Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Misunderestimators

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:41 AM
Original message
The Misunderestimators
Hillary Clinton and Mark Penn never took Barack Obama seriously enough. That's why her chances look so grim.
Post Date Tuesday, April 08, 2008

WASHINGTON--The most striking critiques of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign have come not from her opponents or her enemies, but from her most loyal friends.

Since December, I have been hearing a steady stream of worries from Clinton partisans who took Barack Obama's challenge seriously from the start. These loyalists felt her campaign was misreading the nature of the political year, the state of the Democratic Party, the organizational requirements of a long struggle for the nomination, and the complexity of the party's attitudes toward both the candidate herself and former President Clinton.

The immediate cause of Mark Penn's departure as Hillary Clinton's chief strategist was his private work on behalf of a Colombian free-trade agreement that Clinton opposes. But the fact that Penn could not hold on to his privileged position is a reflection of problems that plagued the Clinton campaign even before it lost the Iowa caucuses in early January.

The failure in Iowa, which allowed Obama's candidacy to take off, was Clinton's original strategic sin. Clinton's advisers were ambivalent about competing in the state. They worried that her vote to authorize the war in Iraq would make it hard for her to win in a place whose caucus-going Democrats are, on the whole, staunchly anti-war.

According to a leaked internal memo, Clinton advisers actually considered skipping Iowa altogether. Instead, her lieutenants were sluggish in organizing the state and then, realizing the dangers of losing it to Obama, poured in resources--thus depleting her coffers for the later fights to come. Her campaign seemed to have only two speeds: overconfidence and panic.


http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=74c11f70-f581-4050-baff-b73b71c9db58
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Their real issue with Barack Obama - he WINS
they hate it when he does that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Rec'd! I loves me some EJ Dionne-tellin' it like it is. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Her campaign seemed to have only two speeds: overconfidence and panic.
From the article and says it all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. K/R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Clinton campaign has been hamstrung at every turn by their own hubris and bullshit.
Obama's "stealth" candidacy was always right in front of their faces, but they were too blind in their arrogance to take him seriously. Well, they're taking him seriously now as they flail about in their final death throes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC