Lakerstan
(599 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-10-04 12:11 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-10-04 12:11 AM by Lakerstan
Other than being Clinton's Chief of Staff, I don't know much about him, but he always comes across well when I see him on TV. Any negatives to him for veep?
|
Josh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-10-04 12:52 AM
Response to Original message |
1. He is inextricably linked to the Lewinsky scandal - |
|
I can't remember the exact details but I think it would be a DISASTER. There was talk of him being Gore's VP at Clinton's behest and THAT is when people started thinking that Clinton wanted Gore to lose.
|
King of New Orleans
(991 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-10-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Was budget director before being chief of staff |
|
Very bright, very capable. From California so he wouldn't have bring a geographic advantage to the ticket.
He'd be a good candidate for California Governor if the state was serious about dealing with it's fiscal mess, which it probably isn't.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |