade.

The unions are furious about the trade meeting because it came about just as they were gearing up to try to defeat the trade deal, which President Bush sent to Congress yesterday.

It also comes just two weeks before the Pennsylvania primary, where job losses linked to trade are a sensitive subject, and where Clinton's lead has been narrowing.

Clinton's recently hired pollster, Geoff Garin, and communications director, Howard Wolfson, moved up to assume Penn's responsibilities.

Both are liked and respected in the campaign, unlike Penn, who had developed a long list of enemies inside the Clinton camp.

But Penn was still involved in campaign conference calls yesterday, a sign that new lines of authority were still being drawn.

Clinton has only a brief window of opportunity to turn around a contest in which her chances to catch Obama are diminishing. Yesterday, Obama extended his national lead over Clinton in the Gallup poll to 52-43.

"Removing Mark Penn from the center of that campaign will remove some of the controversy and allow everyone to focus on the task at hand, which is winning Pennsylvania by a significant margin and then on to North Carolina and Indiana," said Democratic strategist Stephanie Cutter.

The campaign shakeup comes after a brutal period in which Clinton endured stories about her false claims about a trip to Bosnia under sniper fire, news that Obama out-raised her two-to-one in March, and the release of tax returns that revealed she and her husband had made more than $100 million after leaving the White House.

"If she doesn't win Pennsylvania, she's not going to be the nominee," said Democratic strategist Steve Elmendorf, who supports Clinton.

McEntee said: "She should win Pennsylvania; I think she will win Pennsylvania. Whether or not if she loses Pennsylvania it's the end, that's for the candidate to decide."

Tuesday, April 8, 2008 at 7:02 am


http://www.nypost.com/seven/04082008/news/nationalnews/hillary_labor_pains_105544.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh no....Hillary's having a baby?
Why not!...she does everything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary values her Union support, she listened and dumped Penn from the top spot.
Edited on Tue Apr-08-08 10:44 AM by MethuenProgressive
The RW Post hates Unions and Hillary, this must've been a hard story for them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Why didn't she get completely rid of him?
A change in title makes it OK? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Don't believe every DU thread citing RW sources you read.
Or better: Stop believing every DU thread citing RW sources you read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Can you stop spewing bullshit talking Hillbot points for one minute...
...and answer a serious question, OK?

If Penn is poison to Hillary's union support in PA, then why is he still in her campaign in any manner?

That makes -0- sense to keep him around if he was working for something in his other occupation which is 180 degrees from one of her campaign points.

Serious question, OK? Now please exercise some gray matter and give us some reasonable explanation for her conduct in not just totally shit canning him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. More Bullshit from this AM's O-Mail Talking Points.
After months of screeching Penn shouldn't be running Hillary's campiagn, she demotes all the way down to just an advisor on certain issues. So you guys still find something else to bitch about. "We didn't mean he shouldbn't be running it! We meant he shouldn't be connected at all!" And you know, if she fired him completely, you'd all be bitching about how long it took.
Barack OBitch: No Hope, No Change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. That is an answer???
Edited on Tue Apr-08-08 11:23 AM by Hepburn
GMAFB!

Hey, I am no Hillbot...but if I were her and I found that a top aide who I was paying millions of $$$ was out working behind my fucking back to impliment something that I was solidly against, I would be fucking furious and he would be history.

So...let's try this again, OK? And this time get serious:

How does she explain this kind of compromise on her allegedly pro-labor stance? If the guy was back stabbing on an issue important to her...why the fuck is he still around.

Quit spinning and answer the question with something other than bullshit, OK?

This has less than -0- to do with the sucky campaign he has run ~~ it has to do with her values. Get it yet? Please comment on THAT issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. You've made it clear you'll keep hating her no matter what she does.
If she started shitting gold bricks you'd whine they weren't shiny enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. having a cow over shrinking support
I'd love to be a fly on the wall at her HQ when she loses PA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Gov. Rendell: Clinton Should Dump Penn Altogether
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Very nice link that has a list of reasons Penn was bad for the campaign even before Columbia
One interesting point - he has no experience with a winning Presidential nomination effort.

Not mentioned - Gore fired him and in 2004, his candidate that he pushed as the best and a winner - Leiberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Whatsa matter Ed, getting a little but worried that you backed the wrong horse?
Not willing to burn all of your bridges in PA just yet?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. When asked if he would have cut Penn off completely, Rendell said “oh, I would.”
Once again the headlines Scream what the facts mutter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC